Doesn't seem like it. There is confirmed shelling of Verdenis-Sotk highway in Armenia.
Armenian ambassador said they won't ask russian help as of now because that's not a full war and Russia wants to maintain good relations with both.
Doesn't seem like it. There is confirmed shelling of Verdenis-Sotk highway in Armenia.
Okay. I can understand.Isos wrote:@Seig that's what I said.
Doesn't seem like it. There is confirmed shelling of Verdenis-Sotk highway in Armenia.
Armenian ambassador said they won't ask russian help as of now because that's not a full war and Russia wants to maintain good relations with both.
lyle6 wrote:Half of Artsakh including the capital Stepanakert is within artillery range from Armenia. The Azeris simply can't advance if those guns can shoot with impunity. But retaliating would involve attacking Armenian soil - just exactly the excuse the Russians need. Ditto for its BMs and heavy rocket artillery.SeigSoloyvov wrote:
Uncorrect and correct.
CSTO requires you to be attacked on your home soil, Since not even Russia considers the land in question part of Armenia formally. CSTO would not have to act in any military mnner if request.
Long as Azerbaijan only attacks the disputed region, Russia isn't required to act.
The only part you are correct on is IF they attack land Russia considers to be part of Armenia that it will be forced into action.
You are being illogical. Russia risks losing Armenia as an ally and the CSTO framework if they allow the Azeris to capture Karabakh without firing a single Russian bullet, and all for what? The possibility that maybe the Azeris might align with the Russians somehow? That's delusional.
Sorry but there's no end state where the Azeris and Turks come out on top. Just in dead bodies and debt.
Maximmmm wrote:Today seemed to be more about political posturing than anything else.
We saw the joint US_France-Russia statement calling for peace and of course the Turkish rebuttal, there's the typical mud-slinging at the Armenian-Azeri level as well.
Thinking about it from a different perspective, maybe if this keeps going for a bit the west can finally be distracted from Navalny, Belarus and Nord-Stream2. Maybe we can even get around to restarting the construction of the final stretch while this goes on.
slasher likes this post
You simply don't get it. Its immaterial whether Russia considers Artsakh a part of Armenia or not - their ally Armenia certainly does. Artsakh is not just a historic territory of the Armenian peoples - its home to people the Armenian state has a responsibility to protect simply because they are kin. Its basic human instinct, a matter that you can't horse trade with. Whether Russia is behind them or not, the Armenians will fight, and it will get ugly and they are going to require Russia's help. If Russia fails to follow through, then Armenia is simply lost to them. Expect a NATO brigade at the gates of the 102nd coming to evict. To support Armenia is simply pragmatism, to do otherwise is to reserve a spot in the nearest loony bin.SeigSoloyvov wrote:
I am not being "illogical", Russia does not consider the disputed land to be part of Armenia (No one country in the world considers that region to be part of Armenia) and CSTO requires you are attacked on home soil.
CSTO will not come to the aid of "Disputed Lands" the collective defense treaty doesn't have the clause "if you are attacked on lands considered occupied".
I don't give a shit if Turks or Azeris die, I am simply stating the facts as they are. Which is since Karabakh is considered occupied even by the Russians, the Russians have no obligation under the treaty to assist in defense of that region.
You don't like it? tough that's the facts.
flamming_python likes this post
lyle6 wrote:You simply don't get it. Its immaterial whether Russia considers Artsakh a part of Armenia or not - their ally Armenia certainly does. Artsakh is not just a historic territory of the Armenian peoples - its home to people the Armenian state has a responsibility to protect simply because they are kin. Its basic human instinct, a matter that you can't horse trade with. Whether Russia is behind them or not, the Armenians will fight, and it will get ugly and they are going to require Russia's help. If Russia fails to follow through, then Armenia is simply lost to them. Expect a NATO brigade at the gates of the 102nd coming to evict. To support Armenia is simply pragmatism, to do otherwise is to reserve a spot in the nearest loony bin.SeigSoloyvov wrote:
I am not being "illogical", Russia does not consider the disputed land to be part of Armenia (No one country in the world considers that region to be part of Armenia) and CSTO requires you are attacked on home soil.
CSTO will not come to the aid of "Disputed Lands" the collective defense treaty doesn't have the clause "if you are attacked on lands considered occupied".
I don't give a shit if Turks or Azeris die, I am simply stating the facts as they are. Which is since Karabakh is considered occupied even by the Russians, the Russians have no obligation under the treaty to assist in defense of that region.
You don't like it? tough that's the facts.
nomadski wrote:So let's do nothing. Since the fighting is in disputed territory. Let's allow one or other side to make gains and losses. Create more refugees and more disputed territory. And since fighting is within this increasing disputed territory, we will increasingly do nothing. Until one nation is swallowed by another and occupied, and the entire territory is disputed, and we can do absolutely nothing, since entire territory is disputed.
Irrespective of recognition by one state of another, an occupying power is de- facto power and has legal responsibility, for territory under control. Therefore the boundary is the line of contact. And Armenia is attacked, if attacked at any point along this line, or on territory it excersises control. And so is Azerbaijan.
Therefore, even if territories not recognised or in dispute, the line of contact defines legal boundaries. The best plan is a negotiation, leading to new boundaries that both states find more agreeable. Not further war, refugees and destruction.
It doesn't but it will be forced to act all the same. Or Armenia would find an ally that will. I hear NATO is in the neighborhood for try outs, and Iran is free.SeigSoloyvov wrote:
Russia does not have an obligation to protect its ally's annexations and Armenia is well aware of this fact, if Armenia wants to keep the land let them but the Russians aren't going to support them with military force while doing so and honestly they shouldn't. This is a war Armenia started when it occupied land recognized by everyone including Russia has being part of another country, so Armenia will be fighting this war on their own.
Demanding the Russians protect is ignorant they have no treaties or obligations to protect that region and they aren't going to do it period, Armenia is well aware of this fact.
nomadski wrote:I am against any state, taking sides here to advance the cause of either side as well. But according to this CSTO, ...... ".. come to aid, if attacked on home soil....." Since a long time passed since territory changed hands, enough time for homes to be built and children born and new generation. Then Armenia is on home soil. Many refugees who made homes elsewhere and had children, also are now on home soil. A new generation. A regenerative cycle. Those that have not made homes or children in new territory, are not on home soil. They have more right of return or exit. The world should help in this. Stop the fighting. Stop offensives, by providing defense. Come to aid.
miketheterrible wrote:Georgia blocked access to its airspace to Russia. So no, they have to go through Iran
franco, par far, Maximmmm, miketheterrible and thegopnik like this post
The Ottoman wrote:What if this is a joint Turko-Russian plan?
1.- Both nations lost a vast amount of armour, weapons, vehicles, aircraft and ammo. Both sides will place orders by Russia and Turkey.
2.- This war is decreasing the attention for Nordstream 2, Belarus and Navalny. Good for Russia.
3.- This war is also decreasing the attention for the Aegean, the Eastern Mediterranean and the Turkish economy. Good for Erdogan.
4.- This is the 6th theater where Turkey and Russia are involved in.
- Syria (fighting eachother with proxys & cooperating for peace)
- Libya (fighting eachother with proxys)
- Afghanistan (cooperating for peace)
- Balkan Theater (cooperating economicly with Turkstream and Serbian-Bosnian highway project)
- Eastern Mediterranean (silently observing eachothers maneuvers and drills)
Putin and Erdogan talked on the phone, and Cavusoglu and Lavrov did also today. They said it were good talks.
Something is happening, something is planned behind closed doors. I dont know what to think.
Tsavo Lion wrote:Yerevan and Baku are not satisfied with the prospect of a protracted war
The Turks r more warlike, but the Armenians & Iranians (whom Turks once controlled) r more ancient culturally & smarter.
slasher likes this post