Does anyone have a good handle on the game that is being played out here?
From what I can make out:
US is fighting for influence/control over iraq as a puppet state but iraq has increasingly been falling into orbit of iran and russia. Iraq is trying to play these two groups off against one another and against kurds
syria is solidly in russia camp (has been for 40 + years)
turkey was solidly in US camp for decades but following downing russian jet they have had second thoughts? US picked up on this when ergon stopped following US orders and tried to kiss and make up with russia - so they launched a real coup attempt to remove him from power and replace him with someone who follow orders or to at least scare him into line. russia tipped him off, saved his butt effectively, now he is playing US and russia off against one another so he can have some independance to attack turks to stop his own country from fragmenting
Kurds in turkey, iraq, syria are all same religion and secular but hate each others guts. They are playing russia and US off against one another for support to fight terrorists and assad (depending on how brave they feel) - so they can form their own country.
Neither syria, iraq, iran, turkey want to see a kurdistan or 3 exist so oppose it. But russia and US dont mind a kurdistan? Israel has been flying and supplying kurds for 3 years at least - dont mind supporting them to prolong muslims killing each other instead of jews
If this is the case, now that the end is in sight for the iraq campaign against ISIS and assad has given approval for iraq PMU to enter syria to help kill ISIS - does this mean iraq and syria might be moving to push back against the kurds along with turkey? This would seem to be in the best interest of all 3 countries (iraq, syria, turkey)
Could that be why turkey has encroached on these countries sovereignty as opposed to idea of turkey still having idea of wanting to rule middle east. I am sure turkey president knows no way russia/iran would ever let that happen and they dont want to get into a direct fight with them after seeing what they can do last 2 years and how luke-warm US can be when it feels things are not fast and easy (e.g. Libya, Iraq 1, Iraq 2). Does this sound about right?
If this is the players objectives and how they are going about achieving themit might make it easier to understand what is going on in the battle-field. It makes my head spin to read in the newspapers each week the changing in support from one side to another.