Austin wrote:8 trillion comes to $ 136 billion over next 6 years .....not a big amount if average growth rate of 4 % can be achieved for next 6 years
Taking into account that crude oil will not be so much down (Saudis talk about next 10-20 years price cap alliance
it is easy to fiance this form oil alone. Most importantly is to ensure money is not "leaked out somewhere". Luckily it wont be London :-)
As for US - arresting Russian t-bonds would hurt US market even more AFAIK. We'll see how good risk management has Putin anyway soon.
And yes I wonder what Putin will decide to do with pro-western liberals. To me it is hard to understand such an attitude. Personally I do not believe in BS about liberal trade and economy. But being Russian and prowestern is oxymoron. It is like pro-Hitler communist
kvs wrote:
Pure BS. Under Obama and Trump the USA can run 1.5 trillion dollar deficits (with a budget of 3.7 trillion dollars) and everything is
hunky dory. But Russia can't even up its spending over a 6 year period because "bad things will happen".
These "bad things" are Russia's GDP growth will be higher and development levels will increase. Everything is about the wants
and needs of NATO.
oh no no no. Not pure! numbers about money to be invested were real, similar to Skripal poisoning. He was poisoned . this is fact!
ZoA wrote:Russian government is stupid to sell it's bonds in London thus allowing City of London kleptocrats to collect fees on those sales. UK government is stupid to attempt to prevent those sales that benefit them. I hope they ban them, that would be one more way sanctions would actually benefit Russia and undermine Russian neoiberal faction..
Brits are not stupid. It is their long planned action. Brexit IMHO was one of them. Is this weathering of economical storm? Yes hitting oligarchs will have goo effect to Russia and London's budget onetime shot. I guess must be something even more important in UK fiances then couple of thieves and run-away scum.
The only reason why Russia might have decided to do this traitor in UK is to actually trigger such reaction. Yes trigger so anglosaxons start too early before they are ready for an inevitable confrontation.
Kimppis wrote:
Now the situation is different. The economy has adjusted to the new reality. The first, the main stage, of military modernization is almost complete, they are ready for the low oil prices, the shock from 2014-15 is history, inflation is low and Russia knows that cheap Western credit won't be available. WW3 might of course start tomorrow, but Putin's last term could actually be quite stable for Russia. OK, maybe I'm too optimistic, but there's a real chance... That said, I realize that his previous term was stable as well internally, very stable actually, but it's possible that the international situation can't get much worse at this point and/or it will atleast matter less for Russia and its internal development.
Wrong
WW3 has actually started in 2013 in Kiev. Will this be the last term for Putin? Tet would be great. Not that i have anything against Putin, but this would mean he reached his objectives: to eave Russia modernized, stable and developing well
My suspicion is that he keeps liberals around only to somehow integrate them to be pro Russian. Perhaps there is also some external pressure. History teaches that after one brilliant rules not always comes another equal to predecessor. Thus Putin wants to leave legal / political system stable and self regulating. This is precisely what happened after Stalin was killed.