Sounds cruel but there is a war going on - people die. I think a double tap would probably have sufficed.
But I guess there was a lot of hatred behind that blow. Must have hurt really bad back home.
sepheronx, GunshipDemocracy, owais.usmani and Mir like this post
Backman likes this post
Thing is in a month trump will dump Ukraine and the Europeanscant carry Ukraine wrote:
Which ever way it goes people have high hopes for Trump - unfortunately I don't but hopefully this time I'm wrong! wrote:
flamming_python likes this post
Arkanghelsk wrote:If indeed intel can confirm Trump and Europe will exit the conflict and reduce weapons , then it’s just the last thrashing of a lame duck administration
nomadski likes this post
Arrow wrote:
Give it up with Trump. In the US, the president doesn't have much power. Trump will dance to the tune of the Deep State. If he tries something, the next sniper will hit. How much can we repeat this nonsense about Trump giving up on Ukraine.
Big_Gazza and Mir like this post
owais.usmani likes this post
flamming_python likes this post
Firebird wrote:People can talk and speculate all day long.
The solution is obvious.
Someone declares proxy war on you.
You have to declare proxy war on them back.
And America/GAYTO have VASTLY more enemies than Russia.
It's incredible we even have to mention this.
If Putin can't accept this. Then Russia needs to be led by someone who can.
Much as I love Putin as a person and as a peacetime leader, I feel he really fucked up with the Ukraine and let things drag far too long.
OK some will say there were other factors. But the truth is, liberating the whole Ukraine would have been a VERY short operation from 2014
til when Creepy Joe got into the White House.
Putin needs to prove himself to be a wartime leader. NOW.
The US is bowing out of the conflict though wrote:
flamming_python and lancelot like this post
ey will withdraw from the conflict when Russia agrees a ceasefire and a freeze of the conflict. That's the whole point and that's the scenario they are presently trying to implement. After that, sure, Trump can focus on Iran, impose more tariffs on China and yadayadayada. And this scenario requires Russia to be brought to heel wrote:
flamming_python likes this post
flamming_python wrote:They will withdraw from the conflict when Russia agrees a ceasefire and a freeze of the conflict. That's the whole point and that's the scenario they are presently trying to implement. After that, sure, Trump can focus on Iran, impose more tariffs on China and yadayadayada.
And this scenario requires Russia to be brought to heel
flamming_python wrote:
And this scenario requires Russia to be brought to heel
Mir likes this post
Big_Gazza, GunshipDemocracy, Mir and ucmvulcan like this post
Lapain wrote:Problem is also that heavily contested airspace seems poorly monitored. A whole UkrAF squadron approaching so close to Russian border (200 km) should have been detected and intercepted had proper surveillance been implemented.
GunshipDemocracy, JohninMK, Lapain, lancelot and Mir like this post
flamming_python wrote:Lapain wrote:Problem is also that heavily contested airspace seems poorly monitored. A whole UkrAF squadron approaching so close to Russian border (200 km) should have been detected and intercepted had proper surveillance been implemented.
The Su-24 is a low-altitude penetration bomber. They're tricky customers. They will get through some of the time.
kvs and Mir like this post
owais.usmani, lancelot and Mir like this post
kvs wrote:F-16s were supposed to matter. Where are they? Now we have 200 mile ATACMS as the PR fluff and all the trolls come out of the woodwork to yap
up this nothing-burger. Clowns actually expect Russia to go nuclear over this.
kvs, GunshipDemocracy, lancelot and Mir like this post
franco, kvs and Mir like this post