kvs wrote:piska
Someone's having a hankering for a slice of ginger minge - Valentine's can't come any soon for you kvs?
kvs wrote:piska
franco likes this post
lyle6 wrote:kvs wrote:piska
Someone's having a hankering for a slice of ginger minge - Valentine's can't come any soon for you kvs?
#BREAKING No indication of Covid-19 virus in Wuhan before December 2019: WHO mission.
https://twitter.com/AFP/status/1359083073669910528
Pfizer’s vaccine application for India has been turned down. The Subject Expert Committee under CDSCO that looked into Pfizer's proposal and presentation did not recommend that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) approve the application at present.
Written by Prabha Raghavan , Edited by Explained Desk | New Delhi |
Updated: February 6, 2021 11:06:39 am
An expert body under India’s apex drug regulator has recommended against granting approval to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine under emergency circumstances in the country, prompting the American drug giant to withdraw its request. The Indian Express looks at what concerns have been raised by the body and Pfizer’s response.
What are the expert body’s concerns?
The Subject Expert Committee under CDSCO that looked into Pfizer’s proposal and presentation did not recommend that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) approve the application at present.
“After detailed deliberation, the committee has not recommended for grant of permission for emergency use in the country at this stage,” stated minutes of the SEC’s meeting dated February 3.
This was due to concerns over certain Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and the fact that additional safety information had not been generated from local trials in the country.
“The committee noted that incidents of palsy, anaphylaxis and other SAE’s have been reported during post marketing and the causality of the events with the vaccine is being investigated. Further, the firm has not proposed any plan to generate safety and immunogenicity data in Indian population,” stated the minutes.
Pfizer has decided to withdraw its application until it can generate the additional information required by the Indian regulator. “Based on the deliberations at the meeting and our understanding of additional information that the regulator may need, the company has decided to withdraw its application at this time,” stated a Pfizer spokesperson.
At this stage, the vaccine will not be used in India. However, the company says it will “continue to engage” with the Indian regulatory authority and resubmit its approval request with additional information “as it becomes available in the near future.”
kvs likes this post
elconquistador wrote:India rejects Pfizer vaccine. This the moment even the most frantic conspiracy theory shouter should realize that the West is now 100 percent owned by the trifecta of evil Billy Gates, Klaus Schwab and George Soros
And the banking cartel behind them of course
Pfizer’s vaccine application for India has been turned down. The Subject Expert Committee under CDSCO that looked into Pfizer's proposal and presentation did not recommend that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) approve the application at present.
Written by Prabha Raghavan , Edited by Explained Desk | New Delhi |
Updated: February 6, 2021 11:06:39 am
An expert body under India’s apex drug regulator has recommended against granting approval to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine under emergency circumstances in the country, prompting the American drug giant to withdraw its request. The Indian Express looks at what concerns have been raised by the body and Pfizer’s response.
What are the expert body’s concerns?
The Subject Expert Committee under CDSCO that looked into Pfizer’s proposal and presentation did not recommend that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) approve the application at present.
“After detailed deliberation, the committee has not recommended for grant of permission for emergency use in the country at this stage,” stated minutes of the SEC’s meeting dated February 3.
This was due to concerns over certain Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and the fact that additional safety information had not been generated from local trials in the country.
“The committee noted that incidents of palsy, anaphylaxis and other SAE’s have been reported during post marketing and the causality of the events with the vaccine is being investigated. Further, the firm has not proposed any plan to generate safety and immunogenicity data in Indian population,” stated the minutes.
Pfizer has decided to withdraw its application until it can generate the additional information required by the Indian regulator. “Based on the deliberations at the meeting and our understanding of additional information that the regulator may need, the company has decided to withdraw its application at this time,” stated a Pfizer spokesperson.
At this stage, the vaccine will not be used in India. However, the company says it will “continue to engage” with the Indian regulatory authority and resubmit its approval request with additional information “as it becomes available in the near future.”
Also on the use of cheap, non-patented harmless drugs (like Ivermectin, HCQ etc.)
par far wrote:elconquistador wrote:India rejects Pfizer vaccine. This the moment even the most frantic conspiracy theory shouter should realize that the West is now 100 percent owned by the trifecta of evil Billy Gates, Klaus Schwab and George Soros
And the banking cartel behind them of course
Pfizer’s vaccine application for India has been turned down. The Subject Expert Committee under CDSCO that looked into Pfizer's proposal and presentation did not recommend that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) approve the application at present.
Written by Prabha Raghavan , Edited by Explained Desk | New Delhi |
Updated: February 6, 2021 11:06:39 am
An expert body under India’s apex drug regulator has recommended against granting approval to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine under emergency circumstances in the country, prompting the American drug giant to withdraw its request. The Indian Express looks at what concerns have been raised by the body and Pfizer’s response.
What are the expert body’s concerns?
The Subject Expert Committee under CDSCO that looked into Pfizer’s proposal and presentation did not recommend that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) approve the application at present.
“After detailed deliberation, the committee has not recommended for grant of permission for emergency use in the country at this stage,” stated minutes of the SEC’s meeting dated February 3.
This was due to concerns over certain Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and the fact that additional safety information had not been generated from local trials in the country.
“The committee noted that incidents of palsy, anaphylaxis and other SAE’s have been reported during post marketing and the causality of the events with the vaccine is being investigated. Further, the firm has not proposed any plan to generate safety and immunogenicity data in Indian population,” stated the minutes.
Pfizer has decided to withdraw its application until it can generate the additional information required by the Indian regulator. “Based on the deliberations at the meeting and our understanding of additional information that the regulator may need, the company has decided to withdraw its application at this time,” stated a Pfizer spokesperson.
At this stage, the vaccine will not be used in India. However, the company says it will “continue to engage” with the Indian regulatory authority and resubmit its approval request with additional information “as it becomes available in the near future.”
Also on the use of cheap, non-patented harmless drugs (like Ivermectin, HCQ etc.)
Countries should ban and say no to all western vaccines, they should go with the safer Russian vaccines and Chinese vaccines.
Aristide wrote:par far wrote:elconquistador wrote:India rejects Pfizer vaccine. This the moment even the most frantic conspiracy theory shouter should realize that the West is now 100 percent owned by the trifecta of evil Billy Gates, Klaus Schwab and George Soros
And the banking cartel behind them of course
Pfizer’s vaccine application for India has been turned down. The Subject Expert Committee under CDSCO that looked into Pfizer's proposal and presentation did not recommend that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) approve the application at present.
Written by Prabha Raghavan , Edited by Explained Desk | New Delhi |
Updated: February 6, 2021 11:06:39 am
An expert body under India’s apex drug regulator has recommended against granting approval to Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine under emergency circumstances in the country, prompting the American drug giant to withdraw its request. The Indian Express looks at what concerns have been raised by the body and Pfizer’s response.
What are the expert body’s concerns?
The Subject Expert Committee under CDSCO that looked into Pfizer’s proposal and presentation did not recommend that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) approve the application at present.
“After detailed deliberation, the committee has not recommended for grant of permission for emergency use in the country at this stage,” stated minutes of the SEC’s meeting dated February 3.
This was due to concerns over certain Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and the fact that additional safety information had not been generated from local trials in the country.
“The committee noted that incidents of palsy, anaphylaxis and other SAE’s have been reported during post marketing and the causality of the events with the vaccine is being investigated. Further, the firm has not proposed any plan to generate safety and immunogenicity data in Indian population,” stated the minutes.
Pfizer has decided to withdraw its application until it can generate the additional information required by the Indian regulator. “Based on the deliberations at the meeting and our understanding of additional information that the regulator may need, the company has decided to withdraw its application at this time,” stated a Pfizer spokesperson.
At this stage, the vaccine will not be used in India. However, the company says it will “continue to engage” with the Indian regulatory authority and resubmit its approval request with additional information “as it becomes available in the near future.”
Also on the use of cheap, non-patented harmless drugs (like Ivermectin, HCQ etc.)
Countries should ban and say no to all western vaccines, they should go with the safer Russian vaccines and Chinese vaccines.
Lol
The vaccine cost 12 € per,dose. Imdia is a poor shithole country that cant afford it. Of course they buy the cheap shit.
As for russia, the EU now asks why Russia offers its vaccines evrywhere but does not vaccinate its own people
elconquistador wrote:India rejects.
PapaDragon dislikes this post
Aristide wrote:
Lol
The vaccine cost 12 € per,dose. Imdia is a poor shithole country that cant afford it. Of course they buy the cheap shit.
As for russia, the EU now asks why Russia offers its vaccines evrywhere but does not vaccinate its own people
That price excludes the upfront deposit that the EU has already paid Pfizer. The standard, very high volume price at Government level is I believe $19.50, not sure what that is in Euros.Aristide wrote:
The vaccine cost 12 € per,dose. Imdia is a poor shithole country that cant afford it. Of course they buy the cheap shit.
elconquistador wrote:The most insufferable man on the planet, Billy Gates, has now said that 'a third dose may be needed'
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/covid-vaccine-variants-third-shot-bill-gates/
Also, using it will be the only way for millions of EU citizens to get at least some protection.
elconquistador wrote:
A quick sum up of the relevant facts
* 18 October 2019. Coronavirus outbreak wargame (Event 201) organised by the John Hopkins University. High bozos from major media outlets, the military, the Democratic/Republican Party, the CDC, WHO, and UN attend.
elconquistador wrote:This is why fear based predictive programming is so effective. It overrides appeals to rationality on the basis of self preservation
I could post 10 more graphs or data charts showing that there is nothing out of the ordinary going on and people would not even glance at it stating personal experiences as a trumping factor
About your reference to 'healthy' people dying from Covid19, it's exceptional. Unless we have redefined healthy now as well, for it to include overweighted grandpas suffering from chronic cardiovascular diseases
elconquistador likes this post