Don't send a warship near the coastline unless you plan to erase the coastline
Pretty obvious who is over reacting and needs a bitch slap... we have no idea where the ship was even operating and therefore no idea how close it was to any coastline.
...but lets not let facts get in the way of a good whine.
Garry has nothing to do with being a mean person
Being negligent is okay, if your young , or have no responsibility
Ark... to be found negligent you have to know what actually happened in the first place... jumping around claiming missile attack or meteorite is a pointless venting of your spleen that pisses the rest of us off.
The fact is it is very unlikely to have been an attack by Kiev of any sort, and their claims to the contrary should be stacked up with their other claims and statements and then totally ignored for the bullshit they are.
There are literally millions of potential targets the Orcs could try to attack and you say it is negligence to let the Orcs attack any of those targets... with HATO assistance they can go through all those potential targets and pick the easiest, so what you are saying is that the competent commander will stop killing Orcs and call up millions more Russian soldiers so they can defend all the targets the Orcs MIGHT want to attack and claim victory.
Congratulations... you just enabled the orcs to achieve what they wanted... Russia going on the defensive and stop killing Orcs... how long could they do that?
The direct result is a 1-2 year war becomes the 100 years war... amazing.
But not at this level, and not after 30 years of seeing the same shit happen again and again and again
You don't have to go to a military academy to avoid the shit we've seen
Accidents happen... Hurricanes happen as Mir pointed out... you can minimise the risk but accidents will continue to happen... and as frustrating as it might sound there is nothing you can do to stop that.
Thanks to efforts of ukrop apes and Russian Navy we now know what that class of ships should not be used for
The Atlant (Atlas) class was the cheap backup in case the more ambitious and expensive Orlan class was a failure... it wasn't.
What they should have done was upgrade them with naval TOR, but they were saving money going half arsed.
and? I never denied there are Nazi's in the army, I merely said to think every single one is, just makes you a fool.
And if the soldiers around them don't mind fighting with and for nazis then they shouldn't mind being branded nazis and treated as such.
Even the nazis wanting to surrender are treated decently.
And you would be saying the same thing when Ukraine takes out the Crimean bridge with the full support of NATO.
Why are you so sure this fire and explosions at a military airfield was an Orc attack?
Russia has already said it would hit back hard at the "decision making structures" if Russian territory is attacked... therefore...
If the Orcs want to take on that bridge I would love to see them try because the consequences will be devastating for the current political structure of the Kiev government.
Why would Russia refrain from removing them if they are that stupid?
If they continue to lose troops on the front line then they are useful, but attacking targets in Russia and they become a problem that should be straight forward to deal with by removing...
A short video about Rook´s working and look what is hiding at their air base.
I see S-350s...
For those saying the grom-2 ballistic missile doesn't exist, why are there photos of its TEL from 2020?
It does exist... it is a longer range Tochka that clearly they want to be an Iskander equivalent.
Iskander is the ground launched Kinzhal that has sensors on board to detect radar and IR sources to evade air defence systems for which it manouvers and releases jammers and decoys to evade interception... what it is not is it is not radar invisible... it is fast and it actively manouvers to avoid approaching missiles.
The claim that the craters on the airfield in Crimea was a Grom-2 ignores the fact that they would have detected it and heard it... and its shorter range means it is slower than iskander too.
Why does the Russian MoD keep announcing "offensives" around nikolaev krivoy rog this last month, but little to no ground is taken?
AFAIK the offensives they mention are Orc offensives which are generally halted and the driven back with enormous loss of life on the Orcs side because of their vulnerability to artillery...
MoD updates keep announcing the suppression of D-30 batteries. Shouldnt the Ukrainians have already run out of ammo for them already?
Eastern european countries make 122mm shells don't they? Plus when you fire one or two shells before having to move or run away you don't end up using as much ammo as the enemy does.
Anyway with all the "new laundry money" they can now probably afford to fund this project.
Their problem is they are trying to deal with corruption by pouring more money into the broken system... more money just means more money missing and is unlikely to result in anything actually getting funded... like trying to fix a sieve by pumping more water into it than there are holes in the sieve for the water to escape from it.
Not a good idea unless you have a problem of having too much water you don't know what to do with.
War between India and China benefits Russia as well. Also a war between Iran and Turkey.
Not even close... only the US benefits from division and war and hate.
But Russia will have to disintegrate the U.S as well.
Don't you see that wars between Turkey and Iran and China and India and Russia and anyone benefits the US and leads to them getting stronger by weakening their opposition.
A sudden outbreak of peace around the world would be catastrophic for the US...
What we do know for a fact is that NO ONE saw any missiles on that day.
I have been carefully studying that image for quite a few hours since I first saw it and I can say there is only one missile, but that one is safely based in New Zealand...
It has neither the range nor the potential to reach that docking port...
Because civilians are sp good at spotting ballistic missiles flying at mach 4+
A boom coming from the sky before anything is burning and any explosions are heard is rather distinctive... and the trajectory of a missile means it covers a much larger area than any explosion from an impact... it is the same with a rifle shot... the physical area you hear the crack of the supersonic bullet is much greater than the area you hear the sound of the shot being fired.... and they are distinctly different... an explosion is a boom sound while a supersonic shockwave from a supersonic object is more of a crack than a boom.
Show me radar data and close up pics of the blast site and then there will be enough evidence to prove or disprove that it was a missile
The Russians have the radar data and they say it was not a missile or aircraft attack.
However th that you expect me to believe without question that some random person easily see with a naked eye ballistic missiles falling at 1500m/s is more intellectually insulting.
You expect the air defences of the Crimea ignored a missile travelling at least 300km... you do understand that as well as the air defences at the air field which should be substantial, that area will be covered in interlocking air defence systems protecting dozens of locations including the naval HQ for the Russian Black Sea Fleet... it is insulting you think they were all asleep or had their radars turned off.
Especially when the video showing two major explosions also showed smoke from extensive fires that had clearly been burning for some time so at least four craters and two explosions on video so what... an attack by two missiles and then a delay while fires started and burned for a bit and then two more missiles which we don't see or hear any sonic booms of incoming missiles for on the video either BTW... so you are saying not only did they not turn on the AD systems to defend the airfield they kept them turned off after it was clearly a missile attack...
Makes me wonder why Kievs forces are not at the gates of Moscow by now... reality is not a barrier to these guys... they can do anything and say anything...
But that is the real problem... you believe everything they say even when the available evidence suggests it is not possible.
At last they're being honest about things.
I felt the same about Trump as president... he flip flopped and he lied and did all sorts of bad things, but he did them out in the open and the US media called him out on it. He didn't do anything anywhere near as bad as many presidents have done before him... he was just open about it and the US media didn't hide anything... in fact they made shit up to try to make him look worse, but really they are idiots and have no imagination so claims he had russian prostitutes pissing on him makes me think that Bill Clinton probably paid for that to happen to him... wonder if he got Boris drunk and let him do it to Bill too...