nemrod wrote:China's Fifth-Generation Fighter Could Be A Game Changer In An Increasingly Tense East Asia
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/chengdu-j-20-could-be-a-game-changer-in-asia-2014-8#ixzz3B7mDHLrq
And I thought Copp had retired .
nemrod wrote:China's Fifth-Generation Fighter Could Be A Game Changer In An Increasingly Tense East Asia
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/chengdu-j-20-could-be-a-game-changer-in-asia-2014-8#ixzz3B7mDHLrq
Russia won't sell China radar system for J-20 stealth jet: Kanwa
Russia has rejected the idea of providing China with a radar system suitable for fifth-generation stealth fighters like the Chengdu J-20, according to Kanwa Defense Review, a Chinese-language military magazine published in Canada.
China is currently testing the Type 1475 active electronically scanned array radar system designed for the still-in-development J-20 on the nose of a Tu-204 jetliner.
Yuri Guskov from Phazotron, Russia's largest military radar developer, said Russia is working to develop the ZHUK-AE active electronically scanned array radar system for its PAK FA fifth-generation stealth fighter, more commonly known as the T-50, at a rate much faster than China is proceeding.
While the ZHUK-AE radar is ready to be tested with the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited's Tejas fighter for the Indian Air Force, Yuri said a naval version of the radar had been designed earlier and has already been tested on a warship in waters off the Russian Far East.
Guskov said the development of the ZHUK radar system will be completed next year. He said however that Russia will not provide the ZHUK to China because of India's involvement in its development.
China is poised to obtain the IRBIS-E radar from Russia, however, as Moscow is very likely to sell Su-35K fourth-generation fighters to Beijing. All 20 IRBIS-E radars currently in service are used on the Su-35S fighters of the Russian Air Force.
...China is hardly likely to order 300 as a first order, but if they can't make an engine better than an RD-33 then what makes you think they can make an Al-41?
...China is hardly likely to order 300 as a first order, but if they can't make an engine better than an RD-33 then what makes you think they can make an Al-41?
George1 wrote:this aircraft's primary role is air superiority or strike?
And the first producer in the world of tool machinery, the first market du to his huge automobile-market is China. This asset, will boost the tool-machinery innovations, and undoubtly, China does not lack of brighting engineers.
Around the next decade, China du to its huge investissements will be undoubtly the first in every ranking.
Back to your question
GarryB wrote:And the first producer in the world of tool machinery, the first market du to his huge automobile-market is China. This asset, will boost the tool-machinery innovations, and undoubtly, China does not lack of brighting engineers.
Around the next decade, China du to its huge investissements will be undoubtly the first in every ranking.
Back to your question
Look at your list:
1-Swiss
2-Germany/Japan/Italy
3-Swede, Norway, nothern european countries
4-USA/UK/France
5-Russia ?/South Korea/Taiwan
6-China
7-India, Australia, etc...
It is not until you get to 4th on that list... well you call it 4th but if you give each country their own number then you actually have this list:
1-Swiss
2-Germany
3-Japan
4-Italy
5-Sweden
6-Norway
7,8,9-northern european countries
10--USA
11-UK
12-France
13-Russia
14-South Korea
15-Taiwan
16-China
17-India
18-Australia, etc...
If you just look at the list above it is not until you get to 10 that you find a country able to make decent jet engines... 10,11,12,13 and that is all... all the rest have inferior products or no products at all in the jet engine range.
Your claim is that China is moving up that list... OK... I wont dispute that, but I also ask what difference it makes when there are no decent Swiss engines... the Saabs of Sweden don't use Swedish engines either...
Good engines are hard... aerodynamics don't change much but engines can make or break an aircraft design.
I am sure that China can learn but they wont learn just by buying something off the shelf... licence production would be expensive but also a valuable learning experience and investing in that they could certainly become real players in the market.