Apparently use of RBK-500-SPBE-D.
And abit more about it:
Clearly that must be what that reliable intel source, the social networks, are saying. Probably related to the 150000 conscripts that will be battle trained in a couple of weeks.Neutrality wrote:CNN, quoting an official in the Pentagon, reports that there's a high chance Russia might start a ground operation in Syria.
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/05/politics/russia-ground-campaign-syria-isis/
Big red stars one hopes. It will help Turkish and other pilots id them as Russian. Never could understand the reason for low observability markings.medo wrote:http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201510051955-wnyr.htm
Some Russian planes in Syria get their start back on their tails and wings. I hope soon all of them will get their stars back.
Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL Targets in Syria, Iraq
From a Combined Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
SOUTHWEST ASIA, October 4, 2015 — U.S. and coalition military forces have continued to attack Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists in Syria and Iraq, Combined Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve officials reported today.
Officials reported details of the yesterday’s strikes, noting that assessments of results are based on initial reports.
Airstrikes in Syria
Fighter, bomber, ground-attack and remotely piloted aircraft conducted six airstrikes in Syria:
-- Near Hasakah, three strikes struck three separate ISIL tactical units and destroyed three ISIL structures, two ISIL fighting positions and an ISIL motorcycle.
-- Near Raqqah, a strike struck an ISIL tactical unit.
-- Near Mara, a strike destroyed an ISIL excavator.
-- Near Washiyah, a strike damaged an ISIL excavator..........................
Neutrality wrote:CNN, quoting an official in the Pentagon, reports that there's a high chance Russia might start a ground operation in Syria.
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/05/politics/russia-ground-campaign-syria-isis/
"A senior defense official has told NBC News that the Russian military has been moving artillery and ground forces towards Hama — one of the locations that the Russians targeted in the first 24 hours of their airstrikes.
"So much for fighting ISIS," the defense official said."
If the 'activists' in Syria pick it up it will probably increase levels of panic, desertions etc., as they would reasonably believe that the Russians would just roll over them, no mercy. Perhaps not what the Pentagon intended when it briefed NBC.Cyberspec wrote:Regarding the incident with the unidentified MiG-29, Interfax is reporting it was actually a Su-30
http://militarynews.ru/story.asp?rid=1&nid=391372
"A senior defense official has told NBC News that the Russian military has been moving artillery and ground forces towards Hama — one of the locations that the Russians targeted in the first 24 hours of their airstrikes.
"So much for fighting ISIS," the defense official said."
I think they're confusing the Syrian Army with the Russian Army
Neutrality wrote:Solncepek wrote:Russia must work with, not against, America in Syria
The Russian naval and air presences in Syria are vulnerable, isolated geographically from their homeland. They could be “disarmed” if they persist in provoking the US. But, better still, Russia might be persuaded to act with the US in seeking a wider accommodation to a regional problem that transcends the interests of a single state.
With all due respect to the man's reputation but how is he so certain about the US "disarming" a Russian base? One look at the map and it should be clear who's going to come up with a much harsher response if it comes down to provocations. This accentuates the core logic of American geopolitics. Notice how he mentions a military option before the "common interests" option? They didn't shoot at Russian paratroopers in Pristina airport, they didn't respond when the Russian navy was ramming their ships in the Black Sea and I'm positive they won't lift a finger in Syria. All talk but no walk.
Regular wrote:Nato ground forces in Syria? Where they would come from?" Turkey?
Nato will bark and caravan will move on. The better Russians performe, the more allies will squeal. Only thing that makes me worry would be SA anti air weaponry.sepheronx wrote:Regular wrote:Nato ground forces in Syria? Where they would come from?" Turkey?
Exactly.
So this Zbignew or whatever is clearly retarded. But then again, many people were calling him out on his stupidity for decades.
Regular wrote:Nato will bark and caravan will move on. The better Russians performe, the more allies will squeal. Only thing that makes me worry would be SA anti air weaponry.sepheronx wrote:Regular wrote:Nato ground forces in Syria? Where they would come from?" Turkey?
Exactly.
So this Zbignew or whatever is clearly retarded. But then again, many people were calling him out on his stupidity for decades.
Syrian Air Force
March 25, 2014 ·
Report on the MiG-29 and Turkish shoot down
While bombing terrorist targets inside Syria, a Syrian MiG-29 came under radar lock from a Turkish F-16, which proceeded to fire two AMRAAM air to air missiles. The pilot decided to eject when the first missile hit. This represents the first lost of a MiG-29 for Syria in any war and was a very serious act of war by the Turkish military.
We've been authorised to declare that any Turkish aircraft that approaches Syrian jets, whether in international airspace, or in so-called Turkish airspace over occupied Iskenderun will be locked on to. Should these jets turn on their radar systems, they will be fired on with air-to-air missiles and destroyed.
The aim of Turkey in these attacks is to scare the Syrian air force to deploy over the very sensitive area north of Latakia, but these aims have failed and the ugly face of the Turkish air force has revealed itself, they too are the enemies of Syria. We are vindicated in our decision to shoot down the various jets and drones that have approached or violated our airspace
sepheronx wrote:Regular wrote:Nato will bark and caravan will move on. The better Russians performe, the more allies will squeal. Only thing that makes me worry would be SA anti air weaponry.sepheronx wrote:Regular wrote:Nato ground forces in Syria? Where they would come from?" Turkey?
Exactly.
So this Zbignew or whatever is clearly retarded. But then again, many people were calling him out on his stupidity for decades.
Manpads are a threat to the helicopters. Not the other aircrafts.
And if found out even more, I bet Russia would love to help those houthi's.