https://x.com/krakek1/status/1793954582327918632
As I said before, the creeping escalation will continue. This is NATO probing and a direct strike on a Russian strategic nuclear asset hundreds of kilometers within Russia.
flamming_python, The-thing-next-door and owais.usmani like this post
owais.usmani likes this post
Big_Gazza dislikes this post
thegopnik wrote:-more S-400s getting destroyed, Production for ATACMs doesn't stop and will only increase.
-Impossible to find a Russian military official that won't get bribed.
-current pace of war suggests Ukraine can muster another counter offensive in 2025 by the time Russia reaches Kiev.
What a clown show, which is why I just check this war weekly than everyday now.
GarryB, ahmedfire, Big_Gazza, kvs, PapaDragon, Hole, Mir and like this post
zorobabel wrote:Ukraine hit a ballistic missile early warning radar site in Armavir. Damage to multiple buildings.
https://x.com/krakek1/status/1793954582327918632
As I said before, the creeping escalation will continue. This is NATO probing and a direct strike on a Russian strategic nuclear asset hundreds of kilometers within Russia.
jon_deluxe likes this post
The-thing-next-door, owais.usmani, jon_deluxe and ucmvulcan like this post
Some dude on Facebook is not an official source.er Redsamurai84, who has posted decades worth of Soviet/Russian military parades, "the commander of the 20th Combined Arms Army, Major General Suhrab Akhmedov has been relieved of his command. He was repeatedly involved in failed offensive operations with unjustified losses near Vuhledar.
Judging by the interviews and speeches he gave in the last year... No, he doesn´t trust the west at all.He keeps trusting thr west's word. He needs to be firm and finish this job
GarryB, ahmedfire, Big_Gazza, kvs, LMFS, jon_deluxe and Belisarius like this post
billybatts91 wrote:Hope this isn't true...
Karl Haushofer and owais.usmani like this post
GarryB, kvs, jon_deluxe and Belisarius like this post
Hole wrote:For months officials in Russia are stating over and over again that there will be no ceasefire and no freezing
of the conflict.
owais.usmani and jon_deluxe like this post
It's been fairly clear from day one that NATO wants to goad Russia into conducting a limited tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine. GAE / NATO would not respond with nukes but would seek to turn Russia into a pariah state, then they can focus on China. That's why the escalation is slow and calculated. You will see, as I said before, an increasing frequency of strikes on Russia's strategic assets, including deep inside Russian territory. This isn't all conjecture, btw, but is based on some first-hand info. As for a solution, it's fairly obvious the only way to bring it to an end would be to push Ukraine to the western shores of the Dnipro. Not sure anyone in the Russian state is committed to that, since it would require more than a million soldiers based on the current rate of progress.Stealthflanker wrote:zorobabel wrote:Ukraine hit a ballistic missile early warning radar site in Armavir. Damage to multiple buildings.
https://x.com/krakek1/status/1793954582327918632
As I said before, the creeping escalation will continue. This is NATO probing and a direct strike on a Russian strategic nuclear asset hundreds of kilometers within Russia.
Then what ? Nuclear war between NATO and Russia.. Leaving Ukraine in the middle of nuclear wasteland ?
owais.usmani likes this post
thegopnik wrote:-more S-400s getting destroyed, Production for ATACMs doesn't stop and will only increase.
-Impossible to find a Russian military official that won't get bribed.
-current pace of war suggests Ukraine can muster another counter offensive in 2025 by the time Russia reaches Kiev.
What a clown show, which is why I just check this war weekly than everyday now.
GarryB and Big_Gazza like this post
zorobabel wrote:It's been fairly clear from day one that NATO wants to goad Russia into conducting a limited tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine. GAE / NATO would not respond with nukes but would seek to turn Russia into a pariah state, then they can focus on China. That's why the escalation is slow and calculated. You will see, as I said before, an increasing frequency of strikes on Russia's strategic assets, including deep inside Russian territory. This isn't all conjecture, btw, but is based on some first-hand info. As for a solution, it's fairly obvious the only way to bring it to an end would be to push Ukraine to the western shores of the Dnipro. Not sure anyone in the Russian state is committed to that, since it would require more than a million soldiers based on the current rate of progress.
Walther von Oldenburg likes this post
zorobabel wrote: That's why the escalation is slow and calculated.
GarryB, Big_Gazza, LMFS and Hole like this post
flamming_python wrote:
But if this is true then it essentially means that Putin has folded in the face of direct NATO attacks against Russia and agreed to a 'freeze' of the conflict that will only erupt all over again with a completely rebuilt Ukrainian army and supported even more by NATO within a few years time, backed by a revitalized and rebuilt military-industrial complex in the US and EU.
That's why I'm skeptical about this report. Could well just be Western psyops timed with the strike on Armavir. It would take whatever advantages Russia currently enjoys and convert them into a losing play.
GarryB, flamming_python, kvs and Hole like this post
zorobabel wrote:It's been fairly clear from day one that NATO wants to goad Russia into conducting a limited tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine. GAE / NATO would not respond with nukes but would seek to turn Russia into a pariah state, then they can focus on China. That's why the escalation is slow and calculated. You will see, as I said before, an increasing frequency of strikes on Russia's strategic assets, including deep inside Russian territory. This isn't all conjecture, btw, but is based on some first-hand info. As for a solution, it's fairly obvious the only way to bring it to an end would be to push Ukraine to the western shores of the Dnipro. Not sure anyone in the Russian state is committed to that, since it would require more than a million soldiers based on the current rate of progress.Stealthflanker wrote:zorobabel wrote:Ukraine hit a ballistic missile early warning radar site in Armavir. Damage to multiple buildings.
https://x.com/krakek1/status/1793954582327918632
As I said before, the creeping escalation will continue. This is NATO probing and a direct strike on a Russian strategic nuclear asset hundreds of kilometers within Russia.
Then what ? Nuclear war between NATO and Russia.. Leaving Ukraine in the middle of nuclear wasteland ?
GarryB and The-thing-next-door like this post
GarryB, flamming_python, Big_Gazza, PapaDragon, LMFS, jon_deluxe and Belisarius like this post
GarryB, PapaDragon, Hole and Belisarius like this post
ALAMO wrote:I guess that are the rumors assisting Yanuk/Batka/Vova "summit" that is going on right now.
Some political solutions might be riping up.
Those does not involve Cocainsky, clearly
GarryB and Lapain like this post
zorobabel wrote:Ukraine hit a ballistic missile early warning radar site in Armavir. Damage to multiple buildings.
https://x.com/krakek1/status/1793954582327918632
As I said before, the creeping escalation will continue. This is NATO probing and a direct strike on a Russian strategic nuclear asset hundreds of kilometers within Russia.
owais.usmani likes this post
zorobabel wrote:Ukraine hit a ballistic missile early warning radar site in Armavir. Damage to multiple buildings.
https://x.com/krakek1/status/1793954582327918632
As I said before, the creeping escalation will continue. This is NATO probing and a direct strike on a Russian strategic nuclear asset hundreds of kilometers within Russia.
owais.usmani likes this post
ucmvulcan dislikes this post
owais.usmani likes this post
Stealthflanker wrote:zorobabel wrote:Ukraine hit a ballistic missile early warning radar site in Armavir. Damage to multiple buildings.
https://x.com/krakek1/status/1793954582327918632
As I said before, the creeping escalation will continue. This is NATO probing and a direct strike on a Russian strategic nuclear asset hundreds of kilometers within Russia.
Then what ? Nuclear war between NATO and Russia.. Leaving Ukraine in the middle of nuclear wasteland ?
owais.usmani likes this post
flamming_python wrote:NATO missile units using NATO equipment manned by NATO personnel using reconnaissance data from NATO satellites and other means are attacking targets inside Russia and outside the bounds of any possible contested territory.
And the escalation will only continue as others have said. I think Russia has no choice, it should start counter-attacking against NATO bases on the border with the Ukraine as well. I don't think it will cool any heads but again the red line has been crossed and things will only get worse.
owais.usmani and billybatts91 like this post
flamming_python wrote:
If the strike against the Armavir early warning system was an initiative of Zelensky, using only the Ukraine's own capabilities (although I don't understand with what) - then he has become a major liability and will have to be taken out before he provokes WW3.