Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+87
Nibiru
AlfaT8
miroslav
LMFS
littlerabbit
GarryB
dino00
verkhoturye51
The-thing-next-door
T-47
miketheterrible
walle83
Tingsay
Singular_Transform
Peŕrier
GunshipDemocracy
ZoA
Rowdyhorse4
Firebird
SLB
Rodion_Romanovic
George1
Isos
Kimppis
Luq man
PapaDragon
hoom
SeigSoloyvov
franco
Benya
Dennis_3003
VladimirSahin
Rmf
Project Canada
KiloGolf
Mirlo
Ned86
zardof
Honesroc
jaguar_br
max steel
ult
artjomh
wilhelm
marat
Tyloe
type055
Dima
Cyberspec
ExBeobachter1987
PutZin
AbsoluteZero
Werewolf
kvs
chicken
zg18
Stealthflanker
EKS
Flyingdutchman
T055
magnumcromagnon
Vann7
Mike E
partizan
navyfield
calripson
collegeboy16
Morpheus Eberhardt
Vympel
sepheronx
xeno
GJ Flanker
Arrow
medo
flamming_python
KomissarBojanchev
Mindstorm
TheArmenian
TR1
runaway
Andy_Wiz
IronsightSniper
Austin
Robert.V
Admin
Viktor
Russian Patriot
91 posters

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    KiloGolf
    KiloGolf


    Posts : 2481
    Points : 2461
    Join date : 2015-09-01
    Location : Macedonia, Hellas

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  KiloGolf Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:30 pm

    Big_Gazza wrote:FFS, yes the delays are a disappointment, but you know full well that this is a completely new design with new sensors & weapons & battle management systems, so why piss and moan about it?  Who gives a flying fuck?  The ship will be accepted when all bugs are worked out,  system integration is in full compliance to spec, and the Navy is FULLY satisfied.   This is a warship, not a shitcan F-35.  Engine supply issues mean they have plenty of time to get her correct and not repeat the installation issues with Kasatanov (eg dodgy radar cabling), so they are doing it right.  Shake her until she fails, then fix her and do it again.  Rinse & repeat until she's sorted, then apply teh lessons to her sisters.

    That's the way to build a warship.  Not by pushing them out to satisfy a bureaucrats schedule and then having to go back and fix the problems on a number of units once they are eventually solved.  Just because the USAF/USN is going to have to rebuild a load of pre-serial F-35s doesn't mean the RuN wants to follow the same 'exceptional" path with the 22350s.

    Bureaucracy and bad management caused these delays. Same as in the F-35 but on a much smaller scale.
    In both cases the platforms are super capable and promising. In practice, they're very very late and expensive.

    1 frigate --> 11 years to induct.
    <insert slow clapping>
    ZoA
    ZoA


    Posts : 145
    Points : 147
    Join date : 2017-08-20

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  ZoA Sat Sep 30, 2017 10:11 pm

    There are 2 ways to conduct see trials.

    1st is rubber-stamping PR show that allows any barley floating junker to enter service. Case in point Zumwalt  trials.

    2nd is genuine trials to verify built ship is actually complaint to contracted specifications. Case in point Gorshkov trials.

    Which country practices which of those two methods is easily discernible by rejection and delay rate during trials. Rejections and delays of ships such as Lada subs and Gorskov frigates indicates Russian government insists on 2nd method of sea trials.

    On  another hand fact that in US and its satellites it is practically unheard of that military ship gets delayed or rejected during trials indicates more what kind of "trials" they actually practice, then it indicates absence or presence of theatrical issues, or compliance to contractual specifications.
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  hoom Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:30 am

    The Northern Fleet began the final phase of testing the frigate Admiral Gorshkov
    As someone on Balancer put it 'The final final final final phase of tests' tongue
    I'll believe it when I see a St George cross flying.

    Rejections and delays of ships such as Lada subs and Gorskov frigates indicates Russian government insists on 2nd method of sea trials.
    On the other hand Severodvinsk & 20380 have been in service but not fully operational.
    kvs
    kvs


    Posts : 15857
    Points : 15992
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Turdope's Kanada

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  kvs Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:53 am

    ZoA wrote:There are 2 ways to conduct see trials.

    1st is rubber-stamping PR show that allows any barley floating junker to enter service. Case in point Zumwalt  trials.

    2nd is genuine trials to verify built ship is actually complaint to contracted specifications. Case in point Gorshkov trials.

    Which country practices which of those two methods is easily discernible by rejection and delay rate during trials. Rejections and delays of ships such as Lada subs and Gorskov frigates indicates Russian government insists on 2nd method of sea trials.

    On  another hand fact that in US and its satellites it is practically unheard of that military ship gets delayed or rejected during trials indicates more what kind of "trials" they actually practice, then it indicates absence or presence of theatrical issues, or compliance to contractual specifications.

    +1000000

    The west is all about cosmetics and illusion. Scratch under the facade and it is ho-hum and rotten.

    Judging by some of the posts there are those that drink the koolaid and think delays are a sign of weakness.
    Because everyone knows that designs are perfect on paper and no real world problems are ever encountered.
    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza


    Posts : 4896
    Points : 4886
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  Big_Gazza Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:16 am

    hoom wrote:On the other hand Severodvinsk & 20380 have been in service but not fully operational.
    Really? In what respect?  Don't tell me - a sandwich toaster has broke an element, and the toilet next to the engine control room doesn't flush.....

    Yeah sure, compared to the LCSs being unable to travel under their own power, or the Zumwalts not having any advanced ammo for their main cannons, I'd call any issues with Severodvinsk and 20380s to be par for the course in any warship.


    Last edited by Big_Gazza on Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:38 am; edited 1 time in total
    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza


    Posts : 4896
    Points : 4886
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  Big_Gazza Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:38 am

    KiloGolf wrote:1 frigate --> 11 years to induct.
    <insert slow clapping>
    Its not one frigate, its the first completely new series of major Russian surface combatants since the Sovremennys and Udaloys started in the late 70s (I'm ignoring the 11540s as a "false start").  All weapons and systems are new and previously untested, and their production required a complete reboot of industries long neglected and underfunded since 1991.  22350s are a generation ahead of 11356s. Systems integration and testing is complex and commissioning punchlists will run into thousands of items.  WTF do you not understand about that?

    Yeah, its taken longer than expected.  So fucking what?  Its not like there are a dozen on the slipways being held up because of redesign work resulting from lead ship technical problems.  Ukrop have caused a 4-5 year delay while replacement engines are developed, so Severnaya don't really have any pressing schedule concerns.  The world won't end if the RuN doesn't get a single frigate in the next six months, so might as well get her right...

    Getting a little sick of your endless NATOstani agitprop BS.
    KiloGolf
    KiloGolf


    Posts : 2481
    Points : 2461
    Join date : 2015-09-01
    Location : Macedonia, Hellas

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  KiloGolf Sun Oct 01, 2017 6:03 am

    Big_Gazza wrote:22350s are a generation ahead of 11356s. Systems integration and testing is complex and commissioning punchlists will run into thousands of items.  WTF do you not understand about that?

    I understand that they focused on the wrong ship and wrecked their Navy in their process. 11356s could have been inducted since the mid 00s if the political will was there. By now they'd have over a dozen of them, possibly more, not just 3 Grigs and 1 Gorshkov in 2018.
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  hoom Sun Oct 01, 2017 10:31 am

    Really? In what respect?
    Severodvinsk was experimental service for several years before being announced combat ready, 20380 has Redut not properly functional.
    Just pointing out Russia hasn't fully avoided the 'put it in service & pretend it actually works' thing either.
    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza


    Posts : 4896
    Points : 4886
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  Big_Gazza Sun Oct 01, 2017 1:32 pm

    hoom wrote:Severodvinsk was experimental service for several years before being announced combat ready, 20380 has Redut not properly functional.
    Just pointing out Russia hasn't fully avoided the 'put it in service & pretend it actually works' thing either.
    Severodvinsk is the lead unit of a class conceived back in Soviet times and construction schedule was delayed for over a decade due to the 90s meltdown....  its been extensively redesigned since, and is altogether a different boat to that originally envisioned.  Saying its "experimental" is incorrect however.  Its a credit to the Russians that they persevered and didn't simply scrap her, and that she handed over 2 years after start of sea trials. BTW the delay in declaring her "combat ready" was more about crew training than issues with the boat or systems. Crews take a year or two to get fully up to speed on a new design boat, and the Severodvinsk is at least a generation ahead of the Akulas.

    Problems with 20380 Redut is AFAIK only related to long range (120km) version of the missile 9M96E2.  The shorter range (40km) variant works fine, and I suspect it became the plan to fit the active ships with those and rollout the 9M96E2s when ready.  That's a perfectly defendable strategy in my book.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18520
    Points : 19025
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  George1 Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:54 pm

    1st Pr.22350 frigate Admiral Gorshkov with Ka-31 AEW&C on its helo deck, underwent a series of tests near the NF's Severomorsk, RuMoD

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 DLsUnp5XcAAYumS
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18520
    Points : 19025
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  George1 Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:01 am

    Russia to start sea trials of 2nd Admiral Gorshkov-class multirole frigate next summer

    More:
    http://tass.com/defense/974672
    littlerabbit
    littlerabbit


    Posts : 236
    Points : 236
    Join date : 2017-07-03
    Location : Serbia

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  littlerabbit Mon Dec 18, 2017 3:50 pm

    What's up with Gorshkov?! They said it will be commissioned in mid December...are there any news?dunno
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13472
    Points : 13512
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  PapaDragon Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:14 pm

    littlerabbit wrote:What's up with Gorshkov?!  They said it will be commissioned in mid December...are there any news?dunno  

    Forget commissioning, from what they said the other day they don't even plan to order any additional ones before at least 2021.
    littlerabbit
    littlerabbit


    Posts : 236
    Points : 236
    Join date : 2017-07-03
    Location : Serbia

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  littlerabbit Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:39 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    littlerabbit wrote:What's up with Gorshkov?!  They said it will be commissioned in mid December...are there any news?dunno  

    Forget commissioning, from what they said the other day they don't even plan to order any additional ones before at least 2021.

    Jesus... Suspect I don't get Russian Navy, at all. No
    KiloGolf
    KiloGolf


    Posts : 2481
    Points : 2461
    Join date : 2015-09-01
    Location : Macedonia, Hellas

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  KiloGolf Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:24 pm

    littlerabbit wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    littlerabbit wrote:What's up with Gorshkov?!  They said it will be commissioned in mid December...are there any news?dunno  

    Forget commissioning, from what they said the other day they don't even plan to order any additional ones before at least 2021.

    Jesus... Suspect I don't get Russian Navy, at all. No  

    They seem to have a glorified coast guard mentality for anything on the surface with a dash of few cruise missile VLS cells here and there.
    That's it till 2025 for RuN. dunno
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  hoom Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:40 pm

    What's up with Gorshkov?! They said it will be commissioned in mid December...are there any news?dunno
    No news I've seen since announcement of the final final final final tests in Nov.

    There is this nice pic though
    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 28-5651793-2121
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy


    Posts : 6168
    Points : 6188
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  GunshipDemocracy Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:40 pm

    KiloGolf wrote:They seem to have a glorified coast guard mentality for anything on the surface with a dash of few cruise missile VLS cells here and there.
    That's it till 2025 for RuN. dunno


    and what mentality they should have taking into account budget/intl situation/timing? I look forward to hearing your say.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40541
    Points : 41041
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  GarryB Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:42 am

    Yes, of course they should lay down fifty of the damn things... of course the company in Russia that will now be making engines for them wont be able to get that number of engines together until 2040 but you can keep them in the slipways and block other ships from being built while you wait...

    Ironically smaller vessels would have smaller propulsion systems easier to make, and bigger vessels will likely have nuke propulsion which is also OK...
    KomissarBojanchev
    KomissarBojanchev


    Posts : 1429
    Points : 1584
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 27
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  KomissarBojanchev Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:25 am

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    KiloGolf wrote:They seem to have a glorified coast guard mentality for anything on the surface with a dash of few cruise missile VLS cells here and there.
    That's it till 2025 for RuN. dunno


    and what mentality they should have taking into account budget/intl situation/timing?  I look forward to hearing your say.

    The mentality to commission 2-3 ships of the class by 2021.
    KomissarBojanchev
    KomissarBojanchev


    Posts : 1429
    Points : 1584
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 27
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  KomissarBojanchev Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:30 am

    Strawman Maker wrote:block other ships from being built while you wait...
    What other ships are being built within acceptable timeframes in the shitshow called severnaya verf?

    There aren't even any more ships to be blocked because the naval ministry doesn't know WTF it wants.
    ZoA
    ZoA


    Posts : 145
    Points : 147
    Join date : 2017-08-20

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  ZoA Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:30 pm

    In all honesty Russia should prioritise construction of ships with shallow enough draft to be able to transit Unified Deep Water System because that would help unify Russian Northern, Baltic, Black and Caspian fleet in to one force deployable in any of those sectors at need. They should also prioritise maintenance of that channel network as an issue of utmost strategic priority. This would contribute more to effectiveness of Russian fleets and Russian national security than any big displacement surface ships, carriers, cruisers and so on people here tend to obsess with.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Deep_Water_System_of_European_Russia

    I would speculate that is key factor why Russian is at this moment giving priority to construction of large number of smaller ships with draft of 4 m or less, like Karakurt class, instead of making larger surface ships. It is smart decision.
    ,
    And for any new Russian ship first issue you should try to find out is it able to transit Unified Deep Water System because that is more important then it's weapons, speed, autonomy and so on.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy


    Posts : 6168
    Points : 6188
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  GunshipDemocracy Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:34 pm

    KomissarBojanchev wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    KiloGolf wrote:They seem to have a glorified coast guard mentality for anything on the surface with a dash of few cruise missile VLS cells here and there.
    That's it till 2025 for RuN. dunno


    and what mentality they should have taking into account budget/intl situation/timing?  I look forward to hearing your say.

    The mentality to commission 2-3 ships of the class by 2021.

    didn't you forget about budget and turbines factor right?




    KomissarBojanchev wrote:
    Strawman Maker wrote:block other ships from being built while you wait...
    What other ships are being built within acceptable timeframes in the shitshow called severnaya verf?

    There aren't even any more ships to be blocked because the naval ministry doesn't know WTF it wants.


    Oh I am sure that MoD knows what it wants but there is also MoF which cuts most of proposals and intl situation changing. But I am interested in definition of "an acceptable time frame" ? and acceptable means what? how many months per which class? are you going to develop from scratch all modules of like in Spain assemble from ready foreign parts?
    KomissarBojanchev
    KomissarBojanchev


    Posts : 1429
    Points : 1584
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 27
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  KomissarBojanchev Tue Dec 19, 2017 6:14 pm

    didn't you forget about budget and turbines factor right?
    There are already turbines for the Gorshkov class.

    Oh I am sure that MoD knows what it wants but there is also MoF which cuts most of proposals and intl situation changing. But I am interested in definition of "an acceptable time frame" ? and acceptable means what? how many months per which class? are you going to develop from scratch all modules of like in Spain assemble from ready foreign parts?
    Then the MoF shouldn't be nosing around and instead almost completely stick to the 2020 armament program requirements.

    Acceptable means 2-3 years build time for a frigate, max 8 months of testing.

    1-2 years for a corvette, max 5 months of testing

    7 months to 1 year for a minesweeper or missile boat, max 5 months of testing.

    4 years for a destroyer max 2 years of testing.
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  hoom Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:21 pm

    In all honesty Russia should prioritise construction of ships with shallow enough draft to be able to transit Unified Deep Water System because that would help unify Russian Northern, Baltic, Black and Caspian fleet in to one force deployable in any of those sectors at need.
    Would be my primary effort too.
    But above that there is a clear need for a bunch of Frigates & if/when 22350 actually works properly it'll be a very good Frigate.

    Rather than a 'coast-guard mentality' as the reason that there aren't more 22350s being built, its incredibly obvious that the program has suffered extreme concurrency hell, compounded by the Ukraine/Engine issue, absolutely nothing to do with lack of intent.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40541
    Points : 41041
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  GarryB Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:40 am

    Then maybe what they actually need to do is redig those canals so they can take bigger ships.

    At the end of the day all the Russian Navy needs is one articulated river barge a few kilometres long that can carry UKSK launch tubes for 500 Kalibrs and perhaps a similar number of Redut launch tubes... plus come corvette sized vessels to maintain their fisheries areas and clamp down on smugglers.

    Sponsored content


    Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov - Page 30 Empty Re: Project 22350: Admiral Sergei Gorshkov

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:43 pm