eehnie wrote:Is this verified or is again fake news from Twitter "sources"?
the 2 x Su-57's are pretty much confirmed...the new rumour is that 2 more have arrived
eehnie wrote:Is this verified or is again fake news from Twitter "sources"?
eehnie wrote:Is this verified or is again fake news from Twitter "sources"?
franco wrote:Khmeimim has installed concrete dividers for their aircraft probably after the mortar attack.
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3102657.html
Regular wrote:franco wrote:Khmeimim has installed concrete dividers for their aircraft probably after the mortar attack.
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3102657.html
Well boys, this is official. Russian MOD is reading this forum. They are listening to biggest whiners like me.
Isos wrote:Go check your gold source Eehnie, maybe its Su-57 from the navy operating from underwater aircraft carrier They build secretly their equipement now
franco wrote:My first thought when I heard of the Su-57's in Syria was BS as the Air Force doesn't have any... those aircraft belong to Sukhoi. Have since read that back on February 8th, a senior MoD official said they were taking on an unspecified number of the experimental T-50's for Combat & Weapons testing. Two weeks later and here we are.
PapaDragon wrote:
They still have placeholder engines so they are not stealth at this phase
And there is no way anyone would use experiential aircraft to deal with drones
Big_Gazza wrote:.....
Other than a lack of a serrations on the engine nozzle, what stealth benefit will the primary engine provide? Sweet FA I'd suggest, and certainly isn't going to be a detriment in Syria testing....
Big_Gazza wrote:....
Do they count as "experimental" or should they be considered as early-serial models? If they are being deployed to Syria where they could conceivably encountered by F-22s, this is a sign that the military is pleased with the aircrafts performance and its weapons and sensor "fusion" are combat ready.
PapaDragon wrote:That being said, could it be that MoD were intentionally bullshitting everyone when they were reporting progress of this project to the public? As in actually planning to deceive everyone years in advance?
PapaDragon wrote:I completely forgot that later hulls have engine covers installed (even though I posting pic of them here), my bad. So engines are more or less done but still it would be smart to keep true radar signature under wraps so they should put something shiny on them while in use.
...
Experimental, preproduction, early serial, for me it's just different names for new stuff. I'm lazy.
I still believe that main purpose is weapons testing. New bombs were already used here by Su-34 way back but looks like they reached phase where they want to use those new bombs from platform they were designed for.
That being said, could it be that MoD were intentionally bullshitting everyone when they were reporting progress of this project to the public? As in actually planning to deceive everyone years in advance?
PapaDragon wrote:mnztr wrote:Maybe the will use the SU-57 to clear Syria of Israeli and US drones, since it is stealth, they are much harder to track and can just use cannon to mow down the drones.
They still have placeholder engines so they are not stealth at this phase
And there is no way anyone would use experiential aircraft to deal with drones
PapaDragon wrote:Big_Gazza wrote:.....
Other than a lack of a serrations on the engine nozzle, what stealth benefit will the primary engine provide? Sweet FA I'd suggest, and certainly isn't going to be a detriment in Syria testing....
I completely forgot that later hulls have engine covers installed (even though I posting pic of them here), my bad. So engines are more or less done but still it would be smart to keep true radar signature under wraps so they should put something shiny on them while in use.Big_Gazza wrote:....
Do they count as "experimental" or should they be considered as early-serial models? If they are being deployed to Syria where they could conceivably encountered by F-22s, this is a sign that the military is pleased with the aircrafts performance and its weapons and sensor "fusion" are combat ready.
Experimental, preproduction, early serial, for me it's just different names for new stuff. I'm lazy.
I still believe that main purpose is weapons testing. New bombs were already used here by Su-34 way back but looks like they reached phase where they want to use those new bombs from platform they were designed for.
That being said, could it be that MoD were intentionally bullshitting everyone when they were reporting progress of this project to the public? As in actually planning to deceive everyone years in advance?
eehnie wrote:PapaDragon wrote:I completely forgot that later hulls have engine covers installed (even though I posting pic of them here), my bad. So engines are more or less done but still it would be smart to keep true radar signature under wraps so they should put something shiny on them while in use.
...
Experimental, preproduction, early serial, for me it's just different names for new stuff. I'm lazy.
I still believe that main purpose is weapons testing. New bombs were already used here by Su-34 way back but looks like they reached phase where they want to use those new bombs from platform they were designed for.
That being said, could it be that MoD were intentionally bullshitting everyone when they were reporting progress of this project to the public? As in actually planning to deceive everyone years in advance?
completely forgot... lazy...
crod wrote:seriously? mate you're really letting yourself down....
i do not agree with some (but most i do) with PD but you really are a petty little turd and you absolutely devalue this place. it's a forum yes, but ffs will you ever just grow up or ask mammy before you use the internet...
crod wrote:...couldn’t care nor give 2 shits about Russians being killed tbh
...
Just like I don’t give 2 shits about Iranians etc.
...
but my money is on the Yankees getting what they want with the Russians playing second fiddle.
eehnie wrote:crod wrote:seriously? mate you're really letting yourself down....
i do not agree with some (but most i do) with PD but you really are a petty little turd and you absolutely devalue this place. it's a forum yes, but ffs will you ever just grow up or ask mammy before you use the internet...
Did not you saw the 2 previous comments of Papadragon and Isos? Nothing casual here. Yes, we know you agree with Papadragon. Also we know you will get a nomination to the award to the most valuable comment of the months in this forum...
https://www.russiadefence.net/t7187p25-syrian-civil-war-news-17#216256crod wrote:...couldn’t care nor give 2 shits about Russians being killed tbh
...
Just like I don’t give 2 shits about Iranians etc.
...
but my money is on the Yankees getting what they want with the Russians playing second fiddle.
You must feel very up in the rank of the forum.
eehnie wrote:crod wrote:seriously? mate you're really letting yourself down....
i do not agree with some (but most i do) with PD but you really are a petty little turd and you absolutely devalue this place. it's a forum yes, but ffs will you ever just grow up or ask mammy before you use the internet...
Did not you saw the 2 previous comments of Papadragon and Isos? Nothing casual here. Yes, we know you agree with Papadragon. Also we know you will get a nomination to the award to the most valuable comment of the months in this forum...
https://www.russiadefence.net/t7187p25-syrian-civil-war-news-17#216256crod wrote:...couldn’t care nor give 2 shits about Russians being killed tbh
...
Just like I don’t give 2 shits about Iranians etc.
...
but my money is on the Yankees getting what they want with the Russians playing second fiddle.
You must feel very up in the rank of the forum.
JohninMK wrote:
eehnie wrote:JohninMK wrote:
Is your own picture? Source of the picture?
It is necessary to ask you always the same?