S-300/400/500 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #1

medo wrote:http://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201305280924-f47r.htm


They use S-300 complexes, that are already in Ashuluk and didn't take their own which are on duty. So it is possible, that they use older missiles for those live firings, where crews get practical skills firing on different targets. Such unexpected exercises actually show, what is real combat value of units.

I dont understand why do Russian fire expensive missile like S-300 in exercise unless these are EOL product that any way needs to be discarded.

C-300 hit all targets during exercises near Astrakhan


The combat readiness of the calculations of the S-300 "Favorite" was tested frontline aircraft, simulating a simulated enemy air raid.


MOSCOW, May 29 - RIA Novosti. Anti-aircraft missile units of troops Aerospace Defense (ASD) has successfully hit all targets during the live firing on the range "Ashuluk" near Astrakhan, said Wednesday the press service of the Russian military.

The beginning of a new dawn raids readiness of the Russian army on Monday morning announced the chief of the General Staff, Army General Valery Gerasimov. Checking the last three days, during a military campaign, "reflect" aerospace attack. As reported, the alarm raised by 8.7 thousand people, 185 combat aircraft and 240 armored fighting vehicles. On the teachings of the calculations of S-300, in particular, will have to reflect the massive air and missile attack on Ashuluk.

"Today, in the course of the audit readiness of troops ASD units, combat crews of anti-aircraft missile systems S-300" Favorite "on the range" Ashuluk "successfully repelled the massive missile and air attack conventional enemy," - said in a statement.

In the first stage combat effectiveness calculations of the S-300 "Favorite" was tested frontline aircraft, simulating a simulated enemy air raid. Aircraft operated at all altitudes, attacking disguised area with a variety of courses. Calculations of complex airborne targets were promptly detected and destroyed electronic starts.

At the second stage covers up the area was hit by six rockets target type "arquebus" that simulate high-speed maneuvering small-sized aerial targets. Characteristics of targets "arquebus" are identical to those of modern cruise missiles. All the targets were destroyed by rocket launches military S-300 "Favorite".



LINK

Viktor wrote:

hmm what's that dark grey missile at the front of the motto banner ?

It's kinda similar shape as the 2nd Stage of 9M83 missile for S-300V's but kinda different with small canard perhaps at its nose.

Viktor wrote:New self propelled TEL (51P6A) for S-400 system

Rpg type 7v wrote:http://en.rian.ru/military_news/20130531/181444491/Recent-Aerospace-Defense-Drills-Satisfactory--Putin.html
i would say dissapointing
only 9 out of 11 target were hit.
i would say s-300 even by trained russian crews has flopped and failed.
we can only imagine how easy it will be for israel to obliterate it with pathetic syrian crews...

Rpg type 7v wrote:c&c ,maybe but only if they were testing something new but s-300 shouldnt have any problems with any command station or missile garison because s-300 speaks all missile languages.
actually there was insider info that syrian crews were present at ashuluk testing range...but only as observers.

Rpg type 7v wrote:http://en.rian.ru/military_news/20130531/181444491/Recent-Aerospace-Defense-Drills-Satisfactory--Putin.html
i would say dissapointing
only 9 out of 11 target were hit.
i would say s-300 even by trained russian crews has flopped and failed.
we can only imagine how easy it will be for israel to obliterate it with pathetic syrian crews...

sepheronx wrote:9 out of 11 targets taken down is isn't a failure. It would be a failure if it was 6 or 7 IMO.

SOC wrote:So to see if I've got this right as of now:

2 batteries at Elektrostal
2 batteries at Dedenevo

1 battery at Kaliningrad

1 battery at Nakhodka

1 battery at Novorossiysk

Are there unit designators that can be applied to each location? Did I miss a deployment anywhere?

Rpg type 7v wrote:http://en.rian.ru/military_news/20130531/181444491/Recent-Aerospace-Defense-Drills-Satisfactory--Putin.html
i would say dissapointing
only 9 out of 11 target were hit.
i would say s-300 even by trained russian crews has flopped and failed.
we can only imagine how easy it will be for israel to obliterate it with pathetic syrian crews...

The audit will cover the combat calculations designated areas for the purpose of detecting and destroying aircraft and ballistic targets represented a real target. LINK

"In the calculations it is usually assumed that the air to intercept a ballistic target, or at least need to use two missiles. Probability of hitting a target, one air missiles are always lower than one, so the launch, as a rule, two interceptors. In this case, the result is better than anticipated Theory of fire, which is used in the aerospace defense forces, "- said Esin.

LINK

sepheronx wrote:It had nothing to do with the S-300. It had to do with the piss-poor management of the comanding officers using the C&C equipment. Anyway, even in US exercises, they do not get 100%, which is understandable as it is impossible to have 100% anyway.

Don't even know what you are ranting about.

The head of the Defense Ministry reported that during the exercises link the MiG-31 is the destruction of the real cruise missile launched from a strategic bomber Tu-95.

LINK

Thousands of civilian aircraft obstructed the work of the troops ASD checking


LINK

TR1 wrote:

Rpg type 7v wrote:http://en.rian.ru/military_news/20130531/181444491/Recent-Aerospace-Defense-Drills-Satisfactory--Putin.html
i would say dissapointing
only 9 out of 11 target were hit.
i would say s-300 even by trained russian crews has flopped and failed.
we can only imagine how easy it will be for israel to obliterate it with pathetic syrian crews...

lol, what else to expect from out village dolt!

I imagine Israeli A2G weapons have 100% hit rate.

Rpg type 7v wrote:yes seprenox guy was wrong no problem with c&c nore human factor.
and you are wrong too.
it sayt it did hit all of aircraft targets- using electronically simulated launches. they dont want to shoot their own men and aircraft that simulated enemy attack profiles.
true launches -live firing-were used against balistic targets and 2/11 were missed and that is bad.
even putin said himself -satisfactory-, meaning just over the bar ,not very good or excellent...

"You already reported to me during our work that the most vulnerable area, as we discussed recently with the commanders at the meetings in Sochi, is the command and communications system. Please pay particular attention to this area," the president said.

sepheronx wrote:

Rpg type 7v wrote:http://en.rian.ru/military_news/20130531/181444491/Recent-Aerospace-Defense-Drills-Satisfactory--Putin.html
i would say dissapointing
only 9 out of 11 target were hit.
i would say s-300 even by trained russian crews has flopped and failed.
we can only imagine how easy it will be for israel to obliterate it with pathetic syrian crews...

It had nothing to do with the S-300. It had to do with the piss-poor management of the comanding officers using the C&C equipment. Anyway, even in US exercises, they do not get 100%, which is understandable as it is impossible to have 100% anyway.

Don't even know what you are ranting about.

Rpg type 7v wrote:About nakhodka and s-400, that is in far east correct , just east of Vladivostok , im sure it covers whole sakhalin ,but what about kuril islands?

Arrow wrote:What about 40N6 missile?

Arrow wrote:What about 40N6 missile?

Viktor wrote:So far we know nothing about 40N6 and 9M96 line. All of them are according to last reports still on testing.

SOC wrote:

Viktor wrote:So far we know nothing about 40N6 and 9M96 line. All of them are according to last reports still on testing.

40N6 supposedly completed testing in mid-2012.