Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+84
TMA1
ALAMO
Arkanghelsk
Krepost
Mir
Podlodka77
owais.usmani
ult
lancelot
limb
Kiko
magnumcromagnon
Rasisuki Nebia
lyle6
andalusia
LMFS
miroslav
xeno
ultimatewarrior
thegopnik
Rodion_Romanovic
miketheterrible
Labrador
mnztr
Ned86
franco
hoom
PapaDragon
walle83
KiloGolf
Hole
verkhoturye51
Tsavo Lion
Peŕrier
Singular_Transform
Arrow
Project Canada
Honesroc
Tolstoy
Singular_trafo
SeigSoloyvov
Isos
nastle77
slasher
Svyatoslavich
Big_Gazza
artjomh
Morpheus Eberhardt
JohninMK
GunshipDemocracy
Stealthflanker
RTN
jhelb
Kimppis
Dima
Werewolf
mack8
flamming_python
eridan
kvs
Zivo
sepheronx
max steel
Austin
chicken
par far
Mike E
KomissarBojanchev
Flyingdutchman
collegeboy16
etaepsilonk
navyfield
calripson
Vann7
George1
dionis
TheArmenian
Hachimoto
TR1
Viktor
GarryB
runaway
Admin
Russian Patriot
88 posters

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible


    Posts : 7383
    Points : 7341
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  miketheterrible Sat Oct 27, 2018 4:47 pm

    Hole wrote:This would be unbelievable even if all the systems of the P-8 would work. According to a report from last year only the optics work as they should and I doubt that the corrupt system in Amiland is capable to fix all problems in just a year.

    Exactly.

    As said by Papa, this smells as a method to obtain more funding to buy more stuff.

    It was always known that you do not have all your submarines float all near each other. Which makes the P-3 Orion comment a joke in itself. Borei's are not floating all together holding hands in harmony march. It travels on its own.

    Then there were the articles how Russian submarines ended up near Mexico waters without being detected.

    Then there is fact that both Il-38N and P-3 modernized would work in detecting submarines. That is their job. Hence why they have to fly in pre-determined routes. So in other words, they take guesses as to where the subs may be. But when an exercise happens, both sides announce it because that is international standards....

    A lot of flaws and just guess work in such article makes it a joke. Borei II is being built and built in numbers. 14 total borei's will exist while Delta IV's will still be active for lot longer. Because in the end, even if they stay hidden or even found, they can launch their payloads within seconds and would end up reaching their intended target - if sunken or not.
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  hoom Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:42 am

    But he seems to think this Orion is the end all be all. No, it isn't, nor did it detect 10 submarines in the same area all at once.
    The claim is not that the Orion did the detection but that the Orion went straight to where the subs were in sequence -> some other sensor/s provided the coordinates.

    GUGI is laying seafloor sensors Garmoniya in the Barents sea, so it will be increasingly difficult for the US subs to sail there undetected.
    Also a new generation of special purpose subs & 'hydrographic research ships' coming online, it may help yes but it could be a war of attrition who can find & disable/bug whose sensors quickest.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40515
    Points : 41015
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  GarryB Mon Oct 29, 2018 7:37 am

    A lot of talk in the US about the threat of the quiet Russian subs and the need to use active sonar to even have a chance of knowing where they are, but now Orions are able to pick them up at will...

    Then why are they bothering with Poseidons then?

    Sounds like rubbish to me...

    Of course the purpose of the SSBN fleet is not to be invincible... it is to require the enormous expense that it takes to try to keep an eye on it... most Russian subs will volley launch their missiles in a matter of minutes, so they really don't need that much time to do their job...
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11115
    Points : 11093
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Hole Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:24 pm

    I know it is to expensive to refit them, but they would be great carriers for Poseidons/UUV´s.

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 022310

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13467
    Points : 13507
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  PapaDragon Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:38 pm

    Hole wrote:I know it is to expensive to refit them, but they would be great carriers for Poseidons/UUV´s.

    [img]https://i.servimg.com/u/f10/19/89/13/22/022310.jpg

    Poseidon?

    You could shoot Akula SSNs out of these monsters lol1
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11598
    Points : 11566
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Isos Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:45 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Hole wrote:I know it is to expensive to refit them, but they would be great carriers for Poseidons/UUV´s.

    [img]https://i.servimg.com/u/f10/19/89/13/22/022310.jpg

    Poseidon?

    You could shoot Akula SSNs out of these monsters  lol1

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Delta10

    And then Very Happy Shocked

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Typhoo10
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11115
    Points : 11093
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Hole Fri Nov 02, 2018 5:16 pm

    An Akula firing an Akula. That would be sodomy! Wink Twisted Evil
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13467
    Points : 13507
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  PapaDragon Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:26 pm


    Question

    Guys, is there any info at all about new nuclear submarines being laid down or ordered?

    Anything at all?

    SSN, SSGN, SSBN... doesn't matter which.

    Are there news, indications, mulls, contemplations, rumors, assumptions, anything?
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11598
    Points : 11566
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Isos Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:50 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Question

    Guys, is there any info at all about new nuclear submarines being laid down or ordered?

    Anything at all?

    SSN, SSGN, SSBN... doesn't matter which.

    Are there news, indications, mulls, contemplations, rumors, assumptions, anything?

    Just ask Ehniee lol1

    Christmas is coming soon, Santa's shipyard should be making liders, shtorms and yassens like pancakes lol1 lol1 russia
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18514
    Points : 19019
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  George1 Thu Nov 15, 2018 10:32 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Question

    Guys, is there any info at all about new nuclear submarines being laid down or ordered?

    Anything at all?

    SSN, SSGN, SSBN... doesn't matter which.

    Are there news, indications, mulls, contemplations, rumors, assumptions, anything?

    the only nuclear submarines that can be laid down/ordered are Yasens since all ordered Borei IIs (5) have been laid down. The rest 6 Borei IIs planned will be constructed after 2023

    and for Yasens we dont know if there is intention for further orders due to their high cost

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13467
    Points : 13507
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  PapaDragon Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:25 am

    Isos wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:.....
    Just ask Ehniee lol1
    .......


    Play stupid games, win stupid prizes I guess.... lol1



    George1 wrote:....
    the only nuclear submarines that can be laid down/ordered are Yasens since all ordered Borei IIs (5) have been laid down. The rest 6 Borei IIs planned will be constructed after 2023

    and for Yasens we dont know if there is intention for further orders due to their high cost


    So Borei production line is full? Can't complain about that...

    As for Yasens, they can order one or two more can they? Is it too much to ask? cry
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  hoom Fri Nov 16, 2018 6:41 am

    Just ask Ehniee lol1
    Razz

    There's 5 Yasens & 4 Borei-A in construction already, seems sensible to concentrate on getting more of them finished to me? unshaven

    There is the order for more Borei-A but otherwise next should be Husky which is a few years away from laying down.
    An 8th Yasen would even out the numbers but I think its odd due to Kursk leaving an odd number of Oscars.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11598
    Points : 11566
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Isos Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:35 am

    As for Yasens, they can order one or two more can they? Is it too much to ask?

    Yasen orders depend on husky. If they are really working on this new class, yasen may be stoped. But we don't know much about. They also have new SSK designs but ordered impr. Kilos instead. So we can't tell.

    What we can be sure about is that yasen can't replace all their SSN so they will have to come up with a cheaper sub.

    Moreover the number of VLS on yasen is big. 40 per ship would mean 400 missiles for 10 yasen. That's huge. For exemple US navy has a stock of 2000 or 3000 tomahawks. With all the uksk on their ships too, they won't be able to fill all of them.

    There is the order for more Borei-A but otherwise next should be Husky which is a few years away from laying down.
    An 8th Yasen would even out the numbers but I think its odd due to Kursk leaving an odd number of Oscars.

    As SSGN, they will have 7 yasen and 9 oscar which means 16 subs. But I don't think it matters at all to have odd or even numbers. PF abd NF have not the same issues so they will split them by the contexte of each region.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18514
    Points : 19019
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  George1 Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:23 pm

    Comparison of Virginia and Yasen SSNs

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 DsMouszX4AAZ5ex


    Comparison of Los Angeles and Akula class SSNs

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 DsMoyHjW0AE0Dnw
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  hoom Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:11 am

    Ooh someone at Balancer is probably gonna get pissed that their Yasen line drawing got referenced as coming from here rather than there Shocked

    Am surprised to see Yasen shorter than Virginia, I had the impression its quite a lot bigger than Virginias.

    Edit: for the record that Yasen line drawing is almost certainly from igorkot thread http://forums.airbase.ru/2016/07/t93169--chertezhi-podvodnykh-lodok-proekta-885.html


    Last edited by hoom on Sun Dec 16, 2018 12:44 am; edited 1 time in total
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18514
    Points : 19019
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  George1 Wed Nov 21, 2018 2:03 pm

    SSBNs in service and at construction

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 71294_original

    https://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/200567.html
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18514
    Points : 19019
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  George1 Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:26 am

    SSN/SSGN in service/repair/removed as of now

    It seems that only 1 Akula-class is in service Shocked

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 71814_original
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13467
    Points : 13507
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  PapaDragon Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:18 am

    George1 wrote:SSN/SSGN in service/repair/removed as of now

    It seems that only 1 Akula-class is in service Shocked

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/navy_korabel/63221775/71814/71814_original.jpg


    Yeah, it's been that way for a while now
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11598
    Points : 11566
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Isos Mon Dec 24, 2018 3:32 pm

    https://mobile.twitter.com/RSS_40/status/1076957809265311744


    Ka-56 “Osa” (WASP) a helicopter designed “Kamov” bureau in 1975 for 671 RTM (Vctor-III) multirole nuclear sub. The sub could shoot the hel ???? through 533 mm torpedo tube. M~220 kg, payload~110 kg, V~110 km/h, H~1700 m & combat radius~120 km

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Dvifzz10


    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 11115
    Points : 11093
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Hole Mon Dec 24, 2018 4:21 pm

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 000124
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 000223
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 000319

    For special forces. Divers would bring it to some beach and then put it together.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11598
    Points : 11566
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Isos Sat Feb 09, 2019 6:46 pm

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40515
    Points : 41015
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  GarryB Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:46 pm

    Sounds like they still use 650mm torpedoes...
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11598
    Points : 11566
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Isos Sat Feb 09, 2019 11:22 pm

    GarryB wrote:Sounds like they still use 650mm torpedoes...

    Why not ? They are monsters. Kill any ship with one hit.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 40515
    Points : 41015
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  GarryB Sun Feb 10, 2019 4:32 am

    Some members claim they are no longer made and no longer in service...
    avatar
    hoom


    Posts : 2352
    Points : 2340
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  hoom Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:53 am

    Ka-56 “Osa” (WASP) a helicopter designed “Kamov” bureau in 1975 for 671 RTM (Vctor-III) multirole nuclear sub.
    Wow! I think I recall a big hype being made about possibly making something like that for Seawolf class a while back, had no idea Soviets had one all the way back in the '70s Shocked

    Sponsored content


    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 16 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:23 am