Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues
magnumcromagnon wrote:#US military thieves convoy travelling in the northwestern #Hasakah province. There were at least 8+ armored vehicles providing security for stolen fuel tankers and commercial vehicles.
#Syria #USA #Syrianarmy
https://twitter.com/I30mki/status/1324668153645862913
GarryB likes this post
kvs likes this post
then it is true that the new Iraqi prime minister (since spring 2020) is a British stooge... are the people tolerating him?JohninMK wrote:
Spriter
@spriter99880
·
5h
The Al-Kazemi government in Iraq responds to US pressure and issues a decision to prevent Syrian planes from passing through Iraqi airspace ... and only allow flights between the two countries (temporarily).
Spriter
@spriter99880
·
5h
The decision has serious consequences if Syria's allies do not move in Baghdad, as the Syrian flights to Iran, Russia and other countries will stop due to Al-Kazemi's decision
GarryB, flamming_python and starman like this post
According to whom are they stolen?. Sure I have seen my boys take things but I have seen Russia do the same.
Your implying that American forces got behind SAA roadblocks and Russian checkpoints were allowed to go near the vehicles and just take what they wanted.
This is a tweet, tweets don't make things true. You can very easily take a picture and put whatever hashtag you want on it.
GarryB wrote:According to whom are they stolen?. Sure I have seen my boys take things but I have seen Russia do the same.
Your implying that American forces got behind SAA roadblocks and Russian checkpoints were allowed to go near the vehicles and just take what they wanted.
This is a tweet, tweets don't make things true. You can very easily take a picture and put whatever hashtag you want on it.
I am guessing when they say stolen oil tankers, they mean the oil is stolen... not the tanker trucks.
GarryB wrote:According to whom are they stolen?. Sure I have seen my boys take things but I have seen Russia do the same.
Your implying that American forces got behind SAA roadblocks and Russian checkpoints were allowed to go near the vehicles and just take what they wanted.
This is a tweet, tweets don't make things true. You can very easily take a picture and put whatever hashtag you want on it.
I am guessing when they say stolen oil tankers, they mean the oil is stolen... not the tanker trucks.
SeigSoloyvov wrote:GarryB wrote:
I am guessing when they say stolen oil tankers, they mean the oil is stolen... not the tanker trucks.
Again......Who claims that? Some tweet?. May I remind you in that area the Kurds are in control of the oil fields and we have forces stationed there. They give us oil.
Just because some clickbait Twitter post says something that doesn't make it true.
Hole likes this post
JohninMK wrote:SeigSoloyvov wrote:GarryB wrote:
I am guessing when they say stolen oil tankers, they mean the oil is stolen... not the tanker trucks.
Again......Who claims that? Some tweet?. May I remind you in that area the Kurds are in control of the oil fields and we have forces stationed there. They give us oil.
Just because some clickbait Twitter post says something that doesn't make it true.
You are being a bit obtuse methinks. The oil in the ground is owned by the sovereign Syrian Government. If, as is clear, the Kurds or others are pumping it out, putting it into road tankers and shipping it to anyone, including themselves, other than the Damascus government then that oil is being stolen. Unless Damascus has agreed that they can of course.
Surely you can't be disputing that?
Again......Who claims that? Some tweet?. May I remind you in that area the Kurds are in control of the oil fields and we have forces stationed there. They give us oil.
Just because some clickbait Twitter post says something that doesn't make it true.
kvs wrote:That we are discussing the trivially obvious fact that the US is engaged in oil theft from Syrian oil wells is absurd.
SS is a propaganda weened, mentally deficient troll who doubles down on every single BS talking point he spews.
Like with the non-existent referendum in Kosovo.
Even in America and for sure in Canada, people living over resources do not automatically own them. So whatever
the feelings of Kurds, the oil is not theirs. Until Syria is partitioned these Kurds do not get to act like they are
living in a separate country. As usual, they can flaunt the law because the US invaders are there to back up
their criminality.
When Bidet attempts to win again in Syria, Russia should help Syria clean its soil form yanqui occupants.
GarryB wrote:With Biden in power it is likely inevidible... they can either start the war to end all wars... or start paying their bills and living to a budget...
Tell me which you think is most likely?
GarryB wrote:With Biden in power it is likely inevidible... they can either start the war to end all wars... or start paying their bills and living to a budget...
Tell me which you think is most likely?
The network reported that the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz will be transferred to the Persian Gulf region along with other warships to provide combat support and air cover with the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq and Afghanistan by January 15.
Not really the right thread to discuss it but no, if the US was going to attack it is unlikely that they would position a carrier task group as a sitting duck. Unless they wanted to lose it as well as their land bases in the area which again is unlikely as it would damage the US invulnerability image.DerWolf wrote:The network reported that the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz will be transferred to the Persian Gulf region along with other warships to provide combat support and air cover with the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq and Afghanistan by January 15.
Is this the real reason for deploying or attacking Iran?
|
|
|
Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
