Russia isn't stupid, they know that the only real allies they have is its military and patriotic citizenry. India and China would turn on them in an instant if they didn't need Russia anymore.Sujoy wrote:Ukraine regularly votes against India at the UNSC but today India abstained from voting against Ukraine.
China abstained when it was supposed to vote for Russia.
India abstained when it was supposed to vote against Russia.
Russian special military operation in Ukraine #2
Broski- Posts : 772
Points : 770
Join date : 2021-07-12
magnumcromagnon, teh_beard, Odin of Ossetia, miketheterrible, ATLASCUB and Arkanghelsk like this post
Big_Gazza dislikes this post
EkErilaz- Posts : 125
Points : 127
Join date : 2022-02-24
Location : Scandinavia
Isos wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Regular wrote:EkErilaz wrote:zepia wrote:Some air defense still active in Kiev?
Yes s-300
there are pictures from launch
Like i said it is a AD guerilla war now I bet they are moving them around hide them in tunnels etc.
It is against rules of war to deploy it like that , but since russia has already lost the propaganda war on normies it will be ignored.
The problem for russia is that if the war turns to bloody, lets say massive strikes resulting in high numbers of civilian casualties.
portrayed in western media as deliberate massacres, NATO might not be able to reason with politicians and civilians and be forced to escalate.
NATO forced to escalate? With what? Glowniger faggot LGBTQ+ company? Let's be realistic. Their ability to escalate AT THE MOMENT is very limited.
Honestly, I was an active soldier for 10 year, and 6 years as a reservist, and yeah the political woke posturing is not making NATO look great.
I would never go back, due to diversity training etc alone. But make no mistake NATO has teeth especially when it comes to airpower and cruise missiles etc.
Make no mistake, i fully support Russia in this war. They have the high ground.
But I hang on the NATO fanboi OSINT pages as well, not partaking like here but it is good to know what the other side know, right. And they have with open source photo and radar satellites quite a good picture on russian deployment, rear areas, IADS shit like that. Imagine what a real NATO S2 shop would know. loosing logistics right now could kill the war, and quite frankly enough tomahawks could do that.
No one is invincible in war because they are on a particular side, and no weapon system is impossible to deploy in a way that it works perfectly, just look at the ork ballistic missiles that got thru the s-400 umbrella in Rostov. War is not fought with weapon specs, but with deception creativity and brutality.
Yeah in that situation the only thing that matters is if Topols and Bulavas will go through. Nothing else.
Russia made it clear. No conventional war with NATO. Fire a tomahawk you get one of your cities leveled.
I agree, and trust that they will do, but there are some delusional minds in NATO that might think it is a bluff.. If one nuke goes of, it is game over for all of us..
There is no such thing as a limited exchange.
magnumcromagnon likes this post
miketheterrible- Posts : 7383
Points : 7341
Join date : 2016-11-06
EkErilaz wrote:Isos wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Regular wrote:EkErilaz wrote:zepia wrote:Some air defense still active in Kiev?
Yes s-300
there are pictures from launch
Like i said it is a AD guerilla war now I bet they are moving them around hide them in tunnels etc.
It is against rules of war to deploy it like that , but since russia has already lost the propaganda war on normies it will be ignored.
The problem for russia is that if the war turns to bloody, lets say massive strikes resulting in high numbers of civilian casualties.
portrayed in western media as deliberate massacres, NATO might not be able to reason with politicians and civilians and be forced to escalate.
NATO forced to escalate? With what? Glowniger faggot LGBTQ+ company? Let's be realistic. Their ability to escalate AT THE MOMENT is very limited.
Honestly, I was an active soldier for 10 year, and 6 years as a reservist, and yeah the political woke posturing is not making NATO look great.
I would never go back, due to diversity training etc alone. But make no mistake NATO has teeth especially when it comes to airpower and cruise missiles etc.
Make no mistake, i fully support Russia in this war. They have the high ground.
But I hang on the NATO fanboi OSINT pages as well, not partaking like here but it is good to know what the other side know, right. And they have with open source photo and radar satellites quite a good picture on russian deployment, rear areas, IADS shit like that. Imagine what a real NATO S2 shop would know. loosing logistics right now could kill the war, and quite frankly enough tomahawks could do that.
No one is invincible in war because they are on a particular side, and no weapon system is impossible to deploy in a way that it works perfectly, just look at the ork ballistic missiles that got thru the s-400 umbrella in Rostov. War is not fought with weapon specs, but with deception creativity and brutality.
Yeah in that situation the only thing that matters is if Topols and Bulavas will go through. Nothing else.
Russia made it clear. No conventional war with NATO. Fire a tomahawk you get one of your cities leveled.
I agree, and trust that they will do, but there are some delusional minds in NATO that might think it is a bluff.. If one nuke goes of, it is game over for all of us..
There is no such thing as a limited exchange.
While citizens of NATO and various officials are bat shit
insane, it's rather obvious that majority in charge aren't. As they say they won't send troops to assist Ukraine. At best they can send manpads.
I'm certain russia learned it's lesson regarding Afghanistan and how manpads are a bitch.
Edit: phone auto correct should be a criminal offense.
Last edited by miketheterrible on Sat Feb 26, 2022 11:51 am; edited 1 time in total
VARGR198, Broski and EkErilaz like this post
Karl Haushofer- Posts : 1234
Points : 1227
Join date : 2015-05-03
EkErilaz wrote:Isos wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Regular wrote:EkErilaz wrote:zepia wrote:Some air defense still active in Kiev?
Yes s-300
there are pictures from launch
Like i said it is a AD guerilla war now I bet they are moving them around hide them in tunnels etc.
It is against rules of war to deploy it like that , but since russia has already lost the propaganda war on normies it will be ignored.
The problem for russia is that if the war turns to bloody, lets say massive strikes resulting in high numbers of civilian casualties.
portrayed in western media as deliberate massacres, NATO might not be able to reason with politicians and civilians and be forced to escalate.
NATO forced to escalate? With what? Glowniger faggot LGBTQ+ company? Let's be realistic. Their ability to escalate AT THE MOMENT is very limited.
Honestly, I was an active soldier for 10 year, and 6 years as a reservist, and yeah the political woke posturing is not making NATO look great.
I would never go back, due to diversity training etc alone. But make no mistake NATO has teeth especially when it comes to airpower and cruise missiles etc.
Make no mistake, i fully support Russia in this war. They have the high ground.
But I hang on the NATO fanboi OSINT pages as well, not partaking like here but it is good to know what the other side know, right. And they have with open source photo and radar satellites quite a good picture on russian deployment, rear areas, IADS shit like that. Imagine what a real NATO S2 shop would know. loosing logistics right now could kill the war, and quite frankly enough tomahawks could do that.
No one is invincible in war because they are on a particular side, and no weapon system is impossible to deploy in a way that it works perfectly, just look at the ork ballistic missiles that got thru the s-400 umbrella in Rostov. War is not fought with weapon specs, but with deception creativity and brutality.
Yeah in that situation the only thing that matters is if Topols and Bulavas will go through. Nothing else.
Russia made it clear. No conventional war with NATO. Fire a tomahawk you get one of your cities leveled.
I agree, and trust that they will do, but there are some delusional minds in NATO that might think it is a bluff.. If one nuke goes of, it is game over for all of us..
There is no such thing as a limited exchange.
Just one quiz for all here.
Which of these would you prefer:
1. Russia gets defeated in a conventional war and Russia is finished for good as a world power?
2. Russia retaliates with nukes and game over for the world
Finty likes this post
ATLASCUB- Posts : 1154
Points : 1158
Join date : 2017-02-13
lyle6- Posts : 2607
Points : 2601
Join date : 2020-09-14
Location : Philippines
Regular, magnumcromagnon, kvs and LMFS like this post
Hannibal Barca- Posts : 1457
Points : 1467
Join date : 2013-12-13
EkErilaz wrote:Isos wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Regular wrote:EkErilaz wrote:zepia wrote:Some air defense still active in Kiev?
Yes s-300
there are pictures from launch
Like i said it is a AD guerilla war now I bet they are moving them around hide them in tunnels etc.
It is against rules of war to deploy it like that , but since russia has already lost the propaganda war on normies it will be ignored.
The problem for russia is that if the war turns to bloody, lets say massive strikes resulting in high numbers of civilian casualties.
portrayed in western media as deliberate massacres, NATO might not be able to reason with politicians and civilians and be forced to escalate.
NATO forced to escalate? With what? Glowniger faggot LGBTQ+ company? Let's be realistic. Their ability to escalate AT THE MOMENT is very limited.
Honestly, I was an active soldier for 10 year, and 6 years as a reservist, and yeah the political woke posturing is not making NATO look great.
I would never go back, due to diversity training etc alone. But make no mistake NATO has teeth especially when it comes to airpower and cruise missiles etc.
Make no mistake, i fully support Russia in this war. They have the high ground.
But I hang on the NATO fanboi OSINT pages as well, not partaking like here but it is good to know what the other side know, right. And they have with open source photo and radar satellites quite a good picture on russian deployment, rear areas, IADS shit like that. Imagine what a real NATO S2 shop would know. loosing logistics right now could kill the war, and quite frankly enough tomahawks could do that.
No one is invincible in war because they are on a particular side, and no weapon system is impossible to deploy in a way that it works perfectly, just look at the ork ballistic missiles that got thru the s-400 umbrella in Rostov. War is not fought with weapon specs, but with deception creativity and brutality.
Yeah in that situation the only thing that matters is if Topols and Bulavas will go through. Nothing else.
Russia made it clear. No conventional war with NATO. Fire a tomahawk you get one of your cities leveled.
I agree, and trust that they will do, but there are some delusional minds in NATO that might think it is a bluff.. If one nuke goes of, it is game over for all of us..
There is no such thing as a limited exchange.
Exactly, which means that everyone should act like an adult and all respect the current balance of power. This is exactly what is not happening from the governments of the tiny European vassal States, including Greece.
For example, constantly threatening Russia, with a tiny constantly depleting population and a 30% Russian minority that suffers genocide and doesn't even have the right to vote is an example of begging to be liberated. This country, used as example, is called Lithuania. And a campaign there needs 1% the effort of a liberation campaign into Ukraine.
magnumcromagnon, kvs and Odin of Ossetia like this post
EkErilaz- Posts : 125
Points : 127
Join date : 2022-02-24
Location : Scandinavia
Karl Haushofer wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Isos wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Regular wrote:EkErilaz wrote:zepia wrote:Some air defense still active in Kiev?
Yes s-300
there are pictures from launch
Like i said it is a AD guerilla war now I bet they are moving them around hide them in tunnels etc.
It is against rules of war to deploy it like that , but since russia has already lost the propaganda war on normies it will be ignored.
The problem for russia is that if the war turns to bloody, lets say massive strikes resulting in high numbers of civilian casualties.
portrayed in western media as deliberate massacres, NATO might not be able to reason with politicians and civilians and be forced to escalate.
NATO forced to escalate? With what? Glowniger faggot LGBTQ+ company? Let's be realistic. Their ability to escalate AT THE MOMENT is very limited.
Honestly, I was an active soldier for 10 year, and 6 years as a reservist, and yeah the political woke posturing is not making NATO look great.
I would never go back, due to diversity training etc alone. But make no mistake NATO has teeth especially when it comes to airpower and cruise missiles etc.
Make no mistake, i fully support Russia in this war. They have the high ground.
But I hang on the NATO fanboi OSINT pages as well, not partaking like here but it is good to know what the other side know, right. And they have with open source photo and radar satellites quite a good picture on russian deployment, rear areas, IADS shit like that. Imagine what a real NATO S2 shop would know. loosing logistics right now could kill the war, and quite frankly enough tomahawks could do that.
No one is invincible in war because they are on a particular side, and no weapon system is impossible to deploy in a way that it works perfectly, just look at the ork ballistic missiles that got thru the s-400 umbrella in Rostov. War is not fought with weapon specs, but with deception creativity and brutality.
Yeah in that situation the only thing that matters is if Topols and Bulavas will go through. Nothing else.
Russia made it clear. No conventional war with NATO. Fire a tomahawk you get one of your cities leveled.
I agree, and trust that they will do, but there are some delusional minds in NATO that might think it is a bluff.. If one nuke goes of, it is game over for all of us..
There is no such thing as a limited exchange.
Just one quiz for all here.
Which of these would you prefer:
1. Russia gets defeated in a conventional war and Russia is finished for good as a world power?
2. Russia retaliates with nukes and game over for the world
That is exactly the type of game theory bullshit that at this time is debated at NATO HQ.
And this is why NATO might think they are calling a bluff.
if you ask me, it is a hard question, I sometimes think this world is fucked beyond saving maybe a reset is what we need..
But as a living organism my instinct is survival.
thank god that decision is not mine..
It is russia's, and their perspective and doctrine is shaped by what they have experienced in WW2.
I think they will do it, they are way more pragmatic than i am.
magnumcromagnon and Hannibal Barca like this post
miketheterrible- Posts : 7383
Points : 7341
Join date : 2016-11-06
EkErilaz wrote:Karl Haushofer wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Isos wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Regular wrote:EkErilaz wrote:zepia wrote:Some air defense still active in Kiev?
Yes s-300
there are pictures from launch
Like i said it is a AD guerilla war now I bet they are moving them around hide them in tunnels etc.
It is against rules of war to deploy it like that , but since russia has already lost the propaganda war on normies it will be ignored.
The problem for russia is that if the war turns to bloody, lets say massive strikes resulting in high numbers of civilian casualties.
portrayed in western media as deliberate massacres, NATO might not be able to reason with politicians and civilians and be forced to escalate.
NATO forced to escalate? With what? Glowniger faggot LGBTQ+ company? Let's be realistic. Their ability to escalate AT THE MOMENT is very limited.
Honestly, I was an active soldier for 10 year, and 6 years as a reservist, and yeah the political woke posturing is not making NATO look great.
I would never go back, due to diversity training etc alone. But make no mistake NATO has teeth especially when it comes to airpower and cruise missiles etc.
Make no mistake, i fully support Russia in this war. They have the high ground.
But I hang on the NATO fanboi OSINT pages as well, not partaking like here but it is good to know what the other side know, right. And they have with open source photo and radar satellites quite a good picture on russian deployment, rear areas, IADS shit like that. Imagine what a real NATO S2 shop would know. loosing logistics right now could kill the war, and quite frankly enough tomahawks could do that.
No one is invincible in war because they are on a particular side, and no weapon system is impossible to deploy in a way that it works perfectly, just look at the ork ballistic missiles that got thru the s-400 umbrella in Rostov. War is not fought with weapon specs, but with deception creativity and brutality.
Yeah in that situation the only thing that matters is if Topols and Bulavas will go through. Nothing else.
Russia made it clear. No conventional war with NATO. Fire a tomahawk you get one of your cities leveled.
I agree, and trust that they will do, but there are some delusional minds in NATO that might think it is a bluff.. If one nuke goes of, it is game over for all of us..
There is no such thing as a limited exchange.
Just one quiz for all here.
Which of these would you prefer:
1. Russia gets defeated in a conventional war and Russia is finished for good as a world power?
2. Russia retaliates with nukes and game over for the world
That is exactly the type of game theory bullshit that at this time is debated at NATO HQ.
And this is why NATO might think they are calling a bluff.
if you ask me, it is a hard question, I sometimes think this world is fucked beyond saving maybe a reset is what we need..
But as a living organism my instinct is survival.
thank god that decision is not mine..
It is russia's, and their perspective and doctrine is shaped by what they have experienced in WW2.
I think they will do it, they are way more pragmatic than i am.
They been thinking about that for decades. Their time has passed and Russia is far too powerful conventionally now they wouldn't risk it.
You people are overthinking this too much. Ukraine, no one cares about. They say big words in the UN against Russia but did they sanction Russia from SWIFT? Did they block Russian assets being moved to Europe like Oil and Gas? No. Reason why, cause those are more important to them than Ukraine.
magnumcromagnon and Big_Gazza like this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3932
Points : 3938
Join date : 2021-12-08
magnumcromagnon and VARGR198 like this post
ATLASCUB- Posts : 1154
Points : 1158
Join date : 2017-02-13
UAV.
Isos- Posts : 11605
Points : 11573
Join date : 2015-11-06
For all those talking about nato/russian nuk war, just stop it. US made it clear they won't do anything. Even their sanctions are weak as ****. They gave Ukraine just to make Russia looks like a imperialist. It's a failed strategy and shows how much they care about their satelitte state. Poland, bulgaria, baltics should learn the lesson.
Last edited by Isos on Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:19 pm; edited 2 times in total
Hannibal Barca, miketheterrible and Arkanghelsk like this post
Lurk83- Posts : 124
Points : 128
Join date : 2021-02-23
Big_Gazza dislikes this post
nomadski- Posts : 3079
Points : 3087
Join date : 2017-01-02
But before Nuke war , all that is needed is for one pilot of NATO to bite the dust , in supply mission . Then if still idiots do not understand , put a Nuke test on TV . And if super - idiot still , put one near their ship . And if super-super - idiot , then hit a ship with Nuke . Your Ship get hit with Nuke . Then peace . Better than millions dying . Nukes can be used in very limited war , to stop larger war . Hiroshima was example . War ended .
Last edited by nomadski on Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
miketheterrible- Posts : 7383
Points : 7341
Join date : 2016-11-06
Lurk83 wrote:Seems like Hungary is the only state holding out against kicking Russia out of swift now. Germany, Cyprus,Italy have all changed their position according to latest reports.
Then they will lose their entire energy supply, same with supply of metals and other important stuff.
magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs and LMFS like this post
Isos- Posts : 11605
Points : 11573
Join date : 2015-11-06
miketheterrible wrote:Lurk83 wrote:Seems like Hungary is the only state holding out against kicking Russia out of swift now. Germany, Cyprus,Italy have all changed their position according to latest reports.
Then they will lose their entire energy supply, same with supply of metals and other important stuff.
Some kinzhal on oil installations in the middle east would also be worth if the western keep taking russian money. You want destruction then get it.
magnumcromagnon and Big_Gazza like this post
miketheterrible- Posts : 7383
Points : 7341
Join date : 2016-11-06
Isos wrote:miketheterrible wrote:Lurk83 wrote:Seems like Hungary is the only state holding out against kicking Russia out of swift now. Germany, Cyprus,Italy have all changed their position according to latest reports.
Then they will lose their entire energy supply, same with supply of metals and other important stuff.
Some kinzhal on oil installations in the middle east would also be worth if the western keep taking russian money. You want destruction then get it.
Apparently the guy is wrong anyway since it is Europe not wanting Russia kicked out of swift. There may be people in all these countries that do, but they wont do it. They talked about it for so long that it gave Russia, China and others opportunity to bypass it.
magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs and Isos like this post
Regular- Posts : 3894
Points : 3868
Join date : 2013-03-10
Location : Ukrolovestan
Orlan wrote:Kherson again changed hands?
I asked same question, **** knows. It's so fluid that I keep losing track. It's like Ukrainian army melts when Russians come and then solidifies when it's calm. I can't explain how they can teleport there and disappear without a fight.
EkErilaz- Posts : 125
Points : 127
Join date : 2022-02-24
Location : Scandinavia
not surprised at all it have been going on for years, but this is so blatant in your face pure weapons grade propaganda
miketheterrible, Broski and Arkanghelsk like this post
Hole- Posts : 11132
Points : 11110
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
miketheterrible wrote:EkErilaz wrote:Regular wrote:EkErilaz wrote:zepia wrote:Some air defense still active in Kiev?
Yes s-300
there are pictures from launch
Like i said it is a AD guerilla war now I bet they are moving them around hide them in tunnels etc.
It is against rules of war to deploy it like that , but since russia has already lost the propaganda war on normies it will be ignored.
The problem for russia is that if the war turns to bloody, lets say massive strikes resulting in high numbers of civilian casualties.
portrayed in western media as deliberate massacres, NATO might not be able to reason with politicians and civilians and be forced to escalate.
NATO forced to escalate? With what? Glowniger faggot LGBTQ+ company? Let's be realistic. Their ability to escalate AT THE MOMENT is very limited.
Honestly, I was an active soldier for 10 year, and 6 years as a reservist, and yeah the political woke posturing is not making NATO look great.
I would never go back, due to diversity training etc alone. But make no mistake NATO has teeth especially when it comes to airpower and cruise missiles etc.
Make no mistake, i fully support Russia in this war. They have the high ground.
But I hang on the NATO fanboi OSINT pages as well, not partaking like here but it is good to know what the other side know, right. And they have with open source photo and radar satellites quite a good picture on russian deployment, rear areas, IADS shit like that. Imagine what a real NATO S2 shop would know. loosing logistics right now could kill the war, and quite frankly enough tomahawks could do that.
No one is invincible in war because they are on a particular side, and no weapon system is impossible to deploy in a way that it works perfectly, just look at the ork ballistic missiles that got thru the s-400 umbrella in Rostov. War is not fought with weapon specs, but with deception creativity and brutality.
Except franco kinda destroy your comment there a out S-400 which was 200km away from rostov airbase and the ad systems are mobile and left towards Ukraine. So the Tochka strike was bad on Russia leaving the Airfield undefended.
If they had their base defended like in Syria, that tochka wouldn't gone through. It had 80kms at least distance from shoot to target.
Tomahawk are much slower might I add. But yes, no such thing as invisible.
Some years ago I peddled the idea of equipping all major russian airbases with fixes AD installations, like ships. A mix of Redut and Pantsir-M. This would have prevented this incident, beause a fixed installation can´t be send elsewhere (which was likely what happened at the base).
magnumcromagnon and kvs like this post
Guest- Guest
Regular wrote:Orlan wrote:Kherson again changed hands?
I asked same question, **** knows. It's so fluid that I keep losing track. It's like Ukrainian army melts when Russians come and then solidifies when it's calm. I can't explain how they can teleport there and disappear without a fight.
Many videos of abandoned Russian APCs and other vehicles on that part and some destroyed convoys, that seem logistical, fuel trucks and bridge layers.
Ispan- Posts : 645
Points : 657
Join date : 2015-07-10
Age : 47
Location : Madrid
Ура!!
https://guerraenucrania.wordpress.com/2022/02/26/parte-de-guerra-26-02-2022-1200-horas/
GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, teh_beard, zepia and LMFS like this post
VARGR198- Posts : 674
Points : 682
Join date : 2015-08-09
kvs likes this post
miketheterrible- Posts : 7383
Points : 7341
Join date : 2016-11-06
VARGR198 wrote:
If this is true, then it really puts a dent in the Ukrop propaganda about how well the Ukrainians are doing. LOL
magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza and kvs like this post
Guest- Guest