S-300P/400 News [Russian Strategic Air Defense] #3

jhelb wrote:

GarryB wrote:The US was jumping up and down complaining that the cruise missile addon for the Iskander missile violated the INF treaty to distract attention from the fact that their land based AEGIS system in europe is based on the Mk41 launch system... which can fire Standard SAMS but also Tomahawk cruise missiles... which makes it a direct violation of the INF treaty.

This reporter from Finland has eventually found out a way to destroy both the S-400 & Iskander  

https://twitter.com/charlyjsp/status/976089724988411911

@w40nsk1

The war on containers continues

11:47 AM - 20 Mar 2018

Oh, that guy is one of those "foreign policy experts" on Finnish TV (EDIT: yes jhelb, you're correct   ), atleast he was back in 2014-15, I really stopped watching Finnish news after that (you can guess why). But he didn't seem like an actual full-on Russophobe, and his tweets seem to confirm that atleast, but that is of course not saying much.

I also just love how they keep using the basically totally fake "hybrid war" term, i.e. a conspiracy theory. It's a grand narrative on Russia, in which the whole country and Putin can be blamed for literally everything and anything. If you are not 100% convinced, if you don't believe the Western MSM's Russia bashing, you're just a victim of Putler's "hybrid warfare". That shit every time... you can't make it up. They don't see the problem in any of that?

I'm sorry that I'm not convinced of your great Russophobic theories, which have been proven to be fake news. Among so many others, 1. Putin killing journalists and dissidents have been proven to be statistically nonsense, 2. Westerners really do believe it was Russia that started the Georgian war (talk about propaganda...) and 3. using either totally BS or atleast a decade old narratives on Russian demographics and living standard and social indicators... and the list goes on and on. So I wonder why I'm not very convinced? Just blame yourselves. Putler got me there, too bad, sorry.

I mean jeez... We all pick our side. They clearly have theirs, I have mine. But please, can those "experts" and "intellectuals" apply the same standards to all the Western/NATO/US actions? I might as well believe all the anti-Western conspiracy theories, by their standards? Everything else is just Western hybrid war.... jewish-lizard influence... or something.

Just please, don't insult our intelligence.  

/rant

jhelb wrote:

GarryB wrote:The US was jumping up and down complaining that the cruise missile addon for the Iskander missile violated the INF treaty to distract attention from the fact that their land based AEGIS system in europe is based on the Mk41 launch system... which can fire Standard SAMS but also Tomahawk cruise missiles... which makes it a direct violation of the INF treaty.

This reporter from Finland has eventually found out a way to destroy both the S-400 & Iskander  

https://twitter.com/charlyjsp/status/976089724988411911


And in the Nordic countries, this guy Charles is considered to be an outstanding defence reporter.

International sale of missiles and UAVs with ranges above 300 km illegal as for MTCR protocols. US is signor of those protocols and is violating them by providing JASSM to Finland. US is doing same violation by supplying same weapon to Poland , and there is also intend to supply it to Japan too. What is Russia going to do abut it? Nothing, they don't even mention it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Technology_Control_Regime

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM

ZoA wrote:International sale of missiles and UAVs with ranges above 300 km illegal as for MTCR protocols. US is signor of those protocols and is violating them by providing JASSM to Finland. US is doing same violation by supplying same weapon to Poland , and there is also intend to supply it to Japan too. What is Russia going to do abut it? Nothing, they don't even mention it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Technology_Control_Regime

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM

Are you sure it is "nothing"? What about the sales of Iskander to Armenia and Algeria?

Svyatoslavich wrote:International sale of missiles and UAVs with ranges above 300 km illegal as for MTCR protocols. US is signor of those protocols and is violating them by providing JASSM to Finland. US is doing same violation by supplying same weapon to Poland , and there is also intend to supply it to Japan too. What is Russia going to do abut it? Nothing, they don't even mention it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Technology_Control_Regime

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM
Are you sure it is "nothing"? What about the sales of Iskander to Armenia and Algeria?

Do you even make some research? The export variant Iskander-E has a range of 280km...

Sent from Topic'it App

Well the reported range is 280km... everyone knows the Russians exaggerate the performance of their weapons anyway.

The missile is the same but with less fuel for export version. Countries like india or north korea or iran could make it longer range by puting more fuel. They already did that with Scud.

S-500 radar seen being tested + the patents for S-500

https://twitter.com/Russian_Defence/status/980062655976177664?s=19

Very interesting article
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3145944.html

For me the bottom line is:
1. 40N6 is the intended main armament of S-500 (in addition to 77N6)!
2. It is still in field trials and minor changes are necessary.
3. the missile is longer than 48N6 and has small control surfaces
3. S-400 will take the benefit to receive this weapon (~2019) in addition to (the smaller) 48N6

This means in 2020 we have
S-400 with 48N6 (standard) + 40N6 (advanced) and
S-500 with 40N6 (standard) + 77N6 (advanced)

BTW: the 9M96 (originally intended as secondary weapon for S-300PMU2) will be the main armament of S-350. The deployment of this system (even a detachment to Syria was mentioned) was planned for last year.
Does anybody know what's about it?

It is still in field trials and minor changes are necessary. wrote:

Still in tests from 2011

Field Trials are something different than "Tests".

48N6DM is already in service and used extensively. 40N6 is been testing for years. It's undergone changes, and so has the plant that it was designed/made in. Its performance has apparently changed for the better, and I can see why S-500 would use it as main missile.

Interesting when we will see some photos of 40N6? There are 9M96, 48N6DM photos for many years.

Photos of 40N6 has existed for years. Actual use of it, no. But then again, same went with the later variants of the 9M83 but we know it exists. 40N6 is odd.

Photos of 40N6 has existed for years. wrote:

So please one of them.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4h1cfXVMAEXnIm.jpg

This is 48N6DM

I'll have to check keypub forums. I saw it on there way back what looked like Fakel plant.

There are no 40N6 pictures.

If you say so.

Just like no one knew of Khinzal. No pics of avangard, etc.

Even big time papers mentioned it's recent test and one in April/may before being handed over in summer.

Patent on S-500 TEL

Some images from patent





Yenisei acquisition radar at Ashuluk range(YuVO): https://youtu.be/Gpq2KvZrkBk

Reporter Mentioned specs for Radar max.alt: 100km; max rang: 600km



S-500 TEL

There are no 40N6 pictures.

No pictures of all these high speed targets the US is testing its ABM systems against either...

40N6 missile testing is in its final phase,w/ one more set of tests planned for April-May 2018. The missile should enter service this summer. This rather elusive long-range missile is, according to Izvestia, intended for both S-400 & S-500 SAM systems.

https://iz.ru/725373/nikolai-surkov-aleksei-ramm/s-400-smogut-porazhat-tceli-na-distantcii-400-km

What is the status of S350?