Birmingham, the second largest city in Little Britain, has filed for bankruptcy - The Guardian
"The council's head of finance took the dramatic decision on Tuesday to issue a section 114 notice, indicating that it did not have the resources to balance its books" they wrote. Sanctions seem to be working. Already in the first year, the cities in UK started to go bankrupt, what will happen when the debts pile up in the following years. Importantly, Sunak invested in the production of electricity.
As long as there is money for the Ukraine to keep killing Russians I am sure the people of Birmingham wont mind...
Germany showed its true colours to Russia too many times.
Focus on the prize though... the west were in charge and now that domination seems to be changing and Putin could never have done that on his own... he needed the west to expose themselves for the two face bstards they are and for Russian people and people in the rest of the world to see it openly.
Russia isn't doing anything the west hasn't done for a lot less reason this century let alone the last three or four centuries, but they get banned from international sport?
When did that last happen?
The west is showing its double standards which means new standards and new independent international organisations need to be set up or there needs to be an alternative to the current western dominated systems.
I suspect many in the west think if the conflict lasts forever then Russia will start to suffer and then collapse, or conversely if it ends this year things can be back to normal by the end of next year and the west can resume making big profits off cheap resources from Russia and the rest of the world... but it is pretty clear that is not going to happen... the days of cheap resources for the colonial western powers is over it seems.
flamming_python, par far, Hole and Broski like this post
In Germany, outraged because of the "revival" of the Russian economy, 09.09.2023.
BI: German scientist Stamer expressed dissatisfaction with the growth of Russian trade.
MOSCOW, September 9 - RIA Novosti. Russia is "returning" to world trade, which has caused disappointment among German experts, Business Insider reports, citing a report from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
Russia's trading activity picked up in August despite "large-scale sanctions," according to the study. The conclusion is based on the level of activity of the three largest Russian ports ( St. Petersburg , Vladivostok and Novorossiysk ), whose cargo turnover is close to the maximum since the beginning of the special operation in Ukraine.
"In Russian ports, the number of arriving container ships is growing and, despite sanctions and a weak ruble, is almost at the level observed before the start of the conflict," the report says. The institute's calculations are based on data from the German shipping service FleetMon.
The institute said that activity in Russian ports was "surprisingly high." "This is happening despite the sanctions imposed by Western countries and the depreciation of the ruble, which is disappointing," said Dr. Vincent Stamer, head of Kiel Trade Indicator.
He expressed the opinion that Russia "seems to be returning to world trade."
The West has stepped up sanctions pressure on Russia in connection with the military operation in Ukraine. President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly pointed out that the policy of containing and weakening the country is a long-term strategy of the West, and sanctions have dealt a serious blow to the entire global economy. Moscow has repeatedly stated that the country will cope with the sanctions pressure.
The practical implications of this ban is that any Russian tourist with a Russian registered car will have that car seized if they try to enter Germany or the EU. The ban includes laptops and cellphones and cars and other items they have an export ban on.
Sore loser EU-tards. They think that such abuse will bring Russia down. Russia just needs to stop LNG exports to EU-tardia and see them finally flush into the toilet that they have been swirling around. For some bizarre reason this coming winter is being treated like the last one when EU-tardia has vastly more stored Russian gas than it does now. It is not a matter of how mild the winter will be this time around.
I fully support both the new law, and some Russia-tards visiting these enemy countries for holidays and having their cars impounded by the reigning regimes for their troubles. Probably will be the same liberal types that will suffer from the burn. How does that freedom and democracy taste?
Only problem as far as I'm concerned is for transit to/from Kaliningrad and for local residents there.
Only problem as far as I'm concerned is for transit to/from Kaliningrad and for local residents there.
Agree, but it also works both ways with EU citizens wanting to pop into Kaliningrad to get some cheap gas or something else that might be short on stock in the EU over time...
Essentially this is a Robin Hood tax except instead of stealing from the rich and giving to the poor, this is stealing from the Russians and giving to the nazis in power in Kiev. I would doubt most Ukrainians will even see the money because western companies will claim all the money as money the Ukraine owes them for their support in this conflict... that otherwise they would have no way of getting back.
As I said... a useful precedent for all those billions of western dollars invested in the Russian market they were expecting to make trillions out of in an ongoing income for the future.
World trade picks up, Russia's port activity almost at pre-war level
In August, global trade shows a clear countermovement to the weak summer months. The values of the Kiel Trade Indicator for global trade and also for the trade of major economies are all positive and, in some cases, show significant increases compared with the previous month of July (adjusted for price and seasonal effects). In Russia's ports, the number of container ships arriving is surging and, despite sanctions and a weak ruble, is almost at the level seen before the outbreak of the war. The congestion off the Panama Canal has only minor importance for global goods trade.
The latest Kiel Trade Indicator data update shows a 0.9 percent increase in global trade in August compared with the previous month of July (adjusted for price and seasonal effects).
For Germany, the August figures for both exports (+1.8 percent) and imports (+1.5 percent) are quite clearly in the black. "The figures point to a recovery in German trade, after the Federal Statistical Office had recently reported a decline for July exports, but unlike the Kiel Trade Indicator, the values are not adjusted for inflation. It remains to be seen whether German exports will really turn around, as the weak global economy means that demand for new German machinery and other capital goods tends to decline," says Vincent Stamer, Head of Kiel Trade Indicator.
The signs for EU trade arealso positive, with exports (+2.6 percent) noticeably up and imports (+0.6 percent) slightly up. For the US, the Kiel Trade Indicator points upwards for exports (+1.8 percent) and imports (+0.6 percent). China isalso expected to trade more goods in August than in July, with exports (+5.8 percent) likely to make a much bigger jump than imports (+0.5 percent), which are only slightly above the previous month's level.
The overall positive August figures for global trade are also supported by figures on shipped and congested goods. The volume of standard containers shipped rises slightly in August to almost 14 million, with the proportion of these incongestion falling to around 7.5 percent, which is not unusual by historical standards.
Yet the congestion off the Panama Canal has virtually no impact on the global transport of goods, with only 0.5 percent of global cargo capacity stuck there. "Only a fraction of the global container fleet is affected by the low water in the Panama Canal. Due to the size restriction, ships with the biggest dimensions do not pass the canal anyway. And also, waiting container ships are given priority by the canal authority during processing, so that mainly chemical, LNG, or oil tankers are stuck," says Stamer.
Activity in Russia's ports approaches pre-war level
Activity in Russia's ports is surprisingly high. For the first time since the outbreak of the Ukraine war, the volume of goods unloaded at Russia's three largest container ports, St. Petersburg, Vladivostok, and Novorossiysk, is approaching the levels seen at the outbreak of the war.
In particular, arrivals at Russia's most important container port, St. Petersburg, had slumped by 90 percent in the meantime and then jumped in recent weeks. "Where the goods are coming from is not clear from the container ship movements, but Russia seems to be rejoining the world trade. This occurs despite sanctions imposed by Western nations and the falling value of the ruble, which is disappointing," Stamer says.
Our company just replaced our diesel company car with an all electric car. It's 70 ct/kW (more expensive than the Diesel one) and more hostile to the environment in a grid that is powered by non "green" power plants. Also companies are very much pushed in all "electric" nonsense despite the visibly unprepared soon to collapse in some regions power grid.
Idiocracy is now!
franco, flamming_python, kvs and ALAMO like this post
The Germans, like the Ukrainians, are yet another people who are living completely in their own informational reality, carrying on accordingly, and are oblivious to what's actually going on.
A guy I know bought an electric Mercedes VAN for his company. He is suing Mercedes dealer now, as nothing from the parameters of the car matches the reality. It consumes double the energy if compared to the given number. The range is much, much smaller which suggests that the battery capacity is smaller than advertised either. And last but not least, we talk about driving only mode, because every single additional power consumption makes the thing ridiculous. So his driver is forced not to use AC, radio, and even charging a fukin' phone can make the parameters even worse than it is. It is a bloody idiocracy indeed.
Electric cars are constrained by battery capacity. There is a fundamental limit on the electrical power than can be stored per unit mass. No fancy new battery technology will break this barrier. So pure electric vans and pickup trucks are not viable vehicles. They are supposed to carry heavy loads and are themselves heavy. But scaling the battery by a factor of three or more compared to a compact ass-mover starts to compete for the biggest load the vehicle can carry. Ford's electric pickup is also a joke and a fraud in terms of real capabilities. It's all a green gimmick and not serious design.
The only van or pickup EV adaptation that makes sense is hybrid. Braking energy can be stored for electric starts to save fuel. But the fuel can keep the range and load capacity at usable levels.
The physics imposes a limit that cannot be broken. It is possible to hold 1.5 electrons per atom but it is not possible to hold 15 electrons per atom. The electric force is enormous. A notional cup of electrons on Earth and a cup of protons on the Moon would crash the Moon into the Earth in a short period of time. Of course there is no way to keep electrons and protons in cups or to attach these cups to the celestial body sufficiently strongly.
Supercapacitors use surface area but don't change the atom-level storage capacity. Any battery, lithium ion or sodium ion, or anything else cannot be tuned to hold substantially more electrons. But we need about 10 times more electrical energy storage per unit mass to advance electrical vehicles to the next level.
Some sort of chemical energy needs to be used. Fuel created using electrical power (nuclear, wind, solar) that can be "burned" is a better approach. There is no need to fight electrostatic repulsion. Fuel cells enable fuel consumption without generation of CO2, NOx and other problem emissions. There was a flurry of fuel cell research 20 years ago but it appears to have failed to change the nature of transport.
kvs wrote:The physics imposes a limit that cannot be broken. It is possible to hold 1.5 electrons per atom but it is not possible to hold 15 electrons per atom. The electric force is enormous. A notional cup of electrons on Earth and a cup of protons on the Moon would crash the Moon into the Earth in a short period of time. Of course there is no way to keep electrons and protons in cups or to attach these cups to the celestial body sufficiently strongly.
Supercapacitors use surface area but don't change the atom-level storage capacity. Any battery, lithium ion or sodium ion, or anything else cannot be tuned to hold substantially more electrons. But we need about 10 times more electrical energy storage per unit mass to advance electrical vehicles to the next level.
Some sort of chemical energy needs to be used. Fuel created using electrical power (nuclear, wind, solar) that can be "burned" is a better approach. There is no need to fight electrostatic repulsion. Fuel cells enable fuel consumption without generation of CO2, NOx and other problem emissions. There was a flurry of fuel cell research 20 years ago but it appears to have failed to change the nature of transport.
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. You're telling me that electric motors in cars can't get any more powerful or efficient because we've hit a limit storing electrons at the atomic level? Or that batteries can't achieve higher capacities because every atom they're composed of is being used to 'store' electrons? Huh?
Put the crack pipe down, dude. The discussion is obviously about BATTERIES and not electric motors. You can make an electric motor of any size that does not exceed some absurd scale. Battery storage is LIMITED. Period.