Just trample them Russians, kill that Nazi bastard.
This video link is from serbian movie.
Sasha Kots said that is not true.VARGR198 wrote:
kvs likes this post
Ispan wrote:
Today's briefing. Multiple sources, cross checked and arranged in chronological order. Good progress today.
https://guerraenucrania.wordpress.com/2022/05/23/parte-de-guerra-23-05-2022-liman-svitlodarsk-zolotoye/
GarryB, markgreven, kvs, Ispan and Broski like this post
flamming_python wrote:3 fucking Su-25s?
Where do they keep getting these kamikaze pilots from?
I'm finding this hard to believe
And it's not like they can hastily train new pilots in weeks or something, the Su-25 is a complicated machine - anything that flies is, but especially military aircraft and jet aircraft.
GarryB, Sprut-B, Hole, Backman, Mir and Broski like this post
Big_Gazza wrote:
Shades of Japanese naval aviation post-Midway. Best pilots already lost, no time or resources to properly replace them.
Very good.
GarryB and Broski like this post
Regular wrote:Very good example. But West does like to change their toys often. We will see, Chechens were much more hostile than Ukrainians not long ago, and look at them now.
GarryB, JohninMK, Sprut-B, LMFS, Hole, Broski and jon_deluxe like this post
VARGR198 wrote:
According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, in the course of a special military operation, crews of self-propelled guns carry out fire missions to destroy strongholds, fortifications, equipment and manpower of the enemy, and also successfully suppress the firing positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during counter-battery combat. After each fire raid and in case of detection of enemy unmanned aerial vehicles, the firing position is immediately changed.
https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/14698027
Backman and Podlodka77 dislike this post
Vann7 wrote:VARGR198 wrote:
According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, in the course of a special military operation, crews of self-propelled guns carry out fire missions to destroy strongholds, fortifications, equipment and manpower of the enemy, and also successfully suppress the firing positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during counter-battery combat. After each fire raid and in case of detection of enemy unmanned aerial vehicles, the firing position is immediately changed.
https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/14698027
GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, GunshipDemocracy, Sprut-B, Eugenio Argentina, Hole and like this post
GarryB and Broski like this post
GunshipDemocracy wrote:.....
I hope not exxactly as in Japan. Two nukes at the end and eternal love from country you have just bombed?
GarryB and Broski like this post
PhSt wrote:Podlodka77 wrote:VARGR198 wrote:Podlodka77 wrote:Has anyone written about this ? I went back a couple of pages but I don't see any info about this ..If so, I apologize for posting again.
TASS: Military operation in Ukraine
May 23, 07:59
Crews with "Giacint-S" of the RF Armed Forces destroyed a unit of M-777 howitzers from the USA in Ukraine
According to the Ministry of Defense, the crews of self-propelled guns carry out fire missions to destroy enemy strongholds, fortifications, equipment and manpower.
MOSCOW, May 23. /TASS/. The Russian Defense Ministry has published footage of the combat work of the crews of 152-millimeter self-propelled guns "Giacint-S", in particular, the defeat of the Ukrainian unit of 155-mm howitzers M-777 made in the United States. This was reported on Monday in the military department.
"In the course of carrying out the tasks of counter-battery combat, the Giacint-S battery destroyed a unit of 155-millimeter towed howitzers M-777 made in the United States," the report says.
According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, in the course of a special military operation, crews of self-propelled guns carry out fire missions to destroy strongholds, fortifications, equipment and manpower of the enemy, and also successfully suppress the firing positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during counter-battery combat. After each fire raid and in case of detection of enemy unmanned aerial vehicles, the firing position is immediately changed.
https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/14698027
That video link is from 6 days ago and TASS post is from today.. It is possible that everything is interconnected and maybe not.
Target wasn't hit. I don't care if Russia has to steal technology from their adversaries but they have to improve the accuracy of their weapon systems.
GarryB, Sprut-B, Hole, Broski and Podlodka77 like this post
PhSt wrote:Target wasn't hit. I don't care if Russia has to steal technology from their adversaries but they have to improve the accuracy of their weapon systems.
GarryB, kvs, Sprut-B, Eugenio Argentina, Hole, Mir, Broski and Podlodka77 like this post
GarryB, Eugenio Argentina and Broski like this post
GarryB, kvs, Sprut-B, Backman, Mir and Broski like this post
limb wrote:Im particularly worried about anti ship missile shipments to ukraine.
The first problem is that these missiles can be stored in civilian trucks or containers(like how houthis stealthily owned C-802s), or otherwise easily concealed and be undetectable until launched. The ukrainians will be fed targeting info from NATO surveillance, which makes their targeting passive. Whats worrying is that we don't actually know if harpoons were already sent. They could be ready, and the ukrainians may be biding their time, waiting for an opportune moment to hit the grigoroviches.
The second problem is that they can continuously and affordably launched in salvos, and the existing warships of the black sea fleet don't have magazines deep enough to withstand an attack. The grigoroviches must stay together to protect each other, which kind of breaks the blockade. 8-30 harpoons can be easily concealed and launched at the same time.
What do you guys think is the solution for these problems?
lancelot likes this post
That would take monthsdiabetus wrote:limb wrote:Im particularly worried about anti ship missile shipments to ukraine.
The first problem is that these missiles can be stored in civilian trucks or containers(like how houthis stealthily owned C-802s), or otherwise easily concealed and be undetectable until launched. The ukrainians will be fed targeting info from NATO surveillance, which makes their targeting passive. Whats worrying is that we don't actually know if harpoons were already sent. They could be ready, and the ukrainians may be biding their time, waiting for an opportune moment to hit the grigoroviches.
The second problem is that they can continuously and affordably launched in salvos, and the existing warships of the black sea fleet don't have magazines deep enough to withstand an attack. The grigoroviches must stay together to protect each other, which kind of breaks the blockade. 8-30 harpoons can be easily concealed and launched at the same time.
What do you guys think is the solution for these problems?
Take nikolaev and Odessa.
sepheronx, GarryB, kvs, Sprut-B, Eugenio Argentina, Hole, Broski and bitch_killer like this post
limb wrote:
What do you guys think is the solution for these problems?
limb wrote:That would take monthsdiabetus wrote:limb wrote:Im particularly worried about anti ship missile shipments to ukraine.
The first problem is that these missiles can be stored in civilian trucks or containers(like how houthis stealthily owned C-802s), or otherwise easily concealed and be undetectable until launched. The ukrainians will be fed targeting info from NATO surveillance, which makes their targeting passive. Whats worrying is that we don't actually know if harpoons were already sent. They could be ready, and the ukrainians may be biding their time, waiting for an opportune moment to hit the grigoroviches.
The second problem is that they can continuously and affordably launched in salvos, and the existing warships of the black sea fleet don't have magazines deep enough to withstand an attack. The grigoroviches must stay together to protect each other, which kind of breaks the blockade. 8-30 harpoons can be easily concealed and launched at the same time.
What do you guys think is the solution for these problems?
Take nikolaev and Odessa.
Hole wrote:
Those biolabs must be really lucrative.
caveat emptor wrote:
Western countries are also actively involved in restoring the combat capabilities of the Ukrainian Air Force, providing logistics and paying for all the work.
GarryB, flamming_python, Sprut-B, Hole, Broski and Arkanghelsk like this post
limb wrote:Im particularly worried about anti ship missile shipments to ukraine.
The first problem is that these missiles can be stored in civilian trucks or containers(like how houthis stealthily owned C-802s), or otherwise easily concealed and be undetectable until launched. The ukrainians will be fed targeting info from NATO surveillance, which makes their targeting passive. Whats worrying is that we don't actually know if harpoons were already sent. They could be ready, and the ukrainians may be biding their time, waiting for an opportune moment to hit the grigoroviches.
The second problem is that they can continuously and affordably launched in salvos, and the existing warships of the black sea fleet don't have magazines deep enough to withstand an attack. The grigoroviches must stay together to protect each other, which kind of breaks the blockade. 8-30 harpoons can be easily concealed and launched at the same time.Since ships are slow, the ukrainians will be able to keep launching salvoes, with no way for the ship to get out of range.
What do you guys think is the solution for these problems?
GarryB, MMBR, limb and Broski like this post