Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+56
Erk
Firebird
Sprut-B
SeigSoloyvov
Mir
lancelot
Dr.Snufflebug
franco
mnztr
billybatts91
andalusia
TMA1
Arkanghelsk
nomadski
Kiko
lyle6
Backman
ahmedfire
magnumcromagnon
eridan
d_taddei2
Admin
LMFS
ATLASCUB
PapaDragon
kvs
miketheterrible
Isos
The Ottoman
Airman
Sinan
AlfaT8
KKTC
eehnie
Zivo
TheGeorgian
KoTeMoRe
max steel
Rodinazombie
flamming_python
JohninMK
nemrod
sepheronx
zenmonk
assslan
George1
As Sa'iqa
Hannibal Barca
Werewolf
Mike E
mutantsushi
TR1
SOC
GarryB
Pervius
Russian Patriot
60 posters

    Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Poll

    Are they leaving the US' influence?

    [ 9 ]
    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Bar_left29%Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Bar_right [29%] 
    [ 5 ]
    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Bar_left16%Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Bar_right [16%] 
    [ 13 ]
    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Bar_left42%Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Bar_right [42%] 
    [ 4 ]
    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Bar_left13%Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Bar_right [13%] 

    Total Votes: 31
    flamming_python
    flamming_python


    Posts : 9541
    Points : 9599
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  flamming_python Thu Dec 24, 2020 8:08 pm

    lyle6 wrote:
    flamming_python wrote:
    No point in playing moral arbiter in a world with no morals to speak off, where the only standard followed is rule of the mighty and powerful

    A prime opportunity for Russia to step in and offer the Turks co-operation in weaving off NATO tech dependence.

    I suspect Erdogan has rather overplayed his hand here. His position was a lot stronger when he could still balance between NATO and Russia and intervene in every neighbour under the sun

    If NATO takes a hard-line with Turkey now, they'll be reduced to a B-grade actor dependent on Russian joint-projects and Chinese finance; while Egypt, Syria and other neighbouring countries get an equal amount of co-operation from Moscow to keep the Turks in line.

    Its not about policing morals, its simply refusing to enable Turkey with its grand ambitions, ambitions that run counter to Russia and everyone else in the general neighborhood's interest.

    Just because the West has grown tired of Turkey doesn't mean Russia has to take Turkey in. Leave them to hang like Ukraine and watch as they implode within.

    By no means am I advocating Russia sticking its neck out for Turkey. But equally there is no need to stick it out for Greece or Cyprus either; countries that have imposed sanctions on Russia.

    But Turkey's grand ambitions seem to hit the EU a lot more than Russia; so yes as annoying as Erdo can be he is clearly an asset for Russia.
    In places where Russia's and Turkey's interests can clash; like Syria or Armenia-Azerbaijan, we have no problems projecting strength and keeping the upper hand in negotiations with Ankara.

    I don't advocate supporting Turkish adventurism, simply throwing them a lifeline if and when they screw-up with it, tugging them towards Moscow and Beijing, and by doing so advancing Russia's own interests. It's common sense.
    And Turkey moving towards Russia pisses Washington off more than anything else. It wasn't the drilling rights spat with Greece, or supporting ISIS in Syria, or Armenia-Azerbaijan that irked the West. It was buying S-400 missiles. That's what they took as disobedience and disloyalty towards their empire in their confrontation with Russia. That's what they're trying to get pay-back for. And that's why it's the right thing for Russia to continue with.

    GarryB likes this post

    lyle6
    lyle6


    Posts : 2586
    Points : 2580
    Join date : 2020-09-14
    Location : Philippines

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  lyle6 Thu Dec 24, 2020 10:33 pm

    GarryB wrote:The thing is that we keep hearing about these grand amibitions from Erdogan to restore their empire... but we also keep hearing of the ambitions of Putin to restore the Soviet empire... which if also true shows how incompetent he is because he has had multiple opportunities to absorb former soviet states that he has openly turned down.

    There are other explanations for his actions... in fact in both cases that don't require the sort of imperial thinking that goes on continuously in the west... but that is never mentioned.

    It makes me think the west is again projecting its own imperial agenda on its perceived opponents in the form of Erdogan and Putin...

    Like the broken clock, they can't be wrong at all times can they?

    To be fair though, while Putin might have the ambition to set about rejoining Russia's territories he also has the foresight to realize that doing so would neither be very productive for his country considering the conditions on which these territories would agree to rejoin under, as well as the reaction it would provoke from the West.

    It took nazis deposing the lawful government in Kiev and Crimea becoming under threat from nazi hordes before Russia intervened covertly in Ukraine. That's a very high threshold for Russia to bear and illustrates just how dire the situation even has to be for the option to intervene was even considered.

    In contrast Turkey has on its initiative, jumped at any excuse it could get to intervene in its neighbours affairs. It didn't need to support the attempted Syrian regime change - it had a working agreement with Damascus that kept the PKK in check. Both sides also had a vested interest in keeping their backyard stable given the turmoils in neighbouring Iraq. But what did Turkey do?

    flamming_python wrote:
    By no means am I advocating Russia sticking its neck out for Turkey. But equally there is no need to stick it out for Greece or Cyprus either; countries that have imposed sanctions on Russia.

    But Turkey's grand ambitions seem to hit the EU a lot more than Russia; so yes as annoying as Erdo can be he is clearly an asset for Russia.
    In places where Russia's and Turkey's interests can clash; like Syria or Armenia-Azerbaijan, we have no problems projecting strength and keeping the upper hand in negotiations with Ankara.

    I don't advocate supporting Turkish adventurism, simply throwing them a lifeline if and when they screw-up with it, tugging them towards Moscow and Beijing, and by doing so advancing Russia's own interests. It's common sense.
    And Turkey moving towards Russia pisses Washington off more than anything else. It wasn't the drilling rights spat with Greece, or supporting ISIS in Syria, or Armenia-Azerbaijan that irked the West. It was buying S-400 missiles. That's what they took as disobedience and disloyalty towards their empire in their confrontation with Russia. That's what they're trying to get pay-back for. And that's why it's the right thing for Russia to continue with.

    I don't see the point. The Turks have never shown any hint of gratitude towards any action the Russians have done that was to their benefit. Why would you expect they'd change their attitude in the future?

    In my opinion there's not much sense in trying to tug Turkey from NATO either. They know the only reason they even have the latitude to operate on their own is due entirely to NATO covering for them. Otherwise they'd long be steamrolled by Russia and the concert of neighbors that have an ax to grind against them. Its a nice thought to have, but the Turks would never make it that easy for you, as much as they could stomach being stripped of what little fiefdom they are trying to establish.
    flamming_python
    flamming_python


    Posts : 9541
    Points : 9599
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  flamming_python Fri Dec 25, 2020 12:49 am

    lyle6 wrote:I don't see the point. The Turks have never shown any hint of gratitude towards any action the Russians have done that was to their benefit. Why would you expect they'd change their attitude in the future?

    In my opinion there's not much sense in trying to tug Turkey from NATO either. They know the only reason they even have the latitude to operate on their own is due entirely to NATO covering for them. Otherwise they'd long be steamrolled by Russia and the concert of neighbors that have an ax to grind against them. Its a nice thought to have, but the Turks would never make it that easy for you,  as much as they could stomach being stripped of what little fiefdom they are trying to establish.

    I tend to agree, Erdogan's Turkey is almost more trouble than its worth

    If entering into a Russian-led alliance or economic pact, they'd make just as much trouble for Russia as they would for NATO.

    But I'm not really arguing for that. I'm arguing for weakening NATO and developing multi-polarity. A disruptive effect against the primary adversarial alliance that's arming itself against Russia is very much a net positive, even if it doesn't end with Turkey being loyal to some kind of Eurasian framework that Russia would hope to include Turkey in. The more such 'independent' actors we have in the Middle East and Europe, the better it ultimately is for Russia.
    Because Russia is weak against an entire alliance, but stronger than any single one of those states individually and can always leverage ties with a friendly Egypt, a friendly Syria, etc... if the Turks decide to make problems for Russia.

    Russia can work with Turkey on certain issues. But Russia is also free to work with Egypt or Iran on others. Russia has its own relations with every state, the main thing is that these states don't answer to Washington and impose sanctions on Russia; that's already something Russia benefits from. They don't have to answer to Russia.

    But then there's the second argument, which is really that Erdogan is a passing fad. He jumps into every intervention, but that's more him really and his circle, rather than Turkey the state. And there are many circles in Turkey that are interested in building better ties and more integration with Russia, with China, and so on. In time, Turkey can continue to build economic ties with Russia, with the Eurasian Union, become more integrated, build ties with the rest of the BRICS, and find its place in a developing world, and build more stable ties with its neighbours to become a more predictable country.

    This business with NATO cannot last as the US is now calling the bluff and imposing serious sanctions against Ankara. What are their choices at this point? Either bow down and come back hat in hand to the Western community, or continue their present course. Which do you think would be preferable from the perspective of Russia?
    Kiko
    Kiko


    Posts : 3887
    Points : 3963
    Join date : 2020-11-11
    Age : 75
    Location : Brasilia

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  Kiko Tue Jan 12, 2021 11:58 pm

    Erdogan signed up for Telegram after canceling WhatsApp

    https://m.vz.ru/news/2021/1/12/1079754.html
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18519
    Points : 19024
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  George1 Sat Apr 24, 2021 2:16 pm

    The US Department of Defense has officially notified Ankara of Turkey's removal from the F-35 fighter jets programme.

    Speaking to Turkey's Anadolu Agency on Wednesday, a US defence official said that according to the statement sent to Ankara, the Joint Memorandum of Understanding opened to participant countries' signature in 2006 and signed by Turkey on January 26, 2007, has been cancelled and Turkey was not included in the new agreement.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  GarryB Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:10 am

    Like the broken clock, they can't be wrong at all times can they?

    It certainly is true unless it is a digital clock and the screen with LEDS is completely blank and showing no time at all.

    He has to take concrete and continuous action to reform Turkeys former empire before you can accuse him of doing that... and he does not seem to be doing that.

    He is very much acting like the US... except he is only interfering in his region... making money on cheap stolen oil in Syria and supporting people fighting a neighbouring regime most of HATO want gone, making money in the ashes that is Libya, and wanting ownership of suspected underwater oil and gas reserves... western countries do this sort of thing all the time... but the west only says there are imperial ambitions when Erdogan does it... suspicious... because if he really wanted to expand his empire the first step could be to offer autonomy within Turkey for Turkish Kurds but also Syrian Kurds and take over from the US special forces in stealing Syrian oil... a relatively quick easy way to expand his territory... and then Iraqi and Iranian Kurds maybe could join and add their land to the pot...

    To be fair though, while Putin might have the ambition to set about rejoining Russia's territories he also has the foresight to realize that doing so would neither be very productive for his country considering the conditions on which these territories would agree to rejoin under, as well as the reaction it would provoke from the West.

    Where does that come from?

    The west has already accused Putin of annexing the Crimea... so why not annex South Ossetia and Abkhazia... why not annex all of Georgia... and Azerbaijan and Armenia and Nagorny Kharabakh? Belarus and at least half the Ukraine with all of its coastline to solve the the Transnistria problem too.

    If he was the Imperial warlord the west pretends he is he would have done at least some of those.... and the reality is that he has done none of them.

    Crimea voted to join the Russian federation... Russia accepted their request to join... no annexation... like say the Golan Heights in Syria, or Guam, or the Marshall Islands in the Pacific...

    The fact is that Russia is not putting any pressure on any country to join the Russian federation.... a huge irony for HATO countries to suggest they are because HATO has run a long campaign trying to get small non aligned countries on Russian borders to join them so they can be safe from big bad Russia...

    Even more ironic considering of these small countries more have died in Afghanistan fighting for HATO than Russia has killed in the last few years... except those going to Syria or Chechnia specifically to fight Russians.

    [quoteIt took nazis deposing the lawful government in Kiev and Crimea becoming under threat from nazi hordes before Russia intervened covertly in Ukraine. That's a very high threshold for Russia to bear and illustrates just how dire the situation even has to be for the option to intervene was even considered.[/quote]

    Not just Kiev murdering their own people, but also HATO countries and the US funding the coup in the first place and openly funding and training the Kiev thugs to continue to murder their own people... I think the covert support Russia has given was probably off the books via volunteers... I think it should be more solid and overt to prevent the sort of situations happening now where Kiev thinks it can flout the Minsk agreements and solve the problem with a military invasion.

    While the west screams at Russia about the Minsk Agreements it is Kiev that is not following them... Russia is not a party to the agreements, it is just an interested party that shares a border with the victims of violence coming from Kiev.

    In contrast Turkey has on its initiative, jumped at any excuse it could get to intervene in its neighbours affairs.

    They are in HATO.... it is to be expected.

    It didn't need to support the attempted Syrian regime change - it had a working agreement with Damascus that kept the PKK in check.

    Very much agree, but it is part of HATO and had all the important parts of HATO (ie US, UK, France, Germany) screaming for Assad to go and pushing funds into the region.... some of which was going to Kurds who thought this might be their best opportunity to have their own country... he could hardly ignore that, plus with all that chaos... all that oil being pumped and sold for chump change.... how could he ignore that?

    Both sides also had a vested interest in keeping their backyard stable given the turmoils in neighbouring Iraq. But what did Turkey do?

    Stability ended when the west funded a colour revolution and broke Syria into pieces... Erdogan did what he did at the time... what he thought was best for Turkey.... including shooting down a Russian plane which he claimed personal responsibility for but didn't get the hugs and pats on the back he was expecting from his HATO allies, and then rather harsh sanctions and responses from Russia made him reconsider his position... the food export ban to Russia didn't apply to Turkey because the Turks are not part of the EU, so Russia banning stuff from Turkey and stopping Russian tourists going there was a blow that certainly made him re-evaluate who was friend and who was foe.

    The US refusing to sell Patriot to him led to him ordering and buying a much cheaper but also much more capable system from Russia... not a huge surprise after the US attempted to do to him what they had been trying to do in Syria to Assad, or what they did to Saddam and Gaddafi...

    The Russians were certainly not friends, but there was no stab in the back from them, and seemed to live up to agreements in the region even with hostile parties.

    In fact the biggest violator of agreements with Russia was Israel, which has led to Syria probably having a stronger IADS than any other country in the region.

    The Turks have never shown any hint of gratitude towards any action the Russians have done that was to their benefit. Why would you expect they'd change their attitude in the future?

    They bought S-400s. Most of HATO is now cutting them off from their technology... the Ukraine would not be able to replace that... not even close... in fact in many areas Turkey probably have better technology in some areas than the Orcs... the Turks are not idiots, but they are missing a few key technologies that previously they bought from their friends and never bothered to master themselves... a crime most countries are guilty of.

    In my opinion there's not much sense in trying to tug Turkey from NATO either. They know the only reason they even have the latitude to operate on their own is due entirely to NATO covering for them. Otherwise they'd long be steamrolled by Russia and the concert of neighbors that have an ax to grind against them. Its a nice thought to have, but the Turks would never make it that easy for you, as much as they could stomach being stripped of what little fiefdom they are trying to establish.

    Russia does not need to drag Turkey... Russia just needs to trade like a normal country and fill the gaps being created by HATO withdrawing their technology, and HATO will likely push Turkey away like the US essentially forced the EU to push Russia to China and elsewhere.

    Turkey doesn't need HATO, Russia is not going to invade and occupy Turkey, and HATO is all about containing and controlling Russia.

    HATO needs Turkey because of its proximity to Russia and its control of the Black Sea, but Turkey does not need HATO.

    Turkey is not good enough to be in the EU, but they are happy for it to be front line cannon fodder for the war against the Soviets and the Russians...

    If entering into a Russian-led alliance or economic pact, they'd make just as much trouble for Russia as they would for NATO.

    Russia does not need a new Warsaw Pact... without HATO pulling their strings they can just trade with Russia and any other country they please... if they are doing something that Russia does not like... well make an agreement with them so both sides can be happy.

    Because Russia is weak against an entire alliance, but stronger than any single one of those states individually and can always leverage ties with a friendly Egypt, a friendly Syria, etc... if the Turks decide to make problems for Russia.

    Agree.... and when it is an alliance that is dictated to by Brussels, which essentially does as it is told from Washington, sometimes some of those countries in that alliance end up doing things against their own interests... like rejecting Russian Vaccines while waiting for western vaccines to be delivered.

    Remember when the west said Russia didn't have the capacity to produce enough vaccines and that the west will make their own for everyone and there wont be enough Sputnik to go around... ironic really.

    Russia can work with Turkey on certain issues. But Russia is also free to work with Egypt or Iran on others. Russia has its own relations with every state, the main thing is that these states don't answer to Washington and impose sanctions on Russia; that's already something Russia benefits from. They don't have to answer to Russia.

    And that will be an advantage for Turkey if they leave HATO and start talking with neighbours and just trading without worrying about what Brussels or Washington think.


    This business with NATO cannot last as the US is now calling the bluff and imposing serious sanctions against Ankara.

    Read an article on RT this morning that Biden has acknowledged the Armenian Genocide...

    Kicking them out of the F-35 programme was a bonus, those 100 planes would have been dogs... expensive dogs that drained their budgets for very little return...

    This is actually going to be good for Turkey in the long run I think.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18519
    Points : 19024
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  George1 Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:39 pm

    Foreign press: Not only Russia, but also Turkey is dissatisfied with the appearance of a new US military base in Greece
    nomadski
    nomadski


    Posts : 3068
    Points : 3076
    Join date : 2017-01-02

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  nomadski Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:49 pm



    https://climate.esa.int/en/projects/sea-ice/news-and-events/news/simulations-suggest-ice-free-arctic-summers-2050/


    And in the meantime , Russia and Bulgaria and Greece can put port facility and Rail link to MED sea , bypass Bosphorus . Should not be too expensive ! Then no worries about Bosphorous closing or opening . No need to take any or both sides in war ?

    Arkanghelsk
    Arkanghelsk


    Posts : 3906
    Points : 3912
    Join date : 2021-12-08

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  Arkanghelsk Fri Feb 04, 2022 4:25 pm


    https://www.rt.com/russia/548343-erdogan-west-ukraine-tensions/

    West ‘only makes things worse’ in row over Ukraine – Turkish president

    Recep Tayyip Erdogan said US President Joe Biden failed to make a positive impact on the crisis in Europe

    .. well I didnt expect that

    GarryB likes this post

    TMA1
    TMA1


    Posts : 1194
    Points : 1192
    Join date : 2020-11-30

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  TMA1 Fri Feb 04, 2022 5:05 pm

    Erdogan is the ultimate fence sitter. He is walking a dangerous line as that can lead to all parties eventually dumping you.

    GarryB likes this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  GarryB Sat Feb 05, 2022 12:43 am

    He is trying to be the peace maker.... like the French with the Georgian conflict for example, so he is not being pro US at all.... his distance from the US would get respect and cooperation from Russia and his cooperation and trade with ukraine will get cooperation from them too I suspect.
    avatar
    andalusia


    Posts : 771
    Points : 835
    Join date : 2013-10-01

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  andalusia Thu Nov 03, 2022 6:51 am

    Tensions between Turkey and Greece are heating up:

    billybatts91
    billybatts91


    Posts : 706
    Points : 708
    Join date : 2022-02-23

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  billybatts91 Mon Jul 10, 2023 9:27 pm

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Img_1214

    GarryB likes this post

    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2898
    Points : 2936
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  mnztr Mon Jul 10, 2023 9:35 pm

    billybatts91 wrote:Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Img_1214

    Wasn't the condition that Turkey gets accepted into EU?

    Godric likes this post

    billybatts91
    billybatts91


    Posts : 706
    Points : 708
    Join date : 2022-02-23

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  billybatts91 Mon Jul 10, 2023 10:07 pm

    mnztr wrote:
    billybatts91 wrote:Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Img_1214

    Wasn't the condition that Turkey gets accepted into EU?

    Seems a deal was made then?
    billybatts91
    billybatts91


    Posts : 706
    Points : 708
    Join date : 2022-02-23

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  billybatts91 Mon Jul 10, 2023 10:34 pm

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Img_1215
    franco
    franco


    Posts : 7053
    Points : 7079
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  franco Tue Jul 11, 2023 12:16 am

    billybatts91 wrote:
    mnztr wrote:
    billybatts91 wrote:Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Img_1214

    Wasn't the condition that Turkey gets accepted into EU?

    Seems a deal was made then?

    The West is good at making deals then not delivering on them so time will tell.

    GarryB, Big_Gazza and Mir like this post

    Kiko
    Kiko


    Posts : 3887
    Points : 3963
    Join date : 2020-11-11
    Age : 75
    Location : Brasilia

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  Kiko Tue Jul 11, 2023 12:20 am

    Most probably the problem with Recep Tayyip are the yanqui nukes stationed at Incirlik, so from now on masks are off. Reaction should be in Syria.

    sepheronx, Sprut-B and owais.usmani like this post

    billybatts91
    billybatts91


    Posts : 706
    Points : 708
    Join date : 2022-02-23

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  billybatts91 Tue Jul 11, 2023 3:24 am

    Here’s one of the reasons that explains Turkey’s recent behavior…Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Img_1216
    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2898
    Points : 2936
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  mnztr Tue Jul 11, 2023 4:34 am

    billybatts91 wrote:Here’s one of the reasons that explains Turkey’s recent behavior…Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Img_1216


    So they agreed to give Turkey F-16 upgrades from the F-35 money their stole. And make an empty statement that the EU is free to ignore.

    GarryB, Big_Gazza, GunshipDemocracy, JohninMK, zardof, lancelot, Mir and like this post

    avatar
    Dr.Snufflebug


    Posts : 1131
    Points : 1129
    Join date : 2017-12-27

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  Dr.Snufflebug Tue Jul 11, 2023 5:39 am

    Sweden has been a NATO country since the 1950s in all but name. Officially including it is merely a formality.

    Yes, it did claim to adhere to the principle of "freedom of alliance" during the Cold War. Some kind of alleged neutrality. But that was never the case.

    Hell, the U.S. kindly requested Sweden to send its airmen to die on spying missions vs the USSR from the late 1940s and onwards. Sweden happily obliged.

    So, merely a formality. That its own population was led to believe otherwise is a whole other story.

    sepheronx, GarryB, Big_Gazza, GunshipDemocracy, JohninMK, zardof, Sprut-B and like this post

    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 3172
    Points : 3168
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  lancelot Tue Jul 11, 2023 6:48 am

    This will eventually lead to the further implosion of the Swedish defense industry.

    I expect the Gripen NG to be the last fighter Sweden will produce. If even that gets produced in significant numbers.
    They already closed down the engine production facilities which were used to put together the RM12 engine for example.

    I also expect their submarine program to be axed.

    Their MIC will be a pale memory of what it used to be.

    sepheronx, GarryB, Big_Gazza, JohninMK, zardof, Hole, Mir and like this post

    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8847
    Points : 9107
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 35
    Location : Canada

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  sepheronx Tue Jul 11, 2023 7:07 am

    All of the nato and EU countries become the same - debt slaves with zero autonomy.

    Turkey proved they are useless idiots. Erdogan thinks he can have it all and with Putin at the helm, that may be true. Putin won't last forever and the next guy may be sick of Erdogans shit. Because it seems the Duma and somewhat of the security apparatus is sick of the Turks.

    zardof and owais.usmani like this post

    billybatts91
    billybatts91


    Posts : 706
    Points : 708
    Join date : 2022-02-23

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  billybatts91 Tue Jul 11, 2023 7:19 am

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Img_1310

    GunshipDemocracy and nomadski like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40537
    Points : 41037
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  GarryB Tue Jul 11, 2023 8:00 am

    It is definitely approaching genocidal proportions, but that is not Russia's doing, that seems to be part of some other plan. "Ukrainians are expendable" to the Pentagon, if SOME Russians die, it's worth all the Ukrainians we can find. The real "genocide" is to a hundred percent the work of the people attending the Vilnius summit.

    Maybe that is the secret... they figure the Soviet holomodor needs a modern equivalent they can pin on the Russians alone so they are keeping quiet and eventually they will release the real figures of what those evil Russians have been doing slaughtering the brightest and the best of Ukrainian manhood... (the rich and powerful have left of course and those with any power are in logistics well behind the front lines...).

    Poland and the Polish people today are feverent supporters of Neonazi Ukraine so that massacre couldn't have been all that bad in the end.

    The problem I would think is that it was the nazi poles and nazi Orcs that were doing the killing and the killing was obviously rather one sided so as they killed people the number or ratio of nazis increased, so it is the opposite of a good thing sadly.


    No, the systematic destruction of Ukrainians (genocide) is being led by Kiev and its western backers. The former are merely useful idiots, the latter know what they're doing.

    As far as the western backers are concerned they are all Russians or half Russians so the more death and destruction the better...

    Seems a deal was made then?

    Sweden is part of HATO in all but name... all they are waiting for is the badge.

    Wont strengthen HATO and when Sweden goes back to supporting Kurdish separatists Turkey is going to feel double crossed...

    Here’s one of the reasons that explains Turkey’s recent behavior…

    Hahahahaha... yeah, because the only thing preventing Turkey from joining the EU was lack of US support..... Rolling Eyes

    Fucking hilarious...

    Turkey proved they are useless idiots. Erdogan thinks he can have it all and with Putin at the helm, that may be true. Putin won't last forever and the next guy may be sick of Erdogans shit. Because it seems the Duma and somewhat of the security apparatus is sick of the Turks.

    Erdogan is still a useful person to Russia, but if he crosses the line too much it is very easy to punish him now... stop the Turk stream deals... and cut tourism... will cost them billions... but that is likely to hand the US their S-400 systems if you want to play such stupid games.

    But those are export models so they will only improve their own Patriot massively with access to export model S-400s.

    Big_Gazza, Godric, zardof, Hole and jon_deluxe like this post


    Sponsored content


    Turkey relations with US and NATO - Page 11 Empty Re: Turkey relations with US and NATO

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Nov 21, 2024 10:14 am