ucmvulcan Wed Sep 18, 2024 6:16 pm
Why would he respond now when his entire history as a leader of the Russian nation is a long list of non-retaliation after another?
I quit being emotionally involved in Russia's success for this reason. It is too taxing for your psyche to always be at the receiving end. To be the one who is always taking the punches (and kicks under the belt). To be the one who is always the one humiliated.
Now I am just an observer. It took a few years to shed off the emotional side but I guess I am fine now. Tver explosion seems to have been a big military loss for Russia but it did nothing for me. Not hate, not anger. Just a mild disappointment.
Most of the other crap Ukraine has done has not really had an impact on the war. Moskva and the landing ships? They were old. Air force bases? They didn't destroy that much equipment. Over the horizon radars? Those were back up in days. Nordstream? That actually hurts the Eurotrash far more than it helps.
Kerch Bridge, various terror attacks? Sad, but so what. Invasion of Kursk that got cleaned out? PR stunt. Ultimately these actions showed an amateurish stupidity. Actually hitting large munitions dumps and major military installations? That shows a competence.
Evil stupid can actually be entertaining. Evil competent or evil smart? That would be a terrible development. Also, these recent attacks show direct participation by NATO members. If Putin does not punch back hard now they will hit Moscow, Petersburg, Volgograd, Murmansk etc and they will escalate. Again if you want to send weapons and advisers to a nation at war? Okay that is bad, but it is not direct involvement. When you are launching attacks yourself? You have gotten directly involved.
Last edited by ucmvulcan on Wed Sep 18, 2024 6:25 pm; edited 1 time in total