Am I right in thinking that Russia is not giving this gas for free to Europe? And Am I right in saying that this will help Russia?
http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2017/12/31/547362/Gazprom-set-to-supply-record-gas-levels-to-Europe
par far wrote:"Gazprom set to supply record gas levels to Europe."
Am I right in thinking that Russia is not giving this gas for free to Europe? And Am I right in saying that this will help Russia?
http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2017/12/31/547362/Gazprom-set-to-supply-record-gas-levels-to-Europe
kvs wrote:
NATO smartasses think that LNG will give them a net lower price due to spot pricing rackets. Russia needs to quickly move
to LNG instead of pipeline exports. Since there is a bottleneck of LNG ships and ports, there will be a price surge that will
properly fill Russia's coffers and stop the charity madness.
Austin wrote:GunshipDemocracy wrote:
1) This is actually happening now
>> No it is not , Show me any official statement where Russia has banned hardware/SW from West/US and allowed only use of domestic hardware SW
2) Are there better options for liquidity yet?
>> Euro T Bills [ Russia got far better leverage against Europe than US ] , Gold , Yuan , SDR
Keeping US T Bills not exceeding 10 % of Russian Forex is safer bet.
>>>3) And which jets then buy? Waiting 15 years untill placed by Russian ones not to mention that ~ half of titanium used in Boeing is made in Russia.
Buy Russian ones Tu-204SM , IL-96M , MS-21 , Superjet
Impose Tarrif barriers on Western Aircraft , Use Titanium sold to Boeing on Russian Aircraft.
The government intentionally makes few Russian aircraft just to make sure the numbers keep the people employed and paves the way for imports.
kvs wrote:par far wrote:"Gazprom set to supply record gas levels to Europe."
Am I right in thinking that Russia is not giving this gas for free to Europe? And Am I right in saying that this will help Russia?
http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2017/12/31/547362/Gazprom-set-to-supply-record-gas-levels-to-Europe
You would be partly right. Russian natural gas prices are very low considering the premium quality aspects of CH4 as a fuel.
It releases less CO2 when burned compared to oil and CH4 is a feedstock to the chemical and fertilizer industry. Russia
for some stupid reason tied the price of CH4 to the price of oil when it has no such correlation to begin with (i.e. people do
not drive cars using CH4 and flip back and forth between oil and gas when heating their homes).
NATO smartasses think that LNG will give them a net lower price due to spot pricing rackets. Russia needs to quickly move
to LNG instead of pipeline exports. Since there is a bottleneck of LNG ships and ports, there will be a price surge that will
properly fill Russia's coffers and stop the charity madness.
par far wrote:
Thanks for the reply kvs, do you think that Russia will switch to LNG? And if yes, when? I thought it was smart to ggo the LNG way and thought Russia was already doing that.
kvs wrote:
Russia is building huge distribution facilities in spite of sanctions:
[....]
But the reliance on pipelines is going to continue for years to come. I think the EU needs to be punished for its theatrics regarding
Nord Stream II. But Putin is too much of a diplomat to do this.
Подробнее на ТАСС:ANKARA, 2 January. / TASS /. Turkey intends to issue bonds in rubles and yuans in 2018. This was stated on Tuesday by Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Shimshak in an interview with the newspaper Habertürk .
"We are now aiming at new countries with serious stock holdings.We first held road shows in Russia.We studied the ruble bond market, the first reaction is positive, in 2018 we will try to offer our bonds," he said.
In addition, according to Shimshek, Turkey is going to "issue bonds in RMB".
Подробнее на ТАСС:
According to the Minister of Energy, Russia can increase its share in the LNG market to 15-20% by 2035
MOSCOW, January 2. / TASS /. The export of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Russia to the countries of the Asia-Pacific region in 2017 increased by 5.3% to 15.48 billion cubic meters. m. This is stated in the report of the Central Dispatch Office (CDU) of the fuel and energy complex.
In December, LNG exports to the APR countries amounted to 1.47 billion cubic meters. m (-0.2%).
Sakhalin Energy is the operator of the Sakhalin-2 project, Russia's first LNG project. Prior to the launch, Yamal LNG was the only LNG plant in Russia in December 2017. The shareholders of Sakhalin Energy are Gazprom Sakhalin Holdings BV (50% plus one share), Shell Sakhalin Holdings BV (27.5% minus one share), Mitsui Sakhalin Holdings BV (12.5%), Diamond Gas Sakhalin BV (10%). The Sakhalin-2 project provides for the phased development of the Piltun-Astokhskoye oil and Lunskoye gas fields, located 13-16 km from the northeastern coast of Sakhalin Island.
According to the Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak, Russia can increase its share in the LNG market from the current 4% to 15-20% by 2035.
According to the minister, the main resource base of LNG is mainly in the north: the Yamal Peninsula, the Gydan Peninsula, where the reserves exceed 38 trillion cubic meters. m of gas. Novak also stressed that there is an instruction by the Russian president, according to which deliveries from LNG projects will not occur at the expense of pipeline gas supplies.
kvs wrote:Bending over and taking it from the EU is not a viable policy either. So far Russia has been engaged in 24/7/365
appeasement. Time to stop this.
BTW, it is NATO that is always trying to punish Russia across a whole spectrum of things. Retaliation is a valid
game theory move. Tit for tat is the only gaming strategy that guarantees that your enemy cannot win.
Cyberspec wrote:kvs wrote:Bending over and taking it from the EU is not a viable policy either. So far Russia has been engaged in 24/7/365
appeasement. Time to stop this.
BTW, it is NATO that is always trying to punish Russia across a whole spectrum of things. Retaliation is a valid
game theory move. Tit for tat is the only gaming strategy that guarantees that your enemy cannot win.
True, they haven't banged their shoe on the table and threatened to bury them like Khrushcev did in his time...but I think the softly approach is working fine....I hear even the Lithuanians are starting to wake up and shuly whisper that they should establish better relations with Russia and have even stopped opposing Nordstream-2....I wonder why?...maybe they haven't been appeased enough ?
kvs wrote:That's a sad metric for Russia's success. Why should Russia give a flying f*ck what the Baltic chihuahuas think or claim to think?
Lithuania is not the real Nordstream II opposition. It is Uncle Scumbag's sock puppet. Watch as it flips its whispering tone when
Uncle Scumbag snaps his fingers.
France Looks to Deepen Trade Ties With Russia and China
After Brexit vote and Trump’s rise, France aims to build a trade ‘backbone’ that runs from Europe to Beijing via Moscow
France is aiming to build a trade “backbone” that runs from Europe to Beijing via Moscow, as it looks to China and Russia to act as a counterweight to increasingly uncertain trade relations with the U.S. and Britain.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/france-looks-to-deepen-trade-ties-with-russia-and-china-1514808000
kvs wrote:Bending over and taking it from the EU is not a viable policy either. So far Russia has been engaged in 24/7/365
appeasement. Time to stop this.
BTW, it is NATO that is always trying to punish Russia across a whole spectrum of things. Retaliation is a valid
game theory move. Tit for tat is the only gaming strategy that guarantees that your enemy cannot win.
cyberspec wrote:
It means that cutting off your nose to spite your face will only get you so far. Eventually you have to face reality.
As far as Nordstream goes, it means the Baltics have sided with Germany not Uncle Sam...which is pretty significant.
Speaking of "sad" idiots waking up to the inevitable
France Looks to Deepen Trade Ties With Russia and China
After Brexit vote and Trump’s rise, France aims to build a trade ‘backbone’ that runs from Europe to Beijing via Moscow
France is aiming to build a trade “backbone” that runs from Europe to Beijing via Moscow, as it looks to China and Russia to act as a counterweight to increasingly uncertain trade relations with the U.S. and Britain.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/france-looks-to-deepen-trade-ties-with-russia-and-china-1514808000
retaliation or if you prefer tit 4 tat brings poor results for both players. If you speak about theory. So for your ambitions and emotions you'd let millions of Russians suffer?!
GarryB wrote:retaliation or if you prefer tit 4 tat brings poor results for both players. If you speak about theory. So for your ambitions and emotions you'd let millions of Russians suffer?!
Friends get a good price, but also good reliable customers get a good price to keep them happy.
The EU is not really being a good customer and is forcing Russia to develop unnecessary alternative routes for energy to Europe to bypass trouble makers like the Ukraine.
Personally I can see them getting to a point where they don't want to deal with the EU any more and will just send supplies to Turkey or Germany and let them on sell the energy at whatever price they want... solves lots of problems for Russia and gives power to Turkey and Germany.
Personally I think shipping energy is an easier solution as there is less infrastructure on foreign territory that could be seized at any time and nationalised.
A fleet of tankers could deliver all sorts of things including clean water to the pacific islands and middle east... in fact a small nuclear power plant and they could produce clean fresh water from sea water and not have to carry it very far at all. A desalination ship could be very useful... you could deliver electricity and fresh water to small countries that could use both.
In the Far North of Russia it could also deliver heat in the form of a byproduct too.
The EU has to learn that Russia is not an enemy but it can be if it keeps treating it like one.
Austin wrote:First time Photo of Central Bank Gold Reserves
https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/102506/
MOSCOW, January 10. /TASS/. Non-oil-and-gas deficit of the federal budget declined to 7.9% OF GDP in 2017, Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov told reporters on Wednesday.
"Non-oil-and-gas deficit of the federal budget drops to 7.9% of GDP (from 9.1% in 2016), while the oil price supporting the federal budget balance at the primary level declined to $60 per barrel from more than $100 per barrel in 2013-2014," Siluanov said.
Brent oil futures with delivery in March 2018 are currently traded at $68.99 a barrel on the London-based ICE.