Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

hoom wrote:Not wanting to bring up the political aspects but was reading in another forum apparently the sudden improvement in 20380 productivity at Amur may be not only a result of a cash injection &/or rigorous oversight from high levels of Govt but to a previous boss being arrested for corruption & an injection of motivated ex-Ukrainian workers from Nikolaev.
Would also explain why they're now talking about a Karakurt build there as well.

T-47 wrote:

hoom wrote:...............

I think injection of some motivated Ex-Antonov engineers will be helpful for Ilyushin as well.

Sounds suspiciously like the claim that it was captured Germans that created most Soviet weapons in the immediate post WWII period.

Even super skilled workers can't just go into a new factory and suddenly change production rates beyond all recognition... they have to learn to use the equipment too and to design new products.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:From what I understand the remaining project 2038's will all go to the pacific fleet.

They will also get the first two 20385's.

marat wrote:It will be interesting to see how 20385 shall be transported to TOF, on their own on or ship like submarines to Vietnam.

T-47 wrote:

marat wrote:It will be interesting to see how 20385 shall be transported to TOF, on their own on or ship like submarines to Vietnam.

On their own. They are pretty big, no point of transporting them by another ship. That Vietnam ship carried two subs at once, more efficient. But not in this case.

marat wrote:
Well that would be very long (25000 km) and expensive journey for those ships and their crew. With average speed of 25kmh they would need 40 days not counting stops.

And ships would have to go on dock on repairs as soon as they would reach Vladivostok.

Those are not oceangoing ships.

Yes they can do that, but they are not planned for such long voyages.

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Given that the UKSK is already in service, why will the Derzky have shitty X-35s, especially when the 23-85s will have UKSKs?

Only the first one, rest will get UKSK.

Tingsay wrote:

KomissarBojanchev wrote:Given that the UKSK is already in service, why will the Derzky have shitty X-35s, especially when the 23-85s will have UKSKs?

Only the first one, rest will get UKSK.

hoom wrote:

Only the first one, rest will get UKSK.

Seen that said a couple of times but still not seen a proper quote to back it up.
Hope its true though.

Edit: worth pointing out the idea for the original design not having built-in UKSK is that it can use the containerised version.

hoom wrote:

Only the first one, rest will get UKSK.

Seen that said a couple of times but still not seen a proper quote to back it up.
Hope its true though.

Edit: worth pointing out the idea for the original design not having built-in UKSK is that it can use the containerised version.

hoom wrote:

Only the first one, rest will get UKSK.

Seen that said a couple of times but still not seen a proper quote to back it up.
Hope its true though.

Edit: worth pointing out the idea for the original design not having built-in UKSK is that it can use the containerised version.