Russian special military operation in Ukraine #54
Karl Haushofer- Posts : 1234
Points : 1227
Join date : 2015-05-03
Big_Gazza and Rodion_Romanovic dislike this post
lancelot- Posts : 3178
Points : 3174
Join date : 2020-10-17
You wouldn't need to blanket the whole Black Sea with manned aircraft or drones. But you could at least cover the approaches to harbours and the areas around operational ships. Another alternative is taking it to them and blocking the areas where they operate these drone boats from. This could be done with flying drones.You could use 500 aircraft and still miss them.
Anyway the final answer is definitively air power. An aircraft can move much faster than any ship including these drone boats.
Firebird- Posts : 1811
Points : 1841
Join date : 2011-10-14
Britain, America, the EU are completely dependent on shipping for their economies to stay afloat.
GarryB, kvs, lancelot and ucmvulcan like this post
ucmvulcan- Posts : 1369
Points : 1367
Join date : 2022-02-26
GarryB, franco, kvs, ALAMO, nomadski, Hole, lancelot and like this post
sepheronx- Posts : 8850
Points : 9110
Join date : 2009-08-05
Age : 35
Location : Canada
I think people on this forums, for the lack of a better word, has some kind of mental health issues or some kind of disability.
Yes, Russia needs a Navy. No, sinking of a newer patrol vessel, handful of soviet buckets wont change much other than have Russia rethink the design of their ships and what to add. The sinking of the Moscva has actually had this patrol ship design change for newer vessels going forward for air defence. Now sinking of this one will also possibly add new capabilities for anti submersible drone warfare.
Karl's brain damage seems to be critical cause he cant even understand that Crimea is what they call the unsinkable aircraft carrier - its because it isn't ships that is important there. And actually, Ukraine proved that ships in the black sea are easy targets for land based systems so rest assured, NATO ships wouldn't handle this either.
PD is correct though in that whoever is in charge of the BSF needs to be let go. Special attention is required.
xeno, ALAMO, lancelot, jon_deluxe and ucmvulcan like this post
nomadski- Posts : 3072
Points : 3080
Join date : 2017-01-02
@ucmvulcan
Breathe in ....Breathe out .......funny !
Last edited by nomadski on Tue Mar 05, 2024 9:10 pm; edited 2 times in total
ucmvulcan likes this post
Dr.Snufflebug- Posts : 1131
Points : 1129
Join date : 2017-12-27
Karl Haushofer wrote:
Now that Russia has no navy left wouldn't it be logical for Russia to end the war and give Crimea back to Ukraine? What use does Crimea have for Russia if Russia has no navy?
Dude, why do you always opt for the stupidest takes?
1. Russia has a vast and constantly growing navy, the BSF is the smallest part of it, actually, and even with the BSFs mega-stupid decisions lately, it's still the main force in the Black Sea. Do note that the vessels actually relevant to the war are still there, ie VLS-equipped frigates and corvettes, attack subs etc. The ones launching Kalibr strikes on the nazi-wannabes.
2. Crimea has never been Ukrainian. Never. Once it became Russian in the late 1700s, that's what it's been. Soviet idiocy in the 1950s doesn't change that.
3. Again, #1, but also - Russia fought tooth and nails for Crimea so many times. First against the Tatar proxies of the Ottoman Empire, to stop the Crimean Muslims from their disgusting slave raids and constantly attempted invasions of Russian lands etc.
Then it had to fight for Crimea when the Brits and French came to the Islamists rescue. Russia lost that one on a technicality, but got to keep Crimean territory anyway.
Then it had to fight for Crimea against Germany thrice. First in 1918, then in Barbarossa 41-42, and then in 1944.
"Give it 'back'"? U stupid? To whom? Certainly not Ukraine, as it never had anything to do with the place.
To Turkey, the technical heir of the Ottoman Empire?
To Greece or Italy, maybe? The heirs of the maritime empires that controlled the Crimean (Taurida) ports prior to the Turkic-Mongol invasions?
Bah.
Last edited by Dr.Snufflebug on Tue Mar 05, 2024 9:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
sepheronx, GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, GunshipDemocracy, Rodion_Romanovic, thegopnik and like this post
Isos- Posts : 11603
Points : 11571
Join date : 2015-11-06
PapaDragon- Posts : 13474
Points : 13514
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
mnztr wrote:
Did the Ukrainians sink a patrol ship? Man if they did i have no words for the RU navy. If they have no effective way to protect the ships they really need to keep them behind nets until they figure something out.
Indeed they did
First Russian made warship sunk, gotta give props to Ukrs for job well done even though it was Offshore Patrol Vessel
Granted it was parked in harbor so it's not like it could have defended itself like it would have had it been underway
What is baffling is that it was parked in the middle of active warzone which brings us right back to the good old incompetence of Russian surface navy
This ship's home port was Novorossiysk clear across the Black Sea where it would have been perfectly safe so what the hell was it doing offline and parked in the the middle of the shooting gallery?
zorobabel- Posts : 707
Points : 705
Join date : 2015-09-20
As for the Black Sea Fleet, as a medium term solution I say park them in Novorossiysk and build sea defense walls there with a narrow one-way-in-one-way-out portal. Smaller ships can do the same in a couple of the narrow bays of Crimea with enhanced fortifications. Only use subs or light patrol craft in the Black Sea.
Long term solution? Take Odessa.
Rodion_Romanovic, Lapain and jon_deluxe like this post
Kiko- Posts : 3897
Points : 3973
Join date : 2020-11-11
Age : 75
Location : Brasilia
US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland is leaving government service. She was responsible for relations with Russia during the first Yeltsin government, but all-Russian fame came to her after the distribution of “cookies” on the Maidan. There are serious reasons for the fact that Nuland chose retirement, although she was destined for the position of Secretary of State. And the President of Ukraine has reasons to be scared by the candidacy of her replacement.
Formally, Victoria Nuland was only fourth in the US diplomatic hierarchy, but in terms of her real influence she was comparable to number one - Secretary of State Antony Blinken, whose place she was rumored to be aiming for. They were close in their views, but belonged to different clans, and Nuland loomed over Blinken like a nemesis: if they had decided to blame all the foreign policy failures of the Biden period on the Secretary of State and removed him from office, the State Department would probably have gone to her.
She is only a year older than Blinken, but as a diplomat she is old enough to be his mother. He is more of an armchair theorist than a practitioner, more of a give-and-take for politicians than a politician, while Nuland usually worked “on the front lines” - in protected meeting rooms around the world, being a career ambassador in both the Russian and American sense of the term.
In Russia, this means that a person entered the diplomatic service not from the outside (for example, as a political appointee), but through specialized education and a ladder in the structures of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. And in the USA, this is something like the main honorary title for diplomats - a statement of not only merit, but also the highest professional qualifications. Since 1956, only six dozen people have been awarded it, and Nuland is one of the most famous on the list.
She was good at her job, for decades she was responsible for important areas for Washington - NATO, Russia, Ukraine, and as if she was born to someday head the State Department, and best of all now, when it is especially fashionable to appoint women. However, President Joe Biden, like an old man, stubbornly clings to Blinken, whom he has known for a long time and closely. He trusts him and does not want to replace him with stronger and more independent characters like Nuland.
Nevertheless, the Secretary of State must have breathed a sigh of relief when he received her resignation letter .
The fact that Blinken himself announced the departure of his alleged rival seems to indicate his desire to cut off her path to retreat and the possibility of changing her mind. Whether this is true or not, he was generous with his compliments, calling Nuland “exceptional” and promising her a place in textbooks because of the role she played in the events surrounding Ukraine.
There may also be a place for it in Russian textbooks, only with different accents. Nuland became famous on our side of the Pacific and Atlantic when she distributed cookies to Euromaidan protesters in the run-up to the coup. And this fame was supported by the fact that she continued to oversee the Ukrainian direction and was the main negotiator between Washington and Moscow on all issues arising from this.
The beginning of the SVO is her personal failure; Nuland tried to prevent such a turn of events , but was unable to maintain the required degree of control over the willful Ukrainian government. She also allegedly wanted to prevent the resignation of the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny and also did not succeed. Soon after this, Nuland ceased to be Blinken’s first deputy and number two in the State Department (formally she was considered a replacement in this position and lasted six months until the appointment of Kurt Campbell), and now, a month later, she is resigning from her “post number four”, then there is definitively.
This is unlikely to be a decline due to failures. Nuland had many failures in her career, primarily because she worked in the most difficult areas.
This is much more like escaping a sinking ship, where the ship is the Joe Biden administration.
The option in which he will be able to win the presidential election in eight months seems unlikely . In Nuland’s eyes, he may be completely incredible, since she interacts with “old Joe” personally and is closer to his diagnosis than most. And with the return of Donald Trump to the White House, her further work in the State Department is incompatible, despite her experience and “epaulets.”
Although Nuland is strongly associated with the Democratic Party of Obama and Biden, she is a cross-party diplomat - the kind of career pro who remains in service regardless of the personality of the president. Nuland received her first non-official, but truly public position as US Ambassador to NATO under Republican George W. Bush. It is very possible that this was facilitated by her husband Robert Kagan, a political theorist, and also a friend and like-minded person in the entourage of both Bushes, the elder and the younger.
His strong connection with the “ neocons ” - the most aggressive wing of the Republicans - continues to this day, although Kagan himself left the party with the advent of President Trump, cursing him in every way.
Nuland then also left the government service: perhaps because of her husband, but more likely because her political credo suited both the “neocons” Republicans and the globalist Democrats, but not the isolationist “Trumpists.” This credo is to maintain US global dominance at any cost and fight disloyal regimes using force.
She publicly emphasized that the work of diplomats and military personnel complements each other. This is true, but coming from a supporter of American expansionism it sounds creepy – in the spirit of the eternal “wars for democracy” next to Russia and oil.
Trump is more in favor of keeping soldiers at home, and dissolving NATO as too expensive. This is primarily why the “neocons” declared themselves Trump’s main opponents within the party, but lost and were pushed from significant party posts to the margins during the Trumpian renaissance, caused not by the fact that the former president was truly good, but by the fact that the current one ( that is, Biden) is really bad.
Lastly, the “neocons” invested in Nikki Haley , but now it is obvious that it will be easier to put Trump in the ground than to raise Haley above it.
Biden is also, to put it mildly, not a fighter, so the comfortable time for Nuland to leave is now. Blinken will be with the boss to the end, like a faithful squire, and Nuland does not need to hand over matters to the “Trumpists” who hate her, who will ask unpleasant questions and delve into sensitive details.
So she will hand over matters to John Bass, another career diplomat with similar views, whose record, however, should make Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wince. Bass is not a new doctor. More like a pathologist.
He was ambassador to Afghanistan when the Americans fled, leaving the country to the Taliban. And the ambassador to Georgia, when Washington’s protege Mikheil Saakashvili lost power. And also as ambassador to Turkey, when President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, having resisted an attempted military coup, carried out a large-scale purge of American agents and agents of influence.
That is, the person who will inherit all Ukrainian issues from Nuland is not very lucky, but he certainly knows how to destroy evidence and seal premises. But this is exactly what Nuland, and Biden, and Biden Jr. need in Ukraine, whose greed and forgetfulness brought his father under impeachment , and the entire globalist elite that fanned the fire of war in Eastern Europe and could not curb it.
https://vz.ru/politics/2024/3/5/1256631.html
GarryB, JohninMK, thegopnik, Hole and ucmvulcan like this post
thegopnik- Posts : 1830
Points : 1832
Join date : 2017-09-20
GarryB, xeno, GunshipDemocracy, JohninMK, Scorpius, jon_deluxe and ucmvulcan like this post
PhSt- Posts : 1494
Points : 1500
Join date : 2019-04-02
Location : Canada
Houthis and all other groups AT WAR with NATzO needs to be provided with thousands of drones and targeting data to SINK NATzO ships (An Aircraft carrier is preferable) in the Red Sea and beyond.
Yes, All of Ukraine, the Baltics and Finland will be liberated and incorporated back to Russia, but NATzO ships (No less than 10 Destroyers) need to be SUNK as payback for their Cowardly Terrorist attack against Russia's black sea fleet.
jon_deluxe likes this post
kvs- Posts : 15860
Points : 15995
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
Regarding this sunk vessel, it may result in more CIWS focus for such small craft. It's a learning experience all around in this war.
sepheronx, GarryB, Big_Gazza, GunshipDemocracy, JohninMK, PhSt, jon_deluxe and Belisarius like this post
thegopnik- Posts : 1830
Points : 1832
Join date : 2017-09-20
SeigSoloyvov- Posts : 3918
Points : 3896
Join date : 2016-04-08
That is not an irrelevant assist, downplaying the loss is sad
PapaDragon likes this post
lancelot- Posts : 3178
Points : 3174
Join date : 2020-10-17
It is an offshore patrol vessel. Basically a glorified patrol boat.Love how people are now calling a project 22160 an irrelevant assist pure comedy.
That is not an irrelevant assist, downplaying the loss is sad
Its main armament is a 76mm naval gun. Other than that it can carry 14mm machine guns which might be fitted or not.
GarryB and Hole like this post
thegopnik- Posts : 1830
Points : 1832
Join date : 2017-09-20
Vympel- Posts : 147
Points : 151
Join date : 2013-01-30
*They've done this shit to lie about successful strikes before of course - remember when they pretended they struck the Admiral Makarov by just showing a drone POV and zooming the footage in on her hull to make it look like an impact?
Last edited by Vympel on Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:28 am; edited 1 time in total
GarryB, Big_Gazza, JohninMK, Belisarius and ucmvulcan like this post
mnztr- Posts : 2901
Points : 2939
Join date : 2018-01-21
mnztr- Posts : 2901
Points : 2939
Join date : 2018-01-21
PhSt- Posts : 1494
Points : 1500
Join date : 2019-04-02
Location : Canada
Russia needs to SINK NATzO Ships (via proxy) and KILL NATzO troops in Ukraine. Do it Now ASAP.
xeno- Posts : 269
Points : 272
Join date : 2013-02-04
GarryB, PapaDragon, Hole and Belisarius like this post
ucmvulcan- Posts : 1369
Points : 1367
Join date : 2022-02-26
By the way, if I watched RT correctly, they said Russia completely captured their bank of the Dniepr? 2ait, I know what this is. These ship sinkings aren't successes. They aren't even terrorist attacks. They're temper tantrums and Russia has been and should continue to treat them as such. Seriously, Ukraine reminds me so much of the child who says 4 letter words (as it happens Urinepost and its American and Eurotrash supporters loves pottymouths, remember Russian ship go f yourself) when mom has repeatedly told them not to and explained why, so the lil bastard keeps it up, mom (kinda mother Russia in this analogy), gets tired of the potty mouth and back hands him. The child sent to his room defeated retaliates by smashing a vase on the way. The vase is not some priceless object d'art but a 5 dollar thing bought at Target on sale. Oh sure mom liked the vase but its still her house, she can easily replace it and while the bastard feels victorious he is still in his room and she still will dictate terms to him
GarryB, kvs, JohninMK, Hole, jon_deluxe and Belisarius like this post
lyle6- Posts : 2599
Points : 2593
Join date : 2020-09-13
Location : Philippines
And would you look at that because by some strange coincidence all these attacks have had zero effects on the BSFs kalibr ships - the ones doing Ukraine the most damage. They still launch thair massive missile strikes in ever increasing salvos and the Ukrainians still die in the hundreds in their sleep.
GarryB, kvs, JohninMK, Rodion_Romanovic, Eugenio Argentina, Hole and jon_deluxe like this post