JohninMK wrote:
Do you pick up anything as to whether Zakharchenko/Pushilin believe that they can withstand the assault and then reverse it on their own or are they reliant on support from the East?
As you have said, the really vulnerable area is in the south where there is little depth to absorb a big strike. Both sides know this but I suppose that the only people who know what Russia has in position to respond if it wants to that is Russia and US Int as I doubt either has passed much onto the locals. If true that means there are a lot of assumptions in the plans. Is there much open intel on what is there?
If Kiev plans to hide behind the Olympics they only have until the 21st, 16 days. Poro is in the Far East, presumably on his way to Rio as no way will he want to miss that opportunity to hobnob with his (in his mind only) peer group, Obama, Merkel etc! Will he want to be there if war starts?
The support from the West does seem to be very patchy. The most seems to be NATO related with lots of low level training stuff, probably plenty of skilled tactical advisors, odds and ends of military supplies. But very importantly, continued delays to the really crucial stuff, IMF money, the stuff that, if nothing else, they can loot and escape with.
There must be good strategic reasons why the money has stopped as the IMF is normally quite happy to lend to dictators and other basket cases in the knowledge that as it is a state debt they will get it back one day even if the cash 'disappeared'. To make it worse, no-one from the West is rushing in to buy State owned assets. The combination, and they must be linked given Western banking relationships, means that someone either does not believe any loan will ever be repaid or that one day the assets will be reclaimed or be much cheaper. Which leads to a painful lack of cash in the bank but at least with the weak Ruble what they have goes further on their crucial energy purchases.
All this leads to a simple choice, peace or war or run for the hills. Sadly history tells us it will be war and the longer they leave it the worse it gets for them.
I think that if ukrops try the various "route one" scenarios, between Donetsk and Gorlovka on an axis towards Shatersk, but not necessarily going that far, or under Donetsk from Elenovka and up to Makeevka, and in the south directly east either north or south of Telmanovo, then they will be held. The area to the NW of Shaktersk could be a huge killing field for ukrops, and they likely know this. I think in open warfare VSN can hold, tho there will be problems in some areas, it is inevitable in war if enough force is applied, even badly, that some form of success can be had, but not for long, and they may only need enough penetration to cause panic among civilians and all the problems that causes for defending, or withdrawing army. The issue, as I see it, is that Minsk allowed them to sit with one foot almost in Gorlovka and Donetsk. This is bad, very very bad. Here any "help" to an extent is negated as there is limit to how many forces can fit in one street fighting house to house, that is more a matter of fighting ability and being able to replace casualties, not brigades of Buryats or Kantemirovskaya division making dramatic advance in tanks. A cynical and hugely costly to civilian lives major bombardment of northern Donetsk with mass attack could breakthru and have ukrops tanks within ten minute drive of central Donetsk. There will be a plan against this of course, but while civilians live and work as normally as they can in what should be, in normal war, heavily defended urban zone, means that what should be done, the evacutaion of civilians and fortifying their homes and preparing to mine roads in the city, cannot be done, and with ukrops already on doorstep, no time when offensive comes. This is serious Achilles heel. Any breakthru, even if not major, into Donetsk could have disasterous consequences as civilians will be running, and it will be a morale problem if the ukrops rag is seen flying over Kievsky admin building for instance. This potential ability to make a very strong drive into heart of Donetsk is more threat than any open warfare, and if they make some progress into the center, and they could, then if they cannot be quickly thrown out, it will mean end of DNR as Donetsk cannot operate as capital if it is part occupied and major residential districts in south of city come within range of anything ukrops have, and the industrial areas are taken. If Kievsky and Kuibishevsky are taken, and they are vulnerable, or ukrops penetrate very far, they will not be viable as industrial areas. Kievsky houses Tochmash and that cannot be lost. Many mines are right on front line and could also be lost, and here Petrovsky is vulnerable. I'm sure ukrops cannot attack in force in all the areas that seem to be targets, for instance I think they cannot attack Telmanovo, Elenovka, Gorlovka, Dokuchaevsk with sufficient force at the same time, only in two with other attacks being diversions. I'm not sure thay can attempt drive into Donetsk and launch more than one other major attack anywhere on the entire front. We can all guess, but never know until it happens. I still think that a major attack will be launched in the south, but that maybe no offensives inbetween the cities, but straight into Donetsk, and enough diversions to make re-enforcement a problem. As for Lugansk, that is very cloudy and anything could happen in any direction, or nothing except diversions to keep LNR busy, and it will only be when ukrops are defeated at Donetsk that LNR will advance over the Donets. A caveat in that the possibility of ukrops attempting to encircle Donetsk and not try direct assault into city cannot be excluded. That would be the preffered attack they make as it will fail, and the pen ready to draw circles on the map of the pots they end up in is already poised.
24th August will of course feature more and more, and it did seem very certain they were going to attack either on evening of 24th or early morning of 25th last year, but otherwise I don't see Olympics as a factor and that 2008 and 2014 were simply co-incidence and that events were going to happen anyway. I still maintain that the offensive could happen at any day and they have been ready for months.
War? yes, without question, and in future years it will be seen as naive to think now that there is any solution other than war, unless there is a coup/revolution, but most normal UA officers have long defected and all senior commanders from the top down to brigade level are now seriously compromised as war crimminals and cannot afford to loose this war as they will be severely dealt with if they do not get out of Ukraine very quickly, if they survive the firestorm on the battlefield.....