bitcointrader70 wrote:
I’m Russian idiot.
That makes sense.
bitcointrader70 wrote:
I’m Russian idiot.
flamming_python, auslander, miketheterrible, bitch_killer and Arkanghelsk like this post
kvs, Finty and Arkanghelsk like this post
JohninMK wrote:Not a very good map, sorry. There is a second explosion, could be a petrol station.
Spriter
@spriter99880
·
14m
The part where the explosion took place is part of the Druzba pipeline network. One of the largest gas supply networks in the world passes through Lugansk
Intelsky
@Intel_sky
·
34m
UPDATE - The Druzhba gas pipeline is on fire in Luhansk, eastern Ukraine after a powerful explosion - RIA reports
Ukraine War Report@UkrWarReport·47m
Initial unconfirmed reports that a gas pipeline exploded in rebel-held Luhansk area.
sundoesntrise likes this post
He's technically an ethnic mental-midget. He's as much Russian as I'm a Martian!ALAMO wrote:bitcointrader70 wrote:
I’m Russian idiot.
That makes sense.
kvs, miketheterrible and Arkanghelsk like this post
JohninMK wrote:Not a very good map, sorry. There is a second explosion, could be a petrol station.
Spriter
@spriter99880
·
14m
The part where the explosion took place is part of the Druzba pipeline network. One of the largest gas supply networks in the world passes through Lugansk
Intelsky
@Intel_sky
·
34m
UPDATE - The Druzhba gas pipeline is on fire in Luhansk, eastern Ukraine after a powerful explosion - RIA reports
Ukraine War Report@UkrWarReport·47m
Initial unconfirmed reports that a gas pipeline exploded in rebel-held Luhansk area.
GarryB likes this post
bitcointrader70 wrote:Russia’s soft power over Europe is selling oil/gas/energy/natural resources. Other than that no ones want any of Russian crap. Ever heard of anyone wanting a Russian smartphone? How about a computer? How about an automobile? How about even clothes?
Nope I don’t think so.
GarryB, flamming_python, dino00, Big_Gazza, kvs, auslander, JohninMK and like this post
Isos wrote:There is no hope for talks. Diplomacy totally failed.
GarryB, magnumcromagnon, kvs, auslander, Hole, sundoesntrise and Arkanghelsk like this post
miketheterrible wrote:Yeah, seriously, start removing these morons Garry. You are just allowing these threads to be filled with retards and lack of contribution besides their diarrhea
GarryB, magnumcromagnon, par far, Big_Gazza, kvs, Manov, auslander and like this post
Big_Gazza wrote:Isos wrote:There is no hope for talks. Diplomacy totally failed.
Russians tried diplomacy. They talked to the American'ts. In response, the Murkans did their usual - talked at the Russians, and past the Russians, but never to the Russians.
If Ukopistan attacks, Russia can adequately respond without having to send a single uniformed soldier across the border. Long range arty and MLRS conduct deep strikes into the enemy rear to target their supplies & logistics, troop concentrations and arty positions. Russia establishes air superiority and after making examples of whatever rag-tag Soviet-era air-frames the enemy manages to throw airborne, its then a free-for-all CAS action to support DPR/LPP ground units.
Murkan propaganda about "Russian invasion" is intended to give cover to the Ukronazis when they finally get their shit together and launch an offensive. Western MSM nations will spin the inevitable Russian response as "aggression" or "invasion", and these corrupt sock puppets will sit back smugly and lecture all and sundry "we told you so". Needless to say, our feckless MSM scribblers will happily act as cheerleaders for fascist aggression and will celebrate as people are killed in their latest engineered atrocity.
NATOstani plotters think they will engineer "Krajina 2". On the contrary, they will learn the harsh lesson that was handed to Saakashvilli in 2008. Don't fck with the Bear in his own den.
sundoesntrise and Arkanghelsk like this post
kvs likes this post
As you can clearly see, Druzhba doesn't pass anywhere near Lugansk. Also, it is an oil pipeline. Soyuz pipeline is a gas pipeline that passes through Lugansk oblast, but through northern part, controlled by Ukraine. What exploded was, probably, one of the spurs off Soyuz pipeline.JohninMK wrote:Not a very good map, sorry. There is a second explosion, could be a petrol station.
Spriter
@spriter99880
·
14m
The part where the explosion took place is part of the Druzba pipeline network. One of the largest gas supply networks in the world passes through Lugansk
Intelsky
@Intel_sky
·
34m
UPDATE - The Druzhba gas pipeline is on fire in Luhansk, eastern Ukraine after a powerful explosion - RIA reports
Ukraine War Report@UkrWarReport·47m
Initial unconfirmed reports that a gas pipeline exploded in rebel-held Luhansk area.
GarryB likes this post
caveat emptor wrote:
As you can clearly see, Druzhba doesn't pass anywhere near Lugansk. Also, it is an oil pipeline. Soyuz pipeline is a gas pipeline that passes through Lugansk oblast, but through northern part, controlled by Ukraine. What exploded was, probably, one of the spurs off Soyuz pipeline.
GarryB likes this post
Yeah? According to Pavlov's Dogvig that's not a reason to evacuate, even when you have pipelines exploding! For context Pavlov's Dogvig also said Aegis Ashore systems launching Tomahawk missiles was not a legitimate reason to cry foul of INF Treaty violation (circa 2019).Backman wrote:Judging by Twitter , the contact line has gone hot
GarryB, kvs, LMFS, Hole and lancelot like this post
ALAMO wrote:bitcointrader70 wrote:
I’m Russian idiot.
That makes sense.
kvs wrote:Only losers define their identity as being "other than". Ukrs have no real identity and steal their history from Russia. They are
a western project. The only real Ukrs are the ones in the westernmost part that are essentially Polaks. They even sound like
them.
It actually makes sense for the Kiev regime and its NATzO patrons to move to Lvov.
kvs, auslander and LMFS like this post
ALAMO wrote:bitcointrader70 wrote:
I’m Russian idiot.
That makes sense.
ALAMO likes this post
Your boy Putin offered the better deal and outbid the EU.... a lot of billions for a country nobody cares about. A lot of billions for a country nobody "should" care about.
Putin warned the West, but the West didn't listen.
Like it or not, the Russian president is doubling down on his crusade against American hegemony
By Paul Robinson, a professor at the University of Ottawa. He writes about Russian and Soviet history, military history and military ethics, and is author of the Irrussianality blog. He tweets at @Irrussianality.
Fifteen years ago in Munich, Vladimir Putin shook the West with a sharp attack on its efforts to bend the world to its will. The West chose not to listen. As the clouds of war gather over Europe, one has to ask if that was wise.
With US officials anonymously briefing journalists that Russia will invade Ukraine within days, one wonders how things came to this. The optimism that prevailed after the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union some 30 years ago has been replaced by very real fears of war in Europe. Something went badly wrong. What, precisely?
Roughly at the mid-point between the end of the Cold War and today, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin gave a speech which provides an explanation, and which historians may well look back to as something of a turning point. Delivered to the Munich Conference on Security Policy on February 10, 2007, that’s 15 years ago last week, the speech was interpreted by many as a declaration of war on the West. This was a misinterpretation. Putin didn’t threaten the West with anything. Instead, he simply gave it a warning – if it continued along the same path, it would sow the seeds of its own destruction. Time has perhaps proven him right.
In his speech, Putin made a number of specific complaints. First, he objected to the idea of a unipolar order in which one country, the US, has dominated all others. This model, he said, “is not only unacceptable but also impossible in today’s world.” On the one hand, power was shifting; on the other hand, the unipolar model provided “no moral foundations for modern civilization.”
Second, Putin complained of “an almost uncontained hyper use of force – military force – in international relations.” While he didn’t mention any specific examples, it is likely that the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq was high on his list.
And third, the Russian president spoke of “a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law. … One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way.” The result was that “no one feels safe … because no one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them.”
These complaints have formed the basis of Russian foreign policy discourse ever since, with similar statements cropping up time and again in speeches and official documents. Anybody who had been paying attention at Munich 15 years ago should not have been surprised by subsequent Russian behaviour, as Putin had laid out his objectives very clearly.
These included the ending of the unipolar system and a return to a global order at whose center would lie not a single country but rather the United Nations. At Munich, Putin demanded a rethink of “the architecture of global security.” This would mean a system that provided “a reasonable balance between the interests of all participants in the international dialogue,” the use of force “should be a really exceptional measure,” and “the only mechanism that can make decisions about using military force as a last resort is the Charter of the United Nations.”
It is sometimes said that Putin is an ideologically flexible pragmatist, willing to shift his public position in accordance with what suits his practical objectives at any given moment. In fact, when it comes to international affairs, he has been extraordinarily consistent over time. The basic outlines laid out in the Munich speech haven’t changed and can be seen, for instance, in Putin’s recent joint statement with Chinese president Xi Jinping. This includes a call “to protect the United Nations-driven international architecture and the international law-based world order, [and] seek genuine multipolarity with the United Nations and its Security Council playing a central and coordinating role.”
The demand in Munich for a new “global security architecture” is also the primary element of Russia’s recent diplomatic offensive, with Moscow insisting that Ukraine is not its primary concern. Rather it desires a complete overhaul of the way in which international security is governed. Russian commentators have been somewhat dismissive of Western claims that the country is poised to invade Ukraine, arguing that the West is entirely missing the point.
In light of all this, it’s worth noting what a Russian invasion of Ukraine would actually mean. For the past 15 years, ever since the Munich speech, Russian officials have been arguing against the unilateral use of force and demanding a UN-centered security system founded on international law. Were we to wake up one day and find that Russian tanks were rolling towards Kiev without any kind of excuse, it would amount to a complete abandonment of 15 years of argumentation as well as a negation of the entire legal/moral position built up by the Russian Federation in that period, a position reinforced just this month in the Putin/Xi statement.
It would also be very odd. For you can hardly achieve the objective of a multipolar world based on the principles of UN supremacy and international law by means of a massive breach of those very same principles. It would be extraordinarily self-defeating. A certain skepticism about the allegedly “imminent” Russian invasion of Ukraine is therefore due. It’s not impossible, but one has to wonder why, after so many years of consistency, Putin would suddenly change his position in such a drastic way.
As for the West, looking back at its self-destructive errors in recent years, one might consider Putin something of a prophet. But if so, it’s a prophet in the guise of the Trojan princess Cassandra who was fated to be always right but never believed. Rather than taking heed of Putin’s warning, Western leaders have bludgeoned onwards, toppling Colonel Gaddafi in Libya, aiding rebels in Syria, attempting (and failing at) regime change in Venezuela, fighting and losing against the Taliban, sanctioning Iran, supporting revolution in Ukraine, and so on. It has not turned out well. We can’t say we weren’t warned.
Somehow they don't care about any Russians inside Ukraine (ethnic majority) outside of contested borders of the Donbass (drawn up on the fly)...
Somehow Russia doesn't care about Ukraine but will threaten to prevent NATO ascension of Ukraine with "military-technical" measures and potential invasion ambiguity.... consequences of which could equal a break up with the West (most influential and powerful economic, political bloc on the planet). That's a lot on the line for a country Russia doesn't give a shit about...
Why the obvious lie? why the obvious spin? why the damage control day in, day out, for 32,000 posts? Black is white...
It's too easy, but dimwits here can't even spot damage control bots like this. Like I said, a simple propagandist, intellectually dishonest, trying to keep the sheep of this forum on a cohesive narrative (whatever places the Kremlin in a positive light). It's the job folks. To other users here...pay a bit of attention to the patterns. BTw he doesn't give two shits what you think of him, he only cares about what the unsuspecting sheep believe (that's, anyone that can be influenced to think a certain way). Sad, but it's what it's.
Maybe that´s the solution.
Actually Ukraine is quite important. A popultaion of 45 million, fertile lands, nice left over industries from soviet times and they connect Russia to the Balkans.
From an economic point of view it's a very useful coubtry for Russia. If they annexe it they will have a population of 200 million people abd a nice buffer zone against NATO.
Lmao why are they evacuating civilians if the “mighty rebels” are able to handle Ukrainian forces all on their own?
Too many delusional people on this site. Looks like Russia will have to go in to prevent the seperatists from getting their shit pushed in.
Bullshit in debaltsevo the Russian military bailed their ass out.
I'm afraid it will be a very bloody battle. I don't know how long it will last for.
The way I see it, we are heading for war. Idiot Putin let Kiev arm under his nose, while he was giving press conferences with a colgate smile.
It's cozy and warm in the Kremlin. Has Putin visited Donbas to see how his people live day to day? Even the comedian puppet has visited the contact line several times.... Not sure about dear leader traveling anywhere near the Donbas (at least for a "give hope" photo-op at the very border). Too pre-occupied with the "optics"... that'll show them.
The Kremlin can concede the Donbas and call it a day... at this point it's irresponsible to give those people hope for something that costs so much blood against the odds.... just to play a bureaucratic game.... that is Ukraine having "contested territory" thus violating one of NATO's ascension rules thus voiding Ukraine's NATO ascension. A very selfish game, sort of holding those people hostage for a game, not actually freeing them from the Ukro yoke. What about all the other Russians still living in Ukraine, a bit further west, north or south? Millions of them. Boggles the mind the selective, half measure policies. Evacuation is the least they can do (should have happened sooner), god knows these people have served their time as cannon fodder for Russia's Minks agreement "strategy".. if you can even call it a strategy.
If a Georgia 2.0 OP is on the cards... it's so predictably stupid I don't know what else to say. It's no deterrent, which is why the aggression takes place to begin with. But then again, to borrow a user's observation, when you have a reactionary, inert, risk-adverse, aging past political prime, weak leader, everything is possible. Someone with first hand experience calls the whole cadre, the Kremlin gnomes.
The answer, I believe, is obvious: evacuation. There are around 3.2 million residents in Donetsk People’s Republic and 1.4 million in Lugansk People’s Republic, for a total of some 4.6 million residents. This may seem like a huge number, but it’s moderate by the scale of World War II evacuations. Keep in mind that Russia has already absorbed over a million Ukrainian migrants and refugees without much of a problem. Also, Russia is currently experiencing a major labor shortage, and an infusion of able-bodied Russians would be most welcome.
It's hard to say these people deserve this... but, the Russian leadership, immune to accountability, certainly does.
Ukrainian plan is base on big numerical superiority of Ukrainian army.
Nothing dead weight about it
As far as Russia is concerned the Donbass is part of the Ukraine. What business does Putin have inspecting anything there?
You're the one who should think a little
The kids I agree will be mouths to feed but kids do grow up and these kids will grow up in Russia. The elderly are mouths to feed but I don't think Russians don't think like that when it comes to Russians. The women can do jobs.
Try to fight it all you want... 22 years doesn't change the history of centuries. Weak leaders might want to rewrite history with their propaganda while they rule to fit their legacy on the books but historians know better.
So you are saying after 7 years of the obvious Russia is unprepared for a small regional conflict?
So I am advocating for Russia not to waste it's time in some flag waiving operation like Iraq or Afghanistan where you'll lose your war boner and never fight in a war again like our American friends across the sea
West will introduce sanctions against Russia in any case, Putin says
The Russian leader stressed that sanctions pressure "is absolutely illegitimate"
Russia offered a better deal to Ukraine as a state, what the west offered benefitted the oligarchs, there is no contradiction there, unless you would agree that antonov making pencils and wood stoves is in line with the better deal
That man will be needing some himself.... as for the rest of the plebs, if things continue on this path, a run on the ruble is likely.... which means that vodka is gonna get a whole lot more expensive for minimum wage trolls in Crimea. Hoard while you can, just in case Putin doesn't sign the capitulation.
Gary give me some help here, clean this mess up , I'm fending off troll attacks from the bitcoin sped, the atlasclown and seig heil whenever it is he joins in on the chorus
Yeah, seriously, start removing these morons Garry. You are just allowing these threads to be filled with retards and lack of contribution besides their diarrhea
With how quickly this evacuation begun, I think was likely being prepared for a while.
That makes sense.
He's technically an ethnic mental-midget. He's as much Russian as I'm a Martian!
The part where the explosion took place is part of the Druzba pipeline network. One of the largest gas supply networks in the world passes through Lugansk
So this is the pipeline that carries Russian gas through Ukraine to Europe? If so I doubt it was the Ukrainians who did this. Maybe it was the rebels who blew up the pipeline to finally force Russia to intervene?
Using only air force would also mean a longer war and the opportunity of nato to interfere. Russians would need to quickly secure the ukrainian airspace with AD. With only air force they would be at risk agaibst NATO forces.
But when I see the forces involved you can compare Ukraine to a cow going at the slaughterhouse. Russians are aware of that and aren't happy to use their forces and seems to want desperatly another solution. If it was US there would be already 2 million deads.
Yeah? According to Pavlov's Dogvig that's not a reason to evacuate, even when you have pipelines exploding! Rolling Eyes For context Pavlov's Dogvig also said Aegis Ashore systems launching Tomahawk missiles was not a legitimate reason to cry foul of INF Treaty violation (circa 2019).
kvs likes this post
GarryB wrote:
He did, but you are forgetting or ignoring the fact that the Russian offer was not conditional on the Ukraine rejecting the EU bid.
As far as Russia was concerned Kiev could have accepted both the Russian and Chinese and EU bids all at once and played the field like Finland used to and other countries tried to do too.
The problem was that that polish cock sucker who claimed Russia needed Ukraine to become powerful again that is believed so deeply in the west is totally wrong.
Putin said in a speech about 15 years ago that the future of the world can't continue the way it has where international law only applies to little countries and can be totally ignored and used and abused by the west and those that suck up to them... the future needs to be based on international law, which means not invading countries just because it suits your interests... which is why he wont invade the Ukraine... he has no justification for that...
Of course they care, but they also care about Russians in the Baltic states and have not shelled or invaded them either.
It doesn't have to be Ukraine, it could be Finland or Sweden or Georgia that joins that causes what it is going to cause... and I can say it wont cause any attack or any invasion... but it will be something the west will be very unhappy about...
My posts interpret the lies of the western media and politicians... the US State Department prints the stories and the reporters copy and paste and distribute it to th esheeple.... no processing or thinking required or allowed.... even when it doesn't make any sense at all.
You misinterpret freedom of speech... I don't bully or threaten anyone who thinks differently from me... I let them have their say.... very unamerican of me... I should be tracking down the naysayers and trying to get them fired from their jobs and ostracised for polite society.
Backman wrote:Judging by Twitter , the contact line has gone hot
GarryB, par far, LMFS, Hole and Backman like this post
GarryB, par far, LMFS and lancelot like this post
kvs likes this post