Georgia's possible rapprochement with Russia.

I am concluding that most power hungry clowns are innumerate. They sell themselves and their country for a few dollars. Not actual vast riches for their
country but chump change for themselves. They are like the criminals who rob banks and then burn the money on hookers and blow. Not very bright at all,
just very "assertive" in an autistic way.

Sure, the US imperialists groom such clown, but the problem is that they outnumber the people of caliber who want to get into politics and form government by
a factor of 1000 to 1. The only reason that Russia and China have not become 3rd world toilets is because they have elite structures that could not be fully
subverted. China did not undergo revolutionary change like Russia in the 1990s so it is more stable. But the emergence of the siloviki in Russia which includes
Putin is what prevented Yeltsinite vermin from fully taking over and whoring Russia out to NATzO. Georgia and other limitrophes were not so resistant.

It is nice to have ideals about democracy and freedom, but in the real world one has to account for imperial meddling. So support for "dictatorial" elements that
preserve a country from colonization is mandatory. You have to chose the "lesser evil". We see that liberalization is just a conduit for take over. In the case
of Russia it has managed to liberalize under Putin even though he is supposedly a "tyrant". Not by flipping comprador parties every few years, but actual street
level freedom and stability. Putin and United Russia are a legitimate choice of the Russian people thanks to this. If Russia had followed Yeltsin's path and
engaged the token presidential limits and Rolodex party elections it would have been carved up by now into manageable colonies.

This is why China's alleged lack of democracy has to be put into context. If China "democratized" it would likely have been torn apart by strife as regional
elements would push in all directions. China needs to be compared to all of Europe as an effectively multi-state entity and not a single country like France.
(The same is true for India, BTW). Liberalization weakness would open the way for imperial meddling and we would likely have seen what we had in the early
1900s with warlords pulling the country into pieces. Who says that democracy has to come in a few days. It clearly needs to wait for conditions to be
right. In the future I expect China to transition out of a one party regime. But it is lunacy to do this at the cost of the sort of instability we see in the
former USSR and Yugoslavia. Being able to vote every few years for token difference parties (like here in Kanada) is not worth much given other
important considerations.

Tesla tried to murder-by-cop one of their former whistleblower employees. What you state is evidenced by concrete examples. Julian Assange is
the poster boy for western "freedom". Exposing crimes is the worst crime of all in the western utopias.

That was higourashi's comment.

His example is pertinent because the slavery has been abstracted. The proles are not nominally slaves, they are wage slaves. They are also kept on the
mental plantation by the MSM which is fully oligarch controlled. This has been true for the last 200 years of supposed emergent democracy in the west.
There has been some mental liberation through fringe media but as you can see it has not fundamentally changed anything.

I recall a certain big name in climate science saying that the innovation in western democracies is that they are not based on slave labour. That is not
true. The exploitation of the proles is still there. The western "free" proles are also exploited by their "democratic" government which they supposedly elect
into power through taxation and regulation. The government serves the interests of the oligarchy and the elite. The taxpayer money is fed to the
corporations through ludicrously sloppy contracts (as if three bids somehow excludes collusion).