Isos wrote:Hole wrote:And some of the pilots would die on the way to the battle.
And some will be shot down by other f-22 ...
And they cannot transfer data to all allied and to their own legacy planes.
Isos wrote:Hole wrote:And some of the pilots would die on the way to the battle.
And some will be shot down by other f-22 ...
ATLASCUB wrote:On the flip side there are 12 flying prototypes of the Pak-Fa. None are operationally ready. At most between 5-15 Russian pilots have ever touched its cockpit and the procurement of this craft will be a slow trickle that won't significantly alter the force projection capacity of the Russian air force for years to come.
Thus, they are not underestimating something that simply doesn't exist. The bulks are still legacy platforms for both nations, and as Stalin used to say, "quantity has a quality of its own". That's not to mention that American legacy platforms are upgraded rigorously.
What's there to undertimate?
I'll reserve some other comments for when MAKS19 officially ends today. You never know of last minute surprises - although rare.
Blackmail and pressure works
PhSt wrote:
Blackmail and pressure works
Nice. perhaps Russia should start blackmailing countries into buying Russian arms or Russia will nuke them.
ATLASCUB wrote:
1. Blackmail and pressure works
2. CATSAA works.
thegopnik wrote:Chinese, India and Turkey still ignoring threats of sanctions after a s-400 purchase. Plans of Syria and Venezuela foiled. Threats working my ass.
I would probably be worried about how to improve weapons systems and bring critical thinking to the US other than teaching kids in public schools about gay history and supporting 3rd world shithole mass immigration I doubt this is going to help the US in the long run if they want to stay technologically competitive.
ATLASCUB wrote:On the flip side there are 12 flying prototypes of the Pak-Fa. None are operationally ready. At most between 5-15 Russian pilots have ever touched its cockpit and the procurement of this craft will be a slow trickle that won't significantly alter the force projection capacity of the Russian air force for years to come.
Thus, they are not underestimating something that simply doesn't exist. The bulks are still legacy platforms for both nations, and as Stalin used to say, "quantity has a quality of its own". That's not to mention that American legacy platforms are upgraded rigorously.
The U.S has Europe, both West and East on lockdown.
But US have already build more than 300 f-35. They are not yet combat capable but they exist and will be operational. And many more will come in the next decade.
GarryB wrote:
So let them think the F-35 is brilliant and they only need 189 F-22s and everything is fine... let them stew in their ignorance... it is fine.
And the absolute best US standard models with Israeli extras wont even enter Syrian airspace because they fear being shot down by Syria... they were better off with F-16s.
Vann7 wrote:
Common give me a break... you claim 189 F-22 is not enough for Americans..
but is far better than the ZERO!!!! stealth planes that Russia have in service.
you can do better than that Garryb.. I support Russia military and hope they do
great.. but to mock the few hundreds of stealth planes Americans have..
while Russia have NONE.. Is not a serious argument. you are simply no different
that F-16 net trolls.. if you consider US airforce with 189 f-22 "not enough" versus
what Russia have..zero now and 65 in 10 years..
So lets see F-22 189 is not enough now , but 65 Su-57 in 2028 is good enough ?
and Russia only have a ~100 Su-35's still outgunned by US f-22s..
And about 200 very old migs-29 and similar number in su-27 /30 that will be no match
for F-22. or F-35..
End of story US airforce is far stronger and superior than what Russia have..
Russia could be save in mother land ,thanks to S-400s.. but in a fight in open sea ,the
Russian airforce wil be in a major one side combat ,with them losing..Those F-22 and F-35 will be snipping from distance ,see fist and hit first.. Russia airforce is the weakest part of Russia military ,,but at least Putin have very nice Olympic stadiums.. for football..
, In the future 5-10 years they have plans for 65.. stealth planes,still behind those 189.. in short Russia airforce will be in a major disadvantage vs US airforce in the middle of pacific for example.. it will be one side battle in US airforce favor.. Su-57 could end being better than F-22.. but numbers that Russia plans to have up to 2028 ,are too few --> 65, and i don't see how 65 are better than 189 f-22s + 300 F-35. by 2028 US have plans to build twice the number they have now.. So those 65 Su-57 sukhois plane will be facing more than 600+ stealth planes.. a total rape in the ass.
Only chance Russia airforce can compete is in a preventive surprise attack .. and sink US aircraft carriers.. so they can't deploy their planes fast enough , and perhaps hit F-22s bases with hypersonic missiles ,before they take off.. but in a more or less fair fight ,it will be a one side battle in US airforce favor.
Cute attempt at trolling, to one who doesn't understand that the United States is heavily out-matched in the world.Vann7 wrote:[...]
I don't think that 100 would be enough, because it's the platform of the future and if older aircraft are phased out, you need Su-57. Around 250 Su-57 should serve RuAF well.Isos wrote:
~100 su57 is enough. Specially for Russia who doesn't bet on air supremacy but on big land operations with its air defence denying the enemy's air force the airspace above the battles.