+67
Azi
higurashihougi
KiloGolf
Hannibal Barca
Bolt
MMBR
George1
zg18
miketheterrible
x_54_u43
calm
Isos
Regular
Cyberspec
PapaDragon
headshot69
DB1234
Skandalwitwe
Airman
Alex555
eehnie
VladimirSahin
The Ottoman
Project Canada
Godric
KoTeMoRe
Vann7
OminousSpudd
AK-Rex
AlfaT8
klahtinen
Firebird
Khepesh
storm333
BKP
GunshipDemocracy
ultimatewarrior
GarryB
famschopman
Erk
crod
d_taddei2
Odin of Ossetia
starman
arpakola
zorobabel
par far
TheArmenian
Zivo
franco
Big_Gazza
airstrike
auslander
Resistance
onwiththewar
Fred333
whir
Rodinazombie
wilhelm
gaurav
magnumcromagnon
Shadåw
medo
przemek
kvs
zepia
sepheronx
71 posters
Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #10
higurashihougi- Posts : 3393
Points : 3480
Join date : 2014-08-13
Location : A small and cutie S-shaped land.
higurashihougi- Posts : 3393
Points : 3480
Join date : 2014-08-13
Location : A small and cutie S-shaped land.
GarryB wrote:Yeah, not impressive at all.
I am glad two dumb bombs does not impress you... the US spends billions of dollars dropping enormously expensive bombs with perhaps not much greater accuracy... now that really is impressive... the way a Rolls Royce towing a plow is impressive....
Dumb bombs but with excellent ballistic computer (in the aircraft) still manage to do something impressive, like what happened when Russia Su-xx managed to hit the rebels' ammo storage and command posts.
Dumb bombs also means people can invest more money and weight into explosives instead of expensive electronic devices, which significantly increase the bomb power and cut costs.
Just my 2 cent
calm- Posts : 1484
Points : 1486
Join date : 2015-12-19
Location : Serbia
Su-33
KiloGolf- Posts : 2481
Points : 2461
Join date : 2015-09-01
Location : Macedonia, Hellas
higurashihougi wrote:GarryB wrote:Yeah, not impressive at all.
I am glad two dumb bombs does not impress you... the US spends billions of dollars dropping enormously expensive bombs with perhaps not much greater accuracy... now that really is impressive... the way a Rolls Royce towing a plow is impressive....
Dumb bombs but with excellent ballistic computer (in the aircraft) still manage to do something impressive, like what happened when Russia Su-xx managed to hit the rebels' ammo storage and command posts.
Dumb bombs also means people can invest more money and weight into explosives instead of expensive electronic devices, which significantly increase the bomb power and cut costs.
Just my 2 cent
It's a different way of doing things. Both hardly cost much.
The load-out was/is not impressive, not the type of bombs.
KoTeMoRe wrote:KiloGolf wrote:d_taddei2 wrote:we've seen and heard of Su-33 carrying out bombing missions, but nothing of the Mig-29K doing any bombing, or any Ka-52K attacking targets in Latakia, any news i have missed? or anyone know of anything on this?
I bet after ditching that Fulcrum in the Med they grounded them all.
Why?
Because none of the latest RT videos showed a Fulcrum launching. Lets see the recent ones and judge.
par far- Posts : 3496
Points : 3741
Join date : 2014-06-26
A very interesting video showing, how the war in Syria may play out. I recommend that evryone watch this video and comment.
"POSSIBLE SCENARIOS OF THE CONFLICT IN SYRIA."
https://southfront.org/possible-scenarios-of-the-conflict-in-syria/
"POSSIBLE SCENARIOS OF THE CONFLICT IN SYRIA."
https://southfront.org/possible-scenarios-of-the-conflict-in-syria/
eehnie- Posts : 2425
Points : 2428
Join date : 2015-05-13
The problem for the US is that they have not friendly ground forces powerful enough to gain more territory in Syria.
The Syrian Arabs follow not them. The Syrian Kurds are not enough and hate Turkey. The Syrian Turkmen are a very small minority only oversized after the begin of the war by the Turkish media to hide the presence of Turkish Turks, and still the Turkish militias are not enough.
This is what the experts said before the war, and what are saying now.
The Syrian Arabs follow not them. The Syrian Kurds are not enough and hate Turkey. The Syrian Turkmen are a very small minority only oversized after the begin of the war by the Turkish media to hide the presence of Turkish Turks, and still the Turkish militias are not enough.
This is what the experts said before the war, and what are saying now.
ethnologue.com wrote:SYRIA LANGUAGES
Adyghe
[ady] As Suwayda’ Governorate, Salkhad district; equal-sized area, Dara’a Governorate, Dar’a district. 35,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Status: 5 (Dispersed). Alternate Names: Adygey, Circassian, West Circassian. Classification: North Caucasian, West Caucasian, Circassian. Comments: Non-indigenous. Muslim.
More Information
Arabic, Levantine Bedawi Spoken
[avl] Southwest corner, As Suwayda’ and Dara’a governorates, Hawran region, from the border to within 35 km of Damascus. 98,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Status: 6a (Vigorous). Alternate Names: Bedawi. Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, South, Arabic. Comments: Non-indigenous. Muslim, Christian.
More Information
Arabic, Mesopotamian Spoken
[acm] East, mainly Halab and Ar Raqqah governorates, with Buhayrat al Asad reservoir at center; into Dayr az Zawr Governorate, along the Euphrates; central strip in Hims Governorate; into (east) Idlib and (west) Hamah governorates. 68,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Status: 6a (Vigorous). Alternate Names: ’Arabi, Furati, Mesopotamian Gelet Arabic, North Syrian Arabic. Dialects: Euphrates Cluster. Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, South, Arabic. Comments: Muslim, Christian, Jewish.
More Information
Arabic, Najdi Spoken
[ars] Widespread; eastern Syrian desert. 1,690,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Status: 6a (Vigorous). Alternate Names: Bedawi. Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, South, Arabic.
More Information
Arabic, North Levantine Spoken
[apc] Western Syria, Mediterranean coast; widespread. 18,800,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Total users in all countries: 25,871,950. Status: 3 (Wider communication). De facto national working language. Alternate Names: Lebanese-Syrian Arabic, Levantine Arabic, North Levantine Arabic, Syro-Lebanese Arabic. Dialects: There is an urban standard dialect based on Damascus speech. Beiruti dialect well accepted. Aleppo dialect shows Mesopotamian (North Syrian) influence. A member of macrolanguage Arabic [ara]. Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, South, Arabic. Comments: Druze, Christian, Jewish, Muslim.
More Information
Arabic, North Mesopotamian Spoken
[ayp] Far east, Al Hasakah Governorate, from capital city towards northern border with Turkey. 300,000 in Syria (1992). Status: 6a (Vigorous). Alternate Names: Mesopotamian Qeltu Arabic, Moslawi, Syro-Mesopotamian Arabic. Dialects: Mardini Aramaic (Abdul-Massih, Jesrawi, Mardilli, Mardini). Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, South, Arabic. Comments: Muslim, Christian.
More Information
Arabic, Standard
[arb] Widespread. Status: 1 (National). Statutory national language (1973, Constitution, Article 4). Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, South, Arabic. Comments: Non-indigenous.
More Information
Armenian
[hye] Enclaves near rivers, urban centers, Dayr az Zawr and Al Hasakah governorates. 83,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Status: 5 (Dispersed). Alternate Names: Armjanski, Ermenice, Haieren, Somkhuri. Dialects: Western Armenian. Classification: Indo-European, Armenian. Comments: Non-indigenous. Christian.
More Information
Assyrian Neo-Aramaic
[aii] North, Al Hasakah Governorate, Khabur river banks, Turkey border, over 30 villages; some also in governorate capital. 227,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Ethnic population: 700,000. Status: 6b (Threatened). Alternate Names: Aisorski, Assyrian, Assyriski, Lishana Aturaya, Neo-Syriac, Suret, Sureth, Suryaya Swadaya. Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, Aramaic, Eastern, Central, Northeastern. Comments: Non-indigenous.
More Information
Azerbaijani, South
[azb] Hims and Hamah governorates, isolate central enclaves in both. 44,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Status: 5 (Dispersed). Alternate Names: Azeri, Turkmen, Turkomen. Classification: Turkic, Southern, Azerbaijani. Comments: Non-indigenous. Not written in Syria. Muslim.
More Information
Domari
[rmt] Ar Raqqah Governorate; scattered nomadic groups; north, western rural areas; Kurbat dialect: Syria and western Iran. 10 in Syria (2015). Ethnic population: 37,000 (2005). Status: 8b (Nearly extinct). Alternate Names: Barake, Dom, Gypsy, Kurbat, Middle Eastern Romani, Nawar, Tsigene. Dialects: Nawar, Kurbati, Beirut, Nablos, Barake. Classification: Indo-European, Indo-Iranian, Indo-Aryan, Intermediate Divisions, Western, Dom. Comments: Non-indigenous. Arabic influence. Muslim.
More Information
Kabardian
[kbd] Dimashq Governorate; Damascus, Aleppo, possibly other cities. 39,000 in Syria (2005 Circassian Association). Status: 6b (Threatened). Classification: North Caucasian, West Caucasian, Circassian. Comments: Non-indigenous. Muslim.
More Information
Kurdish, Northern
[kmr] Al Hasakah Governorate, area on border northwest of Al Hasakah city; Halab Governorate, north of reservoir along Euphrates; Ar Raqqah Governorate, area surrounding capital; other possible locales: northern Cizire (Qamishlok), Kurd-Dagh (Ciyayê Kurdî, Afrin), Ain-Arab; Allepo, Damascus. 1,900,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Status: 5 (Dispersed). Alternate Names: Kurdi, Kurmancî, Kurmanji. Classification: Indo-European, Indo-Iranian, Iranian, Western, Northwestern, Kurdish. Comments: Muslim, Yezidi.
More Information
Lomavren
[rmi] Al Hasakah Governorate. Status: 6b (Threatened). Alternate Names: Armenian Bosha, Arnebuab Bisa, Bosa, Bosha. Classification: Mixed language, Armenian-Romani. Comments: Non-indigenous.
More Information
Mlahsö
[lhs] Al Hasakah Governorate, Qamishli town. No known L1 speakers. The last speaker died in 1998. Status: 10 (Extinct). Alternate Names: Suryoyo. Dialects: None known. Reportedly similar to Turoyo [tru]. Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, Aramaic, Eastern, Central, Northwestern. Comments: A different language from Turoyo [tru], also called Suryoyo.
More Information
Turoyo
[tru] Far northeast corner, Al Hasakah Governorate, Tigris river near Cizre. 32,000 in Syria (2014 J. Leclerc). Ethnic population: 20,000 (1994). Status: 7 (Shifting). Alternate Names: Surayt, Suryoyo, Syryoyo, Turani. Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, Aramaic, Eastern, Central, Northwestern. Comments: Religious capital is Damascus; formerly at Tur ’Abdin, Turkey. Christian.
More Information
Western Neo-Aramaic
[amw] Rif Dimashq Governorate, Al-Qutayfah district; Qalamoun mountains, 50 km north of Damascus, Ma’lula, Bakh’a, and Jubb ’Adin villages. 24,000 (2014 J. Leclerc). Status: 7 (Shifting). Alternate Names: Loghtha Siryanoytha, Maalula, Neo-Western Aramaic, Siryon. Dialects: Ma’lula (Maaloula, Maalula, Ma’lu:la), Bakh’a (Bax’a), Jub-’adin (Jubb ’Adi:n). Little dialect variation. Classification: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic, Central, Aramaic, Western. Comments: Christian.
More Information
calm- Posts : 1484
Points : 1486
Join date : 2015-12-19
Location : Serbia
Russian strategic bombers flew 11,000km with two refuels to the Mediterranean and fired cruise missiles onto targets in Syria
https://russian.rt.com/world/news/333705-vks-rossii-rakety-siriya
https://russian.rt.com/world/news/333705-vks-rossii-rakety-siriya
Last edited by calm on Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
OminousSpudd- Posts : 942
Points : 947
Join date : 2015-01-03
Location : New Zealand
I'd say they'll escalate the payloads slowly. Those Su-33s can carry a fairly hefty amount of virgin express stamps.
A2A:
Although T/W ratio obviously makes huge difference in this case.
A2A:
Although T/W ratio obviously makes huge difference in this case.
KiloGolf- Posts : 2481
Points : 2461
Join date : 2015-09-01
Location : Macedonia, Hellas
OminousSpudd wrote:I'd say they'll escalate the payloads slowly. Those Su-33s can carry a fairly hefty amount of virgin express stamps.
A2A:
Although T/W ratio obviously makes huge difference in this case.
Well yeah, the Flanker is a beast and a beautiful at that Maybe they play safe by attaching only two bombs yet, maybe they take their time or maybe STOBAR limits them to just that. But having said that I would love to hear what maximum A2G load-out can the Su-33 carry (i.e. iron bombs) with minimal fuel, both wingtip ECM pods and 2 AAMs so it can safely launch from the long line. Chances are nobody will answer that, apart from solid footage.
Guest- Guest
KiloGolf wrote:OminousSpudd wrote:I'd say they'll escalate the payloads slowly. Those Su-33s can carry a fairly hefty amount of virgin express stamps.
A2A:
Although T/W ratio obviously makes huge difference in this case.
Well yeah, the Flanker is a beast and a beautiful at that Maybe they play safe by attaching only two bombs yet, maybe they take their time or maybe STOBAR limits them to just that. But having said that I would love to hear what maximum A2G load-out can the Su-33 carry (i.e. iron bombs) with minimal fuel, both wingtip ECM pods and 2 AAMs so it can safely launch from the long line. Chances are nobody will answer that, apart from solid footage.
Biggest load i have ever seen it with actually taking off was 2xR-73, 4xR-27, 2xFAB-500 (or some other bombs i am not really sure). And it was from some mid 90s documentary movie that certain guy BitnikGR uploaded on Youtube and was later banned... his videos were great source... But it was probably filled with fumes compared to its full fuel cappacity.
KiloGolf- Posts : 2481
Points : 2461
Join date : 2015-09-01
Location : Macedonia, Hellas
Militarov wrote:Biggest load i have ever seen it with actually taking off was 2xR-73, 4xR-27, 2xFAB-500 (or some other bombs i am not really sure). And it was from some mid 90s documentary movie that certain guy BitnikGR uploaded on Youtube and was later banned... his videos were great source... But it was probably filled with fumes compared to its full fuel cappacity.
If a plane of the size of the Su-33 can't launch, refuel and strike with at least x4 FAB 500s there's a problem for the Russian Navy. Especially when they need to project power abroad. They end up wasting fuel and money with mediocre impact. Not sure if it's the case... maybe future footage will tell more.
PapaDragon- Posts : 13463
Points : 13503
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
Will you numbnuts kindly take this aircraft payload nonsense back to Kuznetsov tread AKA The Butthurt Tread of RDN?
This tread is about war, not about tech details for ship that will be in dry dock for several years after this deployment!
Nobody cares about that OT crap!!!
KiloGolf- Posts : 2481
Points : 2461
Join date : 2015-09-01
Location : Macedonia, Hellas
PapaDragon wrote:
Will you numbnuts kindly take this aircraft payload nonsense back to Kuznetsov tread AKA The Butthurt Tread of RDN?
This tread is about war, not about tech details for ship that will be in dry dock for several years after this deployment!
Nobody cares about that OT crap!!!
Kuz and its air wing are carrying out missions in Syria right now.
We're talking about the load-outs as released by RT few hours ago. This is an important discussion relating to the Syria intervention by Russia.
JohninMK- Posts : 15596
Points : 15737
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
Quite a flight plan. QRA all along the route. Rather than take the short cut, RuAF showing NATO what they can do again.
Mil Radar @MIL_Radar 10h10 hours ago
QRA 16 NOV: The group of 8 RUAF aircraft consisted of 3x Tu-95MS, 3x IL-78 Midas and 2x unspecified interceptor/fighter aircraft
Mil Radar @MIL_Radar 10h10 hours ago
QRA 16 NOV: The group of 8 RUAF aircraft consisted of 3x Tu-95MS, 3x IL-78 Midas and 2x unspecified interceptor/fighter aircraft
PapaDragon- Posts : 13463
Points : 13503
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
JohninMK wrote:Quite a flight plan. QRA all along the route. Rather than take the short cut, RuAF showing NATO what they can do again.
................
Yup, this entire war for RU Military is pretty much like going trough the list of stuff they wanted to do in real war but never had opportunity until now.
Guest- Guest
JohninMK wrote:Quite a flight plan. QRA all along the route. Rather than take the short cut, RuAF showing NATO what they can do again.
Mil Radar @MIL_Radar 10h10 hours ago
QRA 16 NOV: The group of 8 RUAF aircraft consisted of 3x Tu-95MS, 3x IL-78 Midas and 2x unspecified interceptor/fighter aircraft
eehnie- Posts : 2425
Points : 2428
Join date : 2015-05-13
With the Su-25, the Tu-95 is one of the aircrafts which use in this campaign can be bigger. Its use is very logical.
GarryB- Posts : 40492
Points : 40992
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
If a plane of the size of the Su-33 can't launch, refuel and strike with at least x4 FAB 500s there's a problem for the Russian Navy.
You are not getting it.
The Su-33 is impressive because it is doing with two dumb 500kg bombs what a Hornet needs expensive guided bombs to do.
It only carries two bombs because it is training and testing... if you want 20 tons of dumb bombs to level a large area then send in the Tu-22M3... if you want 12 tons of bombs on target send the Su-34.
JohninMK- Posts : 15596
Points : 15737
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
Plus, as you keep saying Garry, bombing land targets is way down the list of RuN requirements for the K, it is a fleet air defence ship, primarily protecting subs as I understand it. They are doing this for 'fun' so the Navy flyers do not feel left out of the action.GarryB wrote:If a plane of the size of the Su-33 can't launch, refuel and strike with at least x4 FAB 500s there's a problem for the Russian Navy.
You are not getting it.
The Su-33 is impressive because it is doing with two dumb 500kg bombs what a Hornet needs expensive guided bombs to do.
It only carries two bombs because it is training and testing... if you want 20 tons of dumb bombs to level a large area then send in the Tu-22M3... if you want 12 tons of bombs on target send the Su-34.
JohninMK- Posts : 15596
Points : 15737
Join date : 2015-06-16
Location : England
As I understand it the Su-25s went home many months ago when the force was reduced in size. So their use atm is nill, which as you say is a pity but the RuAF clearly don't want to lose any against MANPADs and seem to prefer to use helicopters.eehnie wrote:With the Su-25, the Tu-95 is one of the aircrafts which use in this campaign can be bigger. Its use is very logical.
eehnie- Posts : 2425
Points : 2428
Join date : 2015-05-13
JohninMK wrote:As I understand it the Su-25s went home many months ago when the force was reduced in size. So their use atm is nill, which as you say is a pity but the RuAF clearly don't want to lose any against MANPADs and seem to prefer to use helicopters.eehnie wrote:With the Su-25, the Tu-95 is one of the aircrafts which use in this campaign can be bigger. Its use is very logical.
It is very difficult to see in the future another war with lower use of Manpads.
d_taddei2- Posts : 3025
Points : 3199
Join date : 2013-05-11
Location : Scotland Alba
- Post n°697
reply
JohninMK wrote:Plus, as you keep saying Garry, bombing land targets is way down the list of RuN requirements for the K, it is a fleet air defence ship, primarily protecting subs as I understand it. They are doing this for 'fun' so the Navy flyers do not feel left out of the action.GarryB wrote:If a plane of the size of the Su-33 can't launch, refuel and strike with at least x4 FAB 500s there's a problem for the Russian Navy.
You are not getting it.
The Su-33 is impressive because it is doing with two dumb 500kg bombs what a Hornet needs expensive guided bombs to do.
It only carries two bombs because it is training and testing... if you want 20 tons of dumb bombs to level a large area then send in the Tu-22M3... if you want 12 tons of bombs on target send the Su-34.
personally what I think, is i dont care whats bombing the terrorists just as long as the terrorist scum die and the SAA etc make progress at the end of the day if they are bombed by Tu-160, Su-25, Mi-24, etc just as long as Russia and Syria win this conflict and stick two fingers up to the west thats what matters. Dont get me wrong i enjoy seeing the various aircraft being used and showcased, but sometimes these threads go way off into nitty gritty stuff which swamps the thread.
GunshipDemocracy- Posts : 6165
Points : 6185
Join date : 2015-05-17
Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada
The defense Ministry started to equip the facility in Tartus as a naval base
http://www.interfax.ru/world/537588
http://www.interfax.ru/world/537588
Moscow. 18 Nov. INTERFAX.RU - the Russian defense Ministry equips your facility in the Syrian port of Tartus ships, boats and technical equipment necessary for the creation of a full-fledged naval base (VMB), said on Friday "Interfax" a source familiar with the situation.
"Without waiting for documentation of raising the status of Russian facility in Syria's Tartus from the point of logistics to the naval base, Russia nourishes it with the necessary auxiliary vessels, boats and equipment," - said the Agency interlocutor.
According to him, "the previous day through the Straits in a South-westerly direction proceeded, the sea tug MB-31 black sea fleet floating crane SPK-46150".
A few days earlier specialized Turkish media reported passing through the Straits to the Russian ships of the auxiliary fleet (in particular, KIL-158), on Board of which were several boats anti-sabotage defense of the "Raptor". Messages accompanied by photos.
On 10 October the state Secretary - Deputy defense Minister Nikolai Pankov said that the preparation of documents, allowing to establish a permanent naval base in the Syrian Tartus.
In a period when the Russian facility in Tartus had the status of the item logistics of the Russian Navy, there on a permanent basis was on duty one of the two floating workshops of the black sea fleet.
Patrol boat of project 03160 "Raptor" built at a shipyard "Pella" by order of the Russian Navy. In particular, three of them - P-275 P-276 P-281 - joined the squad anti-sabotage forces and means of the Novorossiysk naval base.
calm- Posts : 1484
Points : 1486
Join date : 2015-12-19
Location : Serbia
What?
https://www.rt.com/news/367323-lavrov-kerry-apec-lima/
Russian bombers are striking terrorist targets in Syria’s Idlib and Homs provinces so that Islamic State militants retreating from Iraq’s Mosul do not cross into Syria, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said after “constructive” talks with his US counterpart, John Kerry.
https://www.rt.com/news/367323-lavrov-kerry-apec-lima/
Russian bombers are striking terrorist targets in Syria’s Idlib and Homs provinces so that Islamic State militants retreating from Iraq’s Mosul do not cross into Syria, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said after “constructive” talks with his US counterpart, John Kerry.
KiloGolf- Posts : 2481
Points : 2461
Join date : 2015-09-01
Location : Macedonia, Hellas
calm wrote:What?
https://www.rt.com/news/367323-lavrov-kerry-apec-lima/
Russian bombers are striking terrorist targets in Syria’s Idlib and Homs provinces so that Islamic State militants retreating from Iraq’s Mosul do not cross into Syria, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said after “constructive” talks with his US counterpart, John Kerry.
Well remember this is RT.
But ehmm they may imply that by bombing rebel heartland they make areas like that less appealing and less safe for ex- or current IS from Iraq, to seek refuge.