Russian special military operation in Ukraine #29

Isos wrote:Longer video of the s-300 under attack by lancet. I'm impressed they use them this effectively. The propaganda  work is also of better quality as they share real time video where you can see the target.

That new general in charge knows his job.

Lancet seems to be a much better drone than Kub. For close range it is a very good system and seem to use same guidance as izd 305 missiles. For longer range just buy license for iranian shahed drone.

https://mobile.twitter.com/200_zoka/status/1582471470852472832

Isos wrote:Longer video of the s-300 under attack by lancet. I'm impressed they use them this effectively. The propaganda  work is also of better quality as they share real time video where you can see the target.

Isos wrote:
That new general in charge knows his job.

Isos wrote:For close range it is a very good system and seem to use same guidance as izd 305 missiles. For longer range just buy license for iranian shahed drone.

How is it physically possible for the lancet not to cause a massive fireball hitting the S-300, when as proven earlier in the war, even a single single AK bullet hitting the missile tube will cause it?

Broski wrote:Now General Surovikin is put in charge of 300k conscripts...

You base this on what exactly?
I somehow doubt it has any capability for aided post image processing and analyzing capability.
It seems to just be a rather simplier version with less processing involved.

You do know that they have been used all the time?
Just because they use now some propaganda style to let the Ukrops not sleep at night doesn´t mean they have been not using them.
The difference is they are A) publishing footage B) swarming them in bigger numbers.

lancelot wrote:To me it looks like it was just that the tubes were empty. The impact did cause a fire in the vicinity and the Ukrainians tried to quickly put the fire out.

That new general in charge knows his job.

 For longer range just buy license for iranian shahed drone.

lancelot wrote:To me it looks like it was just that the tubes were empty. The impact did cause a fire in the vicinity and the Ukrainians tried to quickly put the fire out.

Hole wrote:
That old space comm array was destroyed today.

Hole wrote:

That new general in charge knows his job.

Could be any russian General. The political guidelines changed. That´s it.

 For longer range just buy license for iranian shahed drone.

There are rumours that the "iranian" drone was in fact designed by a russian company, most likely ZALA (not the other way around). Just like the Chinese attack helicopter which was designed by Kamov. The Iranians put the drone into producion first, now Russia benefits from their experience in production and using the stuff. This partnership started years ago.

Isos wrote:They already have such jammers.

ucmvulcan wrote:
The relatively small amount of troops being sent to Ukraine suggests to me the main blow is going to be elsewhere. The question is, where.  Donbass? Finish up in Donetsk? Maybe.  Odessa, Nikolayevsk? Maybe. Kharkov again? Maybe.  I don't think the main blow is going to be Kiev though, not nearly enough troops.  However, I do see an offensive coming because of what is being hit.  

flamming_python wrote:

billybatts91 wrote:No massive offensives? I don't like the sound of that. This "slowly grinding the enemy down" bullshit is not working as Ukraine will always have enough replacements and weaponry, since the West will fight to the last Ukrainian. I hope this is a trick by the general to confuse the Ukrainians. While Ukraine takes massive amounts of land, Russia only takes very little and goes too slow imo.

https://twitter.com/WarMonitors/status/1582425749948346369

This appears to be exact inverse of what he said about NATO brainwashed hordes and forcing the Ukraine's surrender in one swoop

Assuming he actually said that of course

So I wouldn't put too much stock in what he says publicly. First one thing, then it's opposite.
Generals are not men of words, but men of action.

caveat emptor wrote:

https://twitter.com/WarMonitors/status/1582425749948346369

This is a dangerous level of delusion. This is like listening to Putin's speech.

mnztr wrote:

Erk wrote:

mnztr wrote:i was watching Putins press conference in Astana. One of the journalists brought up the case where a person with no military experience was conscripted as part of the mobilization, sent to Ukraine and killed. He is to be buried this week. Quite shocking. You could tell even Putin was disturbed by this. I was under the impression the mobilization troops were to be sent to relieve contract soldiers stationed in other parts of Russia. Now I have misgivings about how this is being handled. Sending green troops like this into conflict will result in huge losses.

How do you know the journalist asking Putin the question got his facts correct?

The "green troops" claim may be fiction, considering 12mths. military service is a requirement in Russia for all male citizens ages 18–27.
It use to be 2years up until 2008 when the rule changed.

Putin had the facts, he said 16K troops are already with in their units. Some are on the front lines. He said the line of contact is over 1000 km so its not really avoidable. there are many that get exemptions from mandatory military service.  watch it draw your own opinion.  

kvs wrote:For the resident 6th column troll, one's heritage does not determine automatically how one thinks.   I have sympathy for
my western Ukrainian side of the family but I am not a Bandera-tard.   Or some poser like you who is trying to act like
a Russian uber-patriot but is clearly working one way or another for Russia's enemies.

There is a common thread with clowns who designate themselves as experts on the war.   The Gonzalo Lira video with RWA
shows that RWA is full of shit.   They actually believe that Kiev has 700,000 soldiers.   The f*ck it does.   It lost 200,000+
already so that would mean it managed to raise its million man army.   Sure and pigs fly over the icy wastes of Hell.   Where
are these 700,000 soldiers?   None of Kiev's big offensives even any substantial fraction of 100,000 thrown at the Russian
lines.   Are the other 650,000+ just twiddling their thumbs?   Maybe they are en route from Lwow or something...

Big_Gazza wrote:

Odin of Ossetia wrote:

Ukraine is Varangia.

No, Ukraine is Vagina.

Made to be shafted, used for the pleasure of others, ultimately to be abandoned as a soiled mess once the inevitable outcome results.  

sepheronx wrote:

Azi wrote:

kvs wrote:For the resident 6th column troll, one's heritage does not determine automatically how one thinks.   I have sympathy for
my western Ukrainian side of the family but I am not a Bandera-tard.   Or some poser like you who is trying to act like
a Russian uber-patriot but is clearly working one way or another for Russia's enemies.

There is a common thread with clowns who designate themselves as experts on the war.   The Gonzalo Lira video with RWA
shows that RWA is full of shit.   They actually believe that Kiev has 700,000 soldiers.   The f*ck it does.   It lost 200,000+
already so that would mean it managed to raise its million man army.   Sure and pigs fly over the icy wastes of Hell.   Where
are these 700,000 soldiers?   None of Kiev's big offensives even any substantial fraction of 100,000 thrown at the Russian
lines.   Are the other 650,000+ just twiddling their thumbs?   Maybe they are en route from Lwow or something...

Maybe they have 700k soldiers but they can use only a fraction. Most are Volkssturm!

They rally in Kherson now ~60k soldiers for a offensive against russian positions. If the offensive fails Ukraine will lose offensive capabilities for at least 6 months...and the mercenaries will leave the sinking ship faster than you can look.

There isn't 60K troops of Ukraine in Kherson.  That all came from 1 newspaper in Ukraine.

I know Alexander Mercourus mentioned about it and the fact that there really isn't much info and evidence of such. A large grouping would be rather easier to see.