(I'm still angry that no one took a car and ran those fucks over)
and
to that video FP posted?
I can see some signs of disgust in people's eyes when they are prompted to respond to "Slava Usraine" though.
Neutrality wrote:That video... yeah, I don't know what to say. How did that city go from this:
(I'm still angry that no one took a car and ran those fucks over)
and
to that video FP posted?
I can see some signs of disgust in people's eyes when they are prompted to respond to "Slava Usraine" though.
Neutrality wrote:Odessa was discussed plenty of times in 2014 after what happened. I'm not taking any sides here but flamming_python is mostly right about Odessa in general. People were tortured and burned alive in that building yet no real anti-Maidan force responded/retaliated in a proper manner. The biggest paradox of all is that the Odessa massacre is the sole reason for Donetsk's and Lugansk's uprising, yet the same didn't happen in Odessa. Why is that? Because either no one there is willing to fight Kiev or there is no real anti-Maidan movement left.
With that having said some people here want the Russian army (or something alike) to liberate them? And face an anti-Russian atmosphere in the city? Leave the armchair-general-attitude behind and start thinking clearly I'd say. The difference between Donetsk/Lugansk and Odessa is that the people in the first mentioned cities were willing to fight against what they saw as oppression. So again, as I mentioned before, the uprising in Odessa failed because there was no substantial force to fight against Kiev. Obviously I want the situation there to change just as much as you do but it won't happen soon. Maybe Odessitans will realize how catastrophic the new "reforms" are and Kiev's unwillingness or incompetence to better the economic situation in the country. Perhaps then they will demand more self-rule (which will obviously anger the forces in Kiev). Understand that the authoritarian measures currently in place are also Kiev's weakness. They will try to silence any dissident forces in Odessa through the SBU first. When that proves to be insufficient they'll bring in the National Guard or the army which will infuriate the people even more.
TheArmenian wrote:Thanks for the video Python. I had not seen that one.
Just as I expected, people are so unhappy about the occupation they are under. Given the chance, they will tear the Ukrop flag...
flamming_python wrote:TheArmenian wrote:Thanks for the video Python. I had not seen that one.
Just as I expected, people are so unhappy about the occupation they are under. Given the chance, they will tear the Ukrop flag...
Hah hah hah haha
ahah hah hah hah
Armenian, my friend - you're too much.
Or did you watch a different video?
TheArmenian wrote:flamming_python wrote:TheArmenian wrote:Thanks for the video Python. I had not seen that one.
Just as I expected, people are so unhappy about the occupation they are under. Given the chance, they will tear the Ukrop flag...
Hah hah hah haha
ahah hah hah hah
Armenian, my friend - you're too much.
Or did you watch a different video?
This is the video you posted:
I think you have not watched it carefully.
The video is made by Novorossiya supporters to demonstrate that the Majority of Mariopol resident are unhappy about the ukrop/fascist/Nazi occupation.
Watch the facial expressions and other non-verbal communication (body language, posture etc.). They show more than apathy, they show disdain and resentment plus much more.
Almost every person is answering with 0% excitement, they are saying "Geroyem Slava" because they have to, otherwise they may be in trouble.
It is like they are saying "here is your answer, and now f*ck off".
Neutrality wrote:I'd have loved to see Poroshenko's face when he heard about the news. Must've been pure agony. All the support they had in Washington was basically nullified in less than a month.
flamming_python wrote:Or did you watch a different video?
Karl Haushofer wrote:As for Odessa vs. Donbass, there is one thing you are forgetting. Donbass is bordered by Russia while Odessa is far and away from Russia. Russia had a much easier time supporting the Donbass rebels (and in fact starting a rebellion in Donbass) than it would have had in Odessa.
Without Russian assistance the rebellion in Donbass would have been crushed by Kiev. And Russia would have been in no position to help a similar rebellion on Odessa.
True, didn't think about Kharkov too much.Neutrality wrote:Karl Haushofer wrote:As for Odessa vs. Donbass, there is one thing you are forgetting. Donbass is bordered by Russia while Odessa is far and away from Russia. Russia had a much easier time supporting the Donbass rebels (and in fact starting a rebellion in Donbass) than it would have had in Odessa.
Without Russian assistance the rebellion in Donbass would have been crushed by Kiev. And Russia would have been in no position to help a similar rebellion on Odessa.
Kharkov shares a large border with Russia too. I don't think that's a legitimate argument.
kvs wrote:India and Pakistan used to be one united entity but got separated by the British. Now they are two utterly distinct entities.
That people got along at the individual level, like in Yugoslavia, does not guarantee national level integrity. The majority
of Ukrainians in 2013 were in an EU thrall including most of the "novorussians". They only cared about their material well
being and not some brotherhood of the peoples BS or even basic ethnic identity. Especially bad was that their children were
effectively brainwashed into Banderite drones. The old generation that remembers the pre-1991 era is on its way out. The
new generation of EU-tards and Benderatards is ascending.
Russia must not involve itself in restoring anything associated with Banderastan. It's too bad, but that is the cold, cruel reality.
The best thing that can happen if Banderastan does collapse into a 3rd world toilet. That might wake up some of its population
and neutralize the Banderites. But we'll have to wait and see.
miketheterrible wrote:kvs wrote:India and Pakistan used to be one united entity but got separated by the British. Now they are two utterly distinct entities.
That people got along at the individual level, like in Yugoslavia, does not guarantee national level integrity. The majority
of Ukrainians in 2013 were in an EU thrall including most of the "novorussians". They only cared about their material well
being and not some brotherhood of the peoples BS or even basic ethnic identity. Especially bad was that their children were
effectively brainwashed into Banderite drones. The old generation that remembers the pre-1991 era is on its way out. The
new generation of EU-tards and Benderatards is ascending.
Russia must not involve itself in restoring anything associated with Banderastan. It's too bad, but that is the cold, cruel reality.
The best thing that can happen if Banderastan does collapse into a 3rd world toilet. That might wake up some of its population
and neutralize the Banderites. But we'll have to wait and see.
they already had been turned into a third world shit hole, far worse than it was in 2013. What makes it even more pathetic is the fact the Banderites have been proven to not only be grossly incompetent, but even far more corrupt and sinister than Yanukovich. But, people instead put their heads in the sand and or sing thinking it will change anything. Sorry, but they have to rise up and fight or end up perishing while singing.
So I agree with both KVS and Flaming Python, in that Ukraine is lost. Russia must learn from this mistake so that in future it doesn't happen to more Russian states (Tatarstan, Chechnya, Siberia, etc) and just contain Ukraine and let it be a battleground. I think where Russia went wrong was recognizing Ukraine as a sovereign state to begin with. If they didn't and absorbed parts of it after USSR breakup, then it wouldn't have happened. But instead, they allowed it to be its own and allowed the western part (Polish) foster this hatred into rest of Ukraine, that it is what it is now. Russia is avoiding this by increasing patriotism in far east and south so that it will not spread to Russia.
But help Novorussia. At least those people are trying to maintain some kind of normality.
miketheterrible wrote:You two are forgetting something. The fact that Russia has an economy to run is that fact. If Russia just simply stops selling gas to EU or puts pressure on them, then it puts pressure on Russia's own citizens and businesses which could lead to an actual revolt or at least displeasure. Russia is going the third route that we didn't know existed - Winning the hearts and minds. In order to do so, they need to have jobs for their own people, money flowing, trade going and getting the idiot masses who cannot think for themselves beyond what TV and advertisements tells them, to be happy. In order for them to be happy is through consumption. And so in this case, they still demand for the european and other crap goods because they are good goy's and do whatever the media jew tells them. So Russia is playing at that game. While at the same time, obtaining foreign businesses and investments because as we all know (dating back to world war 2) even the Nazi's had foreign companies like Coke and IBM operate in the country regardless of sanctions. Russia is a prime market right now and many businesses are going to grab it. With Russia not making it obvious of their involvement in Ukraine, many business people really don't give two hecks about the sanctions and are investing in Russia. Doing so, keeps the people at home happy. All the while, they are making their plans and making the needed adjustments. They wont cut gas supplies to Europe anytime soon, not at least till the Nord 2 Stream is ready, Turk Stream, Power of Siberia and the LNG plants are ready. Then Russia can and will turn around and start making demands.
As well, they are waiting to see the leaderships upcoming from France, Germany and Italy. Things may change. Already EU is collapsing on its own.