Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
PapaDragon wrote:sepheronx wrote:Confirmed Kh-55?
The engine still looks in good shape.
Is warhead safe enough to screw around with? I would keep my distance just to be on the safe side....
Don't see warhead on those pictures. And nothing is safe when it did not work like intended that is why ROE teams are always called.
The other thing i wanted to know is due the shape like KoTeMore mentioned it is pancaked that would pop up some questions, why is the missile not burned away or remains of fuel visible, warhead does not seem to be in those pictures just the rear engine part.
Like no one can make more than two pictures to show the whole thing from different angles but are masters when it comes to making 1000 duck faces or other retarded pictures on twitter and co. Like KVS said they are somehow magically capable to know the exact location where Cruise missiles will pass by and provide footage of them without shacky cameras but in every other situation of claims they never are capable to hold camera still, provide quality above 144p or never show the entire damn thing. Core of that is everything that has remarkable low quality or is showing parts of it is already very suspicious in todays times. There are more mobile phones in Africa then their are people so don't tell me oil rich countries and regions don't spread mobile phones with cameras all through the region.
http://wikimapia.org/#lang=en&lat=35.198851&lon=40.080142&z=15&m=b
