Also, my copium turned into hopium that THERE ARE SOME GOD DAMN REINFORCEMENTS
But im on ignore, so my hopeful dooming will fall on deaf ears.
caveat emptor wrote:Bro you'll end up in Kuzbass digging coal for Putin's cousin. For free, of course.Arkanghelsk wrote:
If Putin does not send the army, and lavrov is trying to negotiate, what can be done ?
caveat emptor likes this post
It's not. You're right. I have dark sense of humor. I'll erase it.Arkanghelsk wrote:
Thats not funny bro
GunshipDemocracy and Arkanghelsk like this post
SeigSoloyvov wrote:zorobabel wrote:ColonelCassad: AFU have crossed the Donets and have captured part of Svyatogorsk. They are attempting to encircle Lyman.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/63632
So now the fuckup is getting even worse oh wait I am sorry this was all part of the "plaaaaaaaan"
but seriously what the hell are the Russians doing if that's true.
GarryB, kvs, GunshipDemocracy, BliTTzZ, Sprut-B, Hole, Broski and Belisarius like this post
Backman wrote:billybatts91 wrote:Duma member agrees that a full mobilization is needed to achieve the objectives of this Ukraine operation.
[embed]https://]
I thought there could be a middle ground between 5 BTG's holding the whole northern front vs full mobilization
There can't be another half measure.
GarryB, psg, Big_Gazza, kvs, GunshipDemocracy, BliTTzZ, Sprut-B and like this post
flamming_python wrote:
Actually neither is needed
Russia has such a thing called the VDV. You might have heard of it, it's a rapid reaction force. If Russia wanted, it could have deployed 2-3 regiments to Kharkov region as soon as the Ukrs started advancing, and they would have been in position within 12 hours
Russia didn't, and still hasn't. There are other units in Russia, Belarus not engaged in the fighting Russia could have deployed by now.
It hasn't.
So come to your own conclusions.
Arkanghelsk wrote:flamming_python wrote:
Actually neither is needed
Russia has such a thing called the VDV. You might have heard of it, it's a rapid reaction force. If Russia wanted, it could have deployed 2-3 regiments to Kharkov region as soon as the Ukrs started advancing, and they would have been in position within 12 hours
Russia didn't, and still hasn't. There are other units in Russia, Belarus not engaged in the fighting Russia could have deployed by now.
It hasn't.
So come to your own conclusions.
And those are?...
GarryB and BliTTzZ like this post
flamming_python wrote:
Any Russian motor-rifles or armour-tank division in Russia or Belarus
Any Naval Infantry unit
Would have been there in 2-3 days, 4 tops
Or do you believe they are all engaged in the Ukraine at the moment?
Big_Gazza, GunshipDemocracy, BliTTzZ, thegopnik, limb and Broski like this post
Arkanghelsk wrote:So Lavrov and Co. Have been given a task to negotiate peace , and Kharkov is confirmed
A "good-will" gesture,
What a sickening information, the government disgusts me more than the nazis
They want to negotiate with terrorists
GarryB, Big_Gazza and BliTTzZ like this post
flamming_python wrote:
More disinformation to lull the enemy into advancing further and becoming more bold is my guess
Any Tom Dick or Harry can tell you there is nobody to negotiate with in the Ukraine
ucmvulcan likes this post
BliTTzZ dislikes this post
Arkanghelsk wrote:Skabaeva and Sladkov are preparing all of Russia- you can hear them as they calm the population , they cannot speak so aggressively on TV without inciting the population, as most are ready for war
To me several things could transpire, the troops they brought never crossed into Kharkov,
Just like Feb 24, these have gone to pre-planned deployment points
We await some kind of decision by the leadership to send them , what they wait for I have no idea
GarryB, psg, kvs, GunshipDemocracy, Sprut-B, Hole, Broski and like this post
Arkanghelsk and Belisarius like this post
Werewolf wrote:Arkanghelsk wrote:Skabaeva and Sladkov are preparing all of Russia- you can hear them as they calm the population , they cannot speak so aggressively on TV without inciting the population, as most are ready for war
To me several things could transpire, the troops they brought never crossed into Kharkov,
Just like Feb 24, these have gone to pre-planned deployment points
We await some kind of decision by the leadership to send them , what they wait for I have no idea
Ohh Arky, be very careful to not give away to much information about yourself.
Russians have learned from conversations how to know who is an Ukrop as they are always bringing up Solovev and Skobeava.
I have never heared from any Russian of any age even that they would mention Solovev or Skobeava, but every Ukrop is speaking about them like a mantra.
You little hohol
Arkanghelsk likes this post
JohninMK wrote:Following last Sunday's elections it looks like the groundswell of dissatisfaction in what is being done in their name in Ukraine is growing, these politicians reflecting what they have heard from their voters.
limb likes this post
flamming_python dislikes this post
Arkanghelsk wrote:
Продолжаю смотреть Россию-1. Это психологическая подготовка к войне. Без исключений. В сюжетах «60 минут» под тревожную музыку раз за разом повторяют тезисы о накачанной оружием Украине, показывают злого Зеленского (не карикатурного, уже без никаких смехуечек). После мрачного Сладкова, серьезная Скабеева и хмурые эксперты нас словно готовят к логичному выводу. Контраст с ранними выпусками драматический.
Really?...
sepheronx, GarryB, franco, d_taddei2, Big_Gazza, kvs, Ispan and like this post
BULLSHIT! Russia has enough weapons and high tech systems, they are only not using them. After the first very aggressive attacks Ukraine was on the brink of collapsing totally, even high ranking ukrainian NAZI politicians and NATO officers admitted this. But Russia stopped and instead of reinforcing postions with reserve they withdrawed from Kiew, Chernigov and Sumy oblasts. Biggest mistake of the war. With only 50000 more troops they would have win the war easily.calripson wrote:
The best alternative for Russia at this point is a negotiated settlement with the least amount of humiliation possible followed by Putin's departure. What exactly will full mobilization accomplish? NATO can still up the ante technologically - there are no Ukrainians flying around in F-22s - so it is not as if Russia has some secret conventional military technology they haven't yet deployed. NATO has demonstrated that they can mitigate Russia's strike capability and totally deny Russia air superiority. They appear to have full situational awareness and probably communication and EW dominance. How else do you explain Ukraine's ability to move their force structure at will? Russia's production capacity for high tech weapons may be stretched - NATO countries can produce weapons (safe from shortages of essential components) till the cows come home.
GunshipDemocracy, limb, Backman and Arkanghelsk like this post
Arkanghelsk likes this post