Questions and Ideas

Question: you said part of the EM waves hit the nucleus. So what happen then?

Ok then is like this: you have a small nuclear fuel. You make it explode. Range to be 30 cm. All this in a chamber that is in air on a aerostat. In the chamber there is air. The EM waves from nuclear blast make a chain reaction in air . then the EM waves resulted are collected because they have induction. Thus you have lots of energy for a laser weapon or for EM waves that fryes the enemy

Ofcourse you could say that simply can use nukes to make the same. But....nukes on missiles can be and will be intercepted....but ...EM waves cant be intercepted.

Think to posibility to hit at distance whitout nothing that could be done by enemy
And here is the haarp like posibility to hit at distance. Make a chamber resistant to nuke blast....make a very small nuke...and colect the energy

Another idea: make the electric circuit that take energy to antennas a superconductor. Whit a frozen aparatus you will have powerfull waves. Also a question: a antenna can be maked from a superconducter? My point is that not being a electric resistance you will have high move up and down in the antenna so high frecvency of waves. Theoretically whit few energy you could have gamma rays.

About the compton effect. From where do you know that the EM waves powered produce less energy than is plug in the forming of waves?

How a EM wave is form in a antenna?

It would be nice if you could just club all your doubts in one post .

I know but things come to me after first post and is harrasing to edit and reedit same post

What all those are?

victor1985 wrote:What all those are?

An "AFAR" is an "AESA", "active electronically scanned array".

Question: electrons level of energy has a connection whit the waves of a radar antenna?

victor1985 wrote:About the compton effect. From where do you know that the EM waves powered produce less energy than is plug in the forming of waves?

For one thing, the Compton effect is an inelastic scattering which means that losses are involved (obvious losses).

I can't acces PAK-DA thread . https://www.russiadefence.net/t2625p405-pak-da-news


Mods kindly inform whether you've merged it somewhere else ?

Guys I have a suggestion.

We have many treads on naval forum, often about a single class of ships. It can get crowded and many of them are barely active. They could be all bundled into larger categories. Would make for more dynamic treads.

We might pack them all together into several larger treads according to ship types and other general topics like this for example:

Aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers and landing ships

Submarines (nuclear and non-nuclear)  

Battlecruisers, cruisers and destroyers

Corvettes and frigates

Patrol boats, small landing crafts, speedboats

Icebrakers, supply ships and tugs,

Hovercrafts, hydrofoils and ekranoplans  

Coast guard and river police

Naval aviation (fixed wing and helicopters)

Naval UAVs, underwater drones and robots

Naval infantry

Naval weapon systems and radars

A question regarding the T-90...

Doesn't it remove all ammunition from the fighting compartment.? And if so... How?

Mike E wrote:A question regarding the T-90...

Doesn't it remove all ammunition from the fighting compartment.? And if so... How?

Simply by not placing charges and warheads but autoloader but only reload the autoloader with 22 rounds. The ammunition holders are the dangerous problem.

The ammunition holders surrounding the carousel is just kept empty.

PapaDragon wrote:Guys I have a suggestion.

We have many treads on naval forum, often about a single class of ships. It can get crowded and many of them are barely active. They could be all bundled into larger categories. Would make for more dynamic treads.

We might pack them all together into several larger treads according to ship types and other general topics like this for example:

What's wrong with:

Icebrakers, supply ships and tugs,

https://www.russiadefence.net/t3416-minesweepers-other-auxilliary-vessels-and-naval-innovations

Naval aviation (fixed wing and helicopters)

https://www.russiadefence.net/t2897-russian-naval-aviation-news
https://www.russiadefence.net/t1719-asw-aircrafts-for-russian-navy

Naval UAVs, underwater drones and robots

https://www.russiadefence.net/t4232-underwater-drones-of-the-russian-navy

Naval infantry

https://www.russiadefence.net/t2048-russian-naval-infantry-news
https://www.russiadefence.net/t1677-russian-naval-infantry-combat-vehicles
https://www.russiadefence.net/t1070-russian-navy-spetsnaz

Naval weapon systems and radars

https://www.russiadefence.net/t1032-naval-weapon-systems
https://www.russiadefence.net/t2965-anti-ship-missiles-discussion

and ekranoplans

https://www.russiadefence.net/t4141-surprise-caspian-monsters-are-back

Aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers and landing ships

Submarines (nuclear and non-nuclear)  

Battlecruisers, cruisers and destroyers

Corvettes and frigates

Patrol boats, small landing crafts, speedboats

Coast guard and river police

Hovercrafts, hydrofoils

The rest of these are mostly larger or significant enough for individual classes to deserve their own threads.

However a few of these categories still do have general threads (e.g. https://www.russiadefence.net/t11-status-of-russia-s-navy-cruisers or https://www.russiadefence.net/t754-russian-nuclear-submarine-force ); for information on the vessels or vessel classes that don't have their own dedicated threads to be put in - but what actually ends up happening is that often users will post news in both the general and the specific thread; inflating the general thread with needless duplicate information.

I've been meaning to bring up this point for a while now.
Can everyone just check before they post and only post to a more general thread if a specific thread on that ship/sub/aircraft/weapon system/organization doesn't exist?

Does anyone know which is the russian bank that grants loans to foreign states?

George1 wrote:Does anyone know which is the russian bank that grants loans to foreign states?

VEB, perhaps? At least this is what the name means (Vnesheconombank - foreign economic affairs bank).

Svyatoslavich wrote:

George1 wrote:Does anyone know which is the russian bank that grants loans to foreign states?

VEB, perhaps? At least this is what the name means (Vnesheconombank - foreign economic affairs bank).

thanks

George1 wrote:Does anyone know which is the russian bank that grants loans to foreign states?

Several. It depends whether the Russian bank in question has a branch in that particular foreign country.

Sberbank, VTB, Gazprombank have all provided loans to foreign countries. This is because the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) has been extremely accommodative extending Rbs7.4trn of loans to the above mentioned 3 banks.

Wait, so the tank would only hold 22 round? IMO it seems more likely such holders are just enclosed....and any loose ammunition is just removed.