Russian Navy: Status & News #3

PapaDragon wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:Then execute someone this level incompetence is absolutely unacceptable. The Lider class should be to priority.

And what would they need Liders for that is so urgent?

Isos wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:Then execute someone this level incompetence is absolutely unacceptable. The Lider class should be to priority.

And what would they need Liders for that is so urgent?

No that urgent but navy is the first defence of a country. And they dramatically needs big ships to send them patrol the oceans.

The-thing-next-door wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:Then execute someone this level incompetence is absolutely unacceptable. The Lider class should be to priority.

And what would they need Liders for that is so urgent?

Because a proper navy needs some destroyers the Lider class would be incredibly usefull in both nuclear and conventional warfare so what is the excuse for not building it.

Isos wrote:................
No that urgent but navy is the first defence of a country. And they dramatically needs big ships to send them patrol the oceans.

Isos wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:Then execute someone this level incompetence is absolutely unacceptable. The Lider class should be to priority.

And what would they need Liders for that is so urgent?

No that urgent but navy is the first defence of a country. And they dramatically needs big ships to send them patrol the oceans.

The-thing-next-door wrote:Lider class has greater endurance...

...... it can destroy enemy subs, aircraft,....

....ICBMs...

.....and can be used to regroupe after a nuclear war.

http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/4769897


SAINT-PETERSBURG, November 29. / TASS /. The construction of ships of the near sea zone with high-precision cruise missiles and strategic and multipurpose submarines will be the key point of the naval part of the state program of armaments (GWP) for 2018-2027. This was stated on Wednesday by Deputy Defense Minister Yury Borisov.

"A meeting was held in Sochi last week under the leadership of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, discussing in detail the new state armament program for the development of the Navy until 2027. The basic provisions that we have formed have been approved," Borisov said. at a meeting with the leadership of the Navy and representatives of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, dedicated to the implementation of the state defense order in 2017.
According to him, "the main emphasis in the upcoming 10-year period will be made on the construction of ships near the sea zone, equipped with high-precision weapons, including cruise missiles." "We will also develop a strategic nuclear fleet, multi-purpose submarines, repair and modernization of ships of the far sea zone (nuclear missile cruisers) Admiral Nakhimov and Peter the Great." We have a lot of work to do, "the deputy minister added.
Previously, Borisov reported on the results of the meeting in Sochi, that the main priority of the new LG will be the development of the forces of nuclear deterrence. In addition, special attention will be paid to high-precision weapon


Подробнее на ТАСС:
http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/4769897

The-thing-next-door wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:Then execute someone this level incompetence is absolutely unacceptable. The Lider class should be to priority.

And what would they need Liders for that is so urgent?

Because a proper navy needs some destroyers the Lider class would be incredibly usefull in both nuclear and conventional warfare so what is the excuse for not building it.

The-thing-next-door wrote:Lider class has greater endurance it can destroy enemy subs,aircraft,ICBMs and can be used to regroupe after a nuclear war.

Tingsay wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:Lider class has greater endurance it can destroy enemy subs,aircraft,ICBMs and can be used to regroupe after a nuclear war.

2 Super Gorshkovs > 1  Lider

same reason  why 2 decent sized carriers > 1 super carrier

The-thing-next-door wrote:...............

The Lider has the role of anti sub in a nuclear war and will have the S-500 so it should have a chance to hit the old 1970s missiles the west relies on.

PapaDragon wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:...............

The Lider has the role of anti sub in a nuclear war and will have the S-500 so it should have a chance to hit the old 1970s missiles the west relies on.

That's some powerful koolaid you have been drinking

Also, Lider does not exist and even if it did it would be useless in nuclear war same as any other surface vessel that does not take a bullet for nuclear subs to go trough

The-thing-next-door wrote:Oh and what does the "intoxicators" badge mean? I have seen that thing pop up quite allot on this forum.

eehnie wrote:No, the last part of the line.

The guy has also worse moments

https://www.russiadefence.net/t6442p25-syrian-civil-war-news-13#194756

The-thing-next-door wrote:Oh and what does the "intoxicators" badge mean? I have seen that thing pop up quite allot on this forum.

KiloGolf wrote:It's a meme, a legend, an idea.
It's a way of life. Intoxicators Strönk

eehnie wrote:

The-thing-next-door wrote:Oh and what does the "intoxicators" badge mean? I have seen that thing pop up quite allot on this forum.

Means misleading and deceptive indoctrinator. In this case against Russia. As example you can see his attitude in last part of the first paragraph of his last comment.

https://www.russiadefence.net/t3416p175-auxilliary-vessels-special-purpose-and-minor-naval-ships#210414

There is a group of them here, and some are proud of it.

Militarov wrote:Yes, proud and paid i must admit quite handsomly.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:I like that design sexy looking hovercraft.

that said they should build about six of these at least.

2 just isn't enough.