Cyrus the great wrote: Erk wrote: Cyrus the great wrote:The Russians have really changed the dynamics on the ground for the Syrian army, which is why I find it impossible to believe that the Syrians have apparently only recaptured 1.3% of their territory. The Western 'analyst' have likely committed a sleight of hand by calculating the gains in relation to Syria's overall size, when Syria is mostly desert and is very sparsely populated. The figures on the gains of the Syrian army would be significantly higher when only populated areas are taken into consideration.
The obvious question is what percentage of their territory needed to be recaptured from the terrorists? ie. what percentage of Syria do the terrorists control?
I would love to get a definitive answer on that. Based on the flawed Western data, the Syrian army currently only controls 20% of Syria but has over 66% of the Syrian population under its 'protection' - and I use that loosely.
About 60% of Syria is mostly Empty. most of the east of Syria that borders Jordan and IRAQ is desert and there are no rebels and neither Syrian army there. but if the rebels controls a road leading to the desert ,then they get the zone behind them under their flag. What really matters is the controls of Highways and major cities . So the Syrian army have about 60% control of the major cities. Measuring progress by looking at territory is the wrong way to look at things. Capturing Moscow for example to Napoleon did not defeated the Russian army ,it only was the begin of Napoleon defeat ,since overextended its supply lines and its army. Rebels do not have the numbers to capture all cities ,without major NATO direct help. Neither Syrian Army without Russia direct help. So far what matters is that the rebels are retreating in almost all places. Before Russia came ,it was the other way , Rebels were advancing in all fronts. So the momentum for now is on the side of Russia and Syrian army. If the Syrian Army with help of Russia airfoce close the border with Turkey , the entire operation of the terrorist will collapse without supplies and food. they will start suffering of low ammo ,and it will be very easy to recapture any territory.
said in other words ,the Syrian army only needs to liberate about 3-5% of territory in norther
Syria to collapse the Rebel front lines across most of Syria. the same for Southern Syria which
is where Israel /Jordan backup them. But nothing of this is explained by so called experts ,who
try to made it look that Syrian army to win needs to capture 100% of its territory ,when by only liberating 5% of 10% can provoke a collapse of the Rebels logistics and supply lines .
So if the Syrian army close the border of turkey with Syria.. withing 1-3 months the whole
fight of the Rebels will collapse. and they will have no more bullets or bombs or anti tank weapons to fight. will have to surrender or flee the battlefield towards IRAQ.
This means that once Idlib region is recaptured and the other half of Aleppo completely taken
this is about 15% - to 20% of Syria territory ,the whole war of NATO against Syria and their Alqaeda rebels will collapse like a house of cards. western rebels positions will have to be supplied from very far from IRAQ and will create a nightmare in logistics. They will then retreat
and their morale will sink completely. in 1-3 months after those 2 cities cleaned ,the whole thing will break. Is similar to Stalingrad.. when Nazis were defeated there..after being defeated in Leningrad, the whole invasion broke. a fight that lasted like 2 years.. the whole invasion collapsed ,and they began a major retreat all the way to germany. When enemy lose its most important places ,their morale and will to continue fighting will end. There was no way Nazis will want again to try once more Stalingrad after their best troops and division lost there and their army was already retreating in other fronts. So Aleppo and Idlib will be the stalingrad and leningrad of Syria.