Russian special military operation in Ukraine #22

I'm sorry to say, but all the Telegram channels that spent days trying to explain away the air base attack as an accidental fire are going to look dumber and dumber as more attacks occur in Crimea.

zorobabel wrote:I'm sorry to say, but all the Telegram channels that spent days trying to explain away the air base attack as an accidental fire are going to look dumber and dumber as more attacks occur in Crimea.

Treating any frenzy on social media seriously is dumb.

Some pro-Russian channels claim that this depot-storage point was destroyed. Arkhangelsk has right to be mad. Utter incompetence.



People trying to minimize everything Ukrainians do, are as autistic as khokhols. Sure, it won't change end result, but stupid losses and mistakes should be rectified.
And there is a lot of rot in Russian bureaucracy. That's not even a question.

As PD often says, if they couldn't protect it, they didn't deserve to have it in the first place.

Mir wrote:What were those Ukrs smoking!? DForce perhaps?

Copium.

Some examples of captured equipment on Army 2022 forum.

Kremlin sent the signal, it's ok to admit the Crimea airbase incident was sabotage now. Fall in line. No more need to defend the integrity of the general staff....at least on this issue.

zorobabel wrote:I'm sorry to say, but all the Telegram channels that spent days trying to explain away the air base attack as an accidental fire are going to look dumber and dumber as more attacks occur in Crimea.

They'll do the same like the dimwitts in this forum, move on to the next thing to damage control for. It can't be helped, it won't change. Partisan slaves.

Dimwitts love this process, they become even accustomed to it... routine.
----------


That's a great example of a Bayraktar. The real juice of that little piece of scrap metal is its imaging sensors + command control communication link.

More plausible than a cigarette butt finding the wrong trash bin - on purpose...

Hollywoods influence just the same - can't escape it. The stronger the pearl clutch...

Lets just leave it as a magical act of sabotage from Santa Claus - after all Santa's CIA!

Mir wrote:

ATLASCUB wrote:More plausible than a cigarette butt finding the wrong trash bin - on purpose...

Hollywoods influence just the same. The stronger the pearl clutch...

Lets just leave it as a magical act of sabotage from Santa Claus - after all Santa's is CIA!

Happy Christmas then

It's the most wonderful time of the Year!

Perfect where I'm sitting, as always. Not a tear will be shed for anyone's expectations, but it will be solid eye opener for those that on the one hand expect the EU to collapse and on the other, expect the EU to coast without a flinch.

The angry reactions and cognitive dissonance will as always be amusing.... sort of like before the SMO for 98% of this forum.

Let it now! Let it snow!

ucmvulcan wrote:Oh noes, Ukraine hit a secondary munitions dump.  A few months ago it was factories all across Russia (when in reality it was mostly outbuildings and no research or supply was harmed).  Then the Moskva sank, jury is still out on that could have been a drone, may have been a missile, could also have been an on board accident.  The Ukes got a bridge, they knocked out a tank. They shot down a helicopter.  This isn't a video game.  It's war.  Accidents happen.  Terrorist attacks happen. What you must not do is do the enemy's job for them.  Take Nikolayevsk and Odessa and drive the Ukrainians completely out of Donestk and surround and seal off Kharkov.  These strikes by Ukraine are horse fly bites.

considering they knocked out nine aircraft I would hardly be making sarcastic responses

ATLASCUB wrote:More plausible than a cigarette butt finding the wrong trash bin - on purpose...

Hollywoods influence just the same - can't escape it. The stronger the pearl clutch...

Lets just leave it as a magical act of sabotage from Santa Claus - after all Santa's CIA!

Russians confirmed it was Sabotage, why you're making this silly post when they themselves said so, idk cope however you want I guess

Eit: oh nm your mocking the fanboys trying to downplay what happened

LMFS wrote:

owais.usmani wrote:Another explosion in Crimea this morning?

Seriously, what the actual **** is this going on!

Maybe a fucking war with NATO powers?

I don't get why Russia went way overkill in Syria as a means of displaying their power and as a commercial for their arms exports. But they are doing none of that in Ukraine.

Draw two circles for ATACMS at max range ( they would fire from max range , deeper inside Ukrainian territory for safety from counter artillery ) and where they intersect , you find the " saboteurs . "  Pull back important equipment just outside max range . Problem solved . What you say "  they will only provide longer range saboteurs ! " And you will be right . But bigger and longer saboteurs are easier to detect , when crossing border and bigger target on Radar and longer minimum range and more expensive and need more time to organise.......


Edit : putting stores and air bases on Russian soil , means that the USA will be attacking directly ( American made and Amertican fired into Russia ! ) Russian soil . Could be a deterrent .

Backman wrote:I don't get why Russia went way overkill in Syria as a means of displaying their power and as a commercial for their arms exports. But they are doing none of that in Ukraine.

Syrian operation was some planes and almost o ground forces against an army of several hundreds of thousands of international terrorists, Russia did it as small as it gets. In Ukraine the territory is much bigger and the fight is not against non-state actors but against fully nazified, NATO backed ukie state. Russia does it again as small as it gets in order to sustain any effort Western escalation requires. IMHO they know freakin well what they do.

caveat emptor wrote:Some pro-Russian channels claim that this depot-storage point was destroyed. Arkhangelsk has right to be mad. Utter incompetence.


People trying to minimize everything Ukrainians do, are as autistic as khokhols. Sure, it won't change end result, but stupid losses and mistakes should be rectified.
And there is a lot of rot in Russian bureaucracy. That's not even a question.

Yeah yeah. You can sure count on some of the dopes on this site to signal boost every little cheap shot that Ukraine makes way out of proportion.


Russia is raining missiles down on various regions every single day and night. And Ukraine gets a cheap shot in or 2 and its all of a sudden the end of the world. Rusky incompetence bruh. You cant accuse the Russian military for being cheap on the missiles. Its just the opposite.

The only question for the Russian government is if they are going to retaliate specifically for the US crossing the red line by sending weapons that can reach Russia and using them.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:

ucmvulcan wrote:Oh noes, Ukraine hit a secondary munitions dump.  A few months ago it was factories all across Russia (when in reality it was mostly outbuildings and no research or supply was harmed).  Then the Moskva sank, jury is still out on that could have been a drone, may have been a missile, could also have been an on board accident.  The Ukes got a bridge, they knocked out a tank. They shot down a helicopter.  This isn't a video game.  It's war.  Accidents happen.  Terrorist attacks happen. What you must not do is do the enemy's job for them.  Take Nikolayevsk and Odessa and drive the Ukrainians completely out of Donestk and surround and seal off Kharkov.  These strikes by Ukraine are horse fly bites.

considering they knocked out nine aircraft I would hardly be making sarcastic responses

Has Russian satellite photos verified this yet ? Show me. Or are you just taking the Kiev Independents satellite services word for it ?

Dforce wrote:As I said, smoking is bad:

And how many Russian servicemen killed?

Or just some ammo of which Russia is a major producer and the biggest hoarder of in the world?

You people live in your own reality. Meanwhile every day brings hundreds of dead Ukrainian soldiers, driven on by a leadership that has no desire to negotiate