Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+84
TMA1
ALAMO
Arkanghelsk
Krepost
Mir
Podlodka77
owais.usmani
ult
lancelot
limb
Kiko
magnumcromagnon
Rasisuki Nebia
lyle6
andalusia
LMFS
miroslav
xeno
ultimatewarrior
thegopnik
Rodion_Romanovic
miketheterrible
Labrador
mnztr
Ned86
franco
hoom
PapaDragon
walle83
KiloGolf
Hole
verkhoturye51
Tsavo Lion
Peŕrier
Singular_Transform
Arrow
Project Canada
Honesroc
Tolstoy
Singular_trafo
SeigSoloyvov
Isos
nastle77
slasher
Svyatoslavich
Big_Gazza
artjomh
Morpheus Eberhardt
JohninMK
GunshipDemocracy
Stealthflanker
RTN
jhelb
Kimppis
Dima
Werewolf
mack8
flamming_python
eridan
kvs
Zivo
sepheronx
max steel
Austin
chicken
par far
Mike E
KomissarBojanchev
Flyingdutchman
collegeboy16
etaepsilonk
navyfield
calripson
Vann7
George1
dionis
TheArmenian
Hachimoto
TR1
Viktor
GarryB
runaway
Admin
Russian Patriot
88 posters

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    TMA1
    TMA1


    Posts : 1193
    Points : 1191
    Join date : 2020-11-30

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  TMA1 Tue Jun 25, 2024 2:04 pm

    From what open source info I can gather the max speeds given for the yasen-m are 35 knots +. It is very fast and the rumored depth is equally impressive. Now add to this stealthiness near to latest models of our virginia class submarines. It also has a larger set of passive and active arrays.

    The thing is a beast. I could be wrong but I think I am beginning to see now why they went with the modified seven bladed screw. Yasen is the first true purpose built multirole submarine.

    GarryB, flamming_python, Big_Gazza, zardof, Hole and lancelot like this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3449
    Points : 3439
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Arrow Wed Jun 26, 2024 8:32 am

    gather the max speeds given for the yasen-m are 35 knots +. It is very fast and the rumored depth is equally impressive. wrote:

    A submerged speed of 35 knots is nothing new for SSN class vessels. Project 971 could already sail at this speed. As you know, the Russians have created submarines with even higher speeds. Papa and Alpha. Seawolf can also sail at such speeds as 35 knots. However, the 885M project can certainly dive much deeper than Western ships. Officially it is 600m, unofficially it is even deeper.
    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3449
    Points : 3439
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Arrow Mon Jul 01, 2024 7:06 pm

    The most modern heavy torpedo Fizyk 2 compared to the latest versions MK-48 or Spearfish. How does it compare? Available information shows that it has a range of about 50 km and a speed of 50-60 knots. It descends below 500m. MK-48 has similar performance down to 800m. In the case of Russian torpedoes, this is not necessary. American ships don't go below 500m Smile
    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3147
    Points : 3143
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  lancelot Tue Jul 02, 2024 2:14 am

    Arrow wrote:The most modern heavy torpedo Fizyk 2 compared to the latest versions MK-48 or Spearfish. How does it compare? Available information shows that it has a range of about 50 km and a speed of 50-60 knots. It descends below 500m. MK-48 has similar performance down to 800m. In the case of Russian torpedoes, this is not necessary. American ships don't go below 500m Smile
    Typical Yankee nonsense. Torpedoes using Otto fuel *all* have degraded performance at high depth. Mk-48 included. For this reason the Europeans typically use electric torpedoes. Which do not have the same performance degradation while operating at high depth.

    The US hasn't upgraded the propulsion section of the Mk-48 in like three decades. They just upgrade the sensors and electronics. The performance characteristics of the propulsion section are very well known by US opponents.

    ahmedfire likes this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3449
    Points : 3439
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Arrow Tue Jul 02, 2024 5:56 am

    Typical Yankee nonsense. Torpedoes using Otto fuel *all* have degraded performance at high depth. Mk-48 included. For this reason the Europeans typically use electric torpedoes. Which do not have the same performance degradation while operating at high depth. wrote:

    This is interesting because the MK 48 ADCAP was a response to the Proj 705 Lira ships. The torpedo was designed for a depth of up to 800 m. Generally speaking, most heavy torpedoes are powered by Otto fuel. Fizyk 2 also descends to over 500m. It is the most modern Russian heavy torpedo.
    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3147
    Points : 3143
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  lancelot Tue Jul 02, 2024 6:15 am

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Shark_torpedo

    Like all other battery powered HWTs, the battery power system does not suffer the loss of performance of Otto fuel II types at greater depths since there is no exhaust to deal with at greater pressures.

    Arrow likes this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3449
    Points : 3439
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Arrow Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:39 am

    Interesting project.  It seems that Europe has overtaken the USA and Russia in this respect by creating heavy electric torpedoes.  Russia The US still uses chemical drives in its heaviest torpedoes? Since the electric drive is certainly quieter, safer, and works better at greater depths.
    Kiko
    Kiko


    Posts : 3870
    Points : 3946
    Join date : 2020-11-11
    Age : 75
    Location : Brasilia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Kiko Mon Jul 08, 2024 4:39 pm

    Russia's 5th-Gen Submarines to Get 20% Thinner Coating, 07.08.2024.

    MOSCOW (Sputnik) - Russia's fifth-generation submarines will receive new hydroacoustic rubber coating that will be 20% thinner and much more efficient, Valery Polovinkin, science principal at the Krylov State Research Center (KSRC), told Sputnik on Monday.

    "We are talking about thickness reduction of about 10-20%, which is quite significant. It's not just the formulation of substances — special channels are made in the coating. It is not just a monolith but a construction, because air is the best insulator," he said.

    Polovinkin added that submarines needed better camouflage coating because no armor could beat armor-piercing projectiles.

    "Unfortunately, the projectile wins the notorious battle of 'the shell hit versus the armor.' We need to hide the ships," Polovinkin explained.

    Scientists at the KSRC, the main developer of the latest ship and material designs for the Russian navy, are working on polyfunctional coatings for fifth-generation submarines, the scientist said.

    https://sputnikglobe.com/20240708/russias-5th-gen-submarines-to-get-20-thinner-coating-1119292962.html

    GarryB, xeno, Big_Gazza, LMFS and lancelot like this post


    Sponsored content


    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 36 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Nov 17, 2024 10:33 pm