BMP-3 in Russian Army

>its the same 4 fucking vehicles with every insignia painted on and pictured from every angle imaginable
Doesn't seem to be doing them any favors if they captured that many.
I know you're one of the dumbest motherfucking posters here, but sheesh.

Its not the "same 4 vehicles" . If you left your echo chamber you'd see dozens of captured ones, mainly around kharkov. Iraqis captured 0 NATO tanks or IFVs. Bosnian serbs captured 0 NATO tanks or IFVs.

If you left your echo chamber you'd see dozens of captured ones, mainly around kharkov. Iraqis captured 0 NATO tanks or IFVs. Bosnian serbs captured 0 NATO tanks or IFVs.

Show me Bradleys, LAV-25, Stryker MGS, Warrior IFV, puma IFV, centauro, dardo, etc in taliban service.

limb wrote:Show me Bradleys, LAV-25, Stryker MGS, Warrior IFV, puma IFV, centauro, dardo, etc in taliban service.

A comparison of the equipment of the airborne and motorized rifle units regularly rests on the argument "BMD-4M is needed because it has a better fire control system than the BMP-3." The approach is understandable, but incorrect.

Of course, the BMD-4M is better, it has the Bakhcha-U combat module on serial vehicles, with a thermal imager, a digital ballistic computer, a new stabilizer and other useful things, while the BMP-3 with the Bakhcha has so far been seen only at exhibitions. But the module is not the whole machine, and the BMP-3 may well receive it from the factory, as well as an even more advanced Tit. But whether in this case a specialized landing armor is needed, which is much inferior to the BMP in terms of protection, is a question.

In any case, it will be necessary to unify the production lines, expanding the supply of serial vehicles to the army, so you need to think about the appearance of single vehicles in each class from the very beginning. The BMP-3 has excellent firepower, which can be used to a much greater advantage if it receives a modern fire control system. Everything is fine with the BMD-4M with a fire control system, but the level of security of this vehicle leaves much to be desired. The launch of the updated BMP-3, which received optics and electronics from the BMD, under these conditions seems inevitable.

Most BMP-3s the russian mechanized infantry uses are unupgraded models from the 80s or 90s. They don't have the bakcha U modules or 4S24 era. The BMP-3M with the bakhcha U are just for parades and arms exhibitions

Old ones should get the same treatment

There is an impressive video showing from the view of the thermal imager of the turret auto tracking and hitting targets with the 100mm mortar. Wish I could find it. That kind of precision with the surprisingly large shells is incredible to see. Cannot wait for film of the epoch 57mm mortar in use.

Not always, plenty of T-80BVs and T-72Bs were not upgrades to BVM or B3 when overhauled during this war.