Russian special military operation in Ukraine #22

ALAMO wrote:

Big_Gazza wrote:Unbelievable... this stupid fcker has absolutely no  self awareness, does he??  This evil despicable little prick has made a career out of attacking honest journos and spreading the worst sorts of vile lies and hatred, and now he accuses his fellow travellers of the same

This is just so good.  Evil always consumes its own, and now we get to sit back, watch it and enjoy the spectacle.  

Broski wrote:Exclusive footage of the attempted landing of Ukrainian troops at the Nuclear Power Plant.

bandit6 wrote:Hi everyone, I just wanted to ask if anyone here thinks that Russia might eventually end up having to create a foreign legion to bolster it's infantry numbers as the war goes on

If they ever do it the azovites would probably go crazy having to fight Arabs, Asians, or Africans

dionis wrote:
Can anyone provide a good reason why stuff like this has to drag on for weeks?

This fancy bridge outside of Peski has been a "big strong stalwart fortification" of the Ukrainians for weeks now. Why hasn't it been hit by a single KAB-1500?

Am I totally off base here, or wouldn't one KAB-1500 obliterate that entire junction and kill all humans with its shockwave?

Arrow wrote:Ukraine is destroying civilian settlements in Kherson.

https://vk.com/video-206639135_456258555

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Arrow wrote:Ukraine is destroying civilian settlements in Kherson.

https://vk.com/video-206639135_456258555

You do realize this is a war....both sides will destroy civilian buildings if its being used by their enemy and both sides have

ALAMO wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Arrow wrote:Ukraine is destroying civilian settlements in Kherson.

https://vk.com/video-206639135_456258555

You do realize this is a war....both sides will destroy civilian buildings if its being used by their enemy and both sides have

Your comment is absolutely clueless; the only thing it proves is your absolute lack of understanding of this conflict.
Whenever the Ukro propaganda is spinning the western MSM about outrageous attacks on civilian infrastructure, it is not even Russkie propaganda needed as an answer.
The Ukros are dismantling the whole narrative with their hands, showing pictures of destroyed military equipment on spot, dead bodies dressed in uniforms, or happy Ukro troops stationing in schools, kindergartens, and hospitals.
A "civilian multi-floor building in Charkov" mysteriously vomited dozens of unexploded RPG rounds.
"A kindergarten" hit is on fire for 2 days, with thousands of detonations coming from it - an explosive baby milk formula is already known for the other western propaganda campaigns, nothing new to be learned here.
A "shopping mole" turns out to be a warehouse with Grad missiles, with the Grad battery parked in the underground garage.
Another shopping mole, "deliberately targeted by the evil Russkie horde" turns out flammed by the detonations of ammunition, that was stored next by, that was hit with a perfect precision.
And I can do that all day long.
How do you think, why you can be sentenced to prison in Ukr for uploading videos on YT?

On the other side, again no Russkie propaganda is needed either
It is the Ukro YT/Telegram/Twitter that is full of pictures like deliberate targeting obviously civilian infrastructure.
And it is not a new thing either, it is something you can watch free of charge since 2014.
It was a CCTV footage of Ukro regime airforces strikes on parks in Doneck.
Tochka subammunition warhead separated over the center of Lugansk.
In both cases, there were no military targets, as the republican militia has not even formed yet!
A Tochka subammo warhead strike on the railroad station in Krematorsk, where dozens of people were deliberately murdered, and we are lucky enough that an Italian TV crew was there, and was careless enough to provide a close up footage on the remains of the missile, presenting the serial numbers from just te same production series that was marked for 8 years hitting Doneck and Lugansk.
You can easily spot ordinary civilians, doing their daily things like painting the wall or a dance, while hit by the Ukro  IEDs dropped from civilian drones they are operating.
There are thousands of testimonies of witnesses and victims, all stating the same stories.
People living in Energodar know perfectly well where is the fire coming from.  
People in Mariopol are giving testimonies that live no space for any speculations - the city was being deliberately destroyed by the Ukronazi forces, with a clear plan to inflict maximum of material&infrastructural damage to the city that will never return to the Ukropistan.
And - again - I can like this all day long, with different locations, time, whatever you want.

Just accept the fact, that you know nothing, John Snow, while the winter is coming.

Podlodka77 wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Arrow wrote:Ukraine is destroying civilian settlements in Kherson.

https://vk.com/video-206639135_456258555

You do realize this is a war....both sides will destroy civilian buildings if its being used by their enemy and both sides have

And where is your proof that the Russians were in the attic of this building, since the attic or the top floor of the building was destroyed in the video ? The Russians chose to place their soldiers in the attic of this building ? Are you sure ?

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Podlodka77 wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Arrow wrote:Ukraine is destroying civilian settlements in Kherson.

https://vk.com/video-206639135_456258555

You do realize this is a war....both sides will destroy civilian buildings if its being used by their enemy and both sides have

And where is your proof that the Russians were in the attic of this building, since the attic or the top floor of the building was destroyed in the video ? The Russians chose to place their soldiers in the attic of this building ? Are you sure ?

Tell me when did I say Russians were in there? I simple said if Russia or Ukraine is using a building as a defensible position then the opposing side will level it, where is your proof then this was some war crime with Ukranian soldiers just going around shooting civis and destroying the buildings for the lawls.

All I see is a video with no context and the poster claiming "war crime"

Podlodka77 wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Podlodka77 wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

Arrow wrote:Ukraine is destroying civilian settlements in Kherson.

https://vk.com/video-206639135_456258555

You do realize this is a war....both sides will destroy civilian buildings if its being used by their enemy and both sides have

And where is your proof that the Russians were in the attic of this building, since the attic or the top floor of the building was destroyed in the video ? The Russians chose to place their soldiers in the attic of this building ? Are you sure ?

Tell me when did I say Russians were in there? I simple said if Russia or Ukraine is using a building as a defensible position then the opposing side will level it, where is your proof then this was some war crime with Ukranian soldiers just going around shooting civis and destroying the buildings for the lawls.

All I see is a video with no context and the poster claiming "war crime"

You didn't write directly, but you did indirectly with "both sides will destroy civilian buildings if its being used by their enemy". I didn't write that that's what you think, far from it. The fact is that the Russians are hitting Ukroshitstan fighters all over Ukroshitstan with cruise missiles and aviation, not only with artillery.
If it wasn't for civilians, the war would have been over long ago.

ALAMO wrote:Just another clueless comment from a guy who not only has an issue with understanding basic English but obviously can't follow the thread in any other mean other than taking more copium straight up in the ars.
Ukrs are deliberately destroying civilian infrastructure.
Russkie do not.
Dot.
There is nothing to discuss here.
As we all know that you are far away from being brilliant, let me close it up for you a bit.
They are doing so because of two main reasons.
1. they can't do any serious harm to any military grade object, not only if we consider troops&gear on the battlefield, but static infrastructure either. They lack means, firepower and range. In those sole occasions when they finally manage to overwhelm AD assets covering important assets, the effect they can achieve are holes in the ground, lanes or roofs. That's it. That is why they target civilian infrastructure, as there are tens of thousands of potential soft skin targets they can reach, and the Ruskies can't cover them all for obvious reasons. This is a stage of terror only, as they lack the possibility to fight.
2. they know perfectly well, that not a square inch of land the Russkie conquered will ever return to the Ukropistran, no matter what will be i its political shape and status. Even if that will be an independent region/autonomy in the Russian Federation they will never get back the Novorossia and Crimea, Charkov, Odessa etc in the administrative borders. That is why they unleashed a scratched earth tactic, to inflict maximal damage to the civilian infrastructure, which is much more vulnerable and sometimes extremely expensive to restore. Harming a peaceful living of a local population is another bonus, as the effects will harm the Russian administration forced to push huge resources to bring back the principal living standards to the area, or face the political and social consequences.
I hope it is not too complicated for ya' ...

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

ALAMO wrote:Just another clueless comment from a guy who not only has an issue with understanding basic English but obviously can't follow the thread in any other mean other than taking more copium straight up in the ars.
Ukrs are deliberately destroying civilian infrastructure.
Russkie do not.
Dot.
There is nothing to discuss here.
As we all know that you are far away from being brilliant, let me close it up for you a bit.
They are doing so because of two main reasons.
1. they can't do any serious harm to any military grade object, not only if we consider troops&gear on the battlefield, but static infrastructure either. They lack means, firepower and range. In those sole occasions when they finally manage to overwhelm AD assets covering important assets, the effect they can achieve are holes in the ground, lanes or roofs. That's it. That is why they target civilian infrastructure, as there are tens of thousands of potential soft skin targets they can reach, and the Ruskies can't cover them all for obvious reasons. This is a stage of terror only, as they lack the possibility to fight.
2. they know perfectly well, that not a square inch of land the Russkie conquered will ever return to the Ukropistran, no matter what will be i its political shape and status. Even if that will be an independent region/autonomy in the Russian Federation they will never get back the Novorossia and Crimea, Charkov, Odessa etc in the administrative borders. That is why they unleashed a scratched earth tactic, to inflict maximal damage to the civilian infrastructure, which is much more vulnerable and sometimes extremely expensive to restore. Harming a peaceful living of a local population is another bonus, as the effects will harm the Russian administration forced to push huge resources to bring back the principal living standards to the area, or face the political and social consequences.
I hope it is not too complicated for ya' ...

Depends on the context or why child.

not a war crime to destroy bridges or houses if enemy personnel occupy them, Russia has done this against Ukraine in the war.

Again since you are apparently 15 mentally, I never said Ukraine hasn't gone and destroyed things for the lawls, I simply said the particular video is out of context as all it shows are ruins, we do know in Kherson Ukraine managed to occupy some places briefly so most likely those where some areas Ukranian troops held up at and got pushed out of by russian forces.

What you are doing now is trying to bring up a pointless subject to try and make yourself look right, when you overreacted to something that doesn't offer any proof or context of the claim.

All I see is a guy who is blinded by his own hatred.

If you cannot be logical don't talk to me, your anger fueled rants just make you look stupid, show me proof a warcrime was committed in Kherson then, show me proof Ukrainian troops went "Yo manm we should destroy these civis houses just because"

While I am not saying its not possible, I am not going to sit there and accept unproven claims either.