flamming_python wrote:
Well that's do-able if we go back to the time of WW2 and the perimeter aircraft spotters you had for example in the British isles.
But ultimately a little futile. You can work out the direction its going and when it will get there, but you don't know what exactly it will hit. And the cruise missile can and probably does change course.
But we hear each time how the NATO Wunderwaffe air coverage work for Ukrs, do we?
The problem is, that you need clean ears to put the story into.
They don't have the assets to cover that.
Those missiles striking fro the Russian territory, or the Crimean surroundings - making them to fly 1000 km inside Ukr territory.
If you have such 'great' coverage by the NATO flying on all perimeters accessible ... then what?!?
Yeah, sure, I know, just joking - we know what and why.
There is no Wunderwaffe, and there are no marvels.
It is steady and consequent progress, kill&destruction each kilometer.
That is why this whole twitter driven drama is making me lought.
Having all the recon NATO can provide, they can't spot, target, and destroy attacks that are being performed 1000 km inside their claimed territory, deep inside defense perimeters.
Because a/ NATO recon supply has its obvious limitations that we surely can discuss and b/ they lack any means to use whatever they are getting. No mobility, no stuff, no staff. Russkies can make a separate missile strike using one plane, one ship with a displacement of 1000t, and that is enough to level to the ground any desired target.
And in a real need of propaganda message, they are forced to use 5 planes
What a force multiplier, I am telling ya' !!
Oh hell the Hohols are winning! At all fronts, Twitter is full of the victories