It wont make it to IL-476 that is just authors imagination
+48
Scorpius
Arrow
limb
Maximmmm
owais.usmani
Firebird
william.boutros
PapaDragon
TheArmenian
DerWolf
Austin
flamming_python
PhSt
Cyberspec
Tsavo Lion
miketheterrible
Karl Haushofer
medo
jhelb
RusAviaGuy
Admin
MiamiMachineShop
ExBeobachter1987
Aristide
calripson
Regular
Rodion_Romanovic
kvs
GarryB
LMFS
triphosgene
bolshevik345
GunshipDemocracy
JohninMK
Walther von Oldenburg
higurashihougi
Big_Gazza
Tingsay
Kimppis
franco
mutantsushi
Isos
magnumcromagnon
Nibiru
marat
par far
George1
dino00
52 posters
Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°151
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
I think PD-35 will be used only on CR 929 , New Large Transport Aircraft replacement for AN-124 and on modified IL-96-400 class with twin engine.
It wont make it to IL-476 that is just authors imagination
It wont make it to IL-476 that is just authors imagination
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°152
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
How does the technology used on PD-35 matched with GE9X engine ?
I dont know the bypass ratio of PD-35 but will it be better than western engine of its class ?
I dont know the bypass ratio of PD-35 but will it be better than western engine of its class ?
GunshipDemocracy- Posts : 6162
Points : 6182
Join date : 2015-05-17
Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada
- Post n°153
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Tsavo Lion wrote:The US ABM airborne laser failed- it needs more power to be effective at a safe distance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1#Cancellation
from link in wiki you provided
By 2015, the Missile Defense Agency had started efforts to deploy a laser on a high-altitude UAV. Rather than a manned jetliner containing chemical fuels flying at 40,000 feet (12 km), firing a megawatt laser from a range of "tens of kilometers" at a boost-phase missile, the new concept envisioned an unmanned aircraft carrying an electric laser flying at 65,000 feet (20 km), firing the same power level at targets potentially up to "hundreds of kilometers" away for survivability against air defenses. While the ABL's laser required 55 kg (121 lb) to generate one kW, the MDA wanted to reduce that to 2–5 kg (4.4–11.0 lb) per kW, totaling 5,000 lb (2,300 kg) for a megawatt
well , as Magum wrote Russians vae already working 1MW class nuclear power source loaded on truck to power operational Peresvet laser. So yes all elements are alredy here.
PapaDragon wrote: Tanker was cancelled last year
then is was but only because MoD didn't want to spend money (and time) on restarting of production. Production is restarted anyway, so I guess now tanker option on table again.
Hole- Posts : 11099
Points : 11077
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°154
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
The planes were already produced. Two Il-96-400 for Polyot.
Rodion_Romanovic- Posts : 2636
Points : 2805
Join date : 2015-12-30
Location : Merkelland
- Post n°155
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Hole wrote:The planes were already produced. Two Il-96-400 for Polyot.
I commented on this on the 2nd of January on the Tanker fleet thread.
At least it was claimed that the conversion of those 2 ex-polyot aircrafts was not cost effective... maybe it was done not to create problem with the il-78 production..., no idea...Re: Refuelling Tankers for RuAF wrote:
(...)the Il-96 tanker can be the equivalent of the Boeing KC-767 or of the Airbus A330 MRTT.
From what I understood, the cost and time needed of converting 2 existing Il-96 400T airframes was deemed too high compared with the remaining life of the aircrafts (I do not know if this was correct or not). For newly built Il-96 400M it will be different and probably easier to build some of them in tanker/transport version from the start.
Anyway, probably for those two it would be cheaper to convert them to civilian Cargo or to sell them to Cuba or Iran, if there is no practical use domestically.
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°156
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
They rejected the IL-96 tanker for esclating cost reason , It seems RuAF could buy 2 plus tanker for the cost of one 1 IL-96
Hole- Posts : 11099
Points : 11077
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
- Post n°157
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
GarryB- Posts : 40443
Points : 40943
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°158
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
They rejected the IL-96 tanker for esclating cost reason , It seems RuAF could buy 2 plus tanker for the cost of one 1 IL-96
But the two tankers they get wont be the same... they will be Il-78 tankers based on the Il-476, while the Il-96 is faster, able to cruise around the place much more efficiently, and carries more fuel that it can offload to another aircraft.
Very simply a fleet of Il-78s and of course you can fuel a flight of Tu-22M3s bombing Syria, but with Il-96 based tankers you can refuel them closer to the place they are bombing and fill them up with fewer tankers.
Il-96 tankers would be excellent for the strategic nuclear cruise missile carriers they have and are building because fewer aircraft can fill up more aircraft and they can operate at higher flight speeds so fuel the aircraft closer to their targets...
The money invested in the Il-96 aircraft will also boost production numbers and reduce the price for other customers and with the military for other potential roles...
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°159
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
FLIGHT REPORT / REDWINGS TUPOLEV 204 / SIMFEROPOL - ST PETERSBURG
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°160
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
COSMONAUT TRAINING CENTER RECEIVES TWO TU-204-300
https://www.aviaport.ru/news/2019/01/24/572581.html
https://www.aviaport.ru/news/2019/01/24/572581.html
The delivery of Tu-204-300 aircraft in the interests of the Cosmonaut Training Center will end in early 2019. PJSC "Tupolev" expects this year to continue maintaining the existing fleet of Tu-204 type aircraft, modernizing idle planes, including conversion into a cargo version, the interlocutor in the aviation industry told AviaPort. The following is a systematic summary of his interview.
Tu-204-300 aircraft for the Cosmonaut Training Center
Leasing Company "Ilyushin Finance Co." (IFC) transferred the Tu-204-300 aircraft with the tail number 64045 to the customer - Roscosmos State Corporation. Flight No. 64045 from Ulyanovsk to Chkalovsk, to the base of the CPC, is scheduled for January 2019.
The second machine of this type with the number 64044 will be handed over to the customer as soon as possible. Both liners are designed to operate in the interests of the Cosmonaut Training Center (CPC).
For the CPK were selected aircraft in the modification of the Tu-204-300, owned by IFC, these machines were previously operated by Vladivostok Avia. At the Ulyanovsk aircraft factory "Aviastar-SP" the aircraft were re-equipped according to the documentation of PJSC "Tupolev" to the requirements of the CPC.
reference
As previously reported, the purchase of the CPC of two Tu-204-300 aircraft became known in 2015. All subsequent years were carried out their conversion for the transport of astronauts and tests. Each plane has three separate cabins with the necessary medical equipment and places for accompanying persons. The planes were supposed to go to the CPC back in 2016-2017. For their purchase and modernization Roskosmos from the budget was allocated 3.3 billion rubles. Currently, astronauts fly to Baikonur on Tu-134 planes.
The aircraft in the modification of the Tu-204-300 differ from the base certified Tu-204-100 aircraft with a shorter fuselage and an increased range of flight. Both aircraft transferred to Roskosmos underwent a small amount of flight tests required before handing over aircraft to the customer (only a few test flights for each of the aircraft). After receiving the Supplement to the Aircraft Type Certificate for the main change - changes in the interior, the procedure for processing materials and documents for transferring the aircraft to customers was carried out. It should be noted that before re-equipping both planes to the requirements of the Cosmonaut Training Center, they stood for about five years without any operation. It is this fact that caused some difficulties with the testing of aircraft for the Center due to the failure of systems and equipment that were long standing "
Some results of work in 2018
In 2018, Aviastar-SP converted and handed over to customers two Tu-204 aircraft: the Tu-204-300 No. 64014 ordered by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation and the Tu-204-100V No. 64056 of the new production, manufactured in Ulyanovsk by order of the company "Sogaz".
At the end of 2018, the certificate for aircraft No. 64053, which had previously successfully passed flight tests for major changes, and received all the materials and documents for completed tests, was revoked. Now the question of the future fate of the Tu-204-300 No. 64053 is being resolved.
In 2019, it is planned to re-equip in the interests of state customers and transfer two more "Vladivostok" aircraft such as Tu-204-300 No. 64026 ("Salon" for Rosgvardi) and No. 64039 ("Salon" for "
Possible order of Cuba to repair previously delivered aircraft
Today, the Russian side in terms of sales of Tu-204 aircraft is negotiating with a number of potential foreign customers, including Egypt and China. The conclusion of a contract with Cuba for the repair of previously delivered Tu-204 aircraft is also expected. The Cuban side finally found the money and paid off the debt, which was “hanging” behind Cuba for a long time for civil aircraft equipment. Cubans were going to come to Russia in December last year, but postponed the visit to March 2019. We are talking about the flight of Cuban Russian-made aircraft to Ulyanovsk to restore the airworthiness of three aircraft, but the Cubans have some suggestions for improving the Tu-204 during their repair.
Re-equipment of the Tu-204 under the air cargo for the "Russian Post"
In connection with a significant fleet of non-operated Tu-204 series aircraft, the question arises of their further operation after appropriate re-equipment. For example, the IFC wants to convert old Tu-204 aircraft into "trucks" in the interests of the Russian Post. According to preliminary estimates, the need of "Post of Russia" in the "truck" is up to 10 cars. Moreover, for today, "Mail of Russia" successfully exploits two aircraft of this type, and they have proven themselves well.
Re-equipment of airplanes for cargo air transportation is quite simple, not time consuming. Now there are a lot of old cars, for example, it is possible to re-equip such cars as №№ 64018, 64019, 64020. In addition, the Red Wings airline "moved" to Airbus, and its Tu-204 planes "stand at the fence."
The developer of the Tu planes leaves no hope for the possibility of resuming work on the most modern Tu-204 family - Tu-204CM aircraft. Some hopes for this are the difficulties that have arisen with the MS-21 aircraft, primarily on the wing and the tail of composite materials. However, for the Tu-204SM, some difficulties associated with the power plant remain. For the Tu-204SM engines require slightly more thrust than the PD-14. Perm aircraft engine developers can modify the PS-90A2 series of engines under the Tu-204SM, but the Perm order requires an initial order for the Tu-204SM.
In addition, the question remains on the production base. The aircraft plant in Ulyanovsk has a very high load in the framework of the state defense order for the Il-76MD-90A military transport aircraft and its modifications, including fuel-servicing trucks, as well as for upgrading the Il-76MD combat aircraft to the Il-76MD-M and Il-78 / 78M fuel-servicing trucks , as well as the repair of aircraft An-124.
A total of 8-10 Tu-204 aircraft are on the Aviastar today, but mostly they are “long” Tu-204-100 type vehicles. In addition, there are still Tu-204-300 aircraft with a "short fuselage", previously owned by the Vladivostok airline. Some of these aircraft are being converted. In fact, the Ulyanovsk Aviastar is constantly renting out several Tu-204 planes to various customers. However, so far there is practically no outfitting of aircraft available at various stages of production from the production reserve of the aircraft factory, as a rule, aircraft that were previously in operation and now are "standing at the fence."
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°161
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
[ltr]U.S. Sanctions Force MC-21 Course Correction[/ltr]
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/air-transport/2019-01-24/us-sanctions-force-mc-21-course-correction
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/air-transport/2019-01-24/us-sanctions-force-mc-21-course-correction
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°162
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
I think it is a matter of time US will sanction P&W engine better get this baby certified by LEAP besides PD-14
As I was researching on MS-21 program for my new write up for blog I realised this aircraft is very sophisticated and far more spacious yet cheaper compared to even the latest A-320NEO and 737MAX ...
US will eventually sanction this program because Boeing does not any thing to compete with this new modern bird , it is still competing with 60 737 Design that cannot grow in diameter hence internal volume affecting Passenger and Cargo significantly
As I was researching on MS-21 program for my new write up for blog I realised this aircraft is very sophisticated and far more spacious yet cheaper compared to even the latest A-320NEO and 737MAX ...
US will eventually sanction this program because Boeing does not any thing to compete with this new modern bird , it is still competing with 60 737 Design that cannot grow in diameter hence internal volume affecting Passenger and Cargo significantly
GarryB- Posts : 40443
Points : 40943
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°163
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Yeah... sanctions have nothing to do with Russia being aggressive or not... and everything to do with Russia being competitive on the open international trade market... America is afraid of being replaced or no longer needed...
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°164
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
I was looking at latest Boeing Sales projection for period till 2037
https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2018-07-17-Boeing-Forecasts-15-Trillion-Commercial-Airplanes-and-Services-Market
The total sales for Russia/CIS is 1,290 aircraft worth $265 billion.
I think Russia itself would make for more than half of it around $150 billion.
If US sanctions Superjet or MS-21 program then Russia should sanction Boeing for any sale to Russia and ban Boeing Aircraft that will be a big loss to them and Gain for Airbus.
Either use Airbus aircraft and eventually use only Russian ones , Plus stop Titanium supply to Boeing
https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2018-07-17-Boeing-Forecasts-15-Trillion-Commercial-Airplanes-and-Services-Market
The total sales for Russia/CIS is 1,290 aircraft worth $265 billion.
I think Russia itself would make for more than half of it around $150 billion.
If US sanctions Superjet or MS-21 program then Russia should sanction Boeing for any sale to Russia and ban Boeing Aircraft that will be a big loss to them and Gain for Airbus.
Either use Airbus aircraft and eventually use only Russian ones , Plus stop Titanium supply to Boeing
Tsavo Lion- Posts : 5960
Points : 5912
Join date : 2016-08-15
Location : AZ, USA
- Post n°165
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
They don't produce enough planes that can compete with Boeing & they still need $. They could raise overflight fees to bankrupt a few airlines, forcing them to sell their planes & lower their prices. then they won't need to buy new Boeing made planes.
But sanctions may not affect them that much to justify it.
Time will tell!
But sanctions may not affect them that much to justify it.
Time will tell!
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°166
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Tsavo Lion wrote:They don't produce enough planes that can compete with Boeing & they still need $. They could raise overflight fees to bankrupt a few airlines, forcing them to sell their planes & lower their prices. then they won't need to buy new Boeing made planes.
But sanctions may not affect them that much to justify it.
Time will tell!
They dont need to compete with Boeing initially just need to replace B737/A320 within Russia and CIS that should be the target.
They need to ban Boeing in Russia first that would take away a substantial share of Boeing aircraft to Russian Market and Airbus entry into Russia should be case by case basis , That will also improve EU-Russian relation
But ultimately they should replace Narrow , Wide and Short range aircraft with Russian Designed and Built ones.
Austin- Posts : 7617
Points : 8014
Join date : 2010-05-08
Location : India
- Post n°167
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
MS-21 tests will be completed in the second half of 2020
https://www.aviaport.ru/digest/2019/01/28/573287.htmlLast edited by Austin on Mon Jan 28, 2019 5:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Tsavo Lion- Posts : 5960
Points : 5912
Join date : 2016-08-15
Location : AZ, USA
- Post n°168
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
The reason they got so many of them after 1991 is that Soviet made planes weren't economical for the airlines to operate.They dont need to compete with Boeing initially just need to replace B737/A320 within Russia and CIS that should be the target.
To replace B-737 & A-320s, they'll need to produce many MS-21s & SSJs, &/ re-engine the older planes, but that will take years.
Rodion_Romanovic- Posts : 2636
Points : 2805
Join date : 2015-12-30
Location : Merkelland
- Post n°169
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Tsavo Lion wrote:The reason they got so many of them after 1991 is that Soviet made planes weren't economical for the airlines to operate.They dont need to compete with Boeing initially just need to replace B737/A320 within Russia and CIS that should be the target.
To replace B-737 & A-320s, they'll need to produce many MS-21s & SSJs, &/ re-engine the older planes, but that will take years.
The main reason was the corruption of many russian officials and the criminal behavior from Boeing. The PS90 engine on the Tu 204 was not much worse than the engine on the older generation 737.
Tsavo Lion- Posts : 5960
Points : 5912
Join date : 2016-08-15
Location : AZ, USA
- Post n°170
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Well, I agree, but it can't be undone. Producing more Tu-204s will also take years.
GarryB- Posts : 40443
Points : 40943
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°171
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Of course it can be undone... ban Russian airlines from buying non Russian made aircraft.
To operate in Russian skies an airline must operate at least one Russian made airliner in its inventory... including those airlines who want overflights.
Right now the Russians are selective as to who gets overflight rights between Russia and Asia... and lots of small western airlines not on that list are really shitty about it... but tough... no aircraft has a right to fly over Russian territory...
To operate in Russian skies an airline must operate at least one Russian made airliner in its inventory... including those airlines who want overflights.
Right now the Russians are selective as to who gets overflight rights between Russia and Asia... and lots of small western airlines not on that list are really shitty about it... but tough... no aircraft has a right to fly over Russian territory...
Tsavo Lion- Posts : 5960
Points : 5912
Join date : 2016-08-15
Location : AZ, USA
- Post n°172
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
That may lead many, if not all, to go out of business, or be subsided by the government, as there r not enough Russian made planes that burn as much fuel per mile as the Western made models.Of course it can be undone... ban Russian airlines from buying non Russian made aircraft.
1st, the "white tail" fleet must be built for those airlines to lease/buy planes from, not the other way around.
GarryB- Posts : 40443
Points : 40943
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°173
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
It is their country and they can do what they like... America punishes foreign countries for buying Russian weapons, Russia can introduce a Boeing tax so that Boeing using airlines of Russian origin or operating on or over Russian airspace have to pay an extra fee if they operate over Russian airspace...
If a Russian company uses all Boeing aircraft... I suspect they are probably not going out of their way to pay proper taxes in Russia either... who cares if they fold... that is just a challenge for patriotic Russians to try their hand in a more open market that is rigged in their favour if they choose aircraft more patriotically...
Don't expect Russian planes to just enter the market naturally... any push from Russian lawmakers is of benefit and actually in the current world economy nobody seems to care about WTO rules anyway because the US is using sanctions as a weapon anyway.
Who cares if the Russian planes are not so efficient to start off with... their new Boeing tax will generate income that can be divided up amongst Russian national airlines for each Russian aircraft they operate... that will more than offset the differences in costs if there are any...
If a Russian company uses all Boeing aircraft... I suspect they are probably not going out of their way to pay proper taxes in Russia either... who cares if they fold... that is just a challenge for patriotic Russians to try their hand in a more open market that is rigged in their favour if they choose aircraft more patriotically...
Don't expect Russian planes to just enter the market naturally... any push from Russian lawmakers is of benefit and actually in the current world economy nobody seems to care about WTO rules anyway because the US is using sanctions as a weapon anyway.
Who cares if the Russian planes are not so efficient to start off with... their new Boeing tax will generate income that can be divided up amongst Russian national airlines for each Russian aircraft they operate... that will more than offset the differences in costs if there are any...
Tsavo Lion- Posts : 5960
Points : 5912
Join date : 2016-08-15
Location : AZ, USA
- Post n°174
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Import dues were paid to bring those planes to Russia.I suspect they are probably not going out of their way to pay proper taxes in Russia either... who cares if they fold...
Thousands of people will loose jobs & means of transportation in a huge country, disrupting the economy, including around the Black Sea resorts.
Airport fees may be increased for Russian airlines at Western airports to offset that in retaliation. They may even withdraw planes' certification to operate in their airspace...their new Boeing tax will generate income that can be divided up amongst Russian national airlines for each Russian aircraft they operate..
If it was that easy, they would have done it a long time ago.
Rodion_Romanovic- Posts : 2636
Points : 2805
Join date : 2015-12-30
Location : Merkelland
- Post n°175
Re: Russian Civil Aviation: News #3
Tsavo Lion wrote:Import dues were paid to bring those planes to Russia.I suspect they are probably not going out of their way to pay proper taxes in Russia either... who cares if they fold...
Thousands of people will loose jobs & means of transportation in a huge country, disrupting the economy, including around the Black Sea resorts.
Airport fees may be increased for Russian airlines at Western airports to offset that in retaliation. They may even withdraw planes' certification to operate in their airspace...their new Boeing tax will generate income that can be divided up amongst Russian national airlines for each Russian aircraft they operate..
If it was that easy, they would have done it a long time ago.
America uses import taxes in many areas.
Boeing has been (directly or indirectly) subsidized by the american goverment for years, and the same happened in EU with Airbus.
They do not need to do drastic changes, just request that for russian companies at least a third of the new orders are for russian aircrafts (if available in the market) (increasing maybe that to one half in the future), and put some taxes for those airlines who operates too many foreign produced aircrafts.
The MC-21-300 is in the same class of the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320, but will have a larger and more.confortable cabin and better fuel efficiency.
They could even convince some western low cost airlines similar to easyjet to adopt them, if the business case is better than for the A320.
The MC-21-200 (the shortened version, that will be certified a bit later) is in the same class of the A220-300 (ex bombardier CS300) (about 130 passengers in 2 classes or up to 160 in economy). A Russian company recently did large orders for the A220-300. They could be convinced to change part of their orders, maybe.
The Tu-204 could take the segment above it, similar to the old Boeing 757, and displacing some of the Airbus A321 from the russian market, at least until the MC-21-400 will be ready.
The only relative problem is that the higher thrust engine of the PD-14 family (PD-18R) is not ready yet, but it could share the upgraded older generation PS-90 a3m with the Il-96 400M.
(Boeng is also betting on the replacement for the 757, so a modern western engine of that thrust should be available in a few years).
For the regional segment the situation is even better, they have the ssj100 and in a few years both the import substitution version and the shortened, 75 passengers versions will be available.
In addition, the turboprops il-114 (64/68 passengers) and the modernised let-610 willbe able to take the segments of the An-140 and ATR 72 and ATR-42