Vann7 Sun May 12, 2019 9:57 am
dino00 wrote: Vann7 wrote:A summary of what SU-57 with all weapon at least (air to ground).. guided .
by Charlie015 blog..
http://charly015.blogspot.com/2019/05/primer-acercamiento-al-grafico-del.html
Thanks. Vann7
update..
more missiles..
http://charly015.blogspot.com
I really think Russia did a mistake in not building PAK_FA as a hypersonic missile carrier..
and a longer ,larger and wider bay , By the time their mig-41 goes to retail will be too late .. Needs to modify Pak-fa for a hypersonic missile strike capability.. even if the same missile range cut in half..
a special version for Su-57.. will be very important.. with 300km range.. at least.
but the more i think on it.. a mistake to build Pak-fa first.. they should have done Mig-41 first instead.. is much more deterrence a Hypersonic nuke carrier than a redundant plane ,than the previous su-35 can do the job. If Russia don't take advantage of Hypersonic+stealth combo now,, it will be a fucking waste of opportunities ,if they wait 10 -15 years later.. for a mig-41 or pak-da carrier.. Putin is the king of missing Opportunities. with all the scientific talent Russia have, is for Russia to have a significantly more lethal Airforce ,and stop focusing so much in surface warships..
with the money Putin wasted in stupid olympics is for him to have Pak-da and Mig-41 in mass production already in big numbers.. plus a real serious space civilian and military program..
The correct thing that Putin , if he had any brains , will have been to counter US navy with Space bombers and interceptors new stealth Airforce.. + hypersonic missile force.. Whatever is a above in near space earth orbit ,will dominate whatever is below.. That is to build stealth Interceptors and and BIG stealth bombers,that US patriot defendes and Aegis can't counter.. that fly at 50km altitude at least.. This will deny traditional planes like F-16 or F-35 or F-22 completely unprepared to counter planes flying so high above them.. and will turn obsolete US , any aircraft carrier air defense.. vs targets above their air defenses capabilities... NATO standard space interceptors for example are
just mines they deploy in high altitude in space.. that can be easily evaded if a plane don't fly in
a straigh line ,trayectory.. stealth Space Bombers/interceptors > that any aircraft carrier group of NATO..
Last edited by Vann7 on Sun May 12, 2019 11:32 am; edited 1 time in total