I think this guy is AFU and reviews a captured Russian Thermobaric rocket launcher (hand held). Seems quite impressed by it.
Russian special military operation in Ukraine #50
mnztr- Posts : 2901
Points : 2939
Join date : 2018-01-21
I think this guy is AFU and reviews a captured Russian Thermobaric rocket launcher (hand held). Seems quite impressed by it.
franco, zardof and Hole like this post
franco- Posts : 7057
Points : 7083
Join date : 2010-08-18
I’ll be taking a look at the defensive situation in Avdeevka since the Russians are now meters away from entering the city at multiple locations.
Firstly the red areas are the most defensible due to location, type of structures and accessibility to supply.
A: Coke plant (large industrial plant perfect for defense)
B: 9th district (comparable to the citadel in bakhmut, high rise apartments act as high ground for defense)
C: longest standing defense fortifications in Avdeevka and the frontline between the city and Donetsk. (Russians already fighting and clearing fortifications here)
Secondly we have the yellow, this is just housing and is not fantastic for defense.
Blue: main supply route into the city.
Avdeevka is nowhere near as defensible as Bakhmut and about a third of the size, while also lacking the a Chasov Yar fortress city in the rear which was vital for maintaining logistics as Russia enveloped the city.
Good news is there’s another MiG statue for the AFU to destroy.
https://twitter.com/squatsons/status/1724147489291280449
kvs, PapaDragon and Mir like this post
sepheronx- Posts : 8850
Points : 9110
Join date : 2009-08-06
Age : 35
Location : Canada
Just imagine, you will be famous. Or canceled cause you are Canadian.
franco- Posts : 7057
Points : 7083
Join date : 2010-08-18
sepheronx wrote:Hmm, Franco, I know your kinda old but maybe we should fund for you to go there and report for us Live.
Just imagine, you will be famous. Or canceled cause you are Canadian.
Imagine canceled would be the first option for an Anglo-Saxon Canadian however this old fool is strictly armchair (recliner or computer chair if I'm being truthful)
sepheronx, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, Godric and Mir like this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3917
Points : 3923
Join date : 2021-12-08
1. Andriy Yermak is desperately trying to convince US officials to continue weapons assistance
2. Oleksandr Dubinsky has been placed under house arrest, it seems he and a group are accused of leading the charge to overthrow Zelensky
The issue is, he is being charged with corruption, as part of the Quid Pro Quo the democrats alleged on Trump, that Dubinsky was the guy providing Intel on the financial dealings between Biden and his family and the Yermak/Zelensky administration
The plot thickens, as they are begging trump now to open the spigot of military and financial assistance , which is held ransom by the Republicans in the House of Representatives
3. Zaluzhny is already tapped to replace Zelensky, but this faction supported by certain forces in the US (Biden) is now trying to discredit Zaluzhny, by leaking articles to the New York Times - which state that Zaluzhny was in effect responsible for the nord stream pipeline bombings
It's clear that within the US, Europe, and Ukraine, 2 factions have split, with Yermak, Zelensky, Biden, as the main actors in one team, and Zaluzhny, Arestovich, perhaps US Republicans on the other
Either way, if Zelensky is toppled it's likely that Ukraine wants to negotiate a surrender, and join NATO as a consolation for the territorial losses
The problem is, the Russian war economy is not being factored by the western analysts, and so they just discuss the topic as if Russia was not influential at all to the situation- and it is just seen from Ukraines eyes, either total victory, or the NATO membership
What is funny, is Russia has no intention to negotiate with either party
Russia is going to collapse Ukraine and all support for it, exactly as its doing
As Avdeevka falls, the events in Kiev will accelerate, and if he is removed, Zaluzhny will likely have to double down on Zelenskys original strategy, as Russia is in no mood to negotiate anything with Ukraine
However, Zaluzhny could be better suited to lead Ukraine from a military POV
Meaning Ukraines defenses could improve simply because a general would be leading the war
But my belief, and the belief of Russian military experts, is that Zaluzhny has no chance to mount a defense, after Donbass is captured
He can't do what Surovikin did, and dig trenches with mines, because the crucial factor lacking, is the aviation
And that will prevent them from establishing any kind of meaningful defense to stop the Russian army
GarryB, franco, Godric, JohninMK, zardof, thegopnik and Mir like this post
Regular- Posts : 3894
Points : 3868
Join date : 2013-03-11
Location : Ukrolovestan
mnztr wrote:
I think this guy is AFU and reviews a captured Russian Thermobaric rocket launcher (hand held). Seems quite impressed by it.
Ukraine used to produce their own thermobaric RPO Shmel copies/versions.
Anyway,
Can anyone tell me what Ukrs trying to do in Krinky???
What are these suicide missions on the left bank?
Regular- Posts : 3894
Points : 3868
Join date : 2013-03-11
Location : Ukrolovestan
Arkanghelsk wrote:3. Zaluzhny is already tapped to replace Zelensky, but this faction supported by certain forces in the US (Biden) is now trying to discredit Zaluzhny, by leaking articles to the New York Times - which state that Zaluzhny was in effect responsible for the nord stream pipeline bombings
Zalupniy is popular, but he is even less presidential material than the clown. And now as you said, he was completely discredited with this kompromat.
Either way, if Zelensky is toppled it's likely that Ukraine wants to negotiate a surrender, and join NATO as a consolation for the territorial losses
Any sane person who cares about Ukraine would negotiate. Arestovich being a bastard, would still negotiate. But no one will topple Zele for some time.
What is funny, is Russia has no intention to negotiate with either party
Good. Not yet.
As Avdeevka falls, the events in Kiev will accelerate, and if he is removed, Zaluzhny will likely have to double down on Zelenskys original strategy, as Russia is in no mood to negotiate anything with Ukraine
It can also freeze after Avdeevka as well. Factor this in as well.
However, Zaluzhny could be better suited to lead Ukraine from a military POV
As a president? This bandera lover wouldn't stoop so low and wouldn't beg as Zelensky does.
Meaning Ukraines defenses could improve simply because a general would be leading the war
Eh... ? If "Western partners" will ask for results, they will need to provide them. They are boxed in when it comes to "leading the war"
But my belief, and the belief of Russian military experts, is that Zaluzhny has no chance to mount a defense, after Donbass is captured
Not sure about defense, but the offense will go out of the question
He can't do what Surovikin did, and dig trenches with mines, because the crucial factor lacking, is the aviation
They did that in Avd.
They can still do that. But Russia will have initiative and with enough pressure anything breaks, even fortress cities.
And that will prevent them from establishing any kind of meaningful defense to stop the Russian army
PapaDragon likes this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3917
Points : 3923
Join date : 2021-12-08
Regular wrote:
Zalupniy is popular, but he is even less presidential material than the clown. And now as you said, he was completely discredited with this kompromat.
I wouldn't say he is totally discredited, sure some are trying to smear him, but look at the circus of Ukrainian politics - just one NY Times article doesn't mean much, unless serious charges are leveled, and right now no such charges would stand in any court, Zaluzhny is very, very popular with Ukrainian popular opinion
It can also freeze after Avdeevka as well. Factor this in as well.
For the conflict to be frozen, Ukraine would have to defeat the Russian army, and judging by the current trajectory, it does not look good for VSU
Winter will be tough without supplies, and spring will just see a resumption of Russian offensives, as Ukraines own offensive abilities won't be rebuilt
Not sure about defense, but the offense will go out of the question
To mount a credible defense, you need several things, most important of which is aviation, without aviation, the Defense will be just like the offense
They did that in Avd.
No, Avdeevka is a fortress, the defenses are based on the tunnels, factory, and urban areas, as well as the surrounding villages which ring its rear
The surovikin line did not consist of concrete fortifications, with the exception of Dragons teeth, but most of the line was primarily a trench system dug across the front, and minefields overlapping each trench, blocking off whole sections of the frontline
The reason, that the surovikin line was not breached was because of aviation
Aviation was able to quickly immobilize attackers, and artillery finished them off
Ukraine does not have aviation like Russia, to be able to protect its own defensive trench systems it will need once Russia passes the donbass
They can still do that. But Russia will have initiative and with enough pressure anything breaks, even fortress cities.
Ukraine can basically dig in, but without airpower, they will be dislodged from their own trenches and overrun
That was the point of the counteroffensive to Crimea, but they didn't have the aviation to dislodge the Russian defenders from their own lines
In the VSU case, defending will be a worse option than always counterattacking , either way they're going to lose men, but on defense theyl just be taking the damage instead of delivering it
Instead of using storm shadow on ship factories, the bridge and civilian targets , theyl have to use them on Russian armored groups and concentrations on the front line
But this is only happening after donbass chapter
GarryB- Posts : 40553
Points : 41055
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
The conscription enforced by the Kiev regime is horrible enough, but now I have heard that one of the recently captured Ukrainian soldiers is a pregnant woman.
She said she was pregnant...
Reminds me of the firefighter joke... a big strapping fire fighter breaks into a burning room and sees a woman cowering in the corner. He strides forward and says you are the fourth pregnant woman he has saved this week. She said I am not pregnant, to which the fire fighter replied your not rescued yet either...
I think this guy is AFU and reviews a captured Russian Thermobaric rocket launcher (hand held). Seems quite impressed by it.
RShG-1 is not a new weapon... It is a family of engineer rockets.
The RPO-M above is more impressive... reloadable 72mm rocket launcher...
ALAMO- Posts : 7518
Points : 7608
Join date : 2014-11-26
mnztr wrote:
I think this guy is AFU and reviews a captured Russian Thermobaric rocket launcher (hand held). Seems quite impressed by it.
It is a relatively new system, developed well after dissolution of the SU. As far as Ukraine gets some Metis made in Russia after 1992, this one was only delivered to the Russian armed forces around 20 years ago. Ukrs get familiar with it while being at the receiver's end.
GarryB wrote:
RShG-1 is not a new weapon... It is a family of engineer rockets.
It is a 20 y/o weapon system. Considering the realities, we can call it shiny new
GarryB, Big_Gazza and zardof like this post
gc3762 dislikes this post
Hole- Posts : 11122
Points : 11100
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
Compared to the incoming F-16s it´s a baby.we can call it shiny new
Rodion_Romanovic and lancelot like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 7518
Points : 7608
Join date : 2014-11-26
Regular wrote:
Anyway,
Can anyone tell me what Ukrs trying to do in Krinky???
What are these suicide missions on the left bank?
An usual freeak show
They will get hundreds killed to pretend how they "crossed Dnepr".
Big_Gazza, kvs, Hole, lancelot and Mir like this post
walle83- Posts : 977
Points : 987
Join date : 2016-11-13
Location : Sweden
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/11/13/7428574/
Regular- Posts : 3894
Points : 3868
Join date : 2013-03-11
Location : Ukrolovestan
Already hundreds dead and visually confirmed in couple of weeks. Not to mention that recently TOS, UMPK, Grom creamed these troops. You would think marines and special forces would be better used, but little to no equipment lost. Ghoulish behaviourALAMO wrote:An usual freeak show
They will get hundreds killed to pretend how they "crossed Dnepr".
GarryB, Big_Gazza and kvs like this post
gc3762 dislikes this post
franco- Posts : 7057
Points : 7083
Join date : 2010-08-18
The Paratroopers project is a unique opportunity to see the work of soldiers in the Northern Military District zone from the inside.
The heroes of the project are artillerymen and signalmen of the Airborne Forces. The crew of the unique Vena self-propelled gun and the Giatsint-B fire gun are working against tanks, armored cars and infantry weapons. Their implementation is the beginning of the gods of war, striking the enemy for many kilometers. The artillerymen are helped to fire without misses by communication specialists - those without whom it is impossible to imagine modern military operations. They transmit orders, exact coordinates of targets, and connect the front lines with headquarters and senior management.
https://twitter.com/simpatico771/status/1724212475170611268
Hole likes this post
ALAMO- Posts : 7518
Points : 7608
Join date : 2014-11-26
They are all just a cannon fodder destined to get SPAMed.
Nobody trains them anymore for anything else other than how to stick a mag and dig tranches. The other is much more useful actually.
Training for the other types of warfare is quite similar. Tankers are being taught just the principals.
Check some vids how is a Rusian armored column advancing if compared to the Ukro one.
I have not seen a case when dismounted Russkie troops are being run over by running away APC, while dozens like that from the other side.
Troopers, WIAs waiting to be evacuated, no difference.
Yesterday, there was one great, how a tank tried to maneuver and hit the tree line.
It is obvious that they lack training, and I guess they don't have a time to spare training for experience - dying too fast.
franco, psg, Regular, zare, kvs, Godric, Rodion_Romanovic and like this post
zare- Posts : 61
Points : 61
Join date : 2013-05-31
That's a finished story. Russians are breaking through, and the question NATO is asking themselves is what to do when that happens.
The idea, IMO, is to keep one region of Ukraine (West) concentrated with NATO infrastructure to make Russian attacks costly.
Russia did all of this SMO and 2014 Crimea takeover because they couldn't allow NATO on their border.
Well, over the fence it's the same. NATO can't allow Russia on Hungarian border either. If Russia tries to push, they will try to prepare just like Russians prepared for Ukrainian push.
Take a look at F-16 story. F-16 cannot launch from improvised infrastructure, it needs to be proper. Proper airfields cannot be concealed. So they need to be protected. A standard airbase is protected by both ground AA systems and its standby fighters. Ukraine is low on everything - proper airbases, AA, fighters. Hence the most logical task of F-16 if you want to keep them alive is to protect itself, adjacent AA systems and the runways and hangars from sporadic missile attacks.
In a year of time they can deploy two squads of F-16 over a few airbases. Then you always have a handful of planes on standby and can react to incoming missiles.
Same story with all other items, entrenched and spread around last footholds of NATO in Ukraine, but now they will be operated under NATO doctrine and with NATO personnel.
kvs, TMA1 and Mir like this post
kvs- Posts : 15860
Points : 15995
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
stunt treadmill and so do its NATzO patrons.
The question of what to do about western Ukria. I do not think it is worth the cost to try to secure this region. Let
NATzO park its crap there. From a missile-time-to-Moscow perspective it does not matter. NATzO can launch missiles from Poland
with an arrival time essentially the same. The objective is to neutralize Ukria as a viable base for long term destabilization of Russia.
That was the real plan for NATzO. An economically irrelevant western rump will not have the value for this ambition. But Russia must
retake everything to Odessa and northward. This is a realistic ethnic partition.
psg, Big_Gazza, Hole, Mir and Podlodka77 like this post
Rodion_Romanovic- Posts : 2655
Points : 2824
Join date : 2015-12-31
Location : Merkelland
zare wrote:I think none of these items like F-16, Abrams, Gepard, whatever, is for usage in 'counteroffensive'.
That's a finished story. Russians are breaking through, and the question NATO is asking themselves is what to do when that happens.
The idea, IMO, is to keep one region of Ukraine (West) concentrated with NATO infrastructure to make Russian attacks costly.
Russia did all of this SMO and 2014 Crimea takeover because they couldn't allow NATO on their border.
Well, over the fence it's the same. NATO can't allow Russia on Hungarian border either. If Russia tries to push, they will try to prepare just like Russians prepared for Ukrainian push.
Take a look at F-16 story. F-16 cannot launch from improvised infrastructure, it needs to be proper. Proper airfields cannot be concealed. So they need to be protected. A standard airbase is protected by both ground AA systems and its standby fighters. Ukraine is low on everything - proper airbases, AA, fighters. Hence the most logical task of F-16 if you want to keep them alive is to protect itself, adjacent AA systems and the runways and hangars from sporadic missile attacks.
In a year of time they can deploy two squads of F-16 over a few airbases. Then you always have a handful of planes on standby and can react to incoming missiles.
Same story with all other items, entrenched and spread around last footholds of NATO in Ukraine, but now they will be operated under NATO doctrine and with NATO personnel.
I doubt that they have defence lines as strong as the once in the Donbass, which were reinforced since 2014.
Once the Donbass has fallen, the Ukrainian army will be in disarray.
Furthermore if only a couple of North western regions remain, they cannot claim anymore of being the legitimate Ukrainian state.
Finally there would be no Ukrainian soldiers left for it.
If obvious NATO soldiers will be the majority of the fighting force, this would be a real act of war against Russia. Russia could in response bomb Warsaw, Bucharest, etc,and those people know it.
US is not going to send American soldiers there (except for some "instructors" or mercenaries)
Mercenaries know now they are not fighting against some rebels in the middle east or in Africa only poorly armed. They will not want to go there.
Unless US declare war against Russia there are not many things that NATO can still do there and has not done yet. They have lost escalation possibilities.
By the way this is not the case where Syria was fighting against the terrorists in Aleppo and in the meanwhile turkey was fighting against Siria there and controlling part of the territory. Poland and Romania are not Turkey and Russia is present there.
If the fighting arrives to the north west it means that Russia there have clear and stable supply line, both from the north (Bielorussia) and from the rest of Malorossia (which by that time will be in Russian control (similar to what is the south of Kherson and Zaporozhye regions now).
Big_Gazza, kvs and Arkanghelsk like this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3917
Points : 3923
Join date : 2021-12-08
Rodion_Romanovic wrote:
I doubt that they have defence lines as strong as the once in the Donbass, which were reinforced since 2014.
Once the Donbass has fallen, the Ukrainian army will be in disarray.
Furthermore if only a couple of North western regions remain, they cannot claim anymore of being the legitimate Ukrainian state.
Finally there would be no Ukrainian soldiers left for it.
Exactly, many people do not understand why I continue to emphasize how the war will change after donbass
The only defensive system, is donbass, for people to understand, take a map, a urban one, and look at the urban density of the area
Then factor since 2014, they have reinforced the entire area, an area which is already ideal from the perspective of a defender, but which got more fortifications and defensive structures
If you draw a line, from Kharkov, down to Mariupol, that was the essence of the Ukrainian defensive system
Once this is broken, the distance between urban agglomerations, becomes quite vast
What remains of the former system, is now a shorter line from Ugledar to Kramatorsk and then Kharkov
Behind this line You have Zaporozhye, Dnepropetrovsk, Poltava, Pavlograd, Kremenchuk as major urban centers, but those are hundreds of kilometers behind the donbass and essentially lie on the Dnieper
Between that, and the donbass defense system, is flat land, interspersed with rivers and villages with varying population sizes, but NONE Of the attributes which make Donbass a defensive haven
Ukraine can try to dig in, but as I reiterate, VKS aviation will make it impossible for them to defend as the 58th did at Rabotino
Say they want to defend Pokrovsk, or some other small center, the VKS can bomb them, and the Russian army will mop up what little resistance there is left
But they don't have anymore tunnels, bunkers, factories, which are interlinked and conjoined into what Donbass is
So they will be disadvantaged from defensive scenario
They will be overrun at different parts of the lines, and you will see much more traditional maneuver on the part of the Russian army
Yes Ukraine can dig trenches and mine the approaches, but the VKS is a game changer which makes the traditional defense, like Rabotino impossible for the VSU
If Ukraine had a strong airforce, then they would not have lost so many vehicles and men, as they did in the counteroffensive
What made the difference was Russian helicopters, flying bombs, cruise missiles, drones, and just the sheer aerial capabilities, that allowed them to take advantage of minefields and trenches and ATGM sites
But on their own, just digging a trench, and laying mines , will not stop the Russian army for long if they do not have aviation of any kind
Big_Gazza, Walther von Oldenburg and TMA1 like this post
Arkanghelsk- Posts : 3917
Points : 3923
Join date : 2021-12-08
To better illustrate what I mean, you will see that the M-19 highway, is basically what the Ukrainian army, used to build its defensive positions
Essentially they followed the road from Kharkov to Donetsk, taking advantage of the dozens of factories, mini cities, plants, and infrastructure to build a massive fortified complex
But take a look behind, there is nothing behind it, there is one major highway, which leads to Poltava, but which runs east-west, and then no big chain of cities or infrastructure , until the E-105 which runs from Kharkov to Zaporozhye/Melitopol
That will be the next target for the Russian army, essentially after the Donbass, a series of big arrow maneuvers, which favor the army, as the terrain is flat, and there are no large urban agglomerations to build a large defense
Big_Gazza, PapaDragon, JohninMK, thegopnik, Hole and jon_deluxe like this post
Godric- Posts : 802
Points : 828
Join date : 2015-04-30
Location : Alba (Scotland)
GarryB, franco, Big_Gazza, kvs, zardof, thegopnik, Hole and Podlodka77 like this post
kvs- Posts : 15860
Points : 15995
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
expect their precious NATzO west to provide for them. Too much fantasy projection from these cargo cult losers.
GarryB, franco, Big_Gazza, Godric, zardof, thegopnik, Hole and like this post
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E- Posts : 737
Points : 753
Join date : 2016-01-20
shows Russian advances to the north, northwest and southeast of the city. The bottleneck would be around 3.8 km. A few days ago it was at 9 km.
GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, Godric, zardof, Mir and jon_deluxe like this post
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E- Posts : 737
Points : 753
Join date : 2016-01-20
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E wrote:@charly0153
shows Russian advances to the north, northwest and southeast of the city. The bottleneck would be around 3.8 km. A few days ago it was at 9 km.
@MT_Anderson
BSF: NOVOROSSIYSK
0.5M from 12 Nov 2023. Novo appears to still be the center of the BSF. Both Grigorovich Class, 2x 22160 & all 4 KILOs are in port + various other MCM and Amphibious vessels. All Pr. 21631 (Buyan-M) KALIBR shooters are out of port.
https://twitter.com/MT_Anderson/status/1724508181722726623
GarryB, PapaDragon and zardof like this post