They use expensive cruise and ballistic missiles for this purpose.
Russian cruise and ballistic missiles are a fraction of the price of western equivalents, and often the use of a missile to precisely hit a target is actually cheaper than flying dozens of aircraft to attack the same target while also protecting the aircraft delivering the payload to take out the target.
The point is that here there is often an erroneous statement that VKS has achieved air superiority over Ukraine, which is not true. Only in the frontline zone.
The west gains air superiority in most of the places it operates but still loses aircraft.
Air superiority does not mean what you think it means. Air superiority means your airpower has the advantage and can control regions at a time while denying enemy air power access to most territory.
You confuse Air Superiority with Air Supremacy where you rule the air and the enemy air power can do nothing... which is essentially what the Russians have in the Ukraine... but even that does not mean they can fly as they please without fear from ground fire.
so T-90m is less perspective than T-80 ?
They say they are restarting T80 tank production, not that they are stopping T-90AM production.
They are saying the T-80 is good, not that everything else is bad.
The T-80 and T-90 are like MiG and Sukhoi... to some they look the same, but essentially are different with different components and different suppliers so starting production of T-80s means different engines and different parts and components will go into production without putting more strain on the companies already making T-90s and upgrading T-72s.
- well in short T-80 seems to have better potential then T-90 otherwise why military would require restarting production? Omsk as originally manufacturing T-80, now has been upgrading for a while. Let me guess where production restart will go to...
Using that logic the upgraded T-62s they sent into theatre are better than T-90 as well?
They likely have the potential to put T-80s back into production and the suppliers and subcontractors are probably not busy making stuff for other vehicles except probably T-80 upgrades so it will be good for those companies to start serial production for new and upgraded vehicles.
but the question is why? Armata is better anyway then both T-90 and T-80 ... you need skilled workers and production capabilities interesting problem. "Alyosha" effect?
If you put T-14s into service then you have to put T-16s into service as well because you need a T-16 recovery vehicle to recover a T-14 tank because existing tank recovery vehicles are designed for T-90s and T-80s which are lighter than T-14s.
The question also would be how much more useful would a T-14 be in this sort of combat without all the other equivalent systems it would communicate with using its advanced comms and net centric capabilities with.
A bit like sending Coalition to battle but only using 27km range HE shells with it...
It is not ready yet and they have tested it and will make changes and adaptations to further improve it based on experience in the field.
I will only remind you, that the Russian army was cut down to only some 1.1 mln, and were seriously considering going under 1mln.
High-end Armata platform was one of the examples, but not only.
While I agree with what you said the plan was never for the Russian Army to have the T-14 as its MBT for across the board every unit. They have five vehicle families... Armata, Kurganets, Boomerang, Typhoon, and DT-30, and each will have a vehicle with a T-14 turret that it will use as a tank or gun platform. so they wont be needing 20,000 T-14s.
1) T-80 wont start immediately you need some years to restart
That is true but it means in the future those T-80s will go into storage or units where the gas turbine is the best option... ie navy and also arctic units because of teh GT loves cold weather and also navy fuel options.
3) which you may agree or disagree with. The offense is the best defense.
Offense is the best defence when it means you are doing lots of damage to the enemy while minimising your own losses and being too mobile to pin down.
The orcs are losing heavily with their offenses and the Russians are dealing to them from positions of relative safety.
Kiev is attacking because they have no other option... they know the end is near and have to score a win to take to the negotiating table to trade for something and to keep the donations from the west coming... but it isn't working.
They know if they try to hunker down the Russians will just smash them and winkle them out of every crevice and gap.
ATACMS are being delivered now and Russia just does nothing. Generals will be killed. A whole new round of propaganda stories that will intoxicate western retards for the next 6 months. 230 kilogram warheads. JFC.
ATACMS is no better than Tochka which the Russians will shoot down... they will try against military targets and when they get shot down they will start hitting civilian targets that are not as well defended... like they have with drones and M777s and their other shit.
Blinken added that the terms and future borders would depend on Ukraine's views.
So they are not ready for talks yet.
There is going to be a flurry of missile attacks on Russian assets. Most likely in the Black sea and Crimea. This is why they are shilling about negotiations now. They really think they can attack Russia into negotiations. Then a year from now, it will be Tomohawks I guess.
Ignore the hype... these new wonder weapons will be just as useless as the wonder weapons of the past... just more expensive.
So perhaps not a HARM after all.
Which is worse because it means it was a deliberate warcrime...
Sorry to say so, but Mercouris is utterly wrong when he states that the Yanqui ATACMS missiles will be aimed at the Kerch bridge. They'll be ultimately and cowardly aimed at targets among the Russian civilian population, as they've always have done so.
The bridge is too well defended, they simply wouldn't get through.
Doesn't storm shadow have a longer range anyway?
Yes, but it costs them a plane to launch them...
And we have this annoying fucking cycle where the US ups the ante, gets some propaganda cheap-shots in, gets the western public intoxicated again, and Russia basically does no obvious retaliation.
And hundreds of Ukrainian troops die every day on the battlefield... which is all that matters.
Probably that number is meant to create more false hope in the population, but when Ukraine's defeat will become evident in the near future, the fake media can explain this simply with bad luck. That is how Western war propaganda is trying to keep its credibility despite being terribly wrong so many times.
When the Ukrainian military collapses the west will say they provided them with everything and it was just not good enough... these Ukrainians didn't fight the HATO way and so they lost...