Podlodka77 Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:41 pm
ArgentinaGuard wrote: Arkanghelsk wrote:Mobilization is not the answer, it is part of it but only if the clowns at the top bomb civilian Ukraine like Syria
If they bungle this, which they did in Kharkov, it will lead to precisely what NATO is saying
The tail wags the dog, in this case NATO crafted every response to Moscow decisions
This decision was foreseen and told about by NATO, just like nuclear strikes
Why would it happen? If the Kremlin send conscripts into cities like they did in February to the volunteer forces, and average draftees are killed, it will be a bigger disaster then Kharkov- which is the cause of the declaration
Russia recoiled at the ineptitude of Kremlin and MOD, so they scrambled to mobilize because the population demanded it
Only they still have not implemented strikes on civilian infrastructure like apartments and buildings the VSU can hide
If they use these conscripts in this way, leading to casualties in the rank and file, the idiots at the top will escalate into NATO designed and managed nuclear crisis
Mobilization is a necessary but late measure. You cannot live the war of your nation on television. It's not a show. Get off your ass, that's the message. The Russians must understand what is at stake.
There is no possible nuclear crisis. That's the end of the world, at least in the West
Argentinian, there is no more "There is no possible nuclear crisis" but I think that all options are in play.
Nuclear weapons exist and therefore there is also the possibility (and therefore the danger) of their use. And you know what I fear the most ? I fear that the only country that has used nuclear weapons so far and therefore has "experience" with their combat use, could use those weapons again. You and I, like everyone else here, know which country it is. Russia is not the problem, the West, specifically the USA and the UK, is the problem.
I'm afraid that there is no one sane left at the top of the US government.
The Soviet Union disintegrated peacefully and left the world stage without much fanfare, so now it can be seen that the USA is not able to do it in the same way.
And while the West is pushing through its media wunderwaffe like the M777, HIMARS, etc, I'm not really sure that the NATO pact has anything to show in the case of a conventional war. THEY HAVE PLANES, but if one war has proven all the vulnerability of aviation, then it is this war. The Russians would attack all major military airports in the EU without any major problems. And the sick West, led by the USA, is a greater danger in terms of the use of nuclear weapons (strike first) than Russia.
WHY DID THE WEST WANT THE NATO PACT TO ENTER THE TERRITORY OF UKRAINE?First strike, tactical nuclear strike. The West is ready for that.