@Syrian_MC
For the first time since the beginning of the operations in #Idlib
The EW units began jamming on the enemy communications.
Has I said Erdo is an EXPERT at controlling the minds and hearts of his people. The Government and every other structure of power is firmly under his control, Not even by force, they are die-hard loyal to him. Sure maybe some people oppose it but the mass doesn't in fact they love. In their minds, Erdo is bringing them something they long lost. In their minds Erdo is making Turkey powerful again because of this he has the admiration of his people.
Isos wrote:Has I said Erdo is an EXPERT at controlling the minds and hearts of his people. The Government and every other structure of power is firmly under his control, Not even by force, they are die-hard loyal to him. Sure maybe some people oppose it but the mass doesn't in fact they love. In their minds, Erdo is bringing them something they long lost. In their minds Erdo is making Turkey powerful again because of this he has the admiration of his people.
Not really. Turks are overestimating Turkey and most of the time, like you see on twitter, they don't support Erdogan but support Turkey.
No matter which turk it is, if you start complaining about their country they will go wild.
I don't think they really care if it's Erdogan or another guy.
Erdogan controls some people and put the rest in jail. The turkish people is kinda controled by their own "patriotism" which Erdogan always talk about in his speeches.
That's why he is so affraid of being removed because any other politician can talk as he does but they can also stabilize Turkey more than what he does right now. Economical failure, support of terrorism, war in Lybia, dead turkish soldiers, tensions with Cyprus/EU ... soon economical sanctions.
He is not strong at all. He doesn't even trust its army, he send them in jail or die in Syria/Lybia. How long before he gets removed ? I would say very fast.
ATLASCUB wrote:Russia lost a plane and pilot at the hands of the Turkish army, in one of the most public challenges to their power and prestige not seen since the Ukranian maidan, and the response was sanctions, not direct, eye for an eye, military response. People pay attention and take note - who does what when pushed in this certain manner, to inform their decisions.
Russian pilots also fell at the hand of anti-air weaponry provided through Turkey. The plane downing also paraded. For that no economic sanctions came, nor do many for the numbers of Russian dead through proxy funded, and kept fed by Turkey.
Isos wrote:
ELINT News
@ELINTNews
·
1h
#BREAKING: Turkish Ministry of Defence confirms Turkey shot down a Syrian L-39 warplane over Idlib
ahmedfire wrote:Isos wrote:
ELINT News
@ELINTNews
·
1h
#BREAKING: Turkish Ministry of Defence confirms Turkey shot down a Syrian L-39 warplane over Idlib
Why are they doing the same mistakes , sending L-39 and in the presence of F-16 around equipped with Amraam !!?
yes, the Anka S are limited ti about 200kg payload, the other drone about 50 kg.Isos wrote:One thing people didn't notice is that those turkish drones carry mostly very light bombs/atgm style weapon with very small kill radius. And the drones are very slow.
It's not enough to stop an army even if they kill some hardware.
Russian however use a huge su-34 with big bombs, and even the smaller being around 200kg can blow up a building. And they are fast jets coming from a base near the frontline.
Big difference.
Rodion_Romanovic wrote:yes, the Anka S are limited ti about 200kg payload, the other drone about 50 kg.Isos wrote:One thing people didn't notice is that those turkish drones carry mostly very light bombs/atgm style weapon with very small kill radius. And the drones are very slow.
It's not enough to stop an army even if they kill some hardware.
Russian however use a huge su-34 with big bombs, and even the smaller being around 200kg can blow up a building. And they are fast jets coming from a base near the frontline.
Big difference.
To have a comparison, the iranian shahed 129 has 400 kg of payload, and the american MQ1 predator has similar speck to the iranian drone.
(They all have slow speed and four cylinder engines similar to those used on small light aircrafts, and the predator and the Iranian drone use the same engine (115 hp Rotax 914).
the american MQ9 reaper is instead quite larger, with 900 hp turboprop engines, higher cruise speed (about 300km/h) and larger payload (680 kg), longer range but shorter endurance (14 h vs 24 h of the Anka and of the Predator).
I do not know if Russia is developing something on this class, since I believe the Orion-E is mainly for reconnaissance, while the s70 okhotnik is much bigger, fast and expensive... it would be like comparing a boat armed with a small gun to a destroyer...
Rodion_Romanovic wrote:
the american MQ9 reaper is instead quite larger, with 900 hp turboprop engines, higher cruise speed (about 300km/h) and larger payload (680 kg), longer range but shorter endurance (14 h vs 24 h of the Anka and of the Predator).
Rodion_Romanovic wrote:Rodion_Romanovic wrote:
the american MQ9 reaper is instead quite larger, with 900 hp turboprop engines, higher cruise speed (about 300km/h) and larger payload (680 kg), longer range but shorter endurance (14 h vs 24 h of the Anka and of the Predator).
By the way, the russian turboprop engine VK-800 that will be used on the baikal aircraft and on the Let-410 is perfect to power a drone of the size and characteristics of the american MQ9 reaper....
possibly, in this case it shows again the difference between the reaper and the smaller Turkish drone.SeigSoloyvov wrote:Rodion_Romanovic wrote:Rodion_Romanovic wrote:
the american MQ9 reaper is instead quite larger, with 900 hp turboprop engines, higher cruise speed (about 300km/h) and larger payload (680 kg), longer range but shorter endurance (14 h vs 24 h of the Anka and of the Predator).
By the way, the russian turboprop engine VK-800 that will be used on the baikal aircraft and on the Let-410 is perfect to power a drone of the size and characteristics of the american MQ9 reaper....
You made anincorrect statement let me clarify.
Payload: 1700 kg, External is about 1400 and it's Internal is like 360
Rodion_Romanovic wrote:possibly, in this case it shows again the difference between the reaper and the smaller Turkish drone.SeigSoloyvov wrote:Rodion_Romanovic wrote:Rodion_Romanovic wrote:
the american MQ9 reaper is instead quite larger, with 900 hp turboprop engines, higher cruise speed (about 300km/h) and larger payload (680 kg), longer range but shorter endurance (14 h vs 24 h of the Anka and of the Predator).
By the way, the russian turboprop engine VK-800 that will be used on the baikal aircraft and on the Let-410 is perfect to power a drone of the size and characteristics of the american MQ9 reaper....
You made anincorrect statement let me clarify.
Payload: 1700 kg, External is about 1400 and it's Internal is like 360
Both of them are anyway quite vulnerable to proper anti air defences...
I mean a drone like the reaper could be quite useful for some applications, but of course it is not a substitute for front line aviation.
I believe that, anyway, the main reason why Russia did not develop it until now was the lack (until now) of a suitable domestic engine...