other members get annoyed with it, I am the only one who speaks up though.
You have a thread to go spam your videos go put them there.
SeigSoloyvov wrote:Oh idk all the videos you posted since Garry told you to post them there.
other members get annoyed with it, I am the only one who speaks up though.
You have a thread to go spam your videos go put them there.
Can Ultimatewarrior please post his videos to the twitter thread the entire reason that's there is so he can spam it.
Using youtube videos instead doesn't change the fact it's the same thing over.
I am getting tired of clicking on this thread only to see endless posts of videos.
GarryB wrote:Can Ultimatewarrior please post his videos to the twitter thread the entire reason that's there is so he can spam it.
Using youtube videos instead doesn't change the fact it's the same thing over.
I am getting tired of clicking on this thread only to see endless posts of videos.
Objection noted, but posting videos to this thread is a common and accepted thing... these videos are relevant to the topic here.
The other thread is for twitter posts and while these videos might have been posted to twitter, they are not twitter posts and therefore do not belong on the thread created for twitter posts.
This thread is for videos and pictures and discussions about the conflict in Syria... the fact that there are a lot of new videos is a good thing...
Would ask Ultimate Warrior to ensure there is no repetition if possible please, but otherwise carry on.
I wonder if you remember the nonsense you spread in this thread several pages ago. You should have shame for not leaving this conversation after countless of your arguments being proven to be drivel.SeigSoloyvov wrote:He needs to make those blind charges, The airforce cannot do enough damage alone to force the rebels back. The fighting in Idlib is much more complicated then you think.
[...]
Let me make this clear for you, if this rate of attrition keeps up for the SAA, they will not be able to liberate Idlib.
nero wrote:I wonder if you remember the nonsense you spread in this thread several pages ago. You should have shame for not leaving this conversation after countless of your arguments being proven to be drivel.SeigSoloyvov wrote:He needs to make those blind charges, The airforce cannot do enough damage alone to force the rebels back. The fighting in Idlib is much more complicated then you think.
[...]
Let me make this clear for you, if this rate of attrition keeps up for the SAA, they will not be able to liberate Idlib.
Rebel lines have collapsed. Tomorrow we will likely hear news of At Tamaniah or villages surrounding Sukayak have been captured.
The Syrians have taken Al Habit. They are now less than 10 kilometers from Khan Shaykun. If they advance just 4 kilometers and take Tamaniah, Khan Shaykun will be surrounded and due to this Murak, Kafr Zayta and Al Lataminah will fall.
nero wrote:
The Syrians have taken Al Habit. They are now less than 10 kilometers from Khan Shaykun. If they advance just 4 kilometers and take Tamaniah, Khan Shaykun will be surrounded and due to this Murak, Kafr Zayta and Al Lataminah will fall.
nero wrote:I wonder if you remember the nonsense you spread in this thread several pages ago. You should have shame for not leaving this conversation after countless of your arguments being proven to be drivel.SeigSoloyvov wrote:He needs to make those blind charges, The airforce cannot do enough damage alone to force the rebels back. The fighting in Idlib is much more complicated then you think.
[...]
Let me make this clear for you, if this rate of attrition keeps up for the SAA, they will not be able to liberate Idlib.
Rebel lines have collapsed. Tomorrow we will likely hear news of At Tamaniah or villages surrounding Sukayak have been captured.
The Syrians have taken Al Habit. They are now less than 10 kilometers from Khan Shaykun. If they advance just 4 kilometers and take Tamaniah, Khan Shaykun will be surrounded and due to this Murak, Kafr Zayta and Al Lataminah will fall.
SeigSoloyvov wrote:nero wrote:I wonder if you remember the nonsense you spread in this thread several pages ago. You should have shame for not leaving this conversation after countless of your arguments being proven to be drivel.SeigSoloyvov wrote:He needs to make those blind charges, The airforce cannot do enough damage alone to force the rebels back. The fighting in Idlib is much more complicated then you think.
[...]
Let me make this clear for you, if this rate of attrition keeps up for the SAA, they will not be able to liberate Idlib.
Rebel lines have collapsed. Tomorrow we will likely hear news of At Tamaniah or villages surrounding Sukayak have been captured.
The Syrians have taken Al Habit. They are now less than 10 kilometers from Khan Shaykun. If they advance just 4 kilometers and take Tamaniah, Khan Shaykun will be surrounded and due to this Murak, Kafr Zayta and Al Lataminah will fall.
Ahuh none sense, Tell me Nero do you know how much manpower Assad has, how much he can deploy at a given time?. What are his troops operational level's? You don't know any of that, While he does need to move forward he cannot afford a heavy loss.
The first assault went bad they lost a lot of guys and vehicles, they had to stop replan and try again.
I am tired of guys like you pretending otherwise, rebel lines haven't collapsed yet. Where are you getting this BS from? because they lost some minor areas sudden they collapsed?.
That is "none sense" as you put it. What are you basing the crap you are spewing off? I didn't realize you were area of the Rebels movements and operational capability you should so go Tell Assad, I am sure he can use it.
Assad has been fighting this war for a long time, he has lost many men over it. Much of the Syrian population left, he has limited manpower and you cannot fight a war without bodies. Assad will need to take Tama btw if he wants to take Khan otherwise his flanks will get torn up, he has yet to take this small town.
Btw do you think I care if Assad takes Idlib or not? I find it funny how emotional your types get "Oh no he is criticizing the SAA and taking into account their situation" Spare me, nothing I was wrong.
But okay tell me genius, I'll give you one chance to prove me wrong.
How many men does Assad have versus the rebels? if they "collapsed" you must know this then or are you talking out your ass ignoring facts because you want Assad to win.
SeigSoloyvov wrote:nero wrote:I wonder if you remember the nonsense you spread in this thread several pages ago. You should have shame for not leaving this conversation after countless of your arguments being proven to be drivel.SeigSoloyvov wrote:He needs to make those blind charges, The airforce cannot do enough damage alone to force the rebels back. The fighting in Idlib is much more complicated then you think.
[...]
Let me make this clear for you, if this rate of attrition keeps up for the SAA, they will not be able to liberate Idlib.
Rebel lines have collapsed. Tomorrow we will likely hear news of At Tamaniah or villages surrounding Sukayak have been captured.
The Syrians have taken Al Habit. They are now less than 10 kilometers from Khan Shaykun. If they advance just 4 kilometers and take Tamaniah, Khan Shaykun will be surrounded and due to this Murak, Kafr Zayta and Al Lataminah will fall.
Ahuh none sense, Tell me Nero do you know how much manpower Assad has, how much he can deploy at a given time?. What are his troops operational level's? You don't know any of that, While he does need to move forward he cannot afford a heavy loss.
The first assault went bad they lost a lot of guys and vehicles, they had to stop replan and try again.
I am tired of guys like you pretending otherwise, rebel lines haven't collapsed yet. Where are you getting this BS from? because they lost some minor areas sudden they collapsed?.
That is "none sense" as you put it. What are you basing the crap you are spewing off? I didn't realize you were area of the Rebels movements and operational capability you should so go Tell Assad, I am sure he can use it.
Assad has been fighting this war for a long time, he has lost many men over it. Much of the Syrian population left, he has limited manpower and you cannot fight a war without bodies. Assad will need to take Tama btw if he wants to take Khan otherwise his flanks will get torn up, he has yet to take this small town.
Btw do you think I care if Assad takes Idlib or not? I find it funny how emotional your types get "Oh no he is criticizing the SAA and taking into account their situation" Spare me, nothing I was wrong.
But okay tell me genius, I'll give you one chance to prove me wrong.
How many men does Assad have versus the rebels? if they "collapsed" you must know this then or are you talking out your ass ignoring facts because you want Assad to win.
SeigSoloyvov wrote:nero wrote:I wonder if you remember the nonsense you spread in this thread several pages ago. You should have shame for not leaving this conversation after countless of your arguments being proven to be drivel.SeigSoloyvov wrote:He needs to make those blind charges, The airforce cannot do enough damage alone to force the rebels back. The fighting in Idlib is much more complicated then you think.
[...]
Let me make this clear for you, if this rate of attrition keeps up for the SAA, they will not be able to liberate Idlib.
Rebel lines have collapsed. Tomorrow we will likely hear news of At Tamaniah or villages surrounding Sukayak have been captured.
The Syrians have taken Al Habit. They are now less than 10 kilometers from Khan Shaykun. If they advance just 4 kilometers and take Tamaniah, Khan Shaykun will be surrounded and due to this Murak, Kafr Zayta and Al Lataminah will fall.
Ahuh none sense, Tell me Nero do you know how much manpower Assad has, how much he can deploy at a given time?. What are his troops operational level's? You don't know any of that, While he does need to move forward he cannot afford a heavy loss.
The first assault went bad they lost a lot of guys and vehicles, they had to stop replan and try again.
I am tired of guys like you pretending otherwise, rebel lines haven't collapsed yet. Where are you getting this BS from? because they lost some minor areas sudden they collapsed?.
That is "none sense" as you put it. What are you basing the crap you are spewing off? I didn't realize you were area of the Rebels movements and operational capability you should so go Tell Assad, I am sure he can use it.
Assad has been fighting this war for a long time, he has lost many men over it. Much of the Syrian population left, he has limited manpower and you cannot fight a war without bodies. Assad will need to take Tama btw if he wants to take Khan otherwise his flanks will get torn up, he has yet to take this small town.
Btw do you think I care if Assad takes Idlib or not? I find it funny how emotional your types get "Oh no he is criticizing the SAA and taking into account their situation" Spare me, nothing I was wrong.
But okay tell me genius, I'll give you one chance to prove me wrong.
How many men does Assad have versus the rebels? if they "collapsed" you must know this then or are you talking out your ass ignoring facts because you want Assad to win.
SeigSoloyvov wrote:nero wrote:I wonder if you remember the nonsense you spread in this thread several pages ago. You should have shame for not leaving this conversation after countless of your arguments being proven to be drivel.SeigSoloyvov wrote:He needs to make those blind charges, The airforce cannot do enough damage alone to force the rebels back. The fighting in Idlib is much more complicated then you think.
[...]
Let me make this clear for you, if this rate of attrition keeps up for the SAA, they will not be able to liberate Idlib.
Rebel lines have collapsed. Tomorrow we will likely hear news of At Tamaniah or villages surrounding Sukayak have been captured.
The Syrians have taken Al Habit. They are now less than 10 kilometers from Khan Shaykun. If they advance just 4 kilometers and take Tamaniah, Khan Shaykun will be surrounded and due to this Murak, Kafr Zayta and Al Lataminah will fall.
Ahuh none sense, Tell me Nero do you know how much manpower Assad has, how much he can deploy at a given time?. What are his troops operational level's? You don't know any of that, While he does need to move forward he cannot afford a heavy loss.
The first assault went bad they lost a lot of guys and vehicles, they had to stop replan and try again.
I am tired of guys like you pretending otherwise, rebel lines haven't collapsed yet. Where are you getting this BS from? because they lost some minor areas sudden they collapsed?.
That is "none sense" as you put it. What are you basing the crap you are spewing off? I didn't realize you were area of the Rebels movements and operational capability you should so go Tell Assad, I am sure he can use it.
Assad has been fighting this war for a long time, he has lost many men over it. Much of the Syrian population left, he has limited manpower and you cannot fight a war without bodies. Assad will need to take Tama btw if he wants to take Khan otherwise his flanks will get torn up, he has yet to take this small town.
Btw do you think I care if Assad takes Idlib or not? I find it funny how emotional your types get "Oh no he is criticizing the SAA and taking into account their situation" Spare me, nothing I was wrong.
But okay tell me genius, I'll give you one chance to prove me wrong.
How many men does Assad have versus the rebels? if they "collapsed" you must know this then or are you talking out your ass ignoring facts because you want Assad to win.