KoTeMoRe wrote:
Dropable fuel tanks.
Too bad
KoTeMoRe wrote:
Dropable fuel tanks.
mack8 wrote:Best video so far:
Heartbeer wrote:mack8 wrote:Best video so far:
What's that monstrosity on left hand side at 0:46? O_O
Once again, su 34 is such a beautifull plane, perfect curves.. I'd almost take it to dinner.
Militarov wrote:
New strike from last night.
"Old" one from yesterday.
Seems they hit same place again with something more potent as you can see where the entrance to that underground facility is, some good flashes are happening.
Militarov wrote:Heartbeer wrote:mack8 wrote:Best video so far:
What's that monstrosity on left hand side at 0:46? O_O
Once again, su 34 is such a beautifull plane, perfect curves.. I'd almost take it to dinner.
Anddd great, someone was faster than my post . I simply knew someone would ask about it
medo wrote:Militarov wrote:
New strike from last night.
"Old" one from yesterday.
Seems they hit same place again with something more potent as you can see where the entrance to that underground facility is, some good flashes are happening.
Nice to see that Su-34 use satellite guided KAB-500S bombs. Interesting is, that those night pictures are made from higher altitude. Are they from UAV or from Su-24M2 or Su-34 optical sight? If they are from their optical sight, that could prove they have FLIR camera inside for day night all weather operations.
Vann7 wrote:
Look at how erratic and in fear is now the American politicians when speaking
about Syria. She was asked a question about Syria and you could see from a mile how nervous
she became and gave an erratic answer that had nothing to do with the conflict in Syria..
We need to use force against Russia in Syria.. because.. err.. mm..
because you need to see how close they fly so close to our (american) borders..
Zivo wrote:Vann7 wrote:
Look at how erratic and in fear is now the American politicians when speaking
about Syria. She was asked a question about Syria and you could see from a mile how nervous
she became and gave an erratic answer that had nothing to do with the conflict in Syria..
We need to use force against Russia in Syria.. because.. err.. mm..
because you need to see how close they fly so close to our (american) borders..
Wow, what a dumb bitch.
Does she even realize how impossibly stupid her suggestion is? I really hope she watches that interview later tonight and starts kicking herself for that comment.
Militarov wrote:Few sources on Twitter claim this is video of air raid on Dayr al Asafir in suburbs of Damascus from few hours ago:
It seems original claim came from Qasioun news which are not really...very...pro Syrian .
KoTeMoRe wrote:Zivo wrote:Vann7 wrote:
Look at how erratic and in fear is now the American politicians when speaking
about Syria. She was asked a question about Syria and you could see from a mile how nervous
she became and gave an erratic answer that had nothing to do with the conflict in Syria..
We need to use force against Russia in Syria.. because.. err.. mm..
because you need to see how close they fly so close to our (american) borders..
Wow, what a dumb bitch.
Does she even realize how impossibly stupid her suggestion is? I really hope she watches that interview later tonight and starts kicking herself for that comment.
Oh, fantasizing about those Topols, isn't she.
OminousSpudd wrote:KoTeMoRe wrote:Zivo wrote:Vann7 wrote:
Look at how erratic and in fear is now the American politicians when speaking
about Syria. She was asked a question about Syria and you could see from a mile how nervous
she became and gave an erratic answer that had nothing to do with the conflict in Syria..
We need to use force against Russia in Syria.. because.. err.. mm..
because you need to see how close they fly so close to our (american) borders..
Wow, what a dumb bitch.
Does she even realize how impossibly stupid her suggestion is? I really hope she watches that interview later tonight and starts kicking herself for that comment.
Oh, fantasizing about those Topols, isn't she.
I see what you did there KoTeMoRe.
Militarov wrote:medo wrote:Militarov wrote:
New strike from last night.
"Old" one from yesterday.
Seems they hit same place again with something more potent as you can see where the entrance to that underground facility is, some good flashes are happening.
Nice to see that Su-34 use satellite guided KAB-500S bombs. Interesting is, that those night pictures are made from higher altitude. Are they from UAV or from Su-24M2 or Su-34 optical sight? If they are from their optical sight, that could prove they have FLIR camera inside for day night all weather operations.
I guess we cant be sure till they release more info on it. However SU34 should have integral UOMZ Platan electro-optical targeting system, from what we know it has laser designator and CCD TV channel, its somewhat of modern Kaira that was on SU24 but from all what we know it doesnt have FLIR/Thermal. However few times Russians have been spotted flying with French Thales Damocles FLIR/Target laser designation pods on SU24/34/30, apparently they even got licence to produce them, not sure how far that went its not hard to check. Russian option was SAPSAN-E pod, its still not fielded, after it "lost" in competition with Thales Damocles, i guess now they will finally finish it coz of sanctions.
So ill be bad Rusophile and say its probably UAV (French pod maybe... but we havent seen them there for now).
sepheronx wrote:Militarov wrote:medo wrote:Militarov wrote:
New strike from last night.
"Old" one from yesterday.
Seems they hit same place again with something more potent as you can see where the entrance to that underground facility is, some good flashes are happening.
Nice to see that Su-34 use satellite guided KAB-500S bombs. Interesting is, that those night pictures are made from higher altitude. Are they from UAV or from Su-24M2 or Su-34 optical sight? If they are from their optical sight, that could prove they have FLIR camera inside for day night all weather operations.
I guess we cant be sure till they release more info on it. However SU34 should have integral UOMZ Platan electro-optical targeting system, from what we know it has laser designator and CCD TV channel, its somewhat of modern Kaira that was on SU24 but from all what we know it doesnt have FLIR/Thermal. However few times Russians have been spotted flying with French Thales Damocles FLIR/Target laser designation pods on SU24/34/30, apparently they even got licence to produce them, not sure how far that went its not hard to check. Russian option was SAPSAN-E pod, its still not fielded, after it "lost" in competition with Thales Damocles, i guess now they will finally finish it coz of sanctions.
So ill be bad Rusophile and say its probably UAV (French pod maybe... but we havent seen them there for now).
Built in system does indeed have laser designator and CCD TV (IR I presume) but no thermal and no pods. Sapsan-E wasn't produced due to poorer performance and Domacles, even though they obtained licenses, never went more than a few. There wasn't a huge demand for Thermal imaging pods I suppose. But there was one shown recently on MiG-35 and the 101KS-N being developed for PAK FA (and I imagine others will receive it as well).
As for the guided munitions, well, we don't really know too much. The presumed issues with Glonass chips are long history issue as glonass devices are now more in circulation and growing. But about the munitions? I have a feeling Russia barely ordered any for years due to the surplus stock of soviet era missiles mixed in with the idea of using more dumb munitions but with new targeting systems (Gefast & T upgrade on Su-24M2's as an example) which greatly increases the precision strikes with dumb bombs. Things like Laser bombs and TV guided bombs seem to be far more common than glonass guided bombs, that is for sure.
Militarov wrote:sepheronx wrote:Militarov wrote:medo wrote:Militarov wrote:
New strike from last night.
"Old" one from yesterday.
Seems they hit same place again with something more potent as you can see where the entrance to that underground facility is, some good flashes are happening.
Nice to see that Su-34 use satellite guided KAB-500S bombs. Interesting is, that those night pictures are made from higher altitude. Are they from UAV or from Su-24M2 or Su-34 optical sight? If they are from their optical sight, that could prove they have FLIR camera inside for day night all weather operations.
I guess we cant be sure till they release more info on it. However SU34 should have integral UOMZ Platan electro-optical targeting system, from what we know it has laser designator and CCD TV channel, its somewhat of modern Kaira that was on SU24 but from all what we know it doesnt have FLIR/Thermal. However few times Russians have been spotted flying with French Thales Damocles FLIR/Target laser designation pods on SU24/34/30, apparently they even got licence to produce them, not sure how far that went its not hard to check. Russian option was SAPSAN-E pod, its still not fielded, after it "lost" in competition with Thales Damocles, i guess now they will finally finish it coz of sanctions.
So ill be bad Rusophile and say its probably UAV (French pod maybe... but we havent seen them there for now).
Built in system does indeed have laser designator and CCD TV (IR I presume) but no thermal and no pods. Sapsan-E wasn't produced due to poorer performance and Domacles, even though they obtained licenses, never went more than a few. There wasn't a huge demand for Thermal imaging pods I suppose. But there was one shown recently on MiG-35 and the 101KS-N being developed for PAK FA (and I imagine others will receive it as well).
As for the guided munitions, well, we don't really know too much. The presumed issues with Glonass chips are long history issue as glonass devices are now more in circulation and growing. But about the munitions? I have a feeling Russia barely ordered any for years due to the surplus stock of soviet era missiles mixed in with the idea of using more dumb munitions but with new targeting systems (Gefast & T upgrade on Su-24M2's as an example) which greatly increases the precision strikes with dumb bombs. Things like Laser bombs and TV guided bombs seem to be far more common than glonass guided bombs, that is for sure.
Yeah i know about 101KS-N, but its not in play here for sure . Yeah, Sapsan wasnt performing good enough to be obtained in numbers and Domacles it seems was too expencive due to components bought from France, despite having licence Russians still were buying some key components from original producer.
In general guided ammunition in Russia is somewhat of a long term issue, even tho they had some decent solutions even back in 80s they werent procured in significant numbres, as i said above in some post, in last few years Russia was ordering major guided missiles (i am talking about major size cruise missiles and anti shipping missiles) in amounts less than 100 per year. And US alone bought almost 250.000 GPS JDAM sets since 1997. (naturally decent portion was spent) so in terms of cheap "smart" warload Russia is really lagging behind. On top of everything Kosmos seems to have issues with production of enough dual GPS/Glonass reciever chips.
x_54_u43 wrote:I am very confident that these were Orlan drones, or perhaps a different Russian drone.
Unless Russia operates another foreign UAV other than the Hermes 450 or the ScanEagle, then these were certainly an Orlan type drone, unlikely to be an Eleron or a Zala however.
KoTeMoRe wrote:x_54_u43 wrote:I am very confident that these were Orlan drones, or perhaps a different Russian drone.
Unless Russia operates another foreign UAV other than the Hermes 450 or the ScanEagle, then these were certainly an Orlan type drone, unlikely to be an Eleron or a Zala however.
So far the Shahed drone has been good. And there's the CH-4...