Kimppis wrote:Also, did I understand this correctly: if Syria says something, it must be true. Kk, convincing. They never do propaganda or exaggerate enemy casualties, nope. That settles it, thanks.
Syria Government have far better record , that ISIS supporters..
There is no question about this... Almanar News.. if you don't want to take Syria government
claims , Also shows a totally different picture of what Israel propaganda claims..
To defeat an airdefense in Syria , like PAntsir or BUK you need a line of sight and a visual
sight of the target. because they are mobile air defenses.. This means that Israeli aiforce will have to
fly withing very dangerous close visual distance in order to hit their targets and this also a HUGE
Risk of losing a pilot and that he is later captured for humiliating even More Israel.
Not even Russia airforce fly withing visual distance of their targets , in ISIS positions. They use special
forces/drones to guide their missiles.. or free fall bombs ,while flying in a straight line above their targets. Israel have no special forces in damascus with lazer designators to guide any missile.. ok?
So the only realistic way for israel to achieve any precision in Damascus over mobile targets is with lazer guided missiles ,because they can't stay too long over Syria airspace.. TV Guided missiles are easily jammed its signals.. so don't work. Radio guided missiles will not work either for electronic jamming. And GPS guided missiles will only work against STATIC targets.. but they are not very precise. All said.. the real precision capability of Israel in Syria.
should be similar of the one of the Americans with Cruise missiles and GPS..
which was only 30% of effectiveness with 70% of their missiles lost. But the Syrian Army general command is saying that they intercepted most of Israeli missiles in their severals waves.. and hit multiple planes.. including drones and combat jets. So if we are to believe in Syrian army and other sources.. which have been more consistent in their losses... then only about 10% of Israel attacks hit their intended targets.. but without enough precision and without major damages.. only in static targets.. With dynamic Airdefenses ,like Pechora, Pantsir and buks , that constanly move their positions , Israel have ZERO Change to defeat. Because their planes will not know where the air defenses are.. satelite images will always show an outdated position. dynamic air defenses can use passive radars.. that are not detected by Israel airforce..or any radar.. and also Russia air defenses ,and Radar.. can become the EYES.. of Syrian army air defenses.
So how is Israel going to know where are Syria air defenses newest position ,if they constantly move them?
Not even Russia can defeat easily Mobile airdefenses.. this is why their combats planes fly very high altitude over ISIS positions ,they lost planes in Georgia war. Mobile airdefenses are a pain in the ass to defeat..you need very low flying attack hellicopers fkying over damascus for that if they constanly move or israeli special forces with line of sight and lazer target designators ,aiming in real time every movement of the missiles.. so Israel claims are fantasy at best.
To hit stationary targets is the only chance Israel have..in stadoff long distance attacks.. with weak precision. using GPS missiles.. but Syria government said ,they intercepted most israel missile attacks over damascus too..
lie about their damages and exxagerate the effectiveness of their attacks. They did this in Hezbola -Israel war..
that Israel claimed that their losses were significantly smaller , than reality .
GPS armed missiles ,like Cruise missiles is not accurate enough. As the attack of Americans proved on Syria military base. That was running withing 2 hours after the attack after cleaning the dust ,contrary to the American version
that the base was "completely destroyed".
Is also worth to mention that Syria don't need radars at all..in general terms ,which Israel claim they also "destroyed".
in vast majority of cases.. This is because Russia military base can be the Eyes.. of Syrian air defenses..
So unless Israel attack Russian base ..and defeat those radars and S-400 , then Israel have ZERO chance
to blind Syria air defenses.. ZERO chance. Unless they bomb Russia airbase. So i bet none of the zombies
though about that? So Syria only need missiles to be in constant motion in Syria ,and launch them ,and then
continue moving.. because all the missiles can be safely guided from Russia military base. safely.. So what did Israel really bombed is the question? If they disable airports ,or run ways.. then perhaps ,that will delay things abit..
for syria.. just 24 hours of repairs and the show will continue. All things said.. israel have no way to effectively
Neutralize Syrian airdefenses.. until they have boots on the ground ,with laze designators.. Something that they dont
have in damascus at least or central Syria ,where the attacks happened. in Syria borders is a different story.
But even if they had this .. which they don't.. Russia can resupply more mobile cheap defenses to Syria ,like modernized pechora and the fighting will continue.
So in summary Israel can't defeat with its airforce Syria Mobile Air defenses.. Wishful thinking.
and neither they can blind Syrian Radars..because they can use Russian radars
that are safe in Russia military base..
So this means that israel airforce in reality do not have real goals with their attacks.. that could change things
in their favor.. Since Russia military can resupply endlessly Syria military with new missiles ,when they used ,
and can be the eyes of Syria air defenses. you need boots in the Ground to take territory in Syria ,take their military bases in order to really limit Syria possibilities to defend their nation or their airspace. Probably Israel real goals is to
pressure Russia to capitulate in their support for Assad. Because their airforce attacks alone will not win any war.
and will only achieve they losing planes.. and teaching Syria and IRAN and hezbolah how to master the shutdown their planes.