Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+44
xeno
Krepost
Firebird
Arkanghelsk
TMA1
Bob Bollusc
Shadåw
ALAMO
Russian_Patriot_
Mir
x_54_u43
bren_tann
limb
Backman
franco
Rasisuki Nebia
Tai Hai Chen
Sujoy
GarryB
mnztr
magnumcromagnon
william.boutros
kvs
Cyberspec
wilhelm
The-thing-next-door
medo
marat
Hole
TheArmenian
SeigSoloyvov
George1
owais.usmani
ult
LMFS
Arrow
PapaDragon
JohninMK
Big_Gazza
Isos
dino00
Rodion_Romanovic
marcellogo
hoom
48 posters

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Krepost
    Krepost


    Posts : 782
    Points : 784
    Join date : 2021-12-08

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Krepost Sun Dec 19, 2021 7:00 pm

    Firebird wrote:Is there any confirmation anywhere as to what these 2 ships will actually weigh?

    I've heard reports of between 25k tons and around 40k tons.
    I think Tass mentioned 40k tons somewhere (I'm not sure). And Tass are unlikely to be wrong?
    There doesn't seem to be official confirmation anywhere.

    They want you (and everybody else) to keep guessing.
    I am not joking.
    avatar
    Firebird


    Posts : 1808
    Points : 1838
    Join date : 2011-10-14

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Firebird Sun Dec 19, 2021 8:50 pm

    Krepost wrote:
    Firebird wrote:Is there any confirmation anywhere as to what these 2 ships will actually weigh?

    I've heard reports of between 25k tons and around 40k tons.
    I think Tass mentioned 40k tons somewhere (I'm not sure). And Tass are unlikely to be wrong?
    There doesn't seem to be official confirmation anywhere.

    They want you (and everybody else) to keep guessing.
    I am not joking.

    Can't be that hard for someone (with tech knowldege) to work it out. Given that the ships have been laid down? : /
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40521
    Points : 41021
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  GarryB Mon Dec 20, 2021 7:41 am

    Depends how long they want to operate at sea... initially they said it would be slightly heavier than the Mistrals at about 30K ton, but the government official quoted 40K which is a problem... is that standard weight is that overload weight... we really don't know.

    I suspect they probably looked at all the new armour and new helicopters and all the new gear their naval infantry are likely to be getting over the next few years and made it heavier.

    No one ever complained at a ship being too big, but a ship that is too small for the next upgrade is a common problem... more so on British ships ironically because they tend to make small modern missiles and weapons so when it comes time to upgrade the new system can often be just as small but they want more of them like a SAM or something.

    In comparison with Soviet vessels they looked cluttered with all the electronics and sensors and weapons and equipment they crammed on and the new missiles and weapons are often smaller and lighter but also much better than the previous systems.

    For instance Metel anti sub rocket powered missiles that dropped torpedoes on target like the Ikara Aussie missile is huge, while the 91ER1 that replaces it is better all round and much more compact and can be loaded and launched from a torpedo tube.

    A 50km range 533mm torpedo gets replaced by a 400mm torpedo with a 20km range but a solid ballistic rocket that carries it 40km at mach 2, so the target gets less warning and the torpedo has a better chance for a kill.

    The new electronics would free up loads of space for extra equipment and systems too because the older Soviet ships tended to be bigger than they needed to be with extra radars instead of sharing, so the SAM might have a radar and an anti ship missile system might have its own radar too and the ships main search and tracking radar and another radar for the large calibre guns...

    Another aspect is that they talked about the new ships as having slightly different roles where one is a pure landing ship and the other has a more drone focus, which might be interesting... perhaps landing ship in the Pacific fleet for the Kuriles and also potentially for disaster relief in the pacific ring of fire... for earthquakes and volcanic eruptions as well as storms and floods etc, while based in Tartus a drone focused ship with more special forces landing forces of high mobility with Typhoon rather than Kurganets or Boomerang type platforms and of course helicopters and hovercraft and landing ships and subs etc as well as drone aircraft and subs and surface ships...

    Hopefully they will be a success and they make two of each that can be operated together to support each others operations... would be good to see it supporting Egyptian Mistrals in the Med...
    avatar
    Firebird


    Posts : 1808
    Points : 1838
    Join date : 2011-10-14

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Firebird Mon Dec 20, 2021 3:14 pm

    I noticed with other countries's amph ships, it seems fully laden vs empty can add 10 or 11k tons.
    China's and America's seem around the 40k ton mark. The Rogov is similar width but slightly shorter than the US Wasps. So 40k tons seems very possible.

    Those Okhotnik drones could be very dangerous features.

    Maybe the usage will determine the final tonnage.
    Anyway, all in all, its nice to see Russia getting back to producing big ships (amph ships, nuclear icebreakers, and of course large subs).
    With the frigates and heavy cruiser refits, and of course the Indian aircraft carrier, its clear Russia isn't that far removed from building say.. a full aircraft carrier. That of course could be seen as the complete rebirth of Russia's naval shipbuilding from Soviet times.

    GarryB likes this post

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13471
    Points : 13511
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  PapaDragon Wed Dec 22, 2021 12:25 am


    Scale model of the damn thing was accidentally filmed during acceptance day for nuke subs, not much though, behind VVP on the left:

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 E554ca0b7310

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 21-10317765-udk-1

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 1222

    It's like analysing sat photos with this stuff angry




    This was also posted on same tread but I have no Idea what it is so take a guess:
    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 A4241448b6c8


    George1, Arrow, LMFS, Hole, Rasisuki Nebia, Lennox and Arkanghelsk like this post

    Krepost
    Krepost


    Posts : 782
    Points : 784
    Join date : 2021-12-08

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Krepost Wed Dec 22, 2021 12:34 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Scale model of the damn thing was accidentally filmed during acceptance day for nuke subs, not much though, behind VVP on the left:


    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 21-10317765-udk-1

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 1222

    This was also posted on same tread but I have no Idea what it is so take  a guess:
    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 A4241448b6c8



    Helicopter between Ka-52 and Ka-27 is the expected MINOGA.

    Last photo: Whatever it is, it looks like has the hull of an icebreaker.

    Edit: I figured it out, it is Project 1550 Khaski (Husky).

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 16296210

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 37017210

    franco, George1, LMFS, Lennox and Arkanghelsk like this post

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13471
    Points : 13511
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  PapaDragon Wed Dec 22, 2021 3:40 am

    Krepost wrote:...
    Last photo: Whatever it is, it looks like has the hull of an icebreaker.

    Edit: I figured it out, it is Project 1550 Khaski (Husky)....

    Thanks thumbsup

    So Husky would be some kind of Arctic logistics vessel?

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40521
    Points : 41021
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  GarryB Wed Dec 22, 2021 10:37 am

    Helicopter between Ka-52 and Ka-27 is the expected MINOGA.

    Looking at its size compared with the Mi-8, I was thinking it might be an Mi-38 navalised... but the coaxial rotors suggest it is the Minoga.
    avatar
    owais.usmani


    Posts : 1825
    Points : 1821
    Join date : 2019-03-27
    Age : 38

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  owais.usmani Wed Dec 22, 2021 11:12 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Scale model of the damn thing was accidentally filmed during acceptance day for nuke subs, not much though, behind VVP on the left:

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 E554ca0b7310

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 21-10317765-udk-1

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 1222

    It's like analysing sat photos with this stuff angry




    This was also posted on same tread but I have no Idea what it is so take  a guess:
    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 A4241448b6c8



    Can you post the video from where these screen shots are taken?
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5158
    Points : 5154
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  LMFS Wed Dec 22, 2021 11:34 am

    GarryB wrote:Looking at its size compared with the Mi-8, I was thinking it might be an Mi-38 navalised... but the coaxial rotors suggest it is the Minoga.

    Yes, it looks definitely like the leaked photo we saw before. But I am failing to discern the tail, which would be the most interesting part in order to confirm or deny whether it has a pusher propeller angry
    avatar
    ALAMO


    Posts : 7478
    Points : 7568
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  ALAMO Wed Dec 22, 2021 11:42 am

    Considering the scale, this thing will be BIG.
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11116
    Points : 11094
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Hole Wed Dec 22, 2021 11:56 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Krepost wrote:...
    Last photo: Whatever it is, it looks like has the hull of an icebreaker.

    Edit: I figured it out, it is Project 1550 Khaski (Husky)....

    Thanks thumbsup

    So Husky would be some kind of Arctic logistics vessel?


    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 000191

    franco, PapaDragon, zardof and LMFS like this post

    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11116
    Points : 11094
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Hole Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:42 pm

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 000193
    Also on display.
    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 000725

    PapaDragon and LMFS like this post

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13471
    Points : 13511
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  PapaDragon Wed Dec 22, 2021 10:09 pm

    LMFS wrote:
    GarryB wrote:Looking at its size compared with the Mi-8, I was thinking it might be an Mi-38 navalised... but the coaxial rotors suggest it is the Minoga.

    Yes, it looks definitely like the leaked photo we saw before. But I am failing to discern the tail, which would be the most interesting part in order to confirm or deny whether it has a pusher propeller angry

    Minoga won't have a pusher propeller, that's going on new high-speed helicopter

    And we already saw Minoga tail

    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5158
    Points : 5154
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  LMFS Wed Dec 22, 2021 10:30 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:Minoga won't have a pusher propeller, that's going on new high-speed helicopter

    And we already saw Minoga tail

    No we didn't see it, and there are other qualified opinions thinking that it may indeed have such propeller. But we will see
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13471
    Points : 13511
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  PapaDragon Wed Dec 22, 2021 10:38 pm

    LMFS wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:Minoga won't have a pusher propeller, that's going on new high-speed helicopter

    And we already saw Minoga tail

    No we didn't see it, and there are other qualified opinions thinking that it may indeed have such propeller. But we will see

    To get any mileage from pusher propeller the helicopter needs to have reinforced main rotor otherwise blades will start acting funny as speed goes up

    From everything we seen so far Minoga will have standard main rotor

    Besides they gone official on this, no need for qualified opinions, they were pretty clear: Minoga with standard coaxial rotor and new high-speed helicopter with pusher propeller and inter-meshing rotor


    avatar
    owais.usmani


    Posts : 1825
    Points : 1821
    Join date : 2019-03-27
    Age : 38

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  owais.usmani Sat Jul 16, 2022 12:05 pm

    https://flotprom.ru/2022/%D0%A1%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%889/

    Design Bureau "Sevmash" has developed bearings for universal landing ships (helicopter carriers) of project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" and "Mitrofan Moskalenko", which are being built at the plant "Zaliv" in Kerch. This was announced on Thursday, July 7, in the press service of the Severodvinsk enterprise.

    The bearings will be manufactured at Sevmash. An order for their production has been opened in the machine shop No. 4, the press service of the shipyard specified. The first set is planned to be delivered to the Crimean shipyard in July 2023, the second - in 2024.

    GarryB, LMFS, Hole and Belisarius like this post

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 3450
    Points : 3440
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Arrow Mon Aug 15, 2022 3:54 pm

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 6b231b35408ec
    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 E803c0dfb35b3

    Big_Gazza, PapaDragon, tomazy, LMFS, Hole, Mir, Broski and Belisarius like this post

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13471
    Points : 13511
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  PapaDragon Tue Aug 16, 2022 1:33 am


    Two from the other end, more in the link

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 9780391_1000

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 9780674_1000

    https://bmpd.livejournal.com/4572075.html


    George1, Big_Gazza, LMFS, Hole, Mir and Broski like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40521
    Points : 41021
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  GarryB Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:41 pm

    Serious lack of air defence systems...

    JohninMK and LMFS like this post

    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5158
    Points : 5154
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  LMFS Tue Aug 16, 2022 6:15 pm

    GarryB wrote:Serious lack of air defence systems...

    I thought the same... after the SMO even patrol boats need to be armed with AD to the teeth, I am not sure VMF will take it like that...
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13471
    Points : 13511
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  PapaDragon Tue Aug 16, 2022 10:15 pm

    GarryB wrote:Serious lack of air defence systems...

    That's what escorts are supposed to do

    It would be extremely idiotic to send a single ship alone into range of enemy anti-ship missiles

    It might get sunk


    owais.usmani, Mir, Broski and Arkanghelsk like this post

    Arkanghelsk
    Arkanghelsk


    Posts : 3899
    Points : 3905
    Join date : 2021-12-08

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Arkanghelsk Wed Aug 17, 2022 12:43 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    GarryB wrote:Serious lack of air defence systems...

    That's what escorts are supposed to do

    It would be extremely idiotic to send a single ship alone into range of enemy anti-ship missiles

    It might get sunk



    Lmfao - couldn't agree more, and if VMF didn't get the memo from first hand experience

    I wouldn't invest in new ships anyway if they get used the way the old flagship was

    Even if you have 48 cells of S300 Fort, and 64 cells of Osa, and 6 CIWS Kashtan, it makes no difference if your commander is a fucking idiot who sails into AsHm range with no escort and unaware of shore battery,

    Better just staying at Port on such a day

    PapaDragon likes this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40521
    Points : 41021
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  GarryB Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:11 am

    That's what escorts are supposed to do

    At the very least the ship has to be able to defend itself, escorts might be defending themselves and not have the director channels to also defend these ships...

    A 40K ton ship with two Pantsir/Kashtan turrets is absolutely pathetic... it is not like they don't have the space.

    It would be extremely idiotic to send a single ship alone into range of enemy anti-ship missiles

    It would, but when under attack it also needs to be able to defend itself too... it is an important target and would be a priority target for the enemy if only because it carries 1,000 Russian Naval Infantry and their armour...

    It might get sunk

    Anything that floats can be sunk.

    The new USKS-M seems to incorporate all sorts of things including land attack and anti ship and anti sub missiles but also various SAM types and also drones and decoy and self defence equipment. Being equipped with two UKSK-M launchers in each corner of the ship would mean 64 potential launch tubes for land attack or anti ship or anti sub weapons, but also air defence missiles and anti torpedo missiles like PAKET...

    At the moment they are talking about a helicopter landing carrier and a drone support carrier, but there are other potential uses for this design including anti sub with extra helicopters and drones etc or a hospital ship for disaster zones and humanitarian missions for droughts or floods or earthquakes or famine.

    I wouldn't invest in new ships anyway if they get used the way the old flagship was

    You are right... no ships at all... just let the west strangle you and isolate you till you cry and become their little bitch.

    Even if you have 48 cells of S300 Fort, and 64 cells of Osa, and 6 CIWS Kashtan, it makes no difference if your commander is a fucking idiot who sails into AsHm range with no escort and unaware of shore battery,

    When was Kashtan added?

    64 cells of Fort, two twin armed OSA launchers with 40 missiles in total and 6 AK-630 gatling gun mounts... and very few upgrades since it entered service.

    Please tell us more about it because you seem to know exactly what happened... no escort? Really?

    AShM range but not used against any other Russian shipping? Odd isn't it?

    Better just staying at Port on such a day

    Better recognising there are air threats around and upgrading air defences on all ships and not rely on ESCORTS.

    Ka-52s with R-74 and R-77 missiles and AESA radars would be very good at looking for and shooting down incoming air threats, but ship based SAMs can operate 24/7 in all weathers day and night... obviously operating with friendly cruisers and destroyers and a CVN or CV, but not being able to defend yourself is a serious liability in combat and peace time.

    Belisarius likes this post

    avatar
    ALAMO


    Posts : 7478
    Points : 7568
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  ALAMO Wed Aug 17, 2022 8:58 am

    I guess that there is some nice VLS system hidden somewhere we can't see.
    Russian Navy would benefit with a follower of Gibka system, that is several close range F&F missiles. Back in the 80s, they even tried a concept of stacking some missiles to the masts, facing several directions to cover all perimeter. A desperate idea I would say Laughing
    Besides, if we take a Chinese 071 type to compare, they have 2x RAM-like systems and 2x plain gun CIWS. Here you can see a double Pancyr, that combines both, so it has the same number of missile system, same gun systems - only combined. And the missiles are about 5-7x the range.

    owais.usmani likes this post


    Sponsored content


    Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship - Page 12 Empty Re: Project 23900 "Ivan Rogov" Amphibious assault ship

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Nov 18, 2024 12:28 pm